The Cost of Corruption and Nancy Pelosi

The culture of corruption is very serious, because it is undermining the faith that we have in our ability to address serious problems confronting us.  Hopefully we'll get some numbers of the cost of corruption shortly.  

I bring this up because of a story in the Washington Post about Democrat William Jefferson getting stung over corruption.  Jefferson going down has been obvious for awhile, unfortunately, the strategists surrounding House leadership haven't figured out that ethics is actually our issue.

Remember the 'CLEAN HOUSE' committee headed by Abramoff-tainted James Clyburn?  That was the Democratic House-side response to the corruption scandal in Congress.  The Republican way of doing business is corruption, but that is not the way our party works.  We can do better, and we should.

Now, Nancy Pelosi is making some noises on ethics, calling for the ethics committee to function.  I pointed out ten days ago that Jefferson was going to go down, and that filing a complaint against corrupt members of Congress is really the only way to make it known that we are willing to actually use the ethics machinery of the House.  Now, it's an open secret that there has been an ethics truce in the House between Republicans and Democrats for years.  Yet I have received adament denials from Pelosi's staff that she is asking members not to file.  She personally believes that leadership shouldn't file against members of the other party, so I guess that excuses her.  What about the other 200+ members who won't file one?

I'm a little confused by all of this.  Who's really serious about reform?  



Display:


Re: The Cost of Corruption and Nancy Pelosi (3.00 / 1)

Somebody from the Democratic caucus either in leadership (Pelosi, Hoyer) or the CBC should call for his resignation. Jefferson is the ONLY Democrat under any real cloud and it would do the party and nation good to see him gone. We don't need joke Reps. like Jim Trafficant making people hate Congress. Important work never gets done (healthcare, Katrina rebuilding) because voters think everyone is the same shallow corrupt shill.

Forget the BS about the staffing of Ethics Committee and get back in and get fighting. Acknowledge it's imperfect but be bigger than the crooks in the GOP. Because if the Jefferson prosecution comes down in say, September '06, from a cough apolitical Justice department it will destroy the entire reform message. Seeing as the party leadership is still tepid on Iraq and NSA spying - reform has to be done openly and completely. You have to break some eggs to make an omelet - one egg is in LA-2.

IOKIYAD cannot ever be part of real reform.


"Nothing seems to embarrass the political class today." - Bill Moyers
by joejoejoe on Thu Feb 16, 2006 at 01:41:46 AM EST

Re: The Cost of Corruption and Nancy Pelosi (3.00 / 1)

That should be the difference between us and them.  The Republicans protect their criminals.  The Democrats drum them out ASAP.  If we are the reform party, we can't be afraid to take action against our own when necessary.  If Jefferson doesn't go quietly, he must be forced out.


by KTinOhio on Thu Feb 16, 2006 at 02:15:31 AM EST

Re: The Cost of Corruption and Nancy Pelosi (3.00 / 1)

Jefferson has to be asked to resign. It's that simple.


by dereau on Thu Feb 16, 2006 at 02:43:05 AM EST

Re: The Cost of Corruption and Nancy Pelosi (3.00 / 1)

I've diarised before about Pelosi's propensity to talk tough on corruption but ensure the House ethics committee stays unemployed.

Supposedly, the thinking is that activating the ethics committee will trigger GOP complaints against Dems, and muddy public perceptions derived from DOJ action solely against GOP folks.

(I assume that the dispute about staffing is part of her plan to keep the committee inactive.)

The irony is that, if Jefferson's argument on the US Code provisions - that he's home free because the cash he got was unconnected with anything he did, or promised to do, qua Representative - holds up in court, an ethics complaint may be the only way he can be arraigned for the farrago.

Would Pelosi be brave enough to see a complaint initiated against him by a Dem Rep in an election year? (Always noting the Rule 15(h) limitation I mentioned in my earlier piece.) Her current strategy would suggest not.


by skeptic06 on Thu Feb 16, 2006 at 09:00:25 AM EST

Re: The Cost of Corruption and Nancy Pelosi (3.00 / 1)

Agreed. Jefferson must either go, or be sent. His reek must have completely dissipated by the time Labor Day rolls around and the sheeple begin to sniff the political air.


by soybean on Thu Feb 16, 2006 at 11:23:37 AM EST

Re: The Cost of Corruption and Nancy Pelosi (3.00 / 1)

I'd say file a complaint against Jefferson as well as several other republicans then you can spin it as Dems willing to follow corruption wherever it leads and being all bi-partisan about it.


by MNPundit on Thu Feb 16, 2006 at 11:28:47 AM EST

We have to make an example of someone (none / 0)

and one of our own is easier to get our hands on.  

Cut him down.
.


by Grand Moff Texan on Thu Feb 16, 2006 at 12:07:03 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.