Call For Change

I am not of the philosophy that when it looks like we are ahead, we have to pretend that we are ten points down. I don't believe that thinking you are going to lose motivates people to work harder. Instead, I think it motivates people into thinking that they are supporting losers. Further, my personal experience on the ground has taught me that thinking we are going lose has caused a lot of voter and activist retrenchment on our side (which becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy on Election Day). I also think that pretending you are losing, when you are not, is a denial of reality, and I am a proud member of the reality-based community. Finally, I believe that thinking we are going to lose when we are ahead helps to fuel the media narrative that Democrats are pessimistic losers.

While I see no value in pretending that we are behind when we are actually ahead, I also believe that we cannot have a wave election unless we run a more energetic campaign than Republicans. If Republicans and the conservative movement outwork us on the ground, then there simply will not be a wave election. The difference between a wave election and just a good election is very small, and is decided in the results of several close districts. Dave Kowalski recently pointed out that in 1994, Republicans won 25 House districts by less than 10,000 votes. Margins that small are determined by ground games, voter targeting, and local activist excitement. If Republicans did not have an edge in those categories that year, Democrats would have never lost the House of Representatives. In fact, Republicans would never have come within ten seats.

The largest tier in my House forecast is currently "toss-up / lean Republican," with 19 seats. Dozens of Republican-held districts that were not supposed to be competitive are pushing hard against Republican firewalls, and threaten to turn a good Democratic election into a generational realignment. In short, those are the districts that separate Democrats from an election that will determine narrow control of the House, and a wave election that will transform national politics for the next decade or more. If we can out work Republicans on the ground, we can win quite a few, perhaps even most, of these seats. If Republicans outwork us, they will win virtually all of these seats, and the battle for control will be excruciatingly close. Unfortunately, right now, there are clear indications that we are being outworked:
If you're ever read a profile of Ken Mehlman, you know he is obsessed with metrics. For him, one of the most important sources of data is a weekly e-mail his political team prepares called the "Weekly Grassroots Report." It meticulously records the work of tens of thousands of volunteers in targeted states, counties and congressional districts across the country. The data summary allows the RNC to determine which states are meeting goals and which states are falling behind.

The RNC declined to share the most recent report, which was issued Monday. But two independent sources who saw last week's report professed to be surprised: not only was their no drop off last week, 12 states broke new voter contact records.

In a month, the party completed more than a million phone calls and door contacts conbined. Bigger states are putting up big numbers -- even Ohio, which lagged behind its targets all summer, has caught up. The RNC is particularly pleased with their progress in New Jersey, where they've rapidly set up a more aggressive version of their 72 Hour Program in light of the state's more competitive Senate race.
Fortunately, progressives have an answer to this: MoveOn.org's Call for Change. In the most sophisticated phone banking program ever produced in American politics, MoveOn.org has created a program to call ten million key voters in 50 key House districts and more than half a dozen Senate campaigns. I have seen some good information on how this program works, and it is amazing stuff. If you take part in this program, you can reach key voters around the country no matter where you live, and you can do so in a way that will make a difference.

We can't be outworked in this election. This is the biggest and best chance we have had to transform American politics in decades. It might be a couple of decades before we have another chance like this. Sign up to take part in MoveOn.org's Call for Change now. We cannot be outworked in these elections, and your effort in these elections is the only ay we can keep from being outworked. Don't squander this chance--sign up now.



Display:


Re: Call For Change (3.00 / 1)

I'm terrified, but I'm doing it!  My training is at 4 CT today, my first calls are tomorrow.

C'mon guys, don't leave me to do it alone ....

Cheers,


by Klio on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 02:56:04 PM EST

Re: Call For Change (3.00 / 1)

I've signed up too!


by ab initio on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 03:48:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

he RNC declined to share the most recent report, which was issued Monday. But two independent sources who saw last week's report professed to be surprised: not only was their no drop off last week, 12 states broke new voter contact records.

If this is true I have seen no evidence of it in my area and I am skeptical of anonymous sources.

Rather than MoveOn I recommend posters contact their local candidates or political committees.


by Alice Marshall on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 03:05:19 PM EST

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

I would suggest doing both.
by Chris Bowers on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 03:09:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

Agree. I am volunteering for 2 campaigns that are in the DCCC "emerging races" category canvassing in traditionally Repub neighborhoods and have signed up for Call for Change too.

We have to do much better than Rove/Mehlman's much vaunted GOTV and take advantage of this historical opportunity to change the political landscape.


by ab initio on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 03:52:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

Right - the point of call for change as I understand it is that you can be directed with the system to call anywhere in the country.  So if you're in an area where little is in play, then you can volunteer  for a more competitive/key race without having to travel.  So for sure, get connected with good local candidates, but folks should get into the Call for Change network as well.


"Abortions for some, miniature American flags for others."
by ahisma on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 03:12:24 PM EST

Re: Call For Change (3.00 / 1)

I just signed up....

This is great because I live in Berkeley CA, and have felt there's not much I can do other than give money (which I've done what I can) on where the voting is going to be close.

