Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate with Foreign Policy Cred.

(Note, this post -- and indeed any post on the 2008 primaries at this point [at least from me] -- should not be read as an endorsement but rather as an examination of the state of the race.)

The first votes to determine the Democratic nominee for president in 2008 are still over a year away, but the race is still beginning to shape up as various candidates and would-be candidates try to stake out the bases from which they will run. Over the past few days there has been quite a bit of talk about the two perceived frontrunners, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, as well as a third leading candidate, John Edwards. But at the same time, other (potential) candidates have been working hard and garnering some headlines and attention. Among them is New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson.

Fresh off of a 69 percent reelection victory in which he carried every county in his state save for one, which he lost by five votes, and a successful tenure as chairman of the Democratic Governor's Association during which his party picked up six governorships on the way to their first majority of governor's mansions in over a decade, Bill Richardson is currently taking the steps necessary for him to run should he decide that the time is right. But rather than limiting his campaign to his domestic and political successes as Governor (as well as Congressman and Energy Secretary), Richardson has taken quite a bit of time in recent days to set himself apart from other candidates by stressing his views on foreign policy, highlighting his service as UN Ambassador.

The month started off with Richardson coming out strongly in opposition to a border fence, calling on Congress to repeal legislation passed during the waning days of the last legislative session. Richardson's stance on this issue, which straddles both domestic and foreign policy, puts him in a good position to tap into the trend among Hispanic voters towards the Democratic Party. Ten days later Richardson laid out his position on Iraq to voters in New Hampshire, delivering a blistering attack on John McCain's policy prescriptions. During the speech, Richardson also called for a timetable for withdrawal of American forces from Iraq by the end of 2007.

But Richardson has not only been delivering policy addresses. On Friday Richardson engaged in a diplomatic effort to help alleviate the increasingly dangerous situation in North Korea, meeting with the DPRK's UN delegation for two hours. Previously, Richardson had visited North Korea five times through his career, most recently just over a year ago. Richardson has also been asked to meet with the Sudanese government by the Save Darfur Coalition, an invitation he is considering.

With these moves, Richardson can help position himself as a candidate with a firm grasp of both foreign and domestic policy and perhaps move up from a lower tier to a higher one. His task will no doubt be tough as the media and pundits appear content with making the 2008 Democratic primaries a two-person race between Sens. Obama and Clinton. Yet by not only speaking but also doing Richardson might be able to break through the static (as of November, close to two thirds of Americans did not know enough about him to form an opinion) and force not only the media but also the other "leading" candidates to take him seriously.



Display:


Re: Richardson Staking Out Position (none / 0)

This is an informative post that, thankfully, reaches beyond the personality driven media line of the day or week.  Richardson should be taken very seriously.  So should Wes Clark.  For that matter, so should Joe Biden.  Frankly, beyong the frontrunners the (shrinking) Democratic field is very strong on foreign policy.  


by howardpark on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 05:28:53 PM EST

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (none / 0)

Does it appear Richardson will make a serious effort in New Hampshire or try more for Nevada?


BlueSunbelt.Com Netroots for the Sunbelt states robwire.com My personal blog
by robliberal on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 05:30:47 PM EST

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (none / 0)

If any of those making up the lower tiers are going to challenge Clinton, Obama and Edwards, my money's on it being Richardson. I can't see him winning in Iowa or New Hampshire, but if he can take Nevada and compete in South Carolina, he might have enough momentum to be considered as one of the top contenders and get the high profile he'd need to win. Especially since Obama and Clinton are going to be competing for a lot of the same votes, so if one does significantly better than the other the loser may not stay in the race long, providing an empty spot to step up to.


Visit Forgotten Countries, my new foreign policy-based blog
by Englishlefty on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 05:47:12 PM EST

Richardson may join. (none / 0)

One main problem with Richardson is his stance on illegal immigration.


