Youth Poised to Achieve Midterm Turnout Records

Cross-posted at Future Majority.

As I type this, the Harvard Institute of Politics is releasing the results of a new poll that will predict a record-shattering turnout on behalf of young voters in next week's midterm elections.  

The news looks great for Democrats, and great for the youth vote - which will receive added attention from politicians and perhaps put to rest the "apathetic youth" meme if these numbers bear out.

Right now only the press release (pdf) is available, but here are the major points that HIP will report:

Turnout

  • Almost 32% of 18-24 year olds report tat they will "definitely be voting" on November 7th.  Previous turnout records for midterm elections stands at 26.6% in 1982.

Partisan Views

  • 68% of young voters disaprove of the job that the President is doing.

  • 52% would prefer that Democrats control congress vs. 29% who prefer Republicans.  19% see no difference.

  • 60% believe the country is on the wrong track.

  • 46% favor withdrawal from Iraq within the next year.

Faith in the System

  • 75% believe that elected officials don't share their priorities.

Perhaps putting to rest the old saw that young people are apathetic because they don't see politics as relevant to their lives:

  • 70% of 18-24 year olds believe that politics is relevant to their lives

The study also continues to confirm the growing trend of civic participation among millenial voters, noting that 58% of 18-24 year olds volunteer in their communities at least once a month.

The catch - only 19% have participated in a government, political, or issue-related organization in that same time period.

Preliminary Conclusions
The news is really, really good.  The survey sample for this poll is huge - 2,546 respondents half of whom have attended or will attend college and half who have not.  Harvard estimates the margin of error for these stats to be +/- 3%.

I'm a little reluctant to ramp up expectations.  High expectations are what caused the anti-youth backlash in November and December 2004 when Kerry lost.  Yet Democrats are poised to take back at least one chamber of Congress this election cycle, and many state legislatures.  It looks like that victory may in part be due to young voters maintaining their high turnout from the last Presidential cycle.  Certainly all the indicators point that way, and if it happens I hope that the media will give young people due credit.

Now we've just got to figure out a way to get millenials to volunteer for explicitly political organizations at the same rate that they volunteer in their communities.  That would be the beginning of an unstoppable future majority for progressives.

Update: The Executive Summary (pdf) and topline data (pdf) are now online. I know what I'm doing tonight.


Display:


Re: Youth Poised to Achieve Midterm Turnout Record (3.00 / 1)

Normally i'm hesitant to trust polling of young voters because so many only have cell phones and are unreachable to pollers, but i've got to so that is a huge sample size. It doesn't seem to be over representing college students either.
by blueryan on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 12:13:25 PM EST

Gosh, the misinformation must stop... (none / 0)

This silly notion that cell phones are somehow a factor in pollig has to stop.  First of all, cell phone numbers ARE available to anyone who wants to purchase a list.

Secondly, it doesn't matter to polling.  The first step to polling is forming your model:  the demographic break down of the group you are going to  poll.  Once you know what your model looks like you then poll until each demographic segment is satisfied.  A pollster doesn't say, "Oh gee, those darn kids have cell phones and I can't find them so I'll finish my model by asking 70 year olds these questions."  The pollster calls until each segment of their demographic model is complete.  Okay?  So, stop the sillyness of the "Oh gosh, those darn new-fangled cell phones are screwing up polling" nonsense.  It just shows that the person making that statement just doesn't understand polling.


by Maureen Hannigan on Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 04:07:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Youth Poised to Achieve Midterm Turnout Record (none / 0)

Among likely voters in the poll (which may still be a smaple size of 800 or so given how big the whole sample is) it shows a nearly two to one advantage to  Democrats.  For all young voters, not just college students.

Among likley voting college students:  55 D - 28 R
Among likley voting non-college:  51 D - 30 R

Message to campaigns:  Turn out those young voters.


Don't hate the media, become the media. -- Jello Biafra
by Orlando on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 01:45:40 PM EST

absolutely great stuff (none / 0)

and fantastic news.  thanks.


k/o: politics and local blogs
by kid oakland on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 02:16:23 PM EST

Name Game Challenge (3.00 / 1)

Thanks.

As per usual, I actually got  some pushback on Daily Kos, where I also cross posted this.

Lots of folks over there still believe the myths about the youth vote.  In response, I'm asking as many people as possible to recommend the diary to get it in front of the community.

I'm also asking that, in the comments section, everyone start compiling a list of organizations, websites, PACS, etc started by "Millenials."  Anything that has contributed to building progressive infrastrucure that is either run by or created by someone under 30.  Here's the list so far.  

I'm hoping it will catch and get some traction.  I'd love to see the netroots have a real conversation about the youth vote.


Youth to Power
by Mike Connery on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 02:40:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Name Game Challenge (none / 0)

How do we know that young people are being truthful?  Do we have previous polling that shows young people following through on their intentions?

I mean I believe in the youth surge because of cultural changes, I'm just wondering if there's some follow-through bias in the polling.


by Matt Stoller on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 03:10:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's an interesting question (none / 0)

and something that we in the netroots could follow up on on election day.

In 1992 when I was one of the target demographics for the "Rock the Vote" election, youth turnout was really visible. The surge was obvious even before the exit polls came in.

20somethings were lined up and poll workers were pretty dumbfounded.  It seemed to have happened overnight.

We saw that in Mpls.  We heard about from other centers with high rates of single, 20something residents.

We should cover this story in the lead up to the election.  My bet is that Mike's predictions will bear out.


k/o: politics and local blogs
by kid oakland on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 03:16:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Name Game Challenge (none / 0)

Great question to which I don't currently have the answer.  I've  only had time to look through the Press Release and skim the Exec Summary.  

