Katrina's economic effects: Worse than 9/11

[editor's note, by Ben P] Thank You, Mimi

Necessarily, we have all been focused on the almost unimaginable tragedy that unfolded in New Orleans and our Gulf Region.  Soon, however, each and every one of us will begin to feel the indirect effects of Katrina.  Initially, they will be largely economic.  Although the media has so far concentrated on potentially rising fuel costs, there is much, much more to the story.

When the markets closed on Friday, September 2, the Dow was up 50 points for the week, and oil futures, which had peaked at over $70 dollars a barrel on Wednesday, closed thee points lower.  It seemed that the markets' collective judgment echoed that of the White House, that Katrina would be at most a minor setback in a robust economy.

There were some ominous signs, however.  Coffee futures were up 10 percent and the price of sugar rose, while farmers' prices for corn and soybeans fell, according to the Financial Times.  Most discussions of Katrina's economic effects highlighted oil issues. Others made comparisons to the bounceback after 9/11, concluding that we would experience only a short, sharp shock.  But commodity price fluctuations point the way to the real story.  We are all about to find out what Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson knew almost instinctively:  New Orleans may be the most important city in America--and it is now largely under water.  

As George Friedman at Stratfor observed, what Jefferson and the new nation acquired in the Louisiana Purchase was not just land, but land that came with its own built-in transportation system, the mighty Mississippi and its many tributaries from the Alleghenies to the Rockies.  New Orleans is where it is, and where it must be again, because this is where the Mississippi empties into the Gulf of Mexico, where cargoes that come down from America's heartland can be loaded onto ocean-going vessels for export to Latin America, Europe and all over the world.  And imports from Latin America, Africa and many other areas arrive at New Orleans for shipment up river.  It is an unparalleled system for moving heavy and bulky cargo, such as steel, lumber and building materials, and agricultural products like wheat, corn and soybeans.  

Although New Orleans' economy is but a small fraction of the total US economy, because of its location the Port of South Louisiana, including the Port of New Orleans is the largest port in the United States and the fourth largest in the world.  Over half the grains and soybeans exported from the US pass through those ports, and the harvest will begin to peak in about six weeks.

It is unclear at this point how much damage the Port of South Louisiana has suffered.  What is clear is that because of new Orleans' role in the economy, like the human tragedy, the economic consequences of Katrina will far exceed those of 9/11.  First, per the Washington Post, over 1,000,000 people have lost their jobs, about 600,000 of which were in New Orleans. This is almost three times the job losses estimated from the World Trade Center attacks.  But these people have lost not only their jobs but their homes and their communities, and the infrastructure that supported them.  The local tax base of large parts of three states has been virtually obliterated at a time when the area needs services on a massive scale.  

Second, as noted by Daniel Gross at Slate, the industries most affected by 9/11 were mostly part of the "new economy", chiefly in the financial services sector.  They could be relocated or restarted relatively easily.  But New Orleans sits at the intersection of the "new" and the "old" economies.  It deals in agricultural and other "old" economy commodities, and relies on a complex physical structure of barges and ships, docks and storage and transfer facilities.   But it is also, as he points out, a vital link in the "new" economy of dispersed supply lines,  "just-in-time" inventories and the infrastructure for the movement of goods over vast distances they entail.  And it requires a trained workforce to operate the Port, a workforce which is now dispersed and whose homes and communities are largely under water.

It is uncertain how long the Port will be out of commission, but the director of public policy for the National Corn Growers Association was quoted as saying that "It doesn't look like ocean freight will ship out of that area for some time."  Removing wrecked barges and debris is only part of the problem.  Restoring the workforce is the other part.  Workers need homes and communities, schools and shops.  All of that is gone.  In such difficult conditions workers can justifiably command a premium, and that adds to costs.  

It is likely that imports will be affected less than exports, because ocean traffic can go to other ports like Houston or Atlantic seaboard ports.  But even these cannot pick up all of the slack, given the volume of goods that moved through New Orleans.  And costs of imported goods will rise.  Among the products affected are tropical fruits and coffee, as well as rubber, lumber and building materials.  Locally there has also been damage to poultry, cotton and sugar, in addition to oil production and refining.  And many components of the now widely dispersed manufacturing process also come through New Orleans.  The one thing we can predict is that given the behavior of modern corporations, there will be an effort to find new suppliers and new customers if bottlenecks occur.

