MyDD :: 74 House Races to Target (ranked)

74 House Races to Target (ranked)

by Superribbie, Sat Sep 24, 2005 at 03:58:32 PM EST

From the diaries--Chris

(Cross-posted at dailykos)
I have been putting together a series of profiles of vulnerable GOP House seats. On Thursday, I posted the seventh and final installment. That diary included New Mexico, Arizona, California, and Washington.

Prior installments:

1) New England, NJ

NY, PA

WV, OH, MI

IN, IL, WI, MN

The South

IA, KS, CO, WY, NV

These diaries gave an in depth look at 74 potential pickups, some more likely than others. I was asked at one point to provide a summary and rank them in terms of likelihood of winning. To do so, I came up with the following rubric: add the district partisan score to the average of the '02 and '04 Dem challengers' vote percentage, add 10 points for open seat, add 5 points for freshman incumbents, add 5 points for Ohio and Kentucky seats (b/c of scandal), add 10 for scandal, add one for Iraq veteran challenger, and add points at my discretion for strong challengers; and I reserved my right to tweak based on my own hunches. That empiric produced the following ranking, which seems pretty plausible to me.

(See the extended entry for the complete list.)

Iowa 01 (open seat) 119.6

Colorado 07 (open seat) 114

Indiana 09 (Mike Sodrel) 104

Washington 08 (Dave Reichert) 104

Connecticut 04 (Chris Shays) 103.8

Illinois 06 (open seat) 103.6

Connecticut 02 (Rob Simmons) 103.3

Pennsylvania 08 (Mike Fitzpatrick) 102

Pennsylvania 06 (Jim Gerlach) 101.8

Wisconsin 08 (open seat) 101.6

Kentucky 03 (Anne Northup) 100.3

Florida 09 (open seat) 100

Iowa 02 (Jim Leach) 100

California 50 (open seat) 99.6

Minnesota 06 (open seat) 99.6

New Mexico 01 (Heather Wilson) 97.3

Pennsylvania 15 (Charlie Dent) 96.5

California 48 (open seat--special election) 95

Connecticut 05 (Nancy Johnson) 95

North Carolina 11 (Charles Taylor) 94.8

Louisiana 07 (Charles Boustany) 94.3

New Hampshire 02 (Charles Bass) 93.8

Ohio 18 (Bob Ney) 93.3

Nevada 02 (open seat) 93

North Carolina 08 (Robin Hayes) 93

Nevada 03 (Jon Porter) 92.3

Colorado 04 (Marilyn Musgrave) 91.8

New York 29 (Randy Kuhl) 91.8

Indiana 02 (Chris Chocola) 91.8

Ohio 01 (Steve Chabot) 91.3

New Jersey 07 (Mike Ferguson) 90.8

Ohio 12 (Pat Tiberi) 90.8

Arizona 01 (Rick Renzi) 90.8

Michigan 09 (Joe Knollenberg) 90.5

Florida 22 (Clay Shaw) 90.3

Ohio 15 (Deborah Pryce) 90.3

New York 26 (Tom Reynolds) 90.3

Michigan 11 (Thaddeus McCotter) 90

Iowa 04 (Tom Latham) 90

Florida 13 (open seat) 90

Alabama 03 (Mike Rogers) 89.8

Indiana 08 (John Hostettler) 89.5

Minnesota 02 (John Kline) 89.5

Virginia 02 (Thelma Drake) 88.8

Pennsylvania 07 (Curt Weldon) 88.5

New Hampshire 01 (Jeb Bradley) 87.8

Pennsylvania 03 (Phil English) 87.8

Virginia 11 (Tom Davis) 87.5

Illinois 10 (Mark Kirk) 87

Illinois 11 (Jerry Weller) 87

Minnesota 01 (Gil Gutknecht) 86.8

Pennsylvania 18 (Tim Murphy) 86

Ohio 03 (Mike Turner) 86

California 11 (Richard Pombo) 86

New Jersey 03 (Jim Saxton) 86

West Virginia 02 (Shelley Capito) 85.5

New York 13 (Vito Fossella) 85.5

New Jersey 05 (Scott Garrett) 85.5

New Mexico 02 (Steve Pearce) 85.5

Texas 22 (Tom DeLay) 85.5

New York 03 (Peter King) 85.5

Pennsylvania 10 (Don Sherwood) 84.8

California 26 (David Dreier) 84.5

Arizona 08 (Jim Kolbe) 84.3

Michigan 07 (Joe Schwarz) 84.3

Arizona 05 (J.D. Hayworth) 83.5

Florida 08 (Ric Keller) 83.5

Kansas 02 (Jim Ryun) 83.5

Pennsylvania 04 (Melissa Hart) 82.3

Michigan 08 (Mike Rogers) 82

Ohio 14 (Steve LaTourette) 81

New York 24 (Sherwood Boehlert) 80.8

Ohio 04 (Mike Oxley) 78.3

Wyoming at Large (Barbara Cubin) 70.5

Tags: (all tags)

