Governor Forecast 2006: Races Continue to Shift Two Weeks Out

I have updated the MyDD Governor Forecast 2006 and things look to me a little something like this...

DEMOCRATIC TARGETS

First, a few moves. South Carolina, which I had been watching since a close SurveyUSA poll, is now off the board with the Mark Sanford at over 55 percent support. Rhode Island, which had been a toss-up, should not be considered "leans Republican" given the fairly solid lead by Don Carcieri (though the race is not yet over, naturally). And Colorado now moves ahead of Massachusetts on the list of potential Democratic pickups, partially because Bill Ritter is polling better and better and partially because some of Kerry Healey's hits on Deval Patrick are taking some toll. Ohio and and Maryland appear to be solidifying for the Dems, the former in particular because the baseless attacks on Ted Strickland's sexuality appear to be backfiring on Ken Blackwell. Finally, Florida stays in the "likely Republican" category, but is now a race to keep an eye on given recent polling.

Safe Democratic 1. New York (Democrat: Eliot Spitzer).

Likely Democratic 2. Ohio (Democrat: Ted Strickland). 3. Colorado (Democrat: Bill Ritter). 4. Massachusetts (Democrat: Deval Patrick). 5. Arkansas (Democrat: Mike Beebe).

Leans Democratic 6. Maryland (Democrat: Martin O'Malley).

Toss-Up 7. Minnesota (Mike Hatch).

Leans Republican 8. Rhode Island (Democrat: Charlie Fogarty). 9. Nevada (Democrat: Dina Titus).

Likely Republican 10. Florida (Democrat: Jim Davis). 11. Alaska (Democrat: Tony Knowles). 12. California (Democrat: Phil Angelides).

Safe Republican (In alphabetical order, by state): Bob Riley in Alabama, Jodi Rell in Connecticut, Sonny Perdue in Georgia, Linda Lingle in Hawaii, Butch Otter in Idaho (filling an open seat), Dave Heineman in Nebraska, Mark Sanford in South Carolina, Mike Rounds in South Dakota, Rick Perry in Texas (though the race should be interesting with two strong independent candidates), and Jim Douglas in Vermont.

REPUBLICAN TARGETS

First, the moves. Pennsylvania is now off the board; Ed Rendell is just too strong, Lynn Swann too weak. I have also moved Wisconsin and Michigan from the "toss-up" category to "leans Democrat". These two races are still tight and could go for the Republicans, but Jim Doyle and Jennifer Granholm both have clear edges. Iowa might additionally show Democratic leanings, but it remains in a "toss-up" at this point. Illinois might be showing some early signs of trouble, with a large share of support going to a Green candidate, but for now Rod Blagojevich's negatives appear to be trumped by those of his Republican challenger Judy Baar Topinka. Finally, Maine continues to be a trouble spot for the Democrats as John Baldacci stands barely over 40 percent; however, Chandler Woodcock's conservatism and the presence of a third party candidate with strong support are keeping this race up in the air.

Toss-Up 1. Maine (Democrat: John Baldacci). 2. Oregon (Democrat: Ted Kulongoski). 3. Iowa (Democrat: Chet Culver).

Leans Democratic 4. Wisconsin (Democrat: Jim Doyle). 5. Michigan (Democrat: Jennifer Granholm). 6. Illinois (Democrat: Rod Blagojevich).

Safe Democrat (In alphabetical order, by state): Janet Napolitano in Arizona, Kathleen Sebelius in Kansas, John Lynch in New Hampshire, Bill Richardson in New Mexico, Brad Henry in Oklahoma, Ed Rendell in Pennsylvania, Phil Bredesen in Tennessee, and Dave Freudenthal in Wyoming.

For updated polling and analysis of all of this year's most important gubernatorial races, head on over to the MyDD Governor Forecast 2006 sponsored by Bill Richardson.

Update [2006-10-24 17:5:17 by Jonathan Singer]: Thanks for everyone passing on new polling from Massachusetts out today. I'll factor that in and have an update later this afternoon or evening.



Display:


WRONG ABOUT MA (none / 0)

You are WRONG about Massachusetts.  Deval Patrick has opened up the largest lead so far according to the Boston Globe.

Independents, turned off by negative ads, flock to Patrick in new poll

This new poll has Deval with a 27 point lead!!

The best part is that most of this movement has been the result of Healey's own ads doing her in!


by manyoso on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 04:25:08 PM EST

Re: WRONG ABOUT MA (none / 0)

BTW, this is the Suffolk poll and indicates major movement from their last poll that had Patrick below 50.


by manyoso on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 04:28:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: WRONG ABOUT MA (none / 0)

Oh, and another thing :)

Healey is now going to try and go positive!

They are completely changing course because of the backlash they've seen against the ultra-negative ads.  The ads basically say that Deval supports raping white women...


by manyoso on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 04:33:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: WRONG ABOUT MA (none / 0)

The Suffolk poll isn't the only one. Rasmussen and CBS4 also have polls out today: Rasmussen has Patrick up 24, and CBS4 has him by 25. The new narrative is certainly that Healey's negative ads have backfired.


by Jon on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 04:45:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: WRONG ABOUT MA (none / 0)

Do you have links?  Wow, I think this can be moved into the uncontested category.


by manyoso on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 04:47:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: WRONG ABOUT MA (none / 0)

Here is link to Suffolk poll:

link


“Massachusetts voters were pushed to the limit,” said David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center.  “The negative tone by Kerry Healey was overkill – it made her unpopular with some voters and neutralized would-be supporters.  Once voters gave the race a second look, they returned to Deval Patrick.”
Another indication that Healey’s campaign had backfired: 61 percent of voters say the recent tone of her campaign made them less likely to vote for her.  In addition, Healey’s personal unpopularity is at an all-time high, making her campaign an unlikely place to go if Patrick’s campaign falters in the final days.  More than 53 percent of voters now, view her unfavorably, while just 30 percent looked upon her favorably.  In sharp contrast, Patrick had a 60 percent favorable rating and a 24 percent unfavorable rating.


by manyoso on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 04:50:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: WRONG ABOUT MA (none / 0)

SUSA/CBS4
Rasmussen's unreleased numbers (via Pollster)
by Jon on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 10:42:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Governor Forecast 2006: Races Continue to Shif (none / 0)

Living here in Maine, I agree; it's tough to call; but we may end up with independent Barbara Merrill as our next governor.

Baldacci has made a terrific mistake, one I hope other office holders will pay close attention to and learn from: he put a lot of energy and publicity into programs like Dirigo Health (a health insurance initiative)and Pine Tree Zones (business stimulation and job creation), which didn't pan out as advertised. At the same time, his efforts to control the budget have crippled state government's ability to deliver services effeciently; particulary problems with implementation of several new computer systems. Though he's done many good things, particulary with higher education, the overall impression voters have is one of stagnation and failed efforts.

Republicans make a lot of noise about Maine residents being the highest taxed in the nation; the problem is really that our wages are well below national averages, there's less wage to tax for providing services. Additionally, 91% of the residents in the state work for small businesses of 50 or fewer employers, and Baldacci hasn't made the case that federal regulations and policies that help large corporations frequently hinder small companies. But Senator Snow, who chairs the Small Biz Committee, has also failed at this.


by zic on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 04:26:48 PM EST

Illinois (none / 0)

I hope Blagojevich runs some ads pointing out that the Green Party is entirely funded by the Republican Party.

This wouldn't affect Independents, but might stop some Democrats from voting for the Green and might even induce some Republicans to vote Green.


by antiHyde on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 06:39:16 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.