How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion

What kind of idiots does Utah Senator Orrin Hatch take us for? It's one thing to make a bombastic comment and then try to reel it back in. But it's another thing entirely for Hatch to state something unequivocally and then, once he's been found out, to claim that he said something altogether different. (Via Kos.)

Saturday:

Appearing before a group of Iron County, Utah, business leaders Saturday, Hatch said: "And, more importantly, we've stopped a mass murderer in Saddam Hussein. Nobody denies that he was supporting al-Qaida," he said, according to The Spectrum newspaper in St. George. "Well, I shouldn't say nobody. Nobody with brains."

Tuesday:

On Tuesday, Hatch said he may have misspoken at the event, and he was speaking of conditions in post-Hussein Iraq and the terrorist network led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

"Saddam clearly had a long history of supporting terrorists, but I was not talking about any formal link between Saddam and al-Qaida before the war," Hatch said in a statement. "Instead, I pointed out that the current insurgency in Iraq includes al-Qaida, under the leadership of al-Zarqawi, along with former elements of Saddam's regime."

I'm sorry, but no. Hatch didn't "misspeak." He lied. And then to cover up for it, he lied again. Just read the quotes. "[w]e've stopped a mass murderer in Saddam Hussein. Nobody denies that he was supporting al-Qaida." How in the world does that square with "I was not talking about any formal link between Saddam and al-Qaida before the war?" He specifically used Hussein's name, not Zarqawi's, so there can be no confusion. There is absolutely no logic by which these two statements can be viewed as anything but completely contradictory.

The vast majority of Republicans in Washington can simply not be trusted to speak honestly about national security. The Bush administration has elevated this kind of doublespeak to an art form. They tailor one statement -- Iraq had ties to al Qaeda -- to the paranoid and the misinformed, and then sit down for interviews in the national press and deliver a message of moderate consideration, denying that they'd ever mislead the public on the topic. Quite honestly, as infuriating as we might find the practice, it had worked out pretty well for them until very recently.

Unfortunately for Hatch, he's not quite the fine artist of doublespeak that one finds in the ranks of the Bush administration. But fortunately for us, someone was on hand to document this willful deception. It's important to keep in mind that this wasn't just a matter of Hatch playing fast and loose to get a rise out of a friendly crowd. This was a United States Senator giving a deceptive "insider briefing" to key business leaders in his state.

It would not surprise me in the least to learn that this is part of a larger, conscious effort by Republicans to manipulate the public by feeding bad information to local opinion leaders. In communities around the country, business leaders serve as a key part of the opinion leadership. In this roll as a trusted source, they disseminate information to those further down on the media food chain. We wonder how so many people can continue to believe that Iraq had WMD or that Iraq was involved with September 11, despite all of the evidence to the contrary. This is how.



Display:


Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

Clearly, the technique works: Joe McCarthy was known for it, but hardly invented it.

Politicians lie or twist, the media stenographers relay. The op-ed pages may fulminate - elsewhere in the rag. There may be a correction or contextualization - a day or two later on A17.

Dems used to be pretty good at it, I believe...


by skeptic06 on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 08:54:44 PM EST

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

I hope Pete Ashdown (http://www.peteashdown.com), Hatch's Democratic challenger can make some use of this, though with Bush's approval ratings currently at 58% in Utah, I hope Utahns would be receptive to his setting the historical record straight.


by Mr DC on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 09:13:24 PM EST

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

Pete Ashdown has replied to this, by taking broader swoop.  See his blog entry (also released to the press) about this.  Will Washington politicians ever understand the modern media?


by brett on Thu Feb 23, 2006 at 12:07:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

MyDD Diary Entry


by pashdown on Thu Feb 23, 2006 at 12:17:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This Is PART Of How It's Done (none / 0)

I think the most important lies were simply conveyed by association.  They talked about 9/11 and they talked about Saddam Hussein.  They didn't have to explicitly connect them, just talk about them in the same breath, not once, but over and over and over again.  And leave it to others to make the connections.  In fact, the care they took to talk this way--not making the connections in overt claims, but strongly implying them--is itself compelling evidence of their intent to deceive.  A number of folks I've interviewed have pointed this out.

Of course, Cheney did make the connection explicitly, insisting--probably to this day, if you could get him on the record--that Atta met with Iraqi intelligence agents.  But that's Cheney for you.  That's his job.  Pushing the envelope.


by Paul Rosenberg on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 09:13:43 PM EST

It worked on Hatch (none / 0)

Seems the administration's doublespeak worked so well that at least one senator thought Saddam was supporting Al-Qeada.

I say that because I don't think Hatch was lying the first time he spoke. He may well have been saying what he believed. It wasn't until he got called on it that some staffer probably told him the real deal.


TAKE BACK OUR PARTY: Democracy Bonds
by LiberalFromPA on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 10:57:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

They lie because (none / 0)

they
are
detached
from
reality.
Schizophrenia.
Towel heads.
CPAC.
UAE.

They are victims of their own self-induced brainwashing and now the wires are smoking hot.

Independent who blames Dems for Republican crimes.
by Landsurveyor on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 10:10:53 PM EST

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

I did a study in school on Bush speeches, and noticed a particular, commonly-repeated pattern in the layout of his speeches in the run up to the Iraq War.