Permalink :: 34 Comments :: Post a Comment

Flipping the house is nice (none / 0)

But question is how does this work into the issue of what flavor of flip? I've seen analysis on mydd.com that there are some Democrats who consistently vote Republican on the issues. Chairmanship and setting the agenda are a great thing. We need that. But, a true vitory would include being able to set an agenda that is not just playing into the Replubican hands of saying "it's the Democrats." So, when considering this, how does those open races you point out stack up in terms of who is running, what will they be running on and what will be the real, versus no so real effect of a shift into the Democrats favor?

by bruh21 on Sat Sep 24, 2005 at 04:42:22 PM EST

A flip is a huge deal (none / 0)

The way the institution is set up, we'd get to stack the committees even if we have a 218-217 majority. The only roadblock may be, as you point out, some roll call votes. There are some Dems who will vote with the Repubs, but none over 50% of the time now that Ralph Hall has made the switch. Also, there are some GOPers who vote with us a lot. There'd be some close roll calls, but, as you'll remember, the GOP controlled the House with an iron fist with only a 223-212 edge or thereabouts from 1999-2003.

by Superribbie on Mon Sep 26, 2005 at 12:33:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A flip is a huge deal (none / 0)

I don't want to under emphasize the importance of a flip. I wanted to emphasize the importance of the flip in terms of looking at the numbers as any kind of actual agenda after the flip happens.

by bruh21 on Wed Sep 28, 2005 at 07:44:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Forgotten backstabber ? (none / 0)

So we've forgotten the betrayal in
the 5th District of Louisiana?

Back in the spring of 2004, the
incumbent Democratic Congressman
waited until the last legal day for
a candidate to enter the race to
switch parties to the Dark Side.

The clever timing of his treacherous
act meant that no strong Democratic
challenger could get in the race.

Against a couple of unknowns this
flip-flopping traitor to the Democratic
Party won re-election with 59% of
the vote and a wide margin. But
then, he ran essentially unopposed.

Back when Cong. Rodney Alexander
turned his coat from blue to red, many
on this site commented that we would
get even. We will field and finance a
strong challenger "next time" to punish
his perfidy.

Well, it's almost time for "next time"
and Louisiana's 5th District does not
even make your wish list.

Too soon we forget.

Meanwhile, you might want to check
your figures. The partisan share of
the 2004 vote is a cock-eyed number.
Because he had swindled Democrats
out of having a strong opponent,
the traitor ran ahead of George W.
Bush's share in the vote. Normally
a local Democrat would have run far
ahead of John Kerry's share. If you
adjust your calculations, a more
normal election could be much
more favorable to the Democrat
"next time".

by Woody on Sat Sep 24, 2005 at 07:19:26 PM EST

LA-05 (none / 0)

Is actually the 2d most GOP district in the state, behind Jindal's LA-01. It gave Gore 41% in 2000 and Kerry 37%. It was won easily by John Cooksey as a new district in the 1990s and easily held by him until he left it to challenge Mary Landrieu in 2002. Alexander won a squeaker in the open seat race against a really crappy opponent (Lee Fletcher) and then bolted. I realize Alexander's own totals may be inflated because of the bait and switch--and the lingering anger may be enough to put him in hot water. I'm with you in hoping it is.

by Superribbie on Mon Sep 26, 2005 at 12:34:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

AZ Picks (none / 0)

