Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01

This is genuinely different. I'm note sure if I have ever seen an ad like this before:



This election cycle has featured more ads trying to make use of humor than I can ever remember. In my opinion, the funniest one is still Ned Lamont's "Wang Chung" ad, which was made even funnier because that was the song they played in the ballroom after Ned Lamont gave his victory speech. This ad from Cranley is different not only because it makes use of humor, but also because it uses a celebrity impersonator to mimic Bush. Basically, it the same sort of ad you would expect to see in a political campaign, but instead the candidate or a voice-over, this ad has someone impersonating Bush saying it instead.

I think it works. This ad is having a strange ability to stick in my mind. It isn't that funny, but it has kept me quietly giggling and smiling for about fifteen minutes now. It seems to have more of an endurance, slow-twitch muscle fiber quality to its humor, rather than being built for a sprint. Overall, I think this ad will be effective because it shows just how much Cranley opposes Bush. Because he makes fun of Bush, you are left with the impression that Cranley really doesn't like Bush at all, and even shares some of the cynicism about candidates who say they oppose Bush, but don't actually do anything to show it. It also gets a nice dig in on Chabot by having Bush nickname him "Chabby," which is a thinly veiled homonym for "shabby."

On the web: John Cranley for Congress.



Display:


Thought it alluded to "Brownie" (none / 0)

Although, after "Yo, Blair" and "Brownie" it's fair to say Bush probably does call him Chabby, presuming he even remembers him.

BTW, 92% is actually pretty low compared to most GOPers.  Still not good for all of us, but 8% opposite is impressive given the GOP phalanx.


by jcjcjc on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 12:41:35 AM EST

I like the ad (none / 0)

The right has used ridicule against us for a long time--it's good to see a Democrat returning the favor. It makes the ad more memorable as well.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 12:44:03 AM EST

Re: I like the ad (none / 0)

Exactly, this would stick with my parents much more than another "Rep. Brownnose voted with President Bush 95% of the time" done by 'voiceover' guy.


BlueNC - Progressive NC Politics
by Robert P on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 09:42:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

John Cranley ad (none / 0)

I like the light and humorous feel of it.   The world is a pretty dark and heavy place these days, and I don't think we'll win over too many voters by giving them another dose of dark and heavy.


by global yokel on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 12:54:36 AM EST

He...he...he... (none / 0)

This is a good one.


by Pericles on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 12:54:38 AM EST

Re: He...he...he... (none / 0)

What might be even better is Mr. Foley calling some certain GOPers thanking them for covering up his sex crimes for so long...

That might just kill off a couple pesky Reps in one single ad.


Melissa Hart is gone - thank you Chris Bowers
by surfbird007 on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 01:54:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Adwatch (none / 0)

Damm that was actually funny. I expected it to be corny or cheesy based on how you described it. Good impersonator.


by zt155 on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 12:58:24 AM EST

Re: Adwatch (none / 0)

The impersonator nailed it. Just enough of the hesitations and the Texas accent, not too many stumbles, and sounded like something Dubya would actually say because the man is in some ways beyond parody.


by Dan Hartung on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 09:25:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Adwatch (none / 0)

My friends and I saw this during the football game.  It had us cracking up.  If people were watching the game here in Cincinnati, like most people do, I'm sure it'll help Cranley.


by liebers on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 01:14:01 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

I still like the DSCC's anti-DeWine spot.  It begins with a clip of DeWine talking about working together with members of both parties.  Then the picture freezes, and a chorus of children sings "the more we work together the happier we'll be" as details of DeWine's close cooperation with GWB appear on screen.  The spot ends with GWB and DeWine smiling broadly above the words "Mike DeWine likes working together with George Bush."  I'll never get tired of this one.
 
by KTinOhio on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 01:25:28 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

The ad you're referring to, KTinOhio, sounds interesting. I haven't seen it in my (Cincinnati) market, though...


by OH Mark on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 10:08:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

We (played for the SO) thought it was great.... But then, I have to admit, we also liked Lieberman's "lightbulb", despite despising Lieberman.

