Yesterday was an extremely hectic and exhausting day, for obvious reasons. But I'm very pleased to see all the positive comments, thoughtful questions and strong interest in the project, data and results. Thanks, there's much more to come, so stay tuned.
A very quick point. I'm fairly new to writing in html and posting extensively, although I've been doing research for decades. I will do the best I can in posting, particularly in doing crosstab tables, but just know I'm not a pro at this yet. I'm learning and still working on my posting style, which is more conversational, like we're talking face to face. We'll see how it goes. Thanks for your patience.
I've gotten the crosstabs for all questions run out, so I'll be following Chris' release of new data and questions with my detailed analyses of those questions. Sort of a big picture and then detail thing. And the crosstabs I show may vary a bit depending on which ones are showing important findings on any given question. I'll always keep region and party shown, but others might vary. So the detail starts now...
and begins with the right direction/wrong track question. We'll start with a full set of crosstabs on it, so you can see what slices we have. Remember, the margin of error of the data is +/- 3.1 percentage points at a 95% level of confidence. That means any numbers varying from the US numbers by 3 points or more are statistically significant. Here are the slices...
Right Wrong Not
Direction Track Sure
United States 38% 48% 14%
Region:
Northeast 36 51 13
South 42 44 14
Midwest 37 48 15
Rockies 35 45 20
West Coast, AK, HI 33 52 15
Party:
Democrat 18 70 12
Republican 62 23 15
Indep/Other/No party 35 49 16
Gender:
Male 43 44 13
Female 33 51 16
Ethnicity:
Anglo 40 46 14
Minority 25 58 17
Household income:
Under $25K 28 52 20
$25K to $49.9K 36 51 13
$50K to $74.9K 44 42 14
$75K and over 46 44 10
Residence:
Urban 32 57 11
Suburban 42 43 15
Rural 39 46 15
Religious orientation:
Fund./Evangelical 56 28 16
Mainstream 45 40 15
Liberal 21 64 15
Jan. '06 Osama bin Laden tape:
Before release 35 48 17
After release 38 48 14
The first thing to note is significant variability among voter groups on this issue. No surprise. Belief the country is headed in the right direction peaks among those in the South, Republicans, men, some middle income and affluent voters, suburban voters and fundamentalist/evangelical and mainstream religious voters. Sound familiar?
Belief the country is off on the wrong track peaks among those in the Northeast, West Coast, Democrats, women, minority voters, those with less income, urban voters and liberal religious voters. Familiar also?
So out of the gate, we find the data already pointing us to a potential underlying finding that could be very important: the stark division of voter profiles on key public policy and political issues, this time on even a basic and non-political question. (Thinking in terms of a `conversation' with voters, I view the right direction/wrong track question as of a "How's it going?" sort.)
Additionally, I note the right direction response did fall below the sample norm prior to the OBL tape release, meaning voters were less likely to give this response before the tape. This brings up the issue: exactly what effect DID the OBL tape have on American voters? Well, folks, we were in the field before and after tape release and we're going to tell you over the next few days what we know.
Next, we have the data on the initial measurement of Bush approval. Here they are...
Dis- Not
Approve approve Sure
United States 44% 50% 6%
Region:
Northeast 36 53 11
South 51 43 6
Midwest 44 50 6
Rockies 42 51 3
West Coast, AK, HI 37 57 7
Party:
Democrat 18 76 6
Republican 77 19 4
Indep/Other/No party 38 53 9
Gender:
Male 46 48 6
Female 42 51 7
Ethnicity:
Anglo 46 47 7
Minority 29 62 9
Household income:
Under $25K 36 56 8
$25K to $49.9K 46 47 7
$50K to $74.9K 48 48 4
$75K and over 48 49 3
Residence:
Urban 38 57 5
Suburban 43 51 6
Rural 49 43 8
Religious orientation:
Fund./Evangelical 70 23 7
Mainstream 53 42 6
Liberal 23 70 7
Jan. '06 Osama bin Laden tape:
Before release 40 53 7
After release 45 48 7
OK, we see the same/similar pattern in the data as before: stark division among American voters. Those most likely to approve of Bush include voters in the South, Republicans, some middle income and affluent, rural voters, fundamentalist/evangelicals and mainstream religious voters while those in the Northeast, West Coast, Democrats and, this time, Independents, minority urban and religious liberals are most likely to disapprove.
While these findings are not new news, it's important for everyone to note the consistency in the pattern between the two questions so far, and the fact that it has been found regularly by others, provides even greater confidence these data are accurate. That's very important for upcoming questions, as we break new ground in our measurements of key issues.