Check out the New Progressive Blog EENRBLOG
by dk2 on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 06:10:39 PM EST

Iraq US Soldiers Youtube videos (none / 0)

Great post, thanks.  Don't know if you've seen these three short videos from Iraq yet or not, but both show the US Military engaging in some very dubious actions.  I have them up on my site at www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com


The Ripper www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com
by MinorRipper on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 06:27:55 PM EST

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (3.00 / 1)

New Mexico, unlike most other states, does not enforce the federal Clean Water Act.  State enforcement, called "delegation," or "primacy," is regarded as superior to federal enforcement by a politically dominated EPA by environmental advocates.  It was thought that in 2006 Gov. Richardson would at last bring New Mexico into line with most other states and amend the state's water quality laws to provide for state enforcement.  That plan was then shelved, apparently because the huge feedlot/dairies in the Santa Cruz area, immediately north of El Paso, Texas, would be inconvenienced by state enforcement of laws they are reluctant to obey.  These dairy operators left the Central Valley of California precisely because of this sort of regulatory threat to their profits. Richardson does not look good in this area of policy.


by neillherring on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 06:47:27 PM EST

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (none / 0)

You know, I wonder if he is more or less running for Secretary of State.  Don't get me wrong, if the primary were held today, and Gore wasn't running, Richardson would likely get my vote.  (I haven't really decided on a candidate yet, though.)


by nanoboy on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 07:03:23 PM EST

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (none / 0)

Assuming he's running for VP, he needs Edwards or Clinton to win.  He rounds out Edwards' lack of foreign policy experience (and overall experience) very well, and adds some minority juice to a white-guy ticket.  Edwards being strong in places like Ohio-Missouri-Iowa and Richardson being strong in the SW makes a good ticket.

The case for Hillary to choose Richardson is not quite as strong, but she would want someone neither to her left or her right, I'd think.  Her own left is terrified she'll sell us out, so she can't pick someone way on the right, but if she picks someone to her left the GOP will portray her as the closet leftist they've always said she was.  Richardson is neither; he's another competent politically-astute Clinton technocrat, just like her.  He also has the foreign policy juice that she doesn't quite have yet.  Running a ticket with zero white guys would be a little risky, especially against the ultimate white guy, John McCain; Obama/Richardson would be even riskier and is unlikely for that reason.

From back here in the cheap seats, it looks like Richardson's best shot at VP is with Edwards, which makes his moves in Nevada very interesting, because that is also strong for Edwards.  How vigorously does Richardson want to challenge any of these guys, really, if he's basically auditioning for VP or Cabinet under any one of them?

You can ask that question of Biden and Dodd as well.


by texas dem on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 08:30:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (3.00 / 1)

I have thought that there would be an opening in the Dem primary to be filled by an experienced vet with strong foreign policy credentials. Previously, I had my money on Joe Biden but it looks like Richardson is taking the air out of that balloon.
I doubt Richardson will win, but if he has strong showings in the primaries, than he could compete with Warner and Bayh for VP. Being against the border fence and from the southwest, if you combine that with us having our convention in Denver (hopefully), the electoral math would be there to swing Nevada, New Mexico, and Colorado- all of which we narrowly lost last time. Those three states put us over the hump.
by AC4508 on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 07:31:38 PM EST

Latino Vote is Unevenly Distributed (none / 0)

States which have higher than average hispanic populations include a few with Republican tendencies, notably Nevada, Arizona, Texas and Florida. I'm not sure that a democrat could win Texas, but if so, they would need to rely on the latino vote plus turnout.

The latter is the difficult nut to crack, as hispanics often vote at half the rate of other segments of the population. Anger about anti-immigration rhetoric and its racist under-pinnings may be the key to waking the sleeping giant. But, he would also need to be credible on other issues of interest to hispanics. Fortunately, these coincide with the populist economic issues (aka traditional Democratic values) we are hearing so much about these days: Education, Health Care, Minimum Wage.

Richardson grew up speaking Spanish, and has great contacts internationally, in particular in Mexico where his father was a banker for Citibank. If anyone can recreate a foreign policy of multi-lateralism and regain the trust of the world, maybe it is Richardson.

To me this makes him the ultimate centrist-establishment candidate, perhaps even more so than Clinton, and a hell of a lot more so than a right-winger like McCain. Even though my preference is more progressive, but I'm not using the establishment label in a negative way, just a fact.

I agree that the experience as a Governor and proven popularity in a state-wide election are very useful things to have on your resume.


