If I recall correctly, the main Google index is updated monthly, so we probably won't see any new results for half the candidates in the next two weeks.  Can anyone confirm this?

However, news.google.com, when sorted by "relevence" (the default) should swing to the desired articles pretty quickly.

When posting the code, simply preface it with a statement explaining something like "Here's a bunch of informative articles on important Republicans running for Congress."  Don't use the words "Google bomb" -- CNN's spent much time yesterday trying to tell their viewers that Google Bombs Are Bad Bad Bad.  If they see the words "Google bomb" on your website, it's likely to turn them off.

<a href="http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2006-04-13/news/feature_full.html">Jon Kyl</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rick_Renzi&printable=yes#Controversies">Rick Renzi</a> <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/1022hayworth1022.html">J.D. Hayworth</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Doolittle#Controversies">John Doolittle</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Pombo#Controversies_and_criticisms">Richard Pombo</a> <a href="http://www.kfmb.com/story.php?id=66505">Brian Bilbray</a> <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/12054520/the_10_worst_congressmen/10">Marilyn Musgrave</a> <a href="http://www.gazette.com/display.php?id=1322626&amp;secid=1">Doug Lamborn</a> <a href="http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/elections/article/0,2808,DRMN_24736_5063243,00.html">Rick O'Donnell</a> <a href="http://www.connpost.com/news/ci_4509567">Christopher Shays</a> <a href="http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/local/15422371.htm?source=rss&amp;channel=bradenton_local">Vernon Buchanan</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley_scandal">Joe Negron</a> <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/campaign_diary/florida/archive/2006/10/the_foley_scandal_affects_the.htm">Clay Shaw</a> <a href="http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20060923/NEWS/60923003">Bill Sali</a> <a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14988252/">Peter Roskam</a> <a href="http://cbs2chicago.com/video/?id=25835@wbbm.dayport.com">Mark Kirk</a> <a href="http://www.kcci.com/politics/10062284/detail.html">Dennis Hastert</a> <a href="http://www.southbendtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060811/NEWS07/608110314">Chris Chocola</a> <a href="http://www.courier-journal.com/localnews/2004/04/21ky/B1-host0421i0-7412.html">John Hostettler</a> <a href="http://www.qctimes.net/articles/2005/12/09/news/local/doc439930283db6c088625962.txt">Mike Whalen</a> <a href="http://cjonline.com/stories/102306/loc_ryunboyda1.shtml">Jim Ryun</a> <a href="http://www.courier-journal.com/localnews/2002/08/29/ke082902s267079.htm">Anne Northup</a> <a href="http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/15533221.htm">Geoff Davis</a> <a href="http://www.gazette.net/stories/021006/montsta130223_31925.shtml">Michael Steele</a> <a href="http://www.hometown-pages.com/main.asp?SectionID=26&SubSectionID=186&ArticleID=12951&TM=48834.09">Gil Gutknecht</a> <a href="http://citypages.com/databank/27/1348/article14760.asp">Michele Bachmann</a> <a href="http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/politics/15174500.htm">Jim Talent</a> <a href="http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2006/07/28/news/state/20-burns.txt">Conrad Burns</a> <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/sun/2006/oct/22/566689009.html?porter">Jon Porter</a> <a href="http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Top+aide+to+Bass+resigns&amp;articleId=b65bcd02-f478-4a6d-801a-9a12761c3786">Charlie Bass</a> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A23714-2003Apr3?language=printer">Mike Ferguson</a> <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Congresswoman_on_page_board_buried_file_1019.html">Heather Wilson</a> <a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/ny-usking0817,0,6911475,print.story?coll=ny-top-headlines">Peter King</a> <a href="http://blogs.timesunion.com/capitol/?p=983">John Sweeney</a> <a href="http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061004/NEWS01/61004020/1002/NEWS">Tom Reynolds</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Kuhl#Personal">Randy Kuhl</a> <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/291/story/254053.html">Robin Hayes</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_H._Taylor#Controversies">Charles Taylor</a> <a href="http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/091906/chabot.html">Steve Chabot</a> <a href="http://www.wcpo.com/news/2006/local/10/11/murtha_schmidt.html">Jean Schmidt</a> <a href="http://www.columbusdispatch.com/?story=217625">Deborah Pryce</a> <a href="http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1161257895268090.xml&amp;coll=2">Joy Padgett</a> <a href="http://www.sharonherald.com/local/local_story_263230124.html?start:int=0">Melissa Hart</a> <a href="http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/28-10162006-727801.html">Curt Weldon</a> <a href="http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/111-01222006-601349.html">Mike Fitzpatrick</a> <a href="http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/15646184.htm">Don Sherwood</a> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/05/AR2006080500823.html">Lincoln Chafee</a> <a href="http://www.knoxnews.com/kns/election/article/0,1406,KNS_630_5057450,00.html">Bob Corker</a> <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/26/politics/main2039589.shtml">George Allen</a> <a href="http://www.nationalcenter.org/PRJTHGWolfEarmark1006.html">Frank Wolf</a> <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/283622_mcgavick02.html">Mike McGavick</a> <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/287797_reichertsideweb06.html">Dave Reichert<

Thanks Chris!