Kolbe's seat is the most likely pick-up, followed by Renzi. CD-5 will simply not be winnable until it is open. Kolbe will not lose in the general, but he will get a very strong primary challenge in Randy Graf. Graf put up a very strong showing, 42.5% in 2004, given that he raised next to nothing compared to Kolbe. Graf will defeat Kolbe on immigration and Kolbe's open homosexuality and Jeff Latas will defeat Graf in the general. CD-1 might be winnable, but Renzi is a pork machine. He actually wins on the reservations, which should be the starting point for an effort to unseat him, and it's because he can bring them pork.

by Fugee BoBfUn on Sat Sep 24, 2005 at 09:10:37 PM EST

I hoped to see both Nevada seats far down the list (none / 0)

Since they're both in the top 26 I'd have to estimate the number of truly vulnerable seats is really 15 or less.

We're not going to pick up anything in Nevada. Gibbons' district comprises northern Nevada, and Porter is entrenched in a district that started 50/50 but was intentionally drawn by the legislature to grow slightly Republican. We needed to nab that seat as soon as it was available in '02, but Dario Herrera was a flawed candidate beset by scandal. Porter is bland as hell but this state doesn't have an impressive Democratic bench right now. After Bob Miller and Richard Bryan retired we've really scrambled to find top candidates. In 2000 we had to run a local personal injury attorney against John Ensign to fill Bryan's senate seat.

In general, every liberal site projects far too much hope for pickups in Nevada. Clark County is still gripped by national security fear after it was publicized the 9/11 terrorists met here. Every simpleton I talk to worries the big hotels are the next obvious target. That fear trumps all other factors and no sign it's diminishing.

by jagakid on Sat Sep 24, 2005 at 11:49:38 PM EST

Re: I hoped to see both Nevada seats far down the (none / 0)

Interesting, especially the last paragraph.

Us folks outside of Nevada tend to thing of Las Vegas as some sort of SEIU socialist paradise. Guess that will have to wait. And who knows which party the SEIU ends up backing in any particular race.

I'm afraid the prediction of knocking off Dave Reichert is a bit premature. We're talking about the sheriff who caught the Green River killer. Neither Darcy Burner or Randy Gordon is going to be able to knock him off.

The Dems need to build a decent farm team in east King County. I realize that John Kerry did very well in Bellevue, but you need someone with the name ID of a Reichert, or at least someone close.

Aneurin Politics is a blood sport

by chrischross on Sun Sep 25, 2005 at 03:52:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

not so fast on Iowa (none / 0)

Leach is untouchable. We went after him hard in 2002 and couldn't win, despite the fact that his new post-census district contained several counties he hadn't represented before and
"the People's Republic of Johnson County," home of Iowa City and Iowa's most progressive community.

The open 1st district is a different story, but remember that people there have been in the habit of voting Republican (for Jim Nussle) for well over a decade. Won't be a cakewalk, even with a good candidate. Will help if we have a strong candidate in the governor's race (there is no US Senate race in iowa next year).

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.

by desmoinesdem on Sun Sep 25, 2005 at 01:16:41 AM EST

Oklahoma 5 (none / 0)

Ernest Istook is considering a run for governor. If he does, the 5th now contains many more of what pass for Democrats in Oklahoma. At the least, without incombency the district is competitive.

As noted above, this seat will be a DINO but do not sneer at chairmanships that majorities containing DINO's bring; chairpersons get to lead investigations as well as shape agendas. And the House writes taxes.

by Dan on Sun Sep 25, 2005 at 01:48:00 AM EST

Re: No sneer (none / 0)

Not to sneer at any DINO seat
we can get.

In addition to having the Speaker
and the Committee chairs, the
majority party gets more support
from its soft members. It has
considerable power to reward
and punish individual members.
When we get a majority again,
many DINOs will start to vote
with the majority more often
and act less like DINOs.

by Woody on Sun Sep 25, 2005 at 11:13:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Nice job! (none / 0)

Anne Northtup shouldn't rate 11. She's a monster fund-raiser and at 60% she ran well ahead of the results for the open seat (Ky 4?) where Nick Clooney gabe it a go in the Cincy suburbs (we lost that one 55-43 and it was considered a hot button district at the time). That should be on the list, if low down.