-riff


RiffRider
by RiffRider on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 03:14:58 PM EST

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

You can always head out and help out Jerry.  I know they have been organizing buses out to CA-11.  It isnt that far from the Bay.  They also have Bay Area phone banks for him going.


by juls on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 03:27:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

Jerry needs help?  I thought he had it sowed by a huge margin?  Last I heard (and this was a while ago so outdated and maybe misremembering) he was at 75%.  I'd think Angelides or Garamendi or Chiang could likely use the help more - or am I mistaken and now it's gotten close?


"Abortions for some, miniature American flags for others."
by ahisma on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 04:29:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

lol.  Wrong Jerry.  Brown is gonna win in a landslide.  I was thinking of the McNerney Jerry.  He does need some help.


by juls on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 12:51:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For Change (3.00 / 1)

I signed up too in Texas and it's a GREAT system!  I sent emails to frieds asking them to sign up (even in CA where races are not competitive).  I have a question, however.  Is there any chance that Republicans are signing up for this and calling our likely progressive voters?  The website automatically gave me numbers to call it didn't seem to do anything to qualify me as a caller.  Has anybody heard of any mis-use of the system?


by smeyers on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 03:18:33 PM EST

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

Bush meets in the White house with right wing Radio Talk Show hosts:
Support our troops, send them to Iraq to die.

They got radio, we got phones.
Not quite fair.
Unless you believe, as I do, that even Sheep have their limits in what they will take from Talk Radio and the rest of the Republican message machine.


by CLK on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 03:25:02 PM EST

Not sure how hard they're working. (none / 0)

I'm trying to figure out how much to worry about the "one million contacts" figure. Spread across all districts, that's about 3% of a GOP working majority. More carefully spread around the 40 competitive districts, it's closer 30%. But of course, some of those contacts are going into Senate races in states with few competitive House races: Tennessee, Virginia, Rhode Island, Montana. So it's probably something in between; say, 10-15% of GOP voters. Sizeable, but nothing to freak out about.

But one contact isn't anough; you really need 3 or 4 to get things to stick. I don't think this is enough to swing the election. Recall that in the '04 election, Republicans had more than one million volunteers sweeping the nation. To be reduced to only a million contacts is a sizeable dropoff.


by niq on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 03:49:51 PM EST

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

I signed up.

I also signed up for the GOP 72 hour program in NJ -- they emailed me yesterday. I guess they still have my email from when I signed up for updates on the presidential election in '94. I'm curious to see what they send me or when they contact me. :)


by zobai on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 04:14:39 PM EST

Pls keep up posted (none / 0)

Good to get some g2 on the competition.


by ab initio on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 06:29:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For Change (3.00 / 1)

If the Dems are depending on MoveOn's new computerized contact system, they don't have much to hope for.  Why isn't the Democratic Party matching the Republican party program?  Certainly there are at least as many people active in Democratic politics as Repub.


by tyva on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 04:24:07 PM EST

Chris is right (none / 0)

If you think about it - if the move for change and America can't take back both houses of government, then the senate will just kill everything the house sends its way.

A realistic view shows the senate fairly safe right now, and that means that the staid community of senators need wakeup call that if they should choose to ignore Americans, they will face tough re-election in 08 - not enough senators are going on the board to make a takeover easy - but the senate votes more even-headedly than congress so if congress can fall back to the governing body it once was, it may very well be possible to get legislation passed that actually represents people like you and me and not just some corporate or special interest or lobbyist - '

The lobbyists outnumber representatives in washington , 2 to 1. They are writing legislation, moving it forward. taking over.

I will get active in moveon.org and also in my local races. unfortunately, the realistic view here in georgia is that there are no seats that will go into play but at least we have a gubernatorial that stands half a chance.

my main concern with our republican governor here was that he has strafed the schools for funds.
our local school had to close down its council because of lack of funds. which means, they will try to shoehorn in the "intelligent design" noise they've been working on to teach creationism.

A democrat we like, Doug Stoner, here in Georgia - proposed a really nice piece of legislation that really looks good for the democrat that he is - it is an academic study of the bible. This same fellow proposed smoking bans in restaurants, and won. The bible is the foundation of nearly all great works of literature. I think it is the blindside that works best in redstates.

But it was our council that stopped them down here, there was no democratic party that rose up against them. And now our GOP governor has de-funded our council.

So Mark Taylor for Governor down here would make sense I guess - unfortunately for the democrats, they have been run out of the senate, the house, the state house and senate, the governor's mansion and everywhere else down here. This state is as republican as Texas.


.. and when I win the lottery, gonna donate half my money to the city so they have to name a school or a park after me - camper van beethoven
by heyAnita on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 04:30:27 PM EST

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

I have been volunteering for 2 weeks (about 20 hrs/week) at my local Call for Change office in Albuquerque, NM, recruiting MoveOn members to recruit Phone Volunteers (MoveOn members who will make calls from their house, just like when you sign up online). On the average, each of the 20 PV recruiters I have signed up has in turn signed up about 10 PVs (I've also signed up 20 PVs while calling for office volunteers; these are people who couldn't come to the office to work, but wanted to help). Each PV is making an average of 1500 calls total, including Election Day. So that's about 220 PVs, resulting just from my work at the office. The other office volunteers and the amazing MoveOn staffer have been recruiting in three 3-hour shifts 7 days/week, and we have 4-10 PV recruiters working each shift. All together we're signing up 20 to 40 PVs/day. That means an added 20-40 thousand GOTV calls every day, just from our little Albuquerque office. Added every day. Do the math.