You chose a great article on Peter King. Newsday is a very respected paper out in Long Island.

I remember there being two articles for the NY-19 candidate John Hall.

I don't see either source code listed or the race.

Whats up?

-- MrMacMan

I don't have a primarily political
SITE
 but I put it up anyway.

Here are enough "justifying" words CNN should read:
 From "Self Reliance" by Ralf Waldo Emerson:
 A passage from "Self Reliance":

"...Whoso would be a man, must be a nonconformist. Ho who would gather the immortal palms must not be hindered by the name of goodness, but must explore if it be goodness.
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind. Absolve you to yourself, and you shall have the suffrage of the whole world.... No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my CONSTITUTION  ; the only wrong what is against it..."

Wikipedia ... if this gets any kind of traction then I'd expect the battle to move to wikipedia as supporters of candidates delete or alter text at links like wikipedia.org/MyCandidate#Controversies.

If people are still working on the database of linkable stories, it's worth looking for alternatives to wikipedia.

Right Wing News is counter-Googlebombing.  Here's links to fight theirs:

Senate

Connecticut: <a href="http://www.nedlamont.com">Ned Lamont</a>
Maryland: <a href="http://www.bencardin.com">Ben Cardin</a>
Michigan: <a href="http://www.senate.gov/~stabenow/">Debbie Stabenow</a>
Missouri: <a href="http://www.claireonline.com">Claire McCaskill</a>
Montana: <a href="http://www..com">Jon Tester</a>
New Jersey: <a href="http://www.testerforsenate.com">Bob Menendez</a>
Tennessee: <a href="http://www.house.gov/ford/">Harold Ford</a>
Virginia: <a href="http://www.jameswebb.com">James Webb</a>

Democrat Held Seats

(CO-03): <a href="http://www.house.gov/salazar/">John Salazar</a>
(GA-03): <a href="http://jimmarshall.house.gov/">Jim Marshall</a>
(GA-12): <a href="http://barrow.house.gov/">John Barrow</a>
(IA-03): <a href="http://www.boswellforcongress.com">Leonard Boswell</a>
(IL-08): <a href="http://www.melissabean.com">Melissa Bean</a>
(IL-17): <a href="http://www.friendsofphilhare.com">Phil Hare</a>
(IN-07): <a href="http://juliacarson.house.gov/">Julia Carson</a>
(NC-13): <a href="http://www.house.gov/bradmiller/">Brad Miller</a>
(PA-12): <a href="http://www.house.gov/murtha/">John Murtha</a>
(WV-01): <a href="http://www.house.gov/mollohan/">Alan Mollohan</a>

Republican Held Seats

(AZ-08): <a href="http://www.giffordsforcongress.com">Gabrielle Giffords</a>
(CT-04): <a href="http://www.farrellforcongress.com">Diane Farrell</a>
(CT-05): <a href="http://www.murphyforcongress.com">Chris Murphy</a>
(CO-07): <a href="http://www.perlmutter2006.com">Ed Perlmutter</a>
(IA-01): <a href="http://www.brucebraley.com">Bruce Braley</a>
(IL-06): <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/18/AR2006021801295.html">Tammy Duckworth</a>
(IN-02): <a href="http://www.donnellyforuscongress.com">Joe Donnelly</a>
(IN-08): <a href="http://www.ellsworthforcongress.com">Brad Ellsworth</a>
(IN-09): <a href="http://www.baron2006.com">Baron Hill</a>
(FL-13): <a href="http://www.christinejenningsforcongress.com">Christine Jennings</a>
(FL-16): <a href="http://www.timmahoneyforflorida.com">Tim Mahoney</a>
(FL-22): <a href="http://www.ronklein2006.com">Ron Klein</a>
(KY-03): <a href="http://www.johnyarmuth.com">John Yarmuth</a>
(NC-01): <a href="http://www.heathshuler.com">Heath Shuler</a>
(MN-06): <a href="http://www.pattywetterling.com">Patty Wetterling</a>
(NM-01): <a href="http://www.madridforcongress.com">Patricia Madrid</a>
(NY-20): <a href="http://www.gillibrand2006.com">Kirsten Gillibrand</a>
(NY-24): <a href="http://www.arcuriforcongress.com">Michael Arcuri</a>
(NY-26): <a href="http://www.jackdavis.org">Jack Davis</a>
(OH-15): <a href="http://www.kilroyforcongress.com">Mary Jo Kilroy</a>
(OH-18): <a href="http://www.zackspace.com">Zack Space</a>
(PA-06): <a href="http://www.loismurphy.com">Lois Murphy</a>
(PA-08): <a href="http://www.murphy06.com">Patrick Murphy</a>
(PA-07): <a href="http://www.sestakforcongress.com">Joe Sestak</a>
(PA-10): <a href="http://www.carneyforcongress.com">Chris Carney</a>
(VA-02): <a href="http://www.philkellam.com">Phil Kellam</a>
(WI-08): <a href="http://www.kagen4congress.com">Steve Kagen</a>

