Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans

Your guilty conscience may force you to vote Democratic, but deep down inside you secretly long for a cold-hearted Republican to lower taxes, brutalize criminals, and rule you like a king. That's why I did this: to protect you from yourselves. Now if you'll excuse me, I have a city to run. - Sideshow Bob, as Mayor of Springfield in the Simpsons

Political systems are built through symbols, and no symbol has been more pernicious than the idea of a moderate Republican.  Since 1964, the Republican Party has gradually turned itself into a neo-Confederate group of extremists attached to a political network of partisan pagan church groups.  This transformation has happened explicitly, with a bevy of tax breaks directed at white churches, or implicitly, such as when Reagan opened his 1980 campaign at the site where three civil rights workers were murdered.  Moderate Republicans - like Lowell Weicker, who did stand up to Nixon - gradually died out, replaced by leashed poodles who substituted affability and pork for moderation.  Chris Shays, Nancy Johnson, and Rob Simmons are such figures.  

Moderate Republicans are a dangerous symbol because they are a mirage that tricks liberal and moderate voters into thinking that the natural governing center is an affable extremist.  Put a 'moderate' face on extremist policies or a party, and all of a sudden you have a country built on, say, corporate trade agreements that are reviled by the public at large.  Or you have the war on drugs, which is nonsensical but considered part of the natural governing tapestry, or 2 million prisoners costing America hundreds of billions of dollars a year, or any number of crazy policies that are considered moderate but are in fact simply elitist in orientation.

David Gergen is the epitome of the adult in charge, the governing force without which adults will not trust you.  Air America had 'moderate Republicans' running the show, and large Democratic donor networks have been stymied by donors who think that moderate Republicans exist and want to hire them to run a liberal movement (hint, it doesn't work).  People like Tom Kean Sr. are a good example of the problem - he's loved and revered by liberals in New Jersey, and was put on the 9/11 Commission as a respected character, and then he goes out an engages in a dishonest smear campaign to peg Bill Clinton as responsible for 9/11 through an ABC propaganda piece, all to help his son get elected in New Jersey.

Killing the idea of the moderate Republican is critical if we are to convince the country that progressives can govern.  As we've seen, right now journalists, opinion-leaders, donors, and politicians do not think that the hawkish pro-corporate bipartisan consensus will be disturbed if Democrats take over.  Already we have Thomas Riehle trying to say that it is the netroots that want a targeted strategy versus James Carville-types who want to widen the playing field.  We have stories in the New York Times about New Democrats ascendant and the progressives being beaten back in a more moderate party, and Harold Ford splashed on the cover of Newsweek as the face of a new and more conserative party.  The LieberDems are licking their chops at a perceived ability for Joe to rule the Senate if he is reelected (prepare for a bad Q-Poll tomorrow, kids, polling director Doug Schwartz ain't a fan of Lamont).  Certain House Democrats are panting at the ability to reach out to the Republicans as one of their first acts in office, to show a new spirit of openness to their GOP Beltway boyfriends who have been abusing them.

Fortunately, even as power players preen about how close they are to moderate Republicans in their style and attitude, the electoral fortunes of the 'adults' is waning.  The most potent symbol of the moderate Republican up for office is Tom Kean Jr.  He's the poster boy for faux moderate, extremely affable and likeable, and culturally liberal in that he likes Starbucks coffee and doesn't belong to a mega-church.  He's facing Bob Menendez, a candidate who has always had overblown rumors of corruption surrounding him, which is actually standard for New Jersey politicians.  If any matchup were to deliver a Senate seat to a moderate Republican, it would be this one.

And yet, New Jersey is a Democratic state, with leaners likely to go for the Democrat, especially in a year like this one, and a traditional pollster undersampling of Democrats.  Remember in 2004, when Bush was totally almost going to capture New Jersey, until he got blown out?  I would peg Tennessee as the opposite, with all the optimism for Harold Ford somewhat misplaced (I'd love to be proved wrong, of course).  And with Menendez surging in the polls after having run a standard campaign, it's looking like it's becoming increasingly impossible for any Republicans to get the critical cross-over votes they need to stay competitive in blue states.  

