Democrats Call for Begin to Phased Withdrawal from Iraq

It looks like the Democrats aren't going to wait for any pronouncement by James Baker or his coterie before laying out their ideas on how to move forward in Iraq.

Democrats, who won majorities in the U.S. Congress in last week's elections, said on Sunday they will push for a phased withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq to begin in four to six months.

"The first order of business is to change the direction of Iraq policy," said Sen. Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat who is expected to be chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee in the new Congress.

Levin, on ABC's "This Week," said he hoped some Republicans would emerge to join Democrats and press the administration of President George W. Bush to tell the Iraqi government that U.S. presence was "not open-ended."

While I think it would be in the Democrats' best interest to take an even more aggressive stance towards Iraq -- the American people are clearly still ahead of politicians on the issue, with a plurality and perhaps a majority of Americans supporting a timetable to withdraw all American troops within a year -- I like this bold step by Senator Levin and the Democrats. Instead of waiting for the Iraq Study Group -- an unelected group of former bureaucrats -- to come back and provide the Bush administration cover for making changes in strategy (whether the White House ends up doing so or not), the Democrats are clearly paying heed to the American people in calling for a beginning to the redeployment of American forces. And while the Democrats will likely be upbraided by the White House and its allies in the conservative media and Congress for pursuing a policy of "cut and run", Democrats should rest well knowing that they have the support of the American people in trying to bring change to America's policy towards Iraq.



Display:


Re: Democrats Call for Begin to Phased Withdrawal (none / 0)

In order to withdraw from Iraq you have to split it
into at least 3 parts (shiites, sunnis, kurds).
See for example this:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/articl e/0,9171,1555130,00.html
If you leave it as it is a prescription for a
eternal civil war.

by WeNeed3rdParty on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 08:16:17 PM EST

Re: Democrats Call for Begin to Phased Withdrawal (none / 0)

The U.S. is not in control. If we haven't learned anything, it is that. We have no control to determine the outcome in a country where 80% of the people don't want us there, and a nearly equal number support attacks on U.S. troops. We can't divide the country, we can't unite the country. We can't do anything about the militias because they are the government. I don't want one more American son or daughter to die to keep the mullahs in power. I'm glad the Dems are out front and not signing on to any losing Repug plan to save Bush's face.


by cmpnwtr on Mon Nov 13, 2006 at 12:16:16 AM EST

Timetable is a logical necessity (none / 0)

Not that this sort of thing matters, but it's fully redonkulous for Bush or anyone to oppose a timetable on principle.

Here's some quick logic 101:

  • The current Iraqi govt are our nominal partners in Doing Good Things Over There

  • We can't and don't want to stay forever

  • As we leave, we'll want to let our partners know when we're doing so.

  • This will probably take the form of several "milestones" in project-management lingo

  • For these milestones to be truly effective, they have to be relatively set

  • These milestones comprise a timetable

It can be secret if people want. It can be just between the people in charge. But pretending that having a plan for getting out is unacceptable just isn't true.


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Nov 13, 2006 at 01:26:32 AM EST

Re: Democrats Call for Begin to Phased Withdrawal (none / 0)

I keep hearing that if we just get up and go it will cause chaos but i firmly disagree.  i don't think you can get more chaotic than it already is. The longer we are over there, more lives are lost.  The idea of staying there indefinitely is insane.  While we are at it, why not try to unite the Gaza strip?  


by SleepingIn on Mon Nov 13, 2006 at 11:16:56 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.