Does anyone else find it incredibly ironic that a site billing itself as "direct democracy" would be interested in articifically inflating otherwise valid and pertinent search results?

This just totally smacks of a lack of confidence in your own soapbox.

Someone has changed the wiki page so that the "Personal" bookmark doesn't go down to the "Personal" section of the entry. Instead the link now takes you to the top of the wiki page, which kind of messes up the google bomb a bit.

The "Personal" bookmark worked just a couple of hours ago.

(I posted this same comment over in the dKos diary, but there are so many comments over there that you might not see this, Chris.

Let's see:

1). The main media with few exceptions has not been doing their constitutional duty overall and consistently (although I've seen some improvements lately).

2). Voting machine fraud is a huge concern.

3). Voting purging has been occurring.

4). Past elections with their "voting problems" everyone knows about.

5). Both the house & senate let the MCA through. Remember habeus corpus? I'd like to get it back some day...

No, I don't have any problem posting all the links on ANOTHER blog site I have.

Add to your blog template also for many, many, many times the results.

Roskam's article has been withdrawn.  Can we substitute another one?

Okay, color me stupid, but what do we do with these links now that we have them?

Anyone else having problems with these articles disappearing?  Articles on Peter Roskam are disappearing from MSNBC and the Chicago Tribune.    

This is all great stuff.  I'm thinking, though, that it'll be equally important in 2008 to make sure to optimize search results for the challengers.  

Incumbents are better known by the electorate, by and large, than challengers.  So undecided voters are much more likely to google the challenger, and, with less other info about the challenger in their heads already, they are more likely to be swayed by the results.

If your goal is to do serious SEO, make friends with the following items:

ALT tags for links and images.

The H1, H2 and H3 HTML tags.

Add descriptive classes to you P entities also helps.

SEO isn't really as hard as people act like it is.  Most people just don't place enough relevant content next to their good SEO work, and Google eventually dumps them for being bullshitters.

Which means it isn't enough to have a block of links.  That would have worked nicely eight years ago.  Today, Google worries more about your ratio of content to links.

Basically, Google is reversing your trick to detect your trick, and it genrally works.

Worse, as your Google bombing effort spreads, Google's scoring system will note the similarities and punish site scroes accordingly.

That won't hurt a high-traffic site like MyDD, but it will hurt your local bloggers who may only have 100 visiitors a day.

Great job!

Google is useless. My own linguistics site got chopped down after a short period when my motherboard pooped the bed, and I had to replace it, as well as all my system drivers, and the spammers pirated it. But the idiots still have the nerve to post this "Google Ad" where my site should be:

English Grammar Software
www.WhiteSmoke.com      Write, Fix, Edit & Enrich Any Text Unique tool that will amaze you!

I have no idea whether this companies "product" is worth a damn, but I do know that the Googlesluts are making money off my site by showing it.

I never like to leave the job half done. So -- A deep look at Google just before it takes the net over completely:

GOOGLE BLOGOSCOPED:

# Google wants to push their ad system. E.g. in 2006, one of their aims was to sell $1B of new inventory. Google feels that if they make the world's inventory available "marketers will come."

# Google tries to make sure their tools are running everywhere. In around mid-2006, according to their internal numbers 60 Million Google Packs had been installed, but they still want to increase the deployment... especially for "novice users."

But the truth is, Google really just wants to rule the world!

Look at this!:

Break For News Forum
Post by: elbowdeep, Wed Jun 21, 2006

I hate to rant on for a while, but this has been really bugging me as of late... I've been watching Google, and yes, my paranoia is not at "red" level, but it is definitely at yellow when it comes to Google. With each new product they release, it just sends shivers down my spine. Doesn't anyone else see what is going on?

Now lets assume for a minute that the "data" is being assembled into a "Neural Network" for use at a later date...

Not working.  Not for several that I tried.  The intended links are not in the first two pages of search results.

Whatever the "ethics" of this strategy (see the conversation in a follow-up post), it has been preempted, probably by Google who don't like people to think their results can be manipulated.

And it makes lefty bloggers look bad too, by people who have no idea of how it's supposed to work, and who weren't going to search for info via that channel anyway.  Unfortunately, that's the take-home message of this campaign.