Lamont's Wang Chung was funny, but long, so it lost its punch a bit.  This ad was short and sweet.


by MBW on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 01:28:02 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

My only complaint is they don't get Steve Chabot's name in there enough.  After I watched the ad, I had the same reaction you did, Chris, in that I thought it was funny, not extremely so, but as time wore on I was still chuckling about it.  Unfortunately, I couldn't remember who the ad was about.  That may just be me not paying too much attention at 1am, but I think it's important when you have a good ad like this to make sure people know exactly who you're talking about and really burn that connection into people's heads... Chabot = Bush


Rudy Giuliani hates firefighters. And puppies.
by Fran for Dean on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 01:58:05 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

I think its a clever and effective way of presenting Chabot as a rubber-stamp Republican. Good ad by Cranley, and he'll have more time to run positive bio ads- but for now its important he not let Chabot off the hook as some sort of faux moderate.


by AC4508 on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 02:04:57 AM EST

Mockery, Derision, Scorn, Sarcasm... (3.00 / 0)

These are tools sorely lacking from our toolbox.

Our candidates, and ESPECIALLY our ad makers and message-crafters need to spend a good bit of time reading and absorbing the works of Twain, Vonnegut, Mencken, and a host of others.

Humor WORKS.

Ridicule WORKS.

The passion, the heartfelt rhetoric, the sonorous tones of impassioned political stumpsmanship are all great stuff...but political ads, the "take home message" and the "stuff that sticks in your mind" is FUNNY STUFF.

Think about the commercials you REMEMBER. The ones you remember from your childhood.

My balogna has a first name...

You are my sunshine...

Even those god-awful "Ernest" commercials

Heeeey VERNE!

That stuff persists.

We need to use it.

Mock the GOP for the cowards, fools, and pathetic hypocrites that they really are.

Enough with the wounded, impassioned, heartfelt defenses and attempts to recall days of comity and high-toned argument.

Bleah.

Mock them to death!


by RedDan on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 02:12:11 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

Excellent idea but they didn't provide a memorable standout line(s). In that situation you can basically make up anything you want, so think it through and don't merely slap out the first string of sentences that sound decent. The best professor I had in journalism school used to emphasize every day, "every word is important." I'm sure that's what he would be screaming after watching that ad.

RedMan is correct, humor is priceless but IMO neither side utilizes it even 5% as much as they should. A great comedy writer could have made this commercial truly memorable and effective, but as is I think it's an A idea with C execution.


by jagakid on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 03:21:12 AM EST

Whoops (none / 0)

RedDan, not RedMan. That's worse than a C grade:)


by jagakid on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 03:24:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Just the right amount of humor (none / 0)

John Caples, a resident of the copy writers hall of fame, said of humor, "avoid it." He feared that most people wouldn't get the joke.

In this case, they don't have to. If you take the spot literally, you think the GOP asshole does every bad thing Bush asks him to do, which is the message of the spot.

If you watch with the sound off, you get the same message.

And if you listen to the great voiceover, you get a smile for the day, esp. from the delivery of the "pesky questions" lines.

Good spot, all right. Cuts through the clutter, and reminds me of some of the better Republican ads.


by stevehigh on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 06:58:08 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

My favorite add! There are more, you can view them on John's Myspace

http://www.myspace.com/cranleyforcongres s

Be sure to add John as a friend!

www.takebackcincinnati.com


Take Back Cincinnati
by belili on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 07:28:27 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (3.00 / 1)

Yes, I live in Cincinnati (though in OH-02) and I have seen this ad several times. I think it's pretty good because it's different, and thereby, stands out. I think it's funny, too.

(Much better than Cranley's bizarre, even scary ad in which he runs right on immigration -- why in Cincinnati? -- accusing Chabot of "amnesty," and thereby inferring that he, Cranley, would have voted with the House Republicans on immigration.)