Exports are likely to be affected more, because there are no good alternatives to the Mississippi for moving crops like corn and soybeans.  One soybean expert said that if the Port remains inoperable for an extended period,  "Its going to hurt us. I hope our leaders are thinking about this. It has far-reaching effects."  It is entirely possible they are not even aware of this possibility, let alone planning for it.

They should.  If the cost of imports rises and our exports decline, the already huge trade deficit will widen.  This, in turn, will cause the dollar to weaken further.  Consumers already reeling from high oil prices will find imported goods harder to afford.   This has caused some observers to recalculate the chances of a recession.  Many effects will be generally inflationary, but the Fed will be reluctant to raise interest rates during the rebuilding process. And the massive cost of rebuilding the Gulf Coast and New Orleans portends difficult times down the road since our national debt is already fast approaching $8 trillion.  

On the positive side, rebuilding after natural disasters has generally had a stimulative effect, as would grants to displaced citizens for relocation and rebuilding.  But the problems facing the New Orleans area are such that rebuilding will not begin for many months, assuming we can reach some agreement on how to rebuild and how to fund rebuilding.

The prevailing politico-economic philosophy in recent years has told us that we should leave problems to the ever-rational markets to resolve.  But Katrina has exposed the fallacy in this thinking.  The dispersal of manufacturing has created supply chains and infrastructure that belong to eveyone and no one, what Barry Lynn in "The End of the Line" called "our global industrial commons."  We failed to understand the importance of New Orleans, and so we failed as a nation to protect it.  It is the tragedy of the commons all over again, this time with incalculable human suffering.  Katrina has shown us that our economy is more interdependent than it has ever been, and so more vulnerable to shocks.  

As the economic consequences of Katrina ripple through the economy, there may be political changes as well.  As we decide how to rebuild, we must remember that "the market" will not take care of us because the market really does not care; it has no goals other than those that society creates and enforces through the web of laws and regulations that contain it.  We need a society that. through democratic means, using the energy and intelligence of our people, and with respect for science and nature, provides for and protects the common good, our communities, and each and every one of us.  Creating that society is now our challenge, and it is the most fitting memorial we could construct to the victims of Hurricane Katrina.


Display:


Thanks to Chris Bowers (none / 0)

For posting the link to the Stratfor article that got me thinking about all this.  And as I said at The Next Hurrah, where I originally posted this, because of geography and the make-up of their economies, the East and West Coasts, and the Great Lakes states, will feel the economic stresses of Katrina far less than the central Midwest and the Deep South (plus Texas).  
by Mimikatz on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 11:04:01 AM EST

Re: Thanks to Chris Bowers (none / 0)

Actually, I think it was me :) who published this.
by Ben P on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 04:29:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks to Chris Bowers (none / 0)

Ok, sorry, thanks Ben P.  My brain is sort of overloaded.  It was a great article.
by Mimikatz on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 05:35:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Man, that's true. (none / 0)

I hadn't considered that, but it's gonna be a lot rougher on Red America than on those of us who have our own ports. One more reason why the Reeps are so vehement about "not pointing fingers."

It remains to be seen, however, whether there's going to be a net effect against the Reeps. Everybody needs to realize that over the next 12 months, people displaced by NOLA are going to resettle across the region, and the population influx is likely to stir up even more racial tensions, which could play into the hands of the Reeps.

God, this sucks.

Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 08:11:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's harvest time (none / 0)

There was a report on CNN about Iowa... it only came on once... but this Iowa farmer was freaking out because he normally puts his harvest on a barge and sends it down the Missippi to NOLA.... now he will have to put it on trucks at a time when gas is the highest ever...quadrupaling his costs.

We know that the GOP couldn't give a rats ass about Blacks but WTF were they thinking about... NOLA is  the 4th largest port and all of the oil refineries????

Besides telling us how to live, think, marry, pray, vote, invest, educate our children and, die, the GOP has done a fine job of getting gov't out of our lives.
by Parker on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 03:58:11 PM EST

Re: It's harvest time (3.00 / 1)

Because I cover the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles, this was one of my first thoughts.  A port the size of New Orleans (technically, the Port of Southern Louisiana [POSL]) has enormous significance for a huge inland economy.  I don't think that anyone has economic models that are configured to accurately guestimate what the impacts could be.  