Two Jersey seats rated in the low range but 2004 was a terrible year for the Dems here. Kerry made NO effort, the Reps at least did a token job, and 9/11 was played to the max along with McGreevey's scandal/resignation. NJ was second to NY in 9/11 deaths and in both states Kerry won but by much less than Gore. 2005 looks like a much better year. I think in a good year we have a real shot. The Reep candidates mentioned for US Senate are awful, too.

by David Kowalski on Sun Sep 25, 2005 at 05:37:00 AM EST

What about TX-22? (none / 0)

Delay's approval rating is below 50, and has been as low as 42/51, in his own district, and the investigations against him are just picking up steam. There are big demographic shifts in that district as well.

I'd also be curious to know whether you think CAFTA will put more seats into play.

Great analysis! Keep it up.

by thesleepthief on Sun Sep 25, 2005 at 12:24:39 PM EST

Re: What about TX-22? (none / 0)

DeLay's on there. That's one that may jump way up depending on how things develop. CAFTA may help some, but with organized labor's clout at an all-time low and international trade being a somewhat esoteric issue for many, I doubt if it will be a silver bullet. Its real usefulness is as a cog in the overall narrative of "the corrupt, crony-supporting Washington Republicans represent only their fatcat friends."

by Superribbie on Mon Sep 26, 2005 at 12:41:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Minnesota Races (none / 0)

I wouldn't bother with MN-01. Gutknecht is generally popular and voted against CAFTA, a good idea in an agricultural district. It would take a remarkable candidate to make him even feel threatened.

I'm not sure about MN-02. Rowley seems like a good candidate on paper, but I haven't been immensely impressed so far. For starters, her motto of "always try" has to go.

MN-06 may be doable, but I'm not sure all depends on Wetterling as you say. She does have high name ID, but managed to lose in 2004. Granted, she was running against a popular Republican incumbent in a conservative district. It may be different in an open seat. But she seems committed to the Senate race, even though Klobuchar seems to be doing a better job so far.

Further, the candidate currently in there for the Democrats, Elwyn Tinklenberg, may be the right kind. He's a conservative Dem with ties to Jesse Ventura's administration. (Jesse did well in this area.) Add to this the possibility of a nasty Republican endorsement battle and/or primary, in which the candidates will all try to move as far to the right as possible -- and it's hard to move farther to the right than State Senator Michele Bachmann -- and it could be interesting. The candidates may be too far out in right-wing la-la land even for the normally Republican Sixth CD. Tinklenberg could surprise people.

by machinevtool on Mon Sep 26, 2005 at 11:10:16 AM EST

Re: Minnesota Races (none / 0)

I agree that Tinklenberg is impressive; it is just a huge leg up to have run once before--countless current Reps in both parties are people who ran unsuccessfully against an incumbent and then came back to claim an open seat. Minnesota 01 inspires strong commentary both ways; I've gotten comments saying don't bother, and I've also gotten comments complaining that it's too low. The positives are our candidate, Iraq vet Sgt. Major Tim Walz and the fact that both Gore and Kerry took 48% of the two-party vote in MN-01.

by Superribbie on Mon Sep 26, 2005 at 12:45:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Minnesota Races (none / 0)

OK, I may be a bit biased, but unless something big happens between now and election time, MN01 and MN02 ain't gonna flip. The only chance for any change in the House makeup is a Dem pickup of MN06, and that's only if Wetterling runs there. If she doesn't, I don't see much chance of the Dems winning.

And as for Tinklenberg, having "ties to Jesse Ventura's administration" is not exactly a positive thing at this point, so I don't see how that would help. I am guessing that a large percentage of Jesse voters in the 6th (just as in the rest of the state) wished they had never voted for him.

Concerning Wetterling, I am still trying to figure out why she doesn't run at the state level first instead of gunning for a national seat right away. With a few years of experience as a state Rep/Senator, she would be a much more potent national candidate. She has huge name ID and is a sympathetic figure, but she lacks experience and essentially has only a single issue on which to run. A state level position would allow her to fill out her resume beyond that one issue.