(P.S. Chabot also runs an ad against Cranley on immigration, accusing Cranley of "amnesty" too, so who knows?)


by OH Mark on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 07:45:13 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

"(Much better than Cranley's bizarre, even scary ad in which he runs right on immigration -- why in Cincinnati? -- accusing Chabot of "amnesty," and thereby inferring that he, Cranley, would have voted with the House Republicans on immigration.)

(P.S. Chabot also runs an ad against Cranley on immigration, accusing Cranley of "amnesty" too, so who knows?)"

Chabot ran his first - and the Cranley campaign staff felt a need to respond.


Take Back Cincinnati
by belili on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 08:20:59 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (3.00 / 1)

belili wrote: "Chabot ran his first - and the Cranley campaign staff felt a need to respond."

Okay, even so, is Cranley really to the right of Chabot on this?

Does Cranley support the House Republican bill, or does he support the more moderate (Bush) bill, which allows for "amnesty"?


by OH Mark on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 10:06:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

I don't think the touch of humor makes it ineffective. It's a reasonably good ad. It does make me glad I don't live in that district and haven't given any money to Cranley. I understand that in red districts we can't run extreme leftists, but I too am saddened when we have to run to the right of the GOP incumbent on any important issue.

We need the seat. If I lived there, I'd vote for Cranley, of course. Dembench endorsed him. Makes me more actely aware that Dembench applies no ideological filters at all; just age and potential to win and move up.  


by Christopher Walker on Tue Oct 03, 2006 at 09:47:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (3.00 / 1)

Thanks for your comment, Christopher, and I totally agree with your sentiments and how you would vote.

I have a term I started using many, many years ago, when Tom Luken (D) was the long-time Rep from (old) OH-01: "Cincinnati Democrat." (Tom Luken retired in the late 80s, I think, and his son, Charlie Luken, held the seat as a Dem for one term, before quitting because he didn't care for the rough and tumble of DC politics. As a result, the Republicans took over the seat around 1990 and have held it ever since.)

By that I mean, Luken, and many other Cincinnati Democrats, are generally both fiscally and socially conservative, and I really couldn't tell you how they are different than many Republicans.

Cranley would be better than Chabot, not only for the reason of making the majority, but he's pretty conservative for a Dem. Sad to say, that is the reality here in Cincinnati.


by OH Mark on Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 07:59:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cranley v Chabot in OH-01 (none / 0)

Yes, and it wasn't apparent to me, at first, that Chabot is pretty far to the right on economic issues, enough so to get on a "Best" list maintained by the Club for Growth. I posted on that at the big orange blog earlier in the cycle, when I learned that:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/30/ 73536/4589

A dreary choice, but, as you say, a clear one.


by Christopher Walker on Thu Oct 05, 2006 at 09:35:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

Really good ad, loved it!


"I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell." Harry S Truman
by Tennessean on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 08:27:26 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

I thought this ad in KY-03 was kinda funny, similar to the Ned Lamont "Messy Desk" ad except the ridiculous part is a bit shorter:

http://www.yarmuthforcongress.com/yarmut h.php/campaign/multimedia/television-spo ts/ridiculous/


by KainIIIC on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 10:14:29 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

That's a pretty good ad.


by beeswax49 on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 12:18:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Humor in political advertising (none / 0)

Is this entertainment or a political campaign?  Humor has no place in an election cycle in which critical decisions are being made about policy and the leadership of our nation.  

I see this as just more of the "infotainment" trend so neatly carved out by the likes of Jon Stewart and Bill Maher.  The most sickening aspect of this crass practice is that people feel informed after watching it.

Being a citizen is work.  Do you own research on voting records and issues, and keep up on current events.  Don't let the "marketeers" running political campaigns suck you in to their game.


by glennd1 on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 11:03:06 AM EST

Re: Humor in political advertising (none / 0)

Wow, I have to disagree with your overall sentiment about humor in political advertising.

While I agree that politics, elections and governing are serious business, the aspect of political elections that depends upon effective advertising is not inappropriate for humor.