That Kean is losing is a big deal, because it shows voters have moved away from at least one of their illusions.  Tom Kean Sr is a beloved figure in New Jersey politics, a statesman who parlayed a genteel affability into a Governorship in the 1980s and a storied place on the 9/11 Commission.  He was considered for a time Presidential timber, and he's now the model of bipartisan honor and integrity, one of the last good Republicans.  He's a dream, an "independent, honorable public servant, the kind that citizens admire and long for", as New Jersey's master of the obvious pundit David Rebovich puts it.

Of course, there's another thread to Kean Sr.  He won his governor's race in 1981 by an extremely narrow margin using hired racists thugs to suppress minority turnout, his fiscal policies destroyed New Jersey's budget picture, his family shakes down corporate contributors, and he dishonestly pushed the film 'The Path to 9/11', a historical travesty.  His legendary sheen has both threads running in parallel, the race-tinged corruption playing footsie with the bipartisan ethical righteousness.  In 1971, Kean made his first important political move, becoming speaker of the Assembly even though he was a Republican in the minority party.  The myth is that Kean was so respected on both sides of the aisle that he was a consensus pick; the reality is that he cut a deal with a white corrupt Hudson County politician, David Friedland, who couldn't ascend to the speakership because of a loan-sharking scandal and then threw his support to Kean to keep the a black Democrat from becoming the Speaker.

And it was off to the races for Kean Sr, moving quickly to the Governor's mansion and then to a storied place as an elder wiseman for the nation.  His son, who is mostly a lightweight in the State Senate and similarly affable, simply can't get above the mid-forties in the polls.  His avoidance of Iraq and his refusal to disavow Bush has hurt him badly among cross-over voters.  The nasty core of faux moderate Republicans - affability over substance - is dying out.  Iraq is too bloody and obviously wrong for Democrats to be fooled anymore.

So the 'moderate Republican' adult aesthetic - greatly weakened - may still be in charge of DC on November 8th in the form of Beltway journalists, politicians, and lobbyists, but the people are gradually voting it out of power.



Display:


Dying Moderate Republicans (none / 0)

Same for Snow and Collins in Maine.  They get a pass on being responsible for the worst of Bushism because they cast the occasional sensible vote for civil liberties.  But in the final analysis, they are ENABLERS....


by global yokel on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 03:18:30 PM EST

Re: Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans (none / 0)

"...partisan pagan church groups."

That one gets a thumbs up from me with a chuckle.


by MNPundit on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 04:18:36 PM EST

But what about Maryland? (none / 0)

Michael Steele is pretending to be this kind of "moderate Republican" that is now extinct -- and enough Maryland voters are buying it that he's got a real chance to beat Ben Cardin.

There are other dynamics in this race, of course, but the myth has far from died out.


by Master Jack on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 05:14:23 PM EST

Re: But what about Maryland? (none / 0)

I wouldn't so quickly say that Steele has a great shot.  He's down by double digits in some polls.


by Matt Stoller on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 05:41:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: But what about Maryland? (none / 0)

  Steele was down ten or eleven in the last WaPo poll published last Sunday, but Rasmussen has the race in single digits. And that was before several high-profile Prince George's County Democrats came out and endorsed Steele yesterday.

  I wouldn't put this one in the bag just yet. The Republicans have used Steele as a racial wedge candidate (he's run the most substance-free campaign I've ever seen). Low-information voters come in all colors. There are some African-Americans who WILL vote for Steele because he's black, issues be damned, and others who might not be too sold on Steele's agenda but who still want to cast a "message" vote.

 I hope Cardin can hold on, and I still think it's fairly likely that he will, but he hasn't really been helping himself.

