OH-Sen: Is It Hackett?

According to The Hill, Paul Hackett is the last man standing to face Mike DeWine next year. Buried in the article about the hype surrounding Hackett is a throwaway line saying that both Sherrod Brown and Tim Ryan "declined to challenge DeWine." Now, I'd been well aware of the fact that Ryan was leaning against running, but I did not know he had flat out declined to run. But reading The Hill story, it certainly seems that Hackett is the last best hope for taking the seat.

Democratic leaders in Washington are aggressively courting Iraq war veteran Paul Hackett to challenge Sen. Mike DeWine (R-Ohio) next year.

Democratic National Committee leaders were expected to meet with Hackett yesterday in Washington. So, too, was Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.), chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), has called Hackett more than once in the past few weeks to sound him out about a run in 2006.

Members of Ohio's congressional delegation also have urged Hackett to run or, at least, spoken with him about the race. JoAnna Kuebler, communications director for Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), who had been touted as a possible Senate contender himself, said Brown and Hackett had discussed the "incompetence and corruption" that, she said, stems from one-party rule -- in Columbus, Ohio, where Republicans control the state government, and in Washington.

Between his stellar performance in OH-02, the GOP's steady decline in Ohio, and his current star power, Hackett certainly looks like the best candidate. Yet he still has not committed to a run. The article gets into that a bit as well.

...Hackett is probably looking to secure support, including money and campaign visits, from national Democratic leaders before committing to the race. Despite any perceived vulnerabilities, DeWine had nearly $3 million in the bank as of June 30 of this year, according to PoliticalMoneyLine.

"If I were the person, I would want a commitment for support that would be lasting and not be based upon the political conditions that may exist at any given time throughout the campaign," Strickland said. "I would want staying power on the part of the Senate committee."

DSCC spokesman Phil Singer said that the committee is "committed to winning this race, and our candidate will have the resources to do so." Singer declined to comment on any conversations between Schumer and Hackett.

Michael Culp, executive director of the Ohio Democratic Party, suggested that Hackett might run for another statewide office. Democratic sources said Hackett is open to running for state attorney general but more eager to run for Senate.

Essentially, it seems that Hackett's waiting to find out just how serious the DSCC is about backing him before taking on a race against DeWine. Who can blame him? All indications though, are that he wants to run. If he doesn't, where does that leave us? Here's hoping that he does.



Display:


Let's cover his back ourselves! (none / 0)

How 'bout we draft him, with a fundraiser to demonstrate the support for him from the grassroots.

Tie in lots of liberals blogs and raise, say, 100K over the weekend.

by verasoie on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 02:08:48 AM EST

Re: Let's cover his back ourselves! (none / 0)

Good idea, but that won't cut it.  He wants to be promised millions will be provided for his campaign, with no chance of pulling the plug.  I don't blame him.  
by Eric11 on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 12:56:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Extrapolating from OH-2 results.... (3.00 / 1)

Hackett lost in OH-2, which voted 64%-36% for Bush, by only a 3.5% margin.  Ohio as a whole voted 51%-49% for Bush, so if we extrapolate the district numbers to the entire state, we get a Hackett victory with around 61% of the vote.  Obviously such an extrapolation is grossly oversimplified (for one thing, DeWine is a much stronger candidate then Schmidt), but even so, the raw swing calculation is rather appetizing.
--Goobergunch
by Goobergunch on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 02:48:46 AM EST

Re: Extrapolating from OH-2 results.... (none / 0)

I thik if Hackett just maintained his gain there in the CD 2nd and hold what Kerry got it would be enough, and remember, he got air play in Cincy as well, so high name id in that part that's not his CD.
by Jerome Armstrong on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 09:54:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I don't think... (none / 0)

...that it can be anybody but Hackett.

With Brown and Ryan out, the only alternative to Hackett is Dennis Kucinich.

by craverguy on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 02:56:25 AM EST

Re: I don't think... (none / 0)

I LOVE Denny K!

Hmmm... I'm down for either, really.  Only thing is, Denny is SAFE in Cleveland.

by teknofyl on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 10:14:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Kucinich for Senate, and Hackett for Governor! (none / 0)

I like them both too. Kucinich deserves respect for his brave and unflinching stands and 2004 presidential run, and Hackett is charismatic future prez. material. Tough call, but I'd go with:
  • Kucinich for Senate
  • Hackett for Governor!

This kinda makes sense too: legislation is kind of a nerd's job, and who better than Kucinich to fill that role :), esp. given he's been in the house all these years. Administration is a better fit for Hackett's dynamic personality: he can set the agenda, get things done, etc.

I'd vote for an avg. governor over an average senator (for president) anytime of the day!

Neo

ps: and, Oh, BTW, are we fielding someone good to replace that THUG OF DEMOCRACY, Ken Blackwell? If there is no good Dem. has been gearing for that job, how about Renee?

