FL-13: Case For New Election Continues To Mount

A federal agency is set to recommend that a large number of electronic voting machines no longer be used, including those in the still undecided FL-13 congressional race:
The NIST paper also noted that, "potentially, a single programmer could 'rig' a major election."

It recommends "requiring SI [software independent] voting systems in VVSG 2007." The NIST is also going to recommend changes to the design of machines equipped with paper rolls that provide audit trails.

Currently, the paper rolls produce records that are illegible or otherwise unusable, and NIST is recommending that "paper rolls should not be used in new voting systems."

The lack of software independence has reared its ugly head in Sarasota's Congressional race, where 18,000 fewer votes were cast than in other races on the same ballot.

A recount was futile in that election because Sarasota uses a DRE-type machine.
The recount was futile, and even the bogus audit showed serious problems:
An audit of the county's touch-screen voting machines Tuesday found several discrepancies, most prominently in the disputed 13th Congressional District race, but state elections officials said it is unclear whether the problems were the result of human or machine error.

All four voting machines that officials used to simulate the Nov. 7 election had miscounts, and three of them had miscounts in the District 13 race [...]

The voting machines tested Tuesday were among those that the state programmed for the county, but were not used in the Nov. 7 election.

State officials selected four precincts, and had their workers vote to reflect proportionately how votes were cast in the actual election [...]

Of the 251 ballots cast, five additional votes were counted for Jennings, including three extra votes in one precinct. There were also miscounts in five other races.

"Most likely it's human error," said Jenny Nash, spokesperson for the State Division of Elections.
To recap at this point:
  • There was an unusually high undervote in FL-13.
  • The undervote flipped the results of the election.
  • This is Katherine Harris's district
  • A federal agency just recommended de-commissioning the types of voting machines used in the district.
  • The audit of the machines showed serious problems.
It is time for a new election in this district, and for Democrats to take whatever measures necessary for that new election to take place.



Display:


Re: FL-13: Case For New Election Continues To Moun (none / 0)

The one thing that concerns me is what the public perception would be. Contesting it will allow the GOP to rehash all of the Gore 2000 arguments and get some momentum of their own. Whether it would be worth the national publicity for just 1 more seat in the House is debatable.


BlueSunbelt.Com Netroots for the Sunbelt states robwire.com My personal blog
by robliberal on Fri Dec 01, 2006 at 01:23:13 PM EST

Re: FL-13: Case For New Election (3.00 / 1)

I wouldn't say that going to the mat for one house seat is the issue but that many of these electronic only voting machines are hopelessly flawed. Six years after Florida and 5 years after passing HAVA, voting in America is worse not better.  In addition, thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqqis are dying 'for Democracy'.  Democracy is a free and fair election.  I hope/thought


by gasperc on Fri Dec 01, 2006 at 02:05:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: FL-13: Case For New Election (none / 0)

crayons and X's would have worked better.

very sad that computers with GHz speed rates, 100's of gigabytes of memory capability, and security algorythms that would require a super computer to crack, can't add up the votes of a few thousand votes properly.

and I'm all in favor of paper ballots and protecting a companies proprietary software(although I think it should all be open source for auditing and integrity) but these companies complete resistance to allow the software to create any kind of auditable output other than candiate X got A votes and candidate Y got B votes proves that 1. don't care or 2. have corrupted the software to favor one candidate over the other.


by gasperc on Fri Dec 01, 2006 at 02:00:49 PM EST

New Election Continues To Mount (none / 0)

RobLiberal,

I don't think there is much downside to contesting the election.  Most of the electorate is asleep at the wheel and won't pay any attention to what is going on in a single congressional district in Florida.

We've got to fight this, not only for the House seat that is at stake, but for the sake of reforming the way we run elections in this country.


by global yokel on Fri Dec 01, 2006 at 03:37:08 PM EST

Re: FL-13: Case For New Election (none / 0)

Is there a precident for a new election in a Congressional race?  Anytime in the last 60 plus years?


http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Fri Dec 01, 2006 at 03:58:16 PM EST

If there's not, we set one. (3.00 / 1)

The voting method, electronic touch screens with no paper trail, in new alos.  And clearly in this case was fatally flawed.

So whether or not there ws an election in the past, this situation is unique.

Question?  Should a new election be held only in Sarasota County or in all five counties.

By the way, just because a new election is held doesn't mean the Dem will win.  Turnout may well be lower than the first election; or conversely, Rep turnout may be higher when they realize every vote counts.

It's the principle that counts most here.


by Reptile on Fri Dec 01, 2006 at 04:04:55 PM EST

Re: FL-13: Case For New Election Continues To Moun (none / 0)

I noticed tonight on his blog that Wes Clark has raised $20,000 so far for the Christine Jennings recount.

Thanks to the generosity of our WesPAC community, we reached our goal of raising $20,000 for Christine Jenning's recount fund a full week ahead of schedule.

The ongoing recount in FL-13 is fast becoming an important test case for electronic voting, and the results of this battle will certainly have a major impact on voting throughout our country. It is a testament to our community that we would so quickly seize the opportunity to make sure that Christine has the resources needed to ensure that every intended vote is counted.

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/9897


BlueSunbelt.Com Netroots for the Sunbelt states robwire.com My personal blog
by robliberal on Sat Dec 02, 2006 at 01:45:12 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.