 


by Master Jack on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 06:00:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: But what about Maryland? (none / 0)

At the same time there are a large number of low information white voters, especially working-class, who would normally support a Republican like Eherlich but will vote against Steele because he's black.


by MyDD Fan on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 07:43:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans (none / 0)

Tom Kean Sr is definitely the proverbial "wolf in sheep's clothing", but there ARE moderate Republicans.  NJ's other recent GOP governor Christy Todd Whitman would probably rank as one.  I would also consider Colin Powell a moderate Republican as well.

Of course, both these people were ex-communicated from the Bush empire for speaking up as moderates and replaced with wingnut yes-people


NJ Hussein Independent
by NJIndependent on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 05:28:38 PM EST

Re: Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans (3.00 / 2)

Nope, neither one is anything that one could consider moderate.  Powell is mostly a lying putz, and Whitman is a corrupt lobbyist.


by Matt Stoller on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 05:40:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans (3.00 / 1)

I guess it depends on your definition of moderate.  I'm guessing that you consider "moderate" somewhere left of Pelosi?


NJ Hussein Independent
by NJIndependent on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 08:16:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

There is a downside (3.00 / 1)

Pretty much, the old-style Eastern liberal/moderate GOP in Congress is extinct when incumbents die or lose.

Former moderate Republicans (I assume) now mostly vote for the Dems.

Is that something lefties would want to see in an ideal world? Isn't it going to skew rightwards the average voter for Dem candidates in such districts?

Clearly, former moderate GOP candidates will seek the Dem nom in such districts - effectively one party states, like in the old Solid South - and (depending on registration levels and the type of primary) lefties may find their votes diluted by those of former moderate GOP voters.

(Whereas, formerly, a GOP candidate running with some chance of a win would soak up such votes.)


by skeptic06 on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 06:52:00 PM EST

Situational perspective (3.00 / 1)

"And yet, New Jersey is a Democratic state, with leaners likely to go for the Democrat, especially in a year like this one..."

Immediately followed by this:

"That Kean is losing is a big deal, because it shows voters have moved away from at least one of their illusions."

It doesn't demonstrate they have moved away from their illusions at all. Stoller makes the point in the previous paragraph, then pretends it doesn't apply. If you asked voters which side could carve a turkey better, this year the margin would be 58-42% Democratic. I deal with situational influence literally every day in sports but the netroots leaders are obviously rank newcomers in that regard. The sweeping generalizations are lovely. Stick polarized 50/50 back into the equation and most of them freefall.

Democratic state. Slanted year. Democratic incumbent. Heavy monetary edge to the Democrat. How does that equate to moderate Repubicans being rejected? The obvious counter is Kean Jr., as a moderate, is comfortably beating the pointspread.

If Democrats can't be fooled by moderate Republicans anymore, why were we desperately rooting for Laffey over Chafee in the Rhode Island primary? Go back to the MyDD posts early that day, and within weeks. I don't remember too many posts insisting it didn't matter, that either outcome would be a blowout. We feared the Republican with the moderate reputation, and how that could flip the outcome in a Democratic state. Newsflash: in a 50/50 year it probably would have. You can't play results without understanding the degree of alteration in a standard layout.

Looks like Stoller was curious about Kean Sr. and did some research into his career, and needed a place to post it. Nothing wrong with that, and interesting, but a bit of a force.

It's also not situationally proper to compare gov results, like Kean Sr.'s, to a federal race like senate. In the past 10 years or so, at minimum, the nation has trended to House and Senate results that are more representative of the state presidential partisanship than previously. Let's put it this way; I wouldn't want Menendez running against Kean Jr. for governor. At that point, Kean Sr.'s "beloved" status is significantly more relevant, those years a focal point, and Menendez forfeits some of the blue state benefit of a doubt.

