Fascism 101

It's been a rough week for those of us who still think America should set the example for human rights and rule of law.  One is tempted to phrase that role in past tense, as in these are things we used to represent.  As Congress sleep walks through an agenda orchestrated by the most dangerous, incompetent, and deceptive administration in our history, the American people seem, for the most part, uninterested.

Many conservative writers like to begin their thoughtful debate about human rights and legal procedure by calling people like me cowards.  A recent editorial in my local daily described those who do not want people tortured in our name as members of the "cringe party".  That kind of cheap shot serves as its own critique.  I'm one of those quivering cowards who is hiding from al Qaeda and hoping they don't get mad at me.  This is just so readers understand the quality of conservative debate.

That same writer was also the first at his paper to use the term "Islamofascist" which, curiously, the rest of the editorial board rejected in a later editorial.  Then, after the "fascist" spin fell flat because it was a transparently obvious attempt to associate the pointless war in Iraq with a more meaningful struggle of the last century, its recent use faded.  Well, it turns out that "fascist" does have a definition and it actually is applicable to our times.  Here's a pop quiz.

Robert Paxton, a historian who wrote The Anatomy of Fascism, said fascism is comprised of five parts: "1. a sense of overwhelming crisis beyond reach of traditional solutions; 2. belief one's group is the victim, justifying any action without legal or moral limits; 3. need for authority by a natural leader above the law, relying on the superiority of his instincts; 4. right of the chosen people to dominate others without legal or moral restraint; 5. fear of foreign 'contamination'."

How many Republican talking points can readers find in that passage?  If less than 5, readers should do more review before the exam.

World War II started when a fascist government invaded a nonthreatening country just because its leader wanted to and for contrived reasons.  That same government assumed the power to decide guilt or innocence all by itself without any messy legal procedures to follow, and then went on to use whatever means it deemed it necessary to deal with the threat posed by those it found guilty.  Yes, they were the 6 million Jews, and we are all safe from them now.

So after a rough week, what do you do?  In my book, giving up is for sissies.  If you're a writer, all you can do is keep writing.  I couldn't say how many steps it is from where we are now to Nazi Germany.  You never know until you get there.  I CAN say that this week's "Detainee Bill" was one of those steps.  When you stop hearing from guys like me, you'll know you're there.

As for Maine, our moderate Republican senators voted for it.  Readers who believe in human rights and the protections of legal process need to ask themselves a question.  What's the difference between a moderate Republican and a Republican?  Answer - the moderates talk nice in public.

Another a moderate Republican, Senator Specter, tried to prevent the bill from nullifying the concept of habeas corpus.  He failed in that quest and then, staunch moderate that he is, he voted for the bill anyway and said, "we'll just let the courts figure it out."  And these people call themselves lawmakers.

Eleven Democratic senators also voted for the bill (plus Liebermann, of course).  Concerning them, the question is: What's the difference between a Democrat who helps the Republicans pass unconstitutional laws in order to avoid looking "soft on terror" and a Democrat?  Answer - A minimal amount of regard for the Constitution.

I frankly don't know if our elected representatives have to take any oath similar to the one I took at commissioning to "protect and defend the Constitution of the United States".  Regardless, I am sad to say that I don't think it would make any difference.



Display:


Hope you don't mind tim779 (none / 0)

But a good friend, Jen from donkeyod@gmail.com sent me this...thought it would make a good point with your post:

"What no one seemed to notice was the ever widening gap between the government and the people. And it became always wider.....the whole process of its coming into being, was above all diverting, it provided an excuse not to think....for people who did not want to think anyway gave us some dreadful, fundamental things to think about.....and kept us so busy with continuous changes and 'crises' and so fascinated.....by the machinations of the 'national enemies,' without and within, that we had no time to think about these dreadful things that were growing, little by little, all around us.....

"Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, 'regretted,' that unless one understood what the whole thing was in principle, what all these 'little measures'.....must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing.....Each act is worse than the last, but only a little worse. You wait for the next and the next.

"You wait for one great shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join you in resisting somehow. You don't want to act, or even talk, alone.....you don't want to 'go out of your way to make trouble.' But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes.

"That's the difficulty. The forms are all there, all untouched, all reassuring, the houses, the shops, the jobs, the mealtimes, the visits, the concerts, the cinema, the holidays. But the spirit, which you never noticed because you made the lifelong mistake of identifying it with the forms, is changed. Now you live in a world of hate and fear, and the people who hate and fear do not even know it themselves, when everyone is transformed, no one is transformed.

"You have accepted things you would not have accepted five years ago, a year ago, things your father.....could never have imagined."

Milton Mayer, They Thought They Were Free, The Germans, 1938-45 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955)


No matter that patriotism is too often the refuge of scoundrels. Dissent, rebellion, and all-around hell-raising remain the true duty of patriots.
by momoaizo on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 07:12:08 PM EST

Re: Fascism 101 (none / 0)

Of course I don't mind.  It's exactly the concept I was trying to make, only better since it was written long before there was any chance of it being a partisan invention.  That's what happened to Germany, and it can happen here.  We only have to let it.  I remember in 2000, I was bummed about Bush winning, but took it in stride. My father, however, a (now) 90 YO liberal, told me, quite seriously, "This W scares me.  I think he's dangerous."  Daddy, you were right.  Frightening.


Tim Copeland
by tim779 on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 08:52:11 PM EST

Re: Fascism 101 (none / 0)

tim779 is right, the fascist tendencies in the GOP are startling, and are readily apparent for anyone who cares to look.  How about these fascist messages hammered home by the Republican Party every day:

1) We are in a war on terror that will determine the fate of civilization, there has never been anything like it before, so the sacred safeguards and protections in place for over 200 years are no longer relevant.

2) We are the victim of terrorism, which means torture, suspension of Constitutional rights, concentration camps, and lying are all acceptable and necessary.

3) The president is the commander-in-chief, has  classified intelligence no one else can see,  and must be allowed to do whatever is necessary to protect us, regardless of the law.

4) Americans are a superior people chosen by God to spread the virtues of democracy and capitalism to the rest of the world, whether it wants them or not.

5)  Mexicans and other foreigners are invading our country, taking jobs away from Americans, undermining our language, and contaminating our communities.

6)  Those who advocate diplomacy, or peace, or who  otherwise do not parrot the Party line are "cut and run" appeasers promoting the enemy's propaganda.

Why have so many of the media, business leaders, the clergy, and many others been so compliant in accepting this fascist program, without any critical analysis of the meaning of these messages or any efforts to rebut them?  I hope we wake up before it is too late.


by Fascist fighter on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 10:27:12 PM EST

Re: Fascism 101 (none / 0)

the fascist tendencies in the GOP are startling, and are readily apparent for anyone who cares to look.

The fascist tendencies within the Democratic Party are what Democrats must condemn first and louder. Only when we've cleaned the fascist trash who helped pass the torture law from our own party, then we can beat the fascists in the GOP.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 11:25:48 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.