Stay a little longer Denny

I put the transcript from today's situation room in the extended entry. I agree that the longer that Denny stays on, the worse it gets for him, and yet, the more likely now it seems he stays. I was listening to NPR today while driving (up to MA -MIT- then Burlington for the weekend), and Paul Weyrich was on, having just retracted his call for Dennis Hastert to resign. Weyrich claimed that Hastert called him this morning, and told him that neither Boehner or Reynolds said anything to him about Mark Foley (and then you have the underlings (Fordham vs Bonjean) at odds as well.

Boehner, part of the Gingrich faction, and Hastert, part of the Delay faction, are having a public war of the words in public over who knew what and when. Bush came out yesterday supporting Hastert, and USNews is saying that Hastert has turned the corner.

This situation is beginning to settle, with a hardened position by the Republican leadership of Hastert staying on, alongside support by Bush, in the face of damning facts-- so it's as if the election next month is settling into a national referendum on their Republican leadership.

BLITZER: But, even as we speak, this Kirk Fordham, a former aide to Tom Reynolds, is now suggesting that he alerted the speaker's office two years ago about this Mark Foley problem.

BAY BUCHANAN, CNN POLITICAL ANALYST: Wolf, if that's true, I think the speaker will be gone by the end of the day.

I mean, he can't sustain this now. There are Republicans already talking on the Hill, talking amongst themselves, what they should do. Many of them do believe he should step down. Others are remaining loyal.
I think this kind of revelation tells them he has to go. He has to go now. And I think the speaker himself will realize that.

BLITZER: Even if someone on his staff was informed two years ago, and he necessarily -- perhaps maybe he didn't know anything about it.

CARVILLE: Right.

BLITZER: He -- what I hear you saying is, he's the guy responsible, and he should bite the bullet?

BUCHANAN: He has to.

There's no -- he should bite the bullet because of what he did know -- and that we're certain he knew -- six months ago, at least, which is that there was a predator in his midst, amongst his colleagues, who were preying on high school boys.

You have to step forward. You have to stop that. Americans, all Americans, Republicans in particular, expect that of their leaders. And, so, that, in itself, says, he must go. (CROSSTALK)

BLITZER: And she's not a Democrat speaking.

CARVILLE: No. No.

(CROSSTALK)

BLITZER: She's a good conservative.

(CROSSTALK)

CARVILLE: I think Bay and I -- my friend Senator Alan Simpson, a Republican from Wyoming, once said, in Washington, you go from being the toast of the town to toast.

Speaker Hastert is toast.

BUCHANAN: Yes.

CARVILLE: And that's just what it is.

I mean, it's not -- I don't think this is -- and I think Bay, everybody, understands. I think the Republicans in Congress are saying, Mr. Speaker, our majority is in serious jeopardy.

BLITZER: But, James, it wasn't just the speaker who knew about this.

CARVILLE: Right.

BLITZER: It was the House majority leader, John Boehner, was...

CARVILLE: Right.

BLITZER: ... told months ago that there was a problem.

Tom Reynolds...

(CROSSTALK)

BLITZER: ... who chairs the Republican Congressional Campaign Committee...

CARVILLE: Right.

BLITZER: ... he was told about this. Should they go as well?

CARVILLE: You know, I think what the -- from just being -- trying to being -- help -- being an analyst here, without being too much of a partisan, I think what these guys are going to try to do is say, look, we have served up the biggest head that we can do. Let's investigate this and focus on issues that really matter to people.

Do I think it is going to work? Maybe not. But I think their strategy is going to be, the biggest guy has to go to try to stop this hemorrhaging.

And hemorrhaging, they are, right now.

BLITZER: Well, what do you think about -- and you -- I know you think the speaker should resign...

BUCHANAN: Definitely.

BLITZER: ... by the end of today.

BUCHANAN: Yes.

BLITZER: That's what you said. He gives him at least a week to make that decision.

BUCHANAN: A week is one week closer to the election.

BLITZER: But what about the other...

(CROSSTALK)

BLITZER: ... the other Republican leaders, who knew about at least some inappropriate...

BUCHANAN: I think...

BLITZER: ... contact, "Send me a picture," and that e-mail?

BUCHANAN: I think every single one of those congressmen who knew the basic contents of the e-mail that said "Send me a picture," that alone was a -- as I said before, that tells you there's a predator.