I do agree with one basic: the most dangerous person in the world is a conservative Republican, loved by the base, who can feign moderate in a national campaign. That was Bush, obvios when I followed his '98 Texas re-election campaign. And don't count Jeb out in the future, for the same head fake potential. Floridians give him a huge approval rating and think he's governed as a moderate. Minus Iraq, Jeb would have been the '08 nominee, without question.


by Gary Kilbride on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 09:11:03 PM EST

Re: Situational perspective (3.00 / 1)

Well, not quite.  It's unlikely that crossover Democrats are going to vote for Republicans once given a Democrat to vote for.  If you put a Democrat in Chris Shays' seat, she won't lose because the district will be hers from then on.  If you put Whitehouse in over Chafee, Whitehouse is there as long as he wants to be.  Crossover Democrats tend to vote only for Republicans who are incumbents.  Fewer GOP incumbents means changed voting patterns.  Have the voters changed?  Probably.  Bush has changed a lot of minds.

The dying Republican moderate is true in point of fact.  It's not clear yet that the Democratic cross-over voter phenomenon is dead in blue states, but the trend looks that way.

I should have been clearer in my post.


by Matt Stoller on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 10:08:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans (none / 0)

There is a need for the moderate democrat if we are to retake the congress and keep it.  Many of the races are held in republican stronghold areas where dems in Indiana and Tennessee must be more moderate to get the vote.  
It won't do us any good to have only to the left if we don't get elected.  We must first destroy the cartoon that republicans have painted us and that means we must be appealing and not the scary people that has been beaten into people's heads.
Once we show we are adults and can govern better than republicans and the world won't end with us in power, we can have more breathing room.
I'm not saying pandering as a republican.  We do have our standards but, we must appeal to the areas we are in.
I live in a fairly conservative part of Illinois and if someone comes off as a real liberal it will not go good.  10 years ago it was a different story but, now, it's swung to the right.  I want the republicans out and therefore a dem must present him or herself like a Duckworth rather than a Fiengold.  This is unfortunate but, it's a way to start and we can start changing things from so rightwing from that.
by vwcat on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 09:34:20 PM EST

Re: Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans (3.00 / 1)

I would say that a lot of the success of the Democratic Party in this election cycle is all about moderate and centrist Democrats.  The GOP has gotten to a point where it's so transparent now that the warmongerers and religious wingnuts in the extremist wing control that party that they have left the center of the political spectrum open for the Democratic Party to sieze.  Thus far, they have.  Look at some of the candidates who have been successful and where.  Webb in VA & Tester in MT in the Senate.  Guys like Shuler, Ellsworth, & Trauner in the House.  Seats are falling in IN, OH, AZ, & CO, and are in play in ID & WY, and countless other very red areas of either red or blue states.  This is happening because the GOP has lost the centrists.  

If the Democratic Party wants to solidify the gains from this wave and entrench these candidates, they need to govern from the center and establish that they do, indeed, represent the 15% of the people in the center that actually decide every close election.  Obviously, don't give up your ideals and pander to conservatives, but don't set out on an agenda that will alienate the people who put you there, either.


NJ Hussein Independent
by NJIndependent on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 10:46:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans (none / 0)

First, my New Jersey rant.  

Tom Kean was a considerably more moderate governor tham Christie Todd Whitman.  Whitman hamstrung the state by financing huge tax cuts with borrowing and turning the state's Department of Motor Vehicles to be looted by a privatized, no-bid outfit from California (Parsons Technology) that has since added mismanagement of no bid contracts in Iraq to is domestic screw-ups.  It would be fair to characterize Whitman (who won the Governor's mansion by bribing black ministers en masse) as a "social" moderate and a fiscal right-wing extremist.  New Jersey is the richest state in the country (highest median income) but faces undermaintained, inadequate roads, the highest property taxes in the nation, overtly low state income taxes, very poor public transit, a looming environmental'flood crisis in most of the state, and a school system that needs work.  The roads, wetlands, tax-and-borrow and other issues lie directly at the feet of Whitman.  Her support of abortion rights alone doesn't offset a piss poor legacy.