"Don't get stuck on stupid" - Lt. Gen. Honore

by RepTroll on Mon Sep 26, 2005 at 04:41:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

OH - 12 Tiberi (none / 0)

When he ran in 2000 against Maryellen Oshaughnessey (Columbus City council) and won by a small margin. Subsequent to that the Dems have run some nobody. Anyone have any idea if there is a real challenge going to be raised against him? I would do work for that person if they are out there, but I don't want to tilt at windmills with someone who is not going to really try.

My sense is that this district is "moderate" and the right kind of progressive dem could claim it if they played up fiscal responsibility, the need for balance and how Tiberi is too closely aligned with far right elements.

by comotion on Mon Sep 26, 2005 at 05:08:09 PM EST

飞机票 (none / 0)

飞机票
北京飞机票
上海飞机票
广州飞机票
成都飞机票
西安飞机票
厦门飞机票
重庆飞机票
深圳飞机票
特价机票
飞机票
飞机票查询

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 04:50:59 AM EST

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 04:52:00 AM EST

特价机票 (none / 0)

杭州五洋宾馆
杭州湾大酒店
杭州中山大酒店
杭州孔雀大厦
杭州如家客栈（体育场路店A 289;
杭州如家快捷酒店（莫干山 215;）
杭州玉皇山庄

特价机票
 北京特价机票

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 04:52:59 AM EST

特价机票
 北京特价机票

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 04:53:55 AM EST

杭州饭店 (none / 0)

杭州饭店
杭州饭店预定
杭州酒店住宿
携成网杭州旅馆价格
杭州香格里拉饭店
浙江世界贸易中心大酒店
杭州国际大厦雷迪森广场酒 215;
杭州五洲大酒店
杭州华美达广场杭州海华大% 202;店
杭州新侨饭店
杭州之江饭店
杭州华辰国际饭店
杭州海外海·西溪宾馆
杭州南线大酒店
杭州浙江梅地亚宾馆
杭州天鸿饭店
杭州黄龙饭店
杭州浙江文华大酒店
杭州香溢大酒店
杭州新世纪大酒店
杭州红星文化大厦酒店
杭州浙江大酒店
杭州皇冠大酒店
杭州中洲大酒店

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 04:54:39 AM EST

重庆机票 (none / 0)

重庆机票
重庆到北京机票
重庆到广州机票
重庆到上海机票
重庆到深圳机票
重庆到成都机票
重庆到昆明机票
重庆到海口机票
重庆到厦门机票
重庆到台北机票
重庆到香港机票
重庆到澳门机票

机票查询系统
 机票查询软件
 机票定座系统

国际机票
 北京国际机票
 国际航班
 国际特价机票

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 04:55:40 AM EST

重庆机票 (none / 0)

成都机票
成都国内机票
成都国际机票
成都打折机票
成都特价机票
成都机票查询
成都机票预定
成都机票特价
成都到北京机票
成都到广州机票
成都到上海机票
成都到深圳机票
成都到昆明机票
成都到海口机票
成都到厦门机票
成都到杭州机票
成都到香港机票

厦门机票
 厦门到北京机票
 厦门到广州机票
 厦门到上海机票
 厦门到深圳机票
 厦门到昆明机票
 厦门到台北机票
 厦门到香港机票

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 04:57:21 AM EST

北京机票 (none / 0)

北京机票
北京国际机票
北京打折机票
北京特价机票
北京机票查询
北京机票预定
北京到广州机票
北京到上海机票
北京到深圳机票
北京到成都机票
北京到昆明机票
北京到海口机票
北京到厦门机票
北京到杭州机票
北京到西安机票
北京到香港机票
北京到东京机票
北京到新加坡机票

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 04:57:59 AM EST

打折机票 (none / 0)

打折机票
北京打折机票
上海打折机票
成都打折机票
广州打折机票
深圳打折机票
西安打折机票
重庆打折机票
厦门打折机票

机票预定
 北京机票预定
 上海机票预定
 成都机票预定
 广州机票预定
 深圳机票预定
 西安机票预定
 重庆机票预定
 厦门机票预定

济南机票预定
 济南机票
 济南打折机票
 济南特价机票
 济南航班查询

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 04:58:34 AM EST

上海机票 (none / 0)