It's an organic, from the roots system, and the MoveOn database is very good quality (much better than I have seen on phone campaigns in past years) and micro-targeted for maximum effect, so don't underestimate the power of this campaign. The responses I have heard from prospective PV recruiters has been unbelievably positive. People are very eager to work to pry loose the GOP's death-grip on our government. Unlike general election years, there aren't very many groups doing GOTV calls, so it's extra important.

I don't know how many seats we will win, but we will win as many as we possibly can.


by klevenstein on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 05:03:40 PM EST

Damn, they're good! (none / 0)

I am more and more impressed with the MoveOn organization.

I've been a Move On member for a while, so I get their emails. They have exactly the right mix of enthusiasm, concern and possibility that makes for a great sales pitch, ending with the sincere: "You can make a difference: Click here to contribute $100". Obviously, I don't click on every one, but every once in a while the pitch gets me, and MoveOn has another $100 for an ad or a campaign.

I'm not calling for them, as I still owe my precinct more walking.

Speaking of walking, the response has been amazing. I'm working off a list of D's & U's, so I never hit any cranky Republicans. Almost every Dem I talk to is happy to chat for a few minutes; they're worked up and committed. A large number of the U's are really Dems in disguise. I think turnout will be way up for a non-presidential year.

I'm guessing the MoveOn phone lists are targetted to Dem-Symps also, so it isn't like you are cold calling to sell a personal hygiene product.

Speaking of technology, the Colorado Dems have a great new voter interface. As a precinct chair, I have permissions to view and update within my precinct. The cobwebs are being swept out of some corners of the party.


There's more of us than there is of them.
by MetaData on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 05:30:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Verbatim: (none / 0)

Here is what I'm talking about. Darn good sales pitch. Make your own judgement:

This is it. Our last chance to make a difference on TV. The feisty Iraq vets at VoteVets.org have put together a blockbuster TV ad about Iraq, and we need to help them rush it on the air.

That's why we're aiming to raise $500,000 in the next 48 hours for VoteVets.org. Can you chip in $100? Click here...

I spoke last night to Jon Soltz, the young vet who runs VoteVets. He told me that TV stations are running out of ad time. The Republican campaigns are trying to gobble all of it up to keep their opponents and VoteVets off the air.

I can promise this TV ad is powerful. That's why VoteVets.org is keeping the script a secret until it launches to make a bigger splash. But to get the ad finished, they need to know how many races they can go into, and to figure that out, they need to know how much support it has.

Here's what I can tell you: The ad features one of the Americans hardest hit by Bush's mess in Iraq--a paralyzed veteran who has been speaking out. And VoteVets.org is targeting new emerging races where Iraq is a burning issue for voters and a last minute push on TV is the difference between winning and losing.

This is the last chance to get on TV to win these emerging races--can you contribute $100? Click here...

The ad campaign will serve double-duty too: putting Bush's failures in Iraq in front of voters and making sure that a new Congress focuses on cleaning up the mess.

The veteran featured in the ad has a moving and emotional story. Called by September 11th, he enlisted two days after the attacks. But later he was sent to Iraq, not Afghanistan, where he was shot on the fourth day of the invasion while riding in a Humvee without armor. Today he is paralyzed from the waist down and uses a wheelchair.

His story should be told.

Earlier this year our break-out TV ad campaign put marginally competitive races firmly in the toss-up column. Now, new districts are up for grabs and this ad will make the difference.

VoteVets.org is reaching out for support from a lot of places. Please chip in before the deadline.

Thanks for all you do.

-Eli Pariser
  Executive Director, MoveOn.org Political Action
  Wednesday, October 18th, 2006

Support our member-driven organization: MoveOn.org Political Action is entirely funded by our 3.2 million members. We have no corporate contributors, no foundation grants, no money from unions. Our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. If you'd like to support our work, you can give now at...


There's more of us than there is of them.
by MetaData on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 05:35:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

I did a lot of calling in 2004.

One thing was that so many different organizations were working off the same lists that people were getting called twice, three times, even five times in the week before election day -- and they were sick of it.

It was stressful for me to have people (perhaps 10%) go off on me for "calling all the time."

Any chance this won't be a repeat?


by sdedeo on Wed Oct 18, 2006 at 06:56:29 PM EST

Re: Call For Change (none / 0)

There's a program very similar to this running in Bucks and Delaware Counties in PA.

I wrote about it here.

We need 400 hundred peope to contact 100 likely progressive female voters between now and as soon as possible.  This is part of the Women's Voices project that Matt wrote about a week or so ago.  

We using a predicitive dialing company that Ned Lamont used (Pop Vox) so they've been battle-tested.  They're also very nice to work with - I'd recommend them to anyone.

Please give us two hours to remind 100 female progressive voters in suburban Philly that their vote matters.  


by eRobin on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 03:45:56 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.