That being said, Jr. is the absolute worst candidate that either major party has run since at least 1950 (if not ever).  Combing through Wikipedia, it is obvious that although Junior has held a few political positions (mostly by appointment) that this 38 year old baby has never held a real, full-time job.  His closest:  congressional aide to Bob Franks (no years or time span cited) and time spent as an aide at the Environmental Protection Agency (under Whitman presumably) with no time span or years given.

As for character, Junior can't be accused of having no character.  Time and again he has shown actively bad character: lying, weaseling out of meetings, blaming others for his mistakes and the active mistakes of those he hires, running the dirtiest campaign in Jersey history (relying on convicted bribe takers, claiming that Bob Menendez will hurt "working seniors" because he is opposed to the elimination of the estate tax, taking Dick Cheney's money but avoiding a two hour meeting with him, walking out on the mother of an Iraqi vet (and when cornered getting hostile as hell with her) and on and on and on.  Incredibly, a "man" whose campaign is riddled with bribes and payoffs says Jerseyans need to elect him to stop bribery in Trenton and runs ads spouting off about Bob Menedez increasing property taxes (local) and specifically state taxes.

On a national level, only four Senators and six House member can be even remotely thought of as "moderate"  (to the left of libertaian Ron Paul).  Then there's the 51 Senators and 225 House members to the right of Paul, mostly way to the right.  Tellingly, one of the Senate moderates (and probably the only clear moderate of the group) and five of the six House "moderates"  are in trouble this year.  The only safe House "moderate", Rodney Alexander of LA, changed parties two years ago and is "moderate" only based on his votes as a Democrat.  More recently, he's been to the right of Ron Paul.

I respect a few of the GOPer moderates, particularly Sherwood Boehlert (NY) and Rick Leach (Iowa) in the House and Lincoln Chafee and (untill the last year and a half) Arlen Specter in the Senate.  Boehlert has been forced out already after surviving two vicious challenges from the Club For Growth.  Chafee and Specter barely survived their CFG primaries.  Leach has the "worst" CFG score of any Republican and would likely be their top target in 2008.The Maine Ladies have been missing in action on every important vote this section.  I consider them frauds.


by David Kowalski on Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 11:29:17 PM EST

Re: Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans (none / 0)

"He's facing Bob Menendez, a candidate who has always had overblown rumors of corruption surrounding him, which is actually standard for New Jersey politicians."

Overblown?  How?
Is he just a little bit corrupt?

And standard for New Jersey politicians?
Isn't this what we are fighting against?

Seriously, we should be winning New Jersey easily right now.  That we are not says a lot about Menendez's weaknesses.  


by v2aggie2 on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 01:34:51 AM EST

Re: Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans (none / 0)

The fact that the rumors of corruption are overblown is something that's been widely reported in both the local and national media.  Just yesterday, FactCheck.org -- an organization that often goes maddeningly out of their way to be balanced -- called the Kean Jr camp out for wildly exaggerating claims about the Senator.

And we are winning New Jersey right now.  The fact that it's not "easily" is a function of the Kean family brand, not any perceived "weaknesses" of Senator Menendez that you fail to describe in detail.

Sorry if I sound a little defensive about this.  The fact of the matter is that, while I am on the payroll here, I have nothing but respect for Senator Menendez and nothing but disdain for Tom Kean Jr's lying, sleazy, no-class campaign.


by Scott Shields on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 08:55:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fool Me Once... And Dying Moderate Republicans (none / 0)

Fair enough -- I will buy your arguments -- you are much closer to that race than I am.

But corruption can't be "overblown"
Either one is or one isn't.
That is directed at Stoller, now you.

Perhaps I should have clarified -- we should be winning easily in New Jersey, a blue state, in a year that shapes up to be a good one for Democrats.

Keep up the good work, Scott.


by v2aggie2 on Sat Nov 04, 2006 at 01:46:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.