And, hello, the OBL tape pops up again. This time we find voters are less likely to approve of Bush before release and more likely to disapprove. A clear impact. Not huge, but there, nonetheless. Statistically significant.
Before tape release, we found voters less likely to say the country is headed in the right direction. This time, less likely to support Bush. Hmm. A pattern? To the tune of: Osama bin Laden moves voters toward Bush? Possibly. Maybe. Maybe not. Most importantly, now we're hot on the trail of this pattern. It's gotten my analytical attention. We're going to look at all the data, each time, relative to it. You betcha.
Finally, here's the data for the jobs question. More answer categories, so I've got crunch them together a bit to fit...
Widely Available, Rarely Not Not
Available not easy Available Available Sure
United States 18% 38% 24% 9% 11%
Region:
Northeast 13 37 28 9 13
South 28 31 22 10 9
Midwest 12 42 27 9 10
Rockies 14 45 20 6 15
West Coast, AK, HI 19 39 22 9 11
Party:
Democrat 8 36 31 14 10
Republican 32 39 14 4 11
Indep/Other/No party 15 37 28 9 11
Gender:
Male 22 36 24 8 10
Female 15 39 24 11 11
Ethnicity:
Anglo 19 39 22 9 11
Minority 12 30 36 13 9
Household income:
Under $25K 11 30 29 14 16
$25K to $49.9K 16 35 28 11 9
$50K to $74.9K 22 43 21 8 6
$75K and over 23 47 18 6 6
Residence:
Urban 20 37 24 6 13
Suburban 19 39 23 7 12
Rural 16 36 27 13 8
Religious orientation:
Fund./Evangelical 29 35 20 7 9
Mainstream 22 43 17 7 11
Liberal 10 38 31 13 8
Jan. '06 Osama bin Laden tape:
Before release 19 40 23 8 10
After release 18 37 25 9 11
A couple of notes about this question. One, I worded it specifically to focus on the job situation "in your local area". Not the US, not their region, not their state. Let's get personal. How is it in your neck of the woods? That's the geographic thrust of it. Second, note the question specified "good jobs at decent wages". We're not talking about flipping hamburgers or working at Wal-Mart. We're talking about jobs and wages people can live on.
Given the above, we find about a fifth of voters say good jobs at decent wages are widely available locally and another 38% say they're available, but not easy to find. That's 56% who are saying, in essence, good jobs and wages are around in their locale if people work hard to find them.
Who's most likely to see it that way? Guess who, our friend Mr. Political Division Pattern shows up again. This time, we find voters in the South, the Rockies, Republicans,
some middle income and affluent voters and fundamentalist/evangelical and mainstream religious voters are the ones most positive about local job conditions.
About a third of US voters are much more pessimistic about local job conditions. This includes a quarter who say they're rarely available and another 9% who say they're not available at all. Who's most likely to see it this way, very differently from the previous view discussed? Big surprise, the pattern asserts itself again, showing up in this view of jobs as we find voters in the Northeast and Midwest, Democrats and Independents, minority voters, those least affluent, rural voters and religious liberals are most likely to take this view of local job conditions.
So, overall, with these first few general questions from the poll we're getting some very interesting findings from the crosstab internals. Like I said earlier, the existence of such a sharp divide among American voters is not really new knowledge. However, we're getting some indications here that division is more than a political one, hence it emerges on non-political measurements of right direction/wrong track and on local job conditions. This indicates to me a major new potential finding (at least from what I've seen and read): the division among the American electorate may be evolving into more than a political or public policy one; it may be that such disparate perceptions on everyday issues involve fundamentally different world views, one the rose-colored glasses `no worries' `we're winning' meme promoted by Bush, the Republicans and their allies as opposed to what one might call a less enthusiastic, more measured, `realistic', down-to-earth view, espoused by David Sirota and many, many others.
And the OBL tape is also hanging out there for further investigation and articulation of impacts, in addition to the data from measures yet to be released. Which are powerful in their own right.
In short, we've got a lot of meat on these bones, as they say. Even after this initial crosstab analysis, I'll be exploring, testing hypotheses and reporting the results back to you down the road, even a month or two. I set up this interview protocol to allow for some very deep and heavy duty statistical analysis. After things get back to normal a bit, I'll be full steam ahead on that part, too.
So, there you go for today. Thanks everybody, hope you found it useful and informative. Please comment freely, I'll pop in and respond as much as I possibly can. Hasta!
|
|
|
Permalink :: 11 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.