First paragraph would be thanks, followed by an introduction, followed by the danger presented by Iraq. Then he would pivot seemlessly into Al-Qaeda and 9/11 for a paragraph. The fourth paragraph and onward were all about Iraq.

The message was: Iraq = Al Qaeda. They left it to lower level surrogates to make that argument more blatantly. But Bush's speeches would construct a link in one's mind without stating it directly.

Tricky, eh.


by swatdem on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 10:36:55 PM EST

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

You persist in not "getting it" Bush, Hatch they all can say whatever they want to say. Doesn't matter if what they say is an outright lie. Nobody, that means the MSM, is going to call him on it.

They have been lying for five years. Do you really think they are going to stop now?


by Pericles on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 10:46:35 PM EST

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (3.00 / 1)

That they lie is a given. That they will stop is doubtful at best. What I'm talking about here is how they lie and how their message machine runs. I think it's an important topic to explore.

And seriously, I know it's Matt's pet peeve and not mine, but he's right. We need to stop using the rightist construct "MSM" within the progressive blogosphere.


by Scott Shields on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 11:12:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The 21st century lying is different (none / 0)

I just wrote about this yesterday and the lying of Mary Matalin.  I have been alive since 60's and the lying has radically changed in the last five years.

It so blunt, so blatant.  It's as Scott says, only days beofre he had said exactly the opposite!  Days before!

That didn't happen in the past.  The filthy motherfuckers were never so brazen about it.  We had  much better honesty levels just ten years ago, I swear.

It's very bad and it's really depressing.  No one even thinks that being honest is vital to character and survival.  This is one fucked up country.


by paradox on Thu Feb 23, 2006 at 07:15:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

Does anyone think a libel suit would work, The comments by Orin can't be called humorous, parody, etc. A little blot on his record can make an old guy worried about his legacy nervous. Maybe even change direction for fear of getting hit again.


by mOropeza on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 10:56:55 PM EST

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

I would have loved to see someone stand up and call Hatch on it at the meeting!  Something like that could be a turning point for the public taking back control.


by Jude the Obscure on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 11:28:20 PM EST

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

The sociometric star phenomenon is a fairly old and well-documented one. In school, it's the kid with a lot of friends. In Utah, I could see it being Orrin Hatch. And, since it's Utah, no amount of foot-in-mouth disease is going to alter that fact.

However, beyond the Mormon enclave, Hatch becomes more and more deserving of the nickname "Booby".


by cavanaghjam on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 11:28:50 PM EST

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

What if the paper asked Sen. Hatch whether or not he was aware at the time he made that statement that there had been others before him to make that same mistake?  Isn't national security in general and Iraq in particular important enough to speak carefully about them?  Statements like his are dishonest at best.


by permit on Thu Feb 23, 2006 at 09:31:14 AM EST

Re: How Republicans Manipulate Public Opinion (none / 0)

It absolutely makes sense.  They've stopped shouting it on MTP and This Week and have been constantly feeding the beast through their local invitation only "town meetings."

I'll make sure I go to my Congressman's meetings.


by rhinsker on Thu Feb 23, 2006 at 09:53:06 AM EST

I disagree (none / 0)

He's not quite the fine artist of doublespeak that one finds in the ranks of the Bush administration.

IMHO, Hatch is by far the most accomplished and consistent liar on the Republican side. I just think  he got caught with his pants down, so to speak.


by zappatero on Thu Feb 23, 2006 at 10:17:07 AM EST

The Tangled Web (none / 0)

It would not surprise me in the least to learn that this is part of a larger, conscious effort by Republicans to manipulate the public by feeding bad information to local opinion leaders.

They also feed it to the hungry media. From the NYT.

Under the Bush administration, the federal government has aggressively used a well-established tool of public relations: the prepackaged, ready-to-serve news report that major corporations have long distributed to TV stations to pitch everything from headache remedies to auto insurance. In all, at least 20 federal agencies, including the Defense Department and the Census Bureau, have made and distributed hundreds of television news segments in the past four years, records and interviews show. Many were subsequently broadcast on local stations across the country without any acknowledgement of the government's role in their production.

On a related note, CNN looked into identical news release quotes from the military. Apparently CNN accepted the military's explanation of the "mixup."

1/05 The government paid syndicated columnist and TV personality Armstrong Williams to promote No Child Left Behind. Armstrong promoted No Child Left Behind on CNN, two Christian networks, and Sinclear Broadcast Group. The White House stated that this was an isolated incident.
link

It is reported that the Pentagon contracted the Lincoln Group to pay Iraqi news to run their propaganda. On ABC, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley assured the American people that Bush was "very troubled" by the news.
link

But at the same time, Donald Rumsfeld wants the US to fight the war on terror by operating a more effective, 24-hour propaganda machine, or risk a "dangerous deficiency."
link

It's not just about propaganda, it's about about money.

One contract, for $6 million, was for public relations and advertising work in Iraq.

The other Lincoln contract, which is with the Special Operations Command, is worth up to $100 million over five years for media operations with video, print and Web-based products. That contract is not related to the dispute over propaganda and was not for services in Iraq, according to command spokesman Ken McGraw.

War propaganda or political progananda doesn't bother me at all. Hell, I grew up listening to AFRTS. However, I don't want it broadcasted into my living room as "news."


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Thu Feb 23, 2006 at 11:12:21 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.