CLICK to Draft Al Gore!
by NeoLiberal on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 12:10:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kucinich for Senate, and Hackett for Governor! (none / 0)

NO. Kucinich can't win statewide. He'd just be another Cleveland liberal who gets trounced.

Plus, we already have a fabulous Gov candidate: Ted Strickland. Hackett for Senate, Strickland for Gov.

by raginillinoian on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 12:25:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Secretary of State (none / 0)

Can you please provide some feedback and analysis on the SOS situation in Ohio? Is it contested every four years? Will it be contested in 2006? How did the dems do against Blackwell last time around? Are there some "natural" dem. candidates for this job next time around?

Democrats must look in every state to seriously contest these critically important positions. In many senses, as we now well understand following 2000/2004 elections, snatching a SOS position may be at least as important as gaining a senate seat. I will try to gather some info on this nationwide and post some diaries, but would appreciate feedback on the Ohio SOS scene from some locals.

CLICK to Draft Al Gore!
by NeoLiberal on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 12:49:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Secretary of State (none / 0)

I don't live in Ohio, and I don't know the details.  But I did get these statistics from the Ohio Secretary of State:

2002   Blackwell (R)  Flannery (D)
           1,827,995     1,256,428
1998   Blackwell (R)   Tavares (D)
           1,789,105     1,404,081
1994        Taft (R)     Brady (D)
           2,116,258     1,150,460

--Goobergunch
by Goobergunch on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 01:46:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Secretary of State (none / 0)

thanks a ton, gooberB :)

Let's make that our starting point for chucking out corrupt SOSes all around the country!

CLICK to Draft Al Gore!
by NeoLiberal on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 02:24:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kucinich for Senate, and Hackett for Governor! (none / 0)

Is there any chance the Mayor of Columbus will either take the LG spot on Strickland's ticket or run for one of the lower statewide offices to avoid a primary battle for Governor?
by Corey Olomon on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 12:51:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kucinich for Senate, and Hackett for Governor! (none / 0)

Kucinich has about as much chance of winning as Howard the Duck.  
by Eric11 on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 12:58:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kucinich for Senate, and Hackett for Governor! (none / 0)

Kucinich has about as much chance of winning as <u>Howard the Duck</u>.

You mean Dean?

CLICK to Draft Al Gore!
by NeoLiberal on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 01:03:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kucinich for Senate? and Hackett for Governor? (none / 0)

No. I do not think many Dems can handle Kucinich!  We need Hackett in the Senate.  Obviously, you are in northeastern Ohio.  Here in central Ohio, Kucinich would not be given a fighting chance.
by Marie Smith on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 02:39:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Vigilance (none / 0)

Whether Ryan or Hackett (I would prefer to see Paul as the candidate) - we had better be in Ohio on election day in force watching the polling places like hawks.
by griffinia on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 07:35:05 AM EST

Make him an offer he can't refuse! (none / 0)

As a resident of Ohio, I am sick of the corruption, the misuse of power and money, the arrogance, and one-party rule.  Paul Hackett would give us a chance to get out of the cesspool of corruption that the Ohio GOP has created here.  We need to make him an offer he can't refuse.  We should arrange a "sit down" (meeting) with Hackett, Howard Dean, Diane Feinstein, Hillary and Bill Clinton, former astronaut and U.S. Senator John Glenn, and former U.S. Senator Howard Metzenbaum.  What do we tell him?  We tell him that just like he responded to serve in the military, the people of Ohio need him now.  They also must let him know that the DNC and other Democratic Party committees will bankroll him.
I'll write about this at my site:
http://stubbornliberal.blogspot.com
by Marie Smith on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 08:50:08 AM EST

Re: Make him an offer he can't refuse! (3.00 / 1)

three initials:  RON

get out the vote for RON once that sucker gets past Jim Petro's assinine, undemocratic challenge.

by AntiCliche on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 10:40:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I don't like that we appear to be begging (none / 0)

it puts the Reps in a position of power.  Rather, it seems we should have Democrats coming out of the woodwork to take down the corrupt republicans.  When Hackett announces, he should have Brown and Ryan there, both saying that it was their wish that Hackett run for Senate, while they persued other interests.  Make it seem like he is not only the choice, but the only choice for Democrats interested in honesty, equality, equity, truth, and the American Way.
BlueNC - Progressive NC Politics
by Robert P on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 08:54:20 AM EST

Re: I don't like that we appear to be begging (none / 0)

We're not begging--we're just putting out the facts and asking for his help.  I think Hackett would like the opportunity to serve, he just has to be sure that he'll have the funding.  Hackett had to work very hard to raise money.  I think he'd like to know that he wouldn't have to worry so much about the fundraising.
by Marie Smith on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 09:28:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

disappointing (none / 0)