They had to do everything in their power to stop the predator. They have to put the children first and stop the man.

What did they do? I understand, in fairness to Boehner, he said he never knew the contents. He knew there was some kind of e-mail. And he went to the speaker. And he said to the speaker: Look, is there a problem here?

And the speaker said: I have resolved this. I have turned this over. It has been resolved.

Well, to me, that would have been doing enough, because he checked it out. He didn't know the contents.

BLITZER: I want to ask you about the...

BUCHANAN: If he knew the contents, then, he, too has to go.

BLITZER: ... the impact among the conservative base in a moment.

But what about the suggestion that Foley, who was a very ardent campaign...

CARVILLE: Right. BLITZER: ... fund-raiser, gave the Republican Congressional Committee...

CARVILLE: Right.

BLITZER: ... $100,000 over the past several months? Is that a factor in this, do you suspect?

CARVILLE: Sure, it's going to be.

I mean, you know, obviously, the Democrats are going to make this an issue. And why wouldn't they? Also, Foley has $2.8 million in his campaign account. I guarantee you that the Democrats are going to make it an issue if he tries to turn it over to Republicans. I seriously doubt if he will. I don't know what the law is, whether he can use it for his legal fees or not.

But, yes, the -- and the fact that Foley was the chairman of the subcommittee on exploited children. Yes, the Democrats -- and a very legitimate issue, by the way. You see this guy in the Virginia 2nd is using it. And it's not like it's unfair.

BLITZER: What is it going to do to the Republican turnout, the Republican base, this issue, come November 7?

BUCHANAN: It's not good news, Wolf.

I mean, I can't tell you that they are going to be excited because their leaders allowed a predator to remain in the Congress.

Now -- but the key here is, if they take quick action, if the other Republicans say: "Look, we take care of our own. We recognize this was wrong. We recognize our speaker, a good man, made a bad judgment call. We're moving him aside. We're bringing in fresh faces, where the -- you know, and we are going to move ahead," then, they have a chance.

But, if they wait a week or two, until the polls tell them they have to, then they don't look nothing like -- any better than the speaker himself, living by the polls, rather than doing by their natural instinct, as men and women who care about children.

BLITZER: All right.

CARVILLE: It is clear Hastert is not going to last the week. I don't think he will go this afternoon. But I think that people are going to see him right now. And I think he understands the position...

(CROSSTALK)

BLITZER: Who goes -- who tells him that? Who...

CARVILLE: I don't -- I'm not one of them.

But I suspect that... (LAUGHTER)

CARVILLE: You know what I mean? That -- you know, people from the White House, people from the Senate leadership. I mean, I have no idea. People from K Street.

BUCHANAN: Congressmen who would like to remain as congressmen.



Display:


Unrelated (none / 0)

But is it just me, or is it f'ing hilarious that Comedy Central is showing the episode of South Park where Chef tries to molest children?

I wonder what the new episode tonight is going to be about... they'll probably make fun of the Foley scandal knowing them.


by Tom on Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 09:50:18 PM EST

Re: Stay a little longer Denny (none / 0)

Nope.  He's done for.  Sooner rather than later.


by takhallus on Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 09:54:56 PM EST

Re: Stay a little longer Denny (3.00 / 1)

USNews is saying that Hastert has turned the corner.

This is nonsense. We haven't yet turned the corner where (most) Republican parents will vote for pedophile enablers just because they're Republicans, although Dobson apparently is shooting for his particular flock to take that position.

Hastert will resign speakership. The question is whether he will resign from Congress, and exactly the extent of the damage the rest of the GOP will take.

Hastert and everyone else at the top who actually knew -- we don't know the full extent of who we're talking about, but we will soon -- should've resigned the first day this was out. That would've given them some chance of damage control. Clean slate.

They're still doing about the worst possible job of spin. Lack of coordination is bad enough when everyone's telling the truth: it's fatal when everyone is lying, because the stories are so wildly different. And now we see the backstabbing really begin, with Fordham.

To me, this is just a reminder that Rove is just an overstuffed criminal with a bad attitude, not a magician.


by lightyearsfromhome on Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 11:10:36 PM EST

Re: Stay a little longer Denny (3.00 / 1)

This is terrific news...

I hope he stays. More bloodletting methinks.

