Sixty House Races Within Single Digits

Currently, like pretty much everyone who isn't named Karl Rove, I forecast Democrats to take control of the House. This is based on a huge amount of data, including district-by district polls showing Democrats ahead by around 20-25 districts right now (see Pollster.com and Electoral-Vote.com). However, what keeps me up and night, what still fuels my desire for continued and unrelenting activism, and what still gives credence to the worries in the back of my head are the polls from over fifty House races are currently showing campaigns within the single digits. Here they are (and yes, it really is this many):

Republican held seats
AZ-01, AZ-05, CA-04, CA-11, CA-50, CO-04, CO-05, CO-07, CT-02, CT-04, CT-05, FL-13, FL-16, FL-22, ID-01, IN-02, IN-09, IL-06, IL-10, IA-01, IA-02, KS-02, KY-03, KY-04, MN-01, MN-02, MN-06, NV-02, NV-03, NH-02, NJ-07, NM-01, NY-03, NY-19, NY-20, NY-24, NY-25, NY-26, NY-29, NC-08, NC-11, OH-01, OH-02, OH-15, OH-18, PA-04, PA-06, PA-07, PA-08, VA-02, VA-10, WA-08, WI-08, WY-AL

Democratic Held Seats
GA-12, IN-07, IA-03, IL-08, VT-AL, WV-01

So, what pickups do we have in the bag? Maybe AZ-08, IN-08, PA-10 and TX-22. Maybe not even those. Maybe there are even more seats in the single digits than the sixty I listed. This is just what polls, my gut and my personal targeting chart tells me right now. This might be the most fluid election situation we have seen in America in decades. As many as sixty House races will be decided by a very slim margin. In other words, these races could all very well come down to things like GOTV operations, election infrastructure, or even what the weather is like on Election Day.

In 1994, Republicans won a majority on the back of twenty-five narrow victories decided by less than 10,000 votes. With 60 House seats in play, the size of any new majority we have will be determined by just as many narrow victories. At the same time, if Republicans hang on to a narrow majority, it will be because of a huge string of narrow victories. This election is absolutely in flux, and can shift dramatically on the basis of only a few points either way. Those few points can be our people on the streets knocking on doors and making phone calls, or their people doing the same thing. After 103 long weeks of work, this is where the 2006 campaign will be decided.

Eighty percent of the country probably lives within a one-day trip of at least one of the sixty races I listed above. Half of the country probably lives within a two-hour trip of at least one of those races. It is time to hit the streets, and for me to finally complete the second leg of the trip to my backyard. I'll be blogging live about my trips to PA-06, PA-07 and PA-08 this week. Next weekend, I'll be blogging about canvassing my neighborhood in my role as precinct captain. Almost every single one of you can be doing what I am going to do this week. It is time to make it happen because this is where the election will be decided. Find a campaign near you, and get to work. Immediately.

Here are some other good actions you can take: Let's make these next nine days something we will never forget.



Display:


Within Single Digits (3.00 / 1)

I'm predicting that the aftermath of this election is going to be ugly.  Big-time ugly.

I hope the Democrats have a war chest for court challenges and post-election manuevering, because they are going to need it.   Watch Tennessee in particular, where a large African-American turnout is expected in support of Harold Ford.  I'll bet my last nickel that there will be an extraordinary number of 'broken' voting machines and other procedural glitches that work against the Democratic candidate.

I'm not necessarily pessimistic about the outcome of the election, and I'm doing my part to help out; but it would be a major miscalculation on our part to assume that this election will be clean.


by global yokel on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 09:31:51 PM EST

Re: Within Single Digits (none / 0)

ESP tells me that who ever wins the Missouri senate race is gonna have to wage a long legal battle to secure the seat.  


by Winston Smith on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 10:25:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (3.00 / 1)

You forgot FL-24 - it's pretty much tied.


by pattyp on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 09:39:34 PM EST

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

I'd ike to see non-Zogby confirmation on that one. But you might be right and, as I said, there could be even more.
by Chris Bowers on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 09:44:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

Chris,

You probably know this, but Tom Feeney actually drew the boundaries of FL-24 (a new CD based on 2000 Census) while he was Florida House Speaker.  He was also busy those days drafting a bill to allot all Florida's electoral votes to Bush no matter what the recounts resulted in.