There's more of us than there is of them.
by MetaData on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 07:42:41 PM EST

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (none / 0)

I really like Richardson and have been hoping he gets in.  Especially if Obama decides not to run.  I have been eyeing both for prez for awhile now.  i'd support Richardson happily.  I think he is absolutely a great candidate with a great personality and ability to deal with hostile nations as well as our allies.  
he has a grasp of all the issues and is not an in your face guy.  
It would be hard for the right to attack him as he is repsected on both sides and people just like him.  
by vwcat on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 08:37:56 PM EST

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (none / 0)

When I worked on the 2000 campaign, and there were discussions of Richardson as Gore's potential VP candidate, a top staffer (higher than Deputy Field Director me) stated in no uncertain terms that Richardson had even more Monica-esque skeletons in his closet than Clinton, and the press would have a field day if he were the Veep running mate.  He was led to believe by his sources that was the main reason Richardson would not be chosen.

That staffer is one I trust, particularly on matters like this.  Despite my Gore (and Edwards and Dodd) leanings, it depresses me, as I, as PoC, like to see other viable PoC's make the run for the nomination.  But I also think it would do more to reinforce bigoted stereotypes should such allegations prove true in during a primary vetting of the candidate.


by MBW on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 08:52:02 PM EST

perhaps I am being naive.... (none / 0)

I remember hearing this rumor as well, and at the time (2000) the calculus made sense.

But we're talking about 2008, and as long as none of the skeletons involve anyone underage, my guess is that the electorate will consider them quaint, even accounting for our insatiable need for sex scandals.  

We all have much bigger fish to fry now.


by Disputo on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 09:19:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: perhaps I am being naive.... (none / 0)

Particularly since McCain and Giuliani can't really attack him on that one without seeming hypocritical. Granted, the Rovian strategy is to be as hypocritical as possible, but two can play that game.


Visit Forgotten Countries, my new foreign policy-based blog
by Englishlefty on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 09:22:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I agree (none / 0)

One thing the Right never gets is that every time they make hay of a Democrat's personal flaw, said personal flaw becomes less of a taboo the next time around, simply because the public is familiar with it.

Past drug use was once a major taboo -- now who even cares?

Like you said, our nation has much bigger fish to fry at the moment.


TAKE BACK OUR PARTY: Democracy Bonds
by LiberalFromPA on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 04:51:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (1.00 / 1)

Richardson doesn't have the kind of personal discipline required to make a presidential race and HE KNOWS THIS.  I long thought the first Hispanic president would be Henry Ciscenros, but that didn't pan out.  Secretary of State?  Sure.  I'll bet that is his dearest desire.


by Barbara in DC on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 09:31:37 PM EST

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (3.00 / 1)

Can you explain this at all? It seems like an unsubstantiated claim and definitely contradicts my personal experience with the man.


See my homepage at AlexFlores.org
by Alex Flores on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 12:08:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Richardson Staking Out Position as Candidate w (none / 0)

and HE KNOWS THIS

Did he tell you that?


TAKE BACK OUR PARTY: Democracy Bonds
by LiberalFromPA on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 04:44:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Richardson Good VP Candidate for Edwards or Obama (none / 0)

But more likely Edwards, because of the likely hesitation to try to combine two racial minorities one the first ticket to include any racial minority. I don't see him at the top of the ticket though, just doesn't have the personality even if he has the credentials.


by Davidsfr on Tue Dec 19, 2006 at 11:21:07 PM EST

Re: Newsweek Disses Richardson (none / 0)

The recent Newsweek cover -- featuring Obama and Clinton, suggest Democratic voters might be ready to do something historic, like elect a black man or a woman.

Wouldn't electing Richardson, of Hispanic ethnicity, also count as not a "white male Christian?"

Click here to read more on how Jonathan Alter let down the left with this WTF? article.


by JABBS on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 12:04:23 AM EST

Re: Newsweek Disses Richardson (3.00 / 1)

I absolutely agree here. White liberals seem to love the idea of a woman  or an African American candidate. When it comes to a Latino, he falls to wayside and only qualifies for VP consideration.

All of this in spite of the fact that we're a year from the first primaries - a political eternity, and we're acting as if we have 2 front-runner candidates who are locked-in for the number 1 spot.


See my homepage at AlexFlores.org
by Alex Flores on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 12:21:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Newsweek a friend to the democratic party? (none / 0)

I think Newsweek is off base on both points on what this country is ready for. I don't remember them as being pro Democratic, and I wonder if the Republicans won't enjoy a battle of Race to a battle of the female, what good headlines that would make for the next 2 years.

I think they are only about what is selling and if they can drum up something like that, then great for them, but I am not put any credit into their article.


Check out the New Progressive Blog EENRBLOG
by dk2 on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 07:10:51 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.