I've sat in on some discussion about proper poll construction, and correcting for factors like that, but I'm by no means an expert and probably wouldn't even consider myself an informed amateur.  I'd guess that there might be a way to correct for that bias by looking at historical trends from previous midterm elections, but I don't know if Harvard did that.

I'll look through the full poll/results later tonight and report back if they did in fact correct for any biases.  FWIW though, I've heard that the Harvard IOP Polls are usually pretty accurate.  

And, as someone who worked very closely with young voters in 2004, I share your view that there are cultural shifts happening and I think the trend is real.


Youth to Power
by Mike Connery on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 03:33:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Name Game Challenge (none / 0)

Does that sort of follow through happen with other groups of voters?


by Lucas O'Connor on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 04:00:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Name Game Challenge (3.00 / 2)

There is a correlation that is important in these polling numbers, and one that backs up your gut and Mike's post.

The #s in 2004 that were key indicators of the higher turnout in that election were the numbers on how much young people were paying attention, how much young people felt like the election mattered, and how much they were talking about it.

In 2004, all of those numbers were in the 70-80% range.  This poll did not ask the same exact questions, but if you look at the "Definitely going to vote" and "Following the election in the news" #s (54% and 60%), they are lower than 2004, but still higher than anyone would expect for a midterm and almost surely going to lead to a higher turnout than usual and possibly than ever in a midterm.  Over the course of time mid-term turnout is usually 22%.  I think it was 17% in 02.  

It really could go as high as 30 in this election based on the numbers here and in the Pew poll:

From Young Voter PAC:

According to the polling of the Pew Research Center, the number of Americans 18-25 giving a lot of thought to the mid-term elections has almost doubled from 2002 to 2006 (27% to 48%).  Andy Kohut, the chief pollster for the Pew Research Center, believes that "we may again see higher turnout among this generation in this congressional election as we did in the last presidential election."

So, yes.  Turnout is going to go up.  Even better is that Democrats are pounding Republicans 2-1 among those mostly likely to turnout.


Don't hate the media, become the media. -- Jello Biafra
by Orlando on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 05:03:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Name Game Challenge (none / 0)

Do you have any reason to think young people are less truthful than the average poll respondent? I don't. We'll know in a week though. ;)


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 05:11:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Strange assumptions... (1.00 / 1)

For some reason liberals always think the youth vote is going to be liberal.  It's a fallacious assumption that has never been true.  18 - 21 year olds tend to vote exactly as their parents do but don't show up at the polls very well.

The only thing special about the youth vote is their apathy.


by Maureen Hannigan on Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 04:10:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Strange assumptions... (3.00 / 1)

in 2004, 18-29 year olds went for Kerry.  Older voters chose Bush.


by Lucas O'Connor on Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 04:39:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Strange assumptions... (3.00 / 1)

I agree with your point above about cell phones not being a significant factor in polling (yet), but this comment is not right.

The Harvard Poll, the GWU poll, the PRC poll, the election in 2004 - all showed that young people were voting more democratic than older generations.

The idea that liberals (which you seem to be using in a disparaging way) always think young people are liberal is also not the case.  Democratic campaigns have not focussed on young voters in the past because of lower turnout but also because of uncertainty over how they would vote.  Heading in to the election of 2004, young people were much stronger than in support of Bush than their elder coutnerparts (Harvard poll - October 03), but that changed in the election.

Yes, young people are not wholly different than the overall population, but the polls paint a pretty clear picture that Generation Y is not jhust a reflection fo the Xers, the boomers, or the "greatest" generation.

Just for fun, check this out:

http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2006/1 0/14/weekinreview/15kirk_graphic.ready.h tml


Don't hate the media, become the media. -- Jello Biafra
by Orlando on Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 04:43:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Strange assumptions... (3.00 / 1)

P.S. The most common term for my generation is Millenial.  We are no subset of another group ;)


by juls on Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 07:43:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Strange assumptions... (none / 0)

Ignore Maureen - she is not only a provocateur trying to depress Democratic turnout especially Lamont voters, but her distortions are hilariously ignorant of key facts. In other words, she's lying and wrong.


John McCain is dishonest
by dereau on Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 09:12:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Strange assumptions... (none / 0)

agreed. perhaps not a troll, but not much better.


by Lucas O'Connor on Fri Nov 03, 2006 at 12:16:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Youth Poised to Achieve Midterm (none / 0)

thanks Mike. I think the report YDA touts also supports your findings.


by DMIer on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 04:33:37 PM EST

Re: Youth Poised to Achieve Midterm (3.00 / 1)

The one put out by Skyline Public Works (pdf)?  That report definitely supports these conclusions.  And it's not nearly as widely read as it should be among progressive activists and campaign staffers.


Youth to Power
by Mike Connery on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 04:36:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I hope you're right (none / 0)

This semester, my College Dems group made a big effort in our voter reg drive, and we ended up registering 5000 students on campus, beating out our old mid-term registration record by about 1000 more.

We've sent them all a mailer, and right now we're signing people up to work election day and turn out those students to vote on Tuesday.  Looks like we're getting a pretty decent chunk of volunteers lined up, too.  I don't know if it's because this group of College Dems is trying extra hard (I can't really compare since I joined only a year ago), or if people are more motivated this year, but so far we seem to be successful, and for that we certainly can't complain.


Rudy Giuliani hates firefighters. And puppies.
by Fran for Dean on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 04:44:21 PM EST

Re: Youth Poised to Achieve Midterm Turnout Record (3.00 / 2)

I think eventually you're going to see an increase in young voter turnout as the infastructure of the young progressive movement grows. groups like campus progress, the roosevelt institution, young people for, center for progressive leadership, and others will help fill in the current infastructure voids and leave college dems to focus on what should be its primary role, helping elect democrats.
www.adamconner7.com
by Adam Conner on Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 01:47:28 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.