Astoundingly (given the 100-1 financial advantage Feeney has -- I kid you not, $2M vs. $20k) Curtis has a legitimate shot.  I live two blocks north of Feeney in FL-24, just south of Oviedo, Florida.  I think I'll take my yard sign out for a walk along the main road this next week.  Just for fun.

Oh, and by the way, my wife, a registered Republican, early voted today - for Curtis.

Cheers,


by GreginFL on Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 12:05:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Lot of adverbs (none / 0)

"This election is absolutely in flux, and can shift dramatically on the basis of only a few points either way."

Did you know the excess use of adverbs is often the giveaway of a fib or an overdramatization?

We're not at the point we're trying to make sure we keeps Dems scared up enough to pile on, are we?


by jcjcjc on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 09:44:52 PM EST

WV-2nd (none / 0)

I have it from a reliable source as they say that the Democratic Party did a poll last week of this race and it showed Mike Callaghan within the margin of error-about 4 points-to Capito among likely voters and actually WINNING among voters who were sure to vote.  Pretty cool.


Andy Katz
by Andy Katz on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 10:07:24 PM EST

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

Clint Curtis in FL-24?

A Zogby International poll had it 45 Feeney - 43 Curtis, within the margin of error.


by College Progressive on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 10:27:02 PM EST

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

In some states, a Senate seat may be within single digits even if the House seat is not.  That's the case in Montana (has anybody polled Rehberg-Lundeen lately?) and Missouri.  It also holds for Tennessee but all of that state is within a day's drive of House districts in southern Indiana and.or Georgis that are in play.

Right off hand, only Alaska, Hawaii, North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma and big parts of Texas look more than 500 miles from a close race.


by David Kowalski on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 10:31:11 PM EST

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

Alaska's governor race is competitive.


by College Progressive on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 10:47:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

Alaska's house race is also far more competitive than it was just a few weeks ago.  A recent poll put it at a 9 point race.

http://www.alaskareport.com/z44639.htm

In the Fairbanks area, I've probably seen 10 Diane Benson signs to every one Don Young sign, and this is one of the redder parts of the state.

The newspapers are getting many letters in support of Diane Benson, and none, if any, for Don Young

http://www.adn.com/opinion/letters/lette rs_desk/story/8307910p-8204082c.html

Her campaign lacks the attention that it deserves and lacks money.  With some money, winning is a real possibility.  A little money can go a very long way in this race.  We are far from the point of deminishing returns.

http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraiser s/11475

Let us not repeat 1990 when Devens lost to Young by less than 4 points due to the fact that the campaign had no national attention.

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseac tion=blog.view&friendID=105917070&am p;blogID=166881019&MyToken=ea9666e1- 51b7-4de1-8454-25c81894b4d2

Diane Benson's website is: http://bensonforcongress.com


by marmot on Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 12:07:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

Oklahoma isn't that far from Nancy Boyda.


by Lucas O'Connor on Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 12:50:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

I think the Republican rubber stamp in my NY-24 would probably have won but for the atrocious ads.  The phone sex ad was so bad no TV station would air it on advice of counsel.  The child rape ad they are still airing is worse.

Democrat Arcuri now appears to have a lock on a pickup.

Maybe folks here should send donations to the Republican campaign committees to make sure more Democrats are elected. :-)

I wonder now if it is really different in Tennessee and Virginia senatorial campaigns.

Best,  Terry


by terryhallinan on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 10:55:32 PM EST

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

When Idaho's only seat became competitive, that's when I knew that this election was about " A NEW DIRECTION"  we are mobolized. We are FREAKING FOCUSED!!! The intensity is on OUR side the time is NOW!!!! If you live in one of the three SO CALLED FIREWALL STATES, you MUST get out and support Webb, McKaskill and my man Ford!!! LETS GO THE TIME IS NOW!!!!


by nzubechukwu on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 10:56:23 PM EST

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

Not to sound gullible but what is it with right wing pundits like Carlson and Buchannan saying that there are more Republican scandals due to hit before the election?