Why don't Ohio's Democratic congressmen want to take a step up, and take a chance?  Grr.
by Adam B on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 09:36:01 AM EST

Re: disappointing (none / 0)

you answered your own question. why should Joe Congressman risk his secure spot in a safe Democratic district? even if DeWine is vulnerable, it's still ten times harder to unseat an incumbent than to win an open seat. let's face it, 99% of Congress is very conservative when it comes to job security.
by johnny longtorso on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 01:30:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

hope so (none / 0)

Believe so. And if so, its great news, he's got numbers in Cincy that allow a Dem to win, and that cd 2nd stretching up along the river, meeting Strickland's going all the way north, that's area where if Dems hold the numbers that Strickland and Hackett have gotten, they will swamp the Republicans. Hopefully Strickland chooses Coleman as his Lt Gov, and we get a couple of well-known Clevelanders for a few spots to drive up voting there... my dream scenario I thought I'd share.
by Jerome Armstrong on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 09:52:22 AM EST

what about his Marine commitments? (none / 0)

His statement that he expected to return to Iraq if he lost seems to be the only real barrier to  his running.

I mean, can there be any doubt that he'd match DeWine's money in about a month and a half just from on-line donations?

by KevStar on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 10:07:36 AM EST

Re: what about his Marine commitments? (none / 0)

Of course there can be doubt.  The most that the Kos Dozen raised for any one candidate last year was less than $60,000.
by Adam B on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 12:32:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: what about his Marine commitments? (none / 0)

yes, my exuberance took the better of me.

 

by KevStar on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 02:05:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

If he's willing to pick up a gun and fight for us (none / 0)

I'm willing to fight for him. That simple.
by turnerbroadcasting on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 02:02:48 PM EST

Hackett will win (none / 0)

if he runs. I mean, running someone without any political experience for the Senate is not unprecedented. Just look at John Edwards and Jon Corzine. Hackett will be well funded and running against an opponent weakened by a primary challenge and reeling from the Republican corruption in Ohio. If he was so well liked in the most conservative district in Ohio, just imagine how much the rest of Ohio will like him...
by dole4pineapple on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 02:49:04 PM EST

Has anyone thought of the elephant in the room? (none / 0)

That being how this administration works?  Let's say Hackett decides to run.  He has a GREAT chance to beat DeWine, but RoveCo would NEVER let that happen.  So...what happens?  Lo and behold Paul Hackett is sent back to Iraq mysteriously and in the "NAME OF FREEDOM!"  Me thinks that's the way it would play out!!!
by djhwood on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 03:05:59 PM EST

Re: Has anyone thought of the elephant in the room (none / 0)

Hackett is under no obligation to return to service.
Editor
Ohio 2nd Blog
by ignatzmouse on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 03:16:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Has anyone thought of the elephant in the room (none / 0)

He could go and serve and still win an election to the Senate, couldn't he?
by Jerome Armstrong on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 03:21:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

eh my thoughts. (none / 0)

Heh i wonder if Hackett never ran in OH-02 or if he won OH-02 he would have never been mentioned funny how politics works. i like the idea of him running for the Senate and i sure as hell hope he does he could beat Dewine. Also is the GOP stupid enough to challenge Dewine in a primary?
Running the Davis, Nelson Klein team in Florida.
by Liberal on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 05:32:39 PM EST

Hackett vs. DeWine (none / 0)

This is a great, great match-up for us. DeWine is not a good campaigner, at either retail (public speaking) or wholesale (money, strategy, image) level. His strength is that he carries a lot of moderate, independent voters that Democrats need to win.

He's not going to fire up the base, esp without a strong, popular conservative at the top of the ticket.

So his strategy, obviously, will be to go as negative as possible, and then some, to make his opponent unacceptible. The Bush strategy.

Yet Hackett has no public record to distort and attack, and his military career (already vetted, so the Swift Boating will not be as effective; Rush's "puke" attack will be "old news") give him street cred on national security issues. Plus, he's a Guardsmen, and the Guard are national heroes after last week.

Most importantly, I think is that DeWine, despite a competitive race in a big state, has raised only $3m. Obviously, he's yet to get his big drink at the Delay/Abramoff trough, but even so, for an OH candidate facing a competitive race, $3m is nothing money.

Even starting from zero, Hackett could be competitive; he raised a half million dollars in 2 weeks from mostly a national, small-donor base (or so Brigham reported), and unless there is donor fatigue from Katrina relief, he should be able to generate a million or two dollars from online donatoins within a few weeks of announcing.

by desmoulins on Thu Sep 08, 2005 at 11:01:10 PM EST

Go Hackett! (none / 0)

Go Hackett!  He would serve Ohio well!  Let's hope he jumps into the race.  I think he could knock the socks off DeWine.
by roller on Wed Sep 14, 2005 at 03:22:18 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.