Back in 2002, when there was a 10-day lockout by the shippers, people were talking about $1 billion a day, but this was simply pro-rating the amount of trade going through the ports. The goods weren't destroyed, they just delayed, so the real cost was siginificantly less. But, to my knowledge, no one ever tried to do an accurate assessment of what the costs really were.

What we're talking about here is something far more complicated--and potentially more costly than first meets the eye, rather than less. (What happens if half the remaining farms in the fram belt go under?)  We'd be extremely lucky if it's just one harvest that is severly impacted.

I hope to be interviewing someone at the POSL tomorrow, to get some idea of what they think their recovery might look like. But, basically, I would think the limiting factor would be PEOPLE.  You can't run a port without people. And you can't have people without a community for them to live in.  So I just don't see how you get the port up and running that much faster than you begin restoring at least some degree of normalcy to some of New Orleans.

by Paul Rosenberg on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 05:16:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's harvest time (none / 0)

What is catastropic is that they are beginning to harvest in the farmbelt lining the Mississippi... this could not have come at a worse time.
Besides telling us how to live, think, marry, pray, vote, invest, educate our children and, die, the GOP has done a fine job of getting gov't out of our lives.
by Parker on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 05:58:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's harvest time (none / 0)

That's why I wrote:
(What happens if half the remaining farms in the fram belt go under?)

by Paul Rosenberg on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 07:14:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's harvest time (none / 0)

So I just don't see how you get the port up and running that much faster than you begin restoring at least some degree of normalcy to some of New Orleans.

The there will be a real contrast between the big-time efforts that will be made to open the port, and to bring "some" of the city back into operation and the likely plan to leave the large low income areas of the city to rot and in effect redline it out of existence.  


It seems to me that the key political focus of Democrats needs to be keep demanding that the "refugees" be given as much attention and help with  rebuilding as the parts of the city more central to the national economy.


There is a good example of the sort of thing I am talking about in the Senate Democrats Relief Plan posted this afternoon by Atrios.

by Fred in Vermont on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 08:01:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Conservative Brooks: Progressive Resurgence? (none / 0)

Conservative David Brooks, in yesterday's NY Times, compares the 'Hobbesian' gruel of this decade's political events to the negativity of the 1970's and notes that "Reaganite conservatism was the response to the pessimism and feebleness of the 1970's. Maybe this time there will be a progressive resurgence."

First sign of conservative fear that Iraq blunder and now Katrina blunder point to a progressive political swing?

Op/ed available here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/opinion/04brooks.html?incamp=article_popular

by mcdonald928 on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 05:22:06 PM EST

Re: Conservative Brooks: Progressive Resurgence? (none / 0)

Yunno, it is crazy when Brooks seems more "librul" than Clinton  kissing the Bushes
Besides telling us how to live, think, marry, pray, vote, invest, educate our children and, die, the GOP has done a fine job of getting gov't out of our lives.
by Parker on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 05:56:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Big Picture (none / 0)

Actually, the big picture here comes from Kevin Phillips. In Wealth and Democracy he notes a pattern in the three previous world powers--Spain, Holland and Britain. Each reached the apex of its power, and then suffered a stinging defeat, after which the upper strata enjoyed another two generations or so of even more spectacular wealth, buoyed by a sharp reactionary turn in politics.

At the same time however, the great mass of society started losing ground, slowly at first, but cumulatively over time, until a breaking point came, when the social and economic decay threatened the whole nation. (For the British, this came during the Boer War, when the ill-health of the lower class meant the mass-rejection of conscripts as unfit for battle.) At that point, a progressive, egalitarian countermovement set in.

Thus, Phillips provides a picture grounded in a deep historical logic, while Brooks provides a cartoon version, based on little more than idle twitter. Or twaddle.  Take your pick.  