by jarod on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 11:17:28 PM EST

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

When will notice be taken of the latest electronic voting machine news? The U.S. is investigating ties Chavez may have to ownership of many machines used in several states? Can't anyone see this as the groundwork being laid to contest close elections favoring Democrats in their final outcome? It's a pushback against all those alleging Diebold and Bushco are conspiring to steal the election. "Oh yeah, so we stole a few races? Ha! You and your leftist, terrorist buddy Chavez actually are to blame for all this confusion. Our patriotic supporters went to the polls only to be stymied by machines owned by an avowed Bush hater!" This is so transparently an attempt to confuse the electorate as to who is actually planning an electoral heist it's laughable. I won't hold my breath waiting for the MSM to label it for what it is.


by steve duncan on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 11:25:39 PM EST

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

Thanks for the action links, Chris! Do More Than Vote is awesome. It has a ton of chapters in Tennessee so I'm gonna send it to all my family down there. 9 DAYS!


by alicetent on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 11:44:43 PM EST

KY-02 poll (none / 0)

A Democratic poll back in September had the Col. Weaver vs. Lewis race in KY-02 closing to 8 points.  No polls since then as far as I know.  My gut tells me the race is currently within a 10 point margin.


by Federalist on Sun Oct 29, 2006 at 11:47:13 PM EST

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

Which races if any with Repub incumbents and the Dem challenger ahead by 15%?


by ab initio on Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 12:03:49 AM EST

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

None are consistently that wide, but TX-22, IN-08, AZ-08 have broken 15% at some point.


by Lucas O'Connor on Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 12:52:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Goldmark Makes that Sixty-One (none / 0)

Peter Goldmark's within seven points of neocon Cathy McMorris as of early October after being twenty points down in August. Since the DCCC has included this race within the fourth round Red to Blue selections and has made significant ad buys, and since the RNCC is begging for money for McMorris, all signs point to the strong likelihood that Goldmark will recapture former Speaker of the House Tom Foley's old seat and reverse one of the most crushing blows suffered in the 1994 Gingrich assault.

See:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/7/ 14111/6986

So, Chris, ya' think it might make sense to include Peter Goldmark and WA-05 on your list?

Oh, BTW, here's a GREAT piece from Goldmark on the spend and bankrupt Republicans, with the obvious meme that a debt is just a tax deferred. It's the perfect antidote to the BS that "Republicans don't raise taxes." Oh yes they do, it's just that it will come out of your Social Security Trust Fund and your children's paychecks.

(AND, Goldmark's piece is all ready in both html and pdf format for wide internet and hand-to-hand distribution--hint, hint.)

See:

http://www.votepetergoldmark.com/vpg_200 61029PGvtaxlady.php


by Hoomai29 on Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 12:53:56 AM EST

Re: Goldmark Makes that Sixty-One (none / 0)

I'm always curious about this.  Everytime there's a ranking or list of any kind, people rush in trying to get their candidate on the list.  When it's a fundraising thing, I can kinda understand, but what difference does it make if Goldmark is on this list?


by Lucas O'Connor on Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 01:02:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Goldmark Makes that Sixty-One (none / 0)

Everyone wants to show that their candidate has the "Mo" and Goldmark definitely does. This list is one that will be referenced by many pundits and bloggers about which races are most winnable. So, if you have a winnable race, you need to be here.

To me, the question I'd ask is, given the level of insightfulness that MyDD offers about the House races and the respect that its ratings are accorded, how could any candidate NOT want to be on this list?

See:

http://www.votePeterGoldmark.com


by Hoomai29 on Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 01:24:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sixty House Races Within Single Digits (none / 0)

If the experts predict Dem gains of 30 or more seats, and Rove predicts less than 15, I am going with Rove.  Not to say that volunteer efforts will not help, that may put us over the top in a few races, but Rove wins.

And if he says the Republicans will maintain control, he probably knows something we do not.  Whether its cheating by electronic voting machines or preventing likely Democrats from voting, or just knowing how good their GOTV efforts are, we should be very concerned about his calmness before the storm.

So to reiterate what some have already said here, we better be able to get some proof of fraud if we want to win.  Oh, and volunteer like crazy.


Better Progressive Messaging www.progressivemovement.net
by parmenides on Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 01:23:07 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.