If humor can better convey the message, and make it memorable, then humor definitely has a place in political advertising.

Also, not sure why you would criticize Stewart and Maher as "crass" when they are not directly involved in this, or other ads. They are entertainers and comedians, so humor is their business.

Finally, who do you think is behind ANY political ad, humorous or serious, but "marketeers"? (And by that I guess you mean marketing consultants?)


by OH Mark on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 11:51:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Humor in political advertising (none / 0)

This website is about marketing.  The people at this website do their own research.  The electorate doesn't necessarily do the same.

This is an informative ad.  That humor is used makes it more memorable and makes the information stick.

This election is deadly serious.  To suggest that it's too serious to try to get votes by any ethical means necessary is, ironically enough, laughable.


by ZamboniGuy on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 01:47:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

I thought the ad was funny and sharp. I do think they needed to state the names more clearly. That's the one criticism I have too.


by Our Gal in Brooklyn on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 11:53:41 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

It also gets a nice dig in on Chabot by having Bush nickname him "Chabby," which is a thinly veiled homonym for "shabby."

I heard yesterday that Google is fighting the term "Googling" because it wants to avoid the genericide of Xerox, Walkman, Kleenex, etc.  What would happen if we turned "conservative" or "Republican into a bit of a proprietary eponym the way that they've tried to make liberal a dirty word? Maybe we're too good for that, but hey, nothing wrong with contemplation.


by Lucas O'Connor on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 11:58:28 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

It works!
And it sticks in the mind. Simple and straightforward and the association with W is lasting.
by cmpnwtr on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 12:30:14 PM EST

John Cranley: Taking Back Cincinnati (3.00 / 1)

It's nice to see that the Cranley race is getting national attention. This is the best chance Cincinnati has of getting a Democrat to Congress in years.

http://www.takebackcincinnati.com


by RGBlogging on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 01:18:09 PM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

I also love this ad, but what I like the best is that everything shows up on the screen in text.  I don't know why more political ads don't have on-screen text for the big points - how many people watch TV during dinner, or while talking, or even while running the vacuum cleaner?  Lots of people (my grandparents included) simply mute the commercials.

Making your ad understandable to people who aren't listening is a great way of making sure viewers remember it.  Well done to the Cranley team!


by terry312 on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 10:07:29 PM EST

Bush's numbers in OH-01? (none / 0)

Great ad -- as long as Bush is unpopular in OH-01 (or at least with whomever the ad is targeting).  Anyone know what Bush's numbers are like there?  Typically this is a fairly conservative district, but of course this is not a typical year ...


by ajsnow on Tue Oct 03, 2006 at 11:35:59 AM EST

Re: Adwatch: John Cranley, OH-01 (none / 0)

w1 w2 w3 w4 w5 w6 w7 w8 w9 w10 w11 w12 w13 w14 w15 w16 w17 w18 w19 w20 w21 w22 w23 w24 w25 w26 w27 w28 w29 w30 w31 w32 w33 w34 w35 w36 w37 w38 w39 w40 w41 w42 w43 w44 w45 w46 w47 w48 w49 w50 w51 w52 w53 w54 w55 w56 w57 w58 w59 w60 w61 w62 w63 w64 w65 w66 w67 w68 w69 w70 w71 w72 w73 w74 w75 w76 w77 w78 w79 w80 w81 w82 w83 w84 w85 w86 w87 w88 w89 w90 w91 w92 w93 w94 w95 w96 w97 w98 w99 w100 w101 w102 w103 w104 w105 w106 w107 w108 w109 w110 w111 w112 w113 w114 w115 w116 w117 w118 w119 w120 w121 w122 w123 w124 w125 w126 w127 w128 w129 w130 w131 w132 w133 w134 w135 w136 w137 w138 w139 w140 w141 w142 w143 w144 w145 w146 w147 w148 w149 w150 w151 w152 w153 w154 w155 w156 w157 w158 w159 w160 w161 w162 w163 w164


by estebban on Mon Dec 04, 2006 at 04:50:18 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.