So what if Rush Limbaugh and other nutty Republicans don't want him to resign. Are they the ones who form public opinion. Hastert was the TOP story on ALL THREE NEWS SHOWS tonight...he got a MASSIVE REBUKE from Bob Schieffer on CBS's "Free Speech" segment. Tom Reynold's disapproval rating has hit 66% in his own district. Let it continue...which it will, if Hastert stays on!

At this rate we may win 60+ seats in November.


by JackBourassa on Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 11:18:07 PM EST

Re: Stay a little longer Denny (none / 0)

60+ wouldn't that be sweet.

The sweetest part is, it would largely be because of how the GOP has gerrymandered the democrats into less, stronger Dem districts.  The downside for them being, in a wave, more of them get swept away.


by scientician on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 12:04:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

bingo (none / 0)


Progress is Personal | Connie Brennan | My opinions are mine alone
by msnook on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 01:42:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Stay a little longer Denny (none / 0)

I was hoping Denny would stay around longer to serve as a punching bag. But in reality, getting rid of Hastert at this point is like firing the captain of the Titanic after it hit the iceberg. The GOP is going down no matter how many deck chairs they rearrange.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 12:02:55 AM EST

Re: Stay a little longer Denny (none / 0)

Somewhat OT, but am I the only disturbed by the fact that if you took the names away, it would be almost impossible to distinguish James Carville from Bay Buchanan in this transcript? Way to fight the good fight, man.


Stop blaming the media. The FACTS have a liberal bias.
by McSnatherson on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 01:53:14 AM EST

A little beef with Carville (3.00 / 0)

I know he likes to think of himself as somehow "above the partisan fray," but he's not. Ex-presidents get to do that, not their advisors. If this is a situation in which it's particularly important to seem non-partisan, than he shouldn't be avoiding his own partisanship by conferring it upon Democrats:

...the Democrats are going to make this an issue. And why wouldn't they? Also, Foley has $2.8 million in his campaign account. I guarantee you that the Democrats are going to make it an issue...

It's stupid. It highlights the opportunism and partisan context of the claim without even asserting it, just so that he doesn't have to look partisan. Why doesn't he just say: "Of course it's an issue! Foley has 2.8 million in his campaign account, and if that money finds its way back to the Republican party, they're profiting from a child sex predator, and that's dispicable."

If there's a choice between Carville making a claim (and maybe even arguing it!) and allerting the public to the partisan claims Democrats are about to make, he needs to choose the former -- especially 33 days before the election.


Progress is Personal | Connie Brennan | My opinions are mine alone
by msnook on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 02:09:35 AM EST

GOP is sounding like Germany in early 1945 (3.00 / 0)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/article s/2006/10/timing_plays_for_dems_and_silv .html

They seem to think if they can hold on a little longer, their army will deploy new super weapons and  turn the tide of the fight.

And they really believe it:

"the only important media event of this campaign to date was Bill Clinton's narcissistic outburst on Fox News."

So, um, what the hell would they call this thing with Foley?  Unimportant?

Of course, because protecting kids is unimportant.


by jcjcjc on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 02:32:00 AM EST

Re: Stay a little longer Denny (none / 0)

Oh lets just start calling them pedocons and be done with it.....


by druidbros on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 07:25:23 AM EST

Re: Stay a little longer Denny (none / 0)

I heard Weyrich too, I gagged when he said 'homosexuals are preoccupied with sex.'  Then when the NPR interviewer (whose name I don't recall) said people would take issue with it he claimed it was fact not his opinion.  Seriously, why was this guy allowed on the airwaves.


by pipe on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 09:34:26 AM EST

Re: Stay a little longer Denny (none / 0)

c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c7 c8 c9 c10 c11 c12 c13 c14 c15 c16 c17 c18 c19 c20 c21 c22 c23 c24 c25 c26 c27 c28 c29 c30 c31 c32 c33 c34 c35 c36 c37 c38 c39 c40 c41 c42 c43 c44 c45 c46 c47 c48 c49 c50 c51 c52 c53 c54 c55 c56 c57 c58 c59 c60 c61 c62 c63 c64 c65 c66 c67 c68 c69 c70 c71 c72 c73 c74 c75 c76 c77 c78 c79 c80 c81 c82 c83 c84 c85 c86 c87 c88 c89 c90 c91 c92 c93 c94 c95


by estebban on Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 05:03:44 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.