But the fact remains, the spectacle of Katrina's aftermath reads like a prophecy foretold in Wealth and Democracy.  In fact, it's downright eerie.

by Paul Rosenberg on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 07:22:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Haven't read the book, but (none / 0)

I noticed that niether Spain, nor Britain have recovered yet. From a vantage point in the sciences, I can tell you that we are selling our seed corn, so to speak. Rather than attract American scientists with respectable salaries, we exploit Indian and Chinese labor. In the short run you save a bundle on labor costs, because an American with half a brain ought to be making 50k after undergrad (grads in science make 20k). In the long run you cede leadership in the sciences to other continents. Military and economic might stem from science; the hordes of knowledge-averse Americans is like a house infested with termites. Sooner rather than later, it will fall.
by Paul Goodman on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 10:08:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Progressive Resurgance (none / 0)

Archpundit reminds us who already drew the map for that resurgance.

http://www.archpundit.com/archives/012883.html

by tomb82279 on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 07:35:56 PM EST

Re: Progressive Resurgance (none / 0)

my bad on the spelling.  Resurgence!
by tomb82279 on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 07:37:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The economy (3.00 / 1)

I was just thinking.  The right wingers aren't going to blame Bush.  We probably won't be able to get our message out about the federal governments incompetence or complicity (depending on how you take certain events).  So these people are all going to suffer.  But they aren't going to blame Bush or the right for that particular problem.  At least the polls up to this point don't show it (and it makes no sense to me whatsoever) In fact they might be bouyed against such a thing and rally to the right.  But in the end these people are still stuck.  Millions of people.  Still without jobs, homes, lives to speak of.  Many will suffer from this trauma.  So what is Bush going to do about it?  He can try to lower taxes but that isn't really working now except to give the economy a sugar high and screwy fundamentals (0% savings at all time low, debt both private and public at highs).  The only thing that is going to really fix this thing is violating everything he believes.  And we all know he isn't going to do that.  So whether it comes through impeachment or tremendous hardship, the right is very likely screwed.  If for some unimaginable reason they are able to spin their way out of this, they have a limited time that their popularity will be raised.  Right about the time of the next elections things are going to really hit the fan.  This all assumes they survive this.  I'm hoping that impeachment or at a minium enlightenment of the masses takes place immediately.  My hopes are way WAY out there.  Thats what would make sense to me.  But, as always, I suspect they will slip away.  Bush gets 3 years to face the worst problem this nation has ever faced since the depression.  If it didn't bring tears to your eyes it would make you smile until it hurts.
"So this is how liberty dies...to thunderous applause." Padme, Star Wars Episode III
by jrflorida on Mon Sep 05, 2005 at 09:28:07 PM EST

Katrina effects worse than 9/11 (none / 0)

http://postmanpatel.blogspot.com posted 5/9/05
04/08/04 The Economic Consequences of the War on Terror
THE BIG BANG THEORY - The Bigger the Bang, the Louder the Silence by Edward Teague
"The National Weather Service in the US expects a major Hurricane every 70-80 years. One is overdue. If a Force 4 or 5 step Saffir Simpson hurricane force scale hits the Gulf of Mexico this year, the impact on gas and gasoline supplies in the US will make 9/11 look like a tea party in terms of economic cost to the US economy. An economy already saddled with massive and rising double deficits on trade and internal budgets. Interest rates will rise, the dollar dive further and electors will freeze in their November homes, just when they are about to go out and vote. Alex, the first in the new season's Atlantic alphabetic tagging, a puny 90 miles per hour hurricane started the season rather late this week off the Carolina coast - keep watching!"

Original @ http://www.williambowles.info/env/big_bang.html

by postman on Sat Sep 10, 2005 at 07:10:22 PM EST

Thank you (none / 0)

mimikatz:

I was not sure how else to leave you a message, as there is not an e-mail button on this page, so I guess comments are the only way to do it.

In this (http://www.mydd.com/story/2005/9/19/175520/322) story, you asked how to find out more about the candidates in question, and I would love to invite you to the Bruderly for Congress website, www.bruderly.com. You can find out more about Dave there, learn more about his stands on the issues and the challenge facing us in the Florida Sixth. If you feel like donating to help our cause, you can do that as well, as we all work toward November Victory!

Thanks for your comment on the above story and thanks for your interest,

Dave Bruderly for Congress

by Bruderly For Congress on Wed Oct 19, 2005 at 12:11:16 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.