航班查询
 北京航班查询
 上海航班查询
 成都航班查询
 广州航班查询
 深圳航班查询
 西安航班查询
 重庆航班查询
 厦门航班查询

机票价格
 北京机票价格
 上海机票价格
 成都机票价格
 广州机票价格
 深圳机票价格
 西安机票价格
 重庆机票价格
 厦门机票价格

航班时刻表
 北京航班时刻表
 上海航班时刻表
 成都航班时刻表
 广州航班时刻表
 深圳航班时刻表
 西安航班时刻表
 重庆航班时刻表
 厦门航班时刻表

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 04:59:20 AM EST

广州机票 (none / 0)

广州机票查询
广州机票
广州打折机票
广州航班查询
广州航班时刻表
广州机票查询
广州机票预定
广州机票价格
广州国际机票查询
广州到北京机票
广州到广州机票
广州到上海机票
广州到深圳机票
广州到大连机票
广州到厦门机票
广州到杭州机票
广州到西安机票
广州到重庆机票
广州到青岛机票
广州到香港机票
广州到台北机票
广州到高雄机票
广州到澳门机票
广州到东京机票
广州到汉城机票
广州到新加坡机票
广州到曼谷机票

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 05:00:20 AM EST

上海机票 (none / 0)

上海机票
上海机票价格
上海打折机票
上海国际机票
上海特价机票
上海机票预定
上海航班查询
上海航班时刻表
上海机票查询
上海机票价格
上海飞机票
上海到北京机票
上海到广州机票
上海到成都机票
上海到深圳机票
上海到昆明机票
上海到西安机票
上海到厦门机票
上海到大连机票
上海到重庆机票
上海到青岛机票
上海到东京机票
上海到大阪机票
上海到汉城机票
上海到香港机票
上海到台北机票
上海到曼谷机票
上海到雅加达机票
上海到澳门机票
上海到名古屋机票
上海到巴黎机票
上海到伦敦机票

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 05:01:06 AM EST

成都机票 (none / 0)

成都机票查询
成都机票
成都打折机票
成都航班查询
成都航班时刻表
成都机票查询
成都机票预定
成都机票价格
成都国际机票查询
成都到北京机票
成都到广州机票
成都到上海机票
成都到深圳机票
成都到大连机票
成都到厦门机票
成都到杭州机票
成都到西安机票
成都到重庆机票
成都到青岛机票
成都到香港机票
成都到台北机票
成都到高雄机票
成都到澳门机票
成都到东京机票
成都到汉城机票
成都到新加坡机票
成都到曼谷机票

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 05:01:49 AM EST

上海机票 (none / 0)

西安机票
西安机票
西安国际机票
西安打折机票
西安特价机票
西安机票查询
西安机票预定
西安机票特价
西安北京机票
西安广州机票
西安上海机票
西安深圳机票
西安昆明机票
西安海口机票
西安厦门机票
西安杭州机票
西安成都机票
西安香港机票
西安台北机票
西安高雄机票
西安澳门机票

上海机票
 上海特价机票
 上海打折机票
 上海国际机票
 上海航班查询
 上海机票查询
 机票查询
 上海飞机票查询
 上海机票价格

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 05:02:43 AM EST

北京机票 (none / 0)

北京机票
北京机票
北京国际机票
北京打折机票
北京特价机票
北京机票查询
北京航班查询
北京广州机票
北京上海机票
北京深圳机票
北京成都机票
北京昆明机票
北京海口机票
北京厦门机票
北京杭州机票
北京西安机票
北京香港机票
北京东京机票
北京台北机票
北京高雄机票
北京澳门机票
北京汉城机票

成都机票
 成都机票
 成都国际机票
 成都打折机票
 成都特价机票
 成都机票查询
 成都机票预定
 成都机票特价
 成都北京机票
 成都广州机票
 成都上海机票
 成都深圳机票
 成都昆明机票
 成都海口机票
 成都厦门机票
 成都杭州机票
 成都西安机票
 成都香港机票
 成都台北机票
 成都高雄机票
 成都澳门机票

by 123 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 05:03:25 AM EST

NY 29 (Kuhl) (none / 0)

I'd have to believe Randy Kuhl is very vulnerable. He's an empty suit who, when asked questions by constituents at town meetings and the like, often replies with "I don't know", or "Send that question in writing to my office". He's a first-termer, who won by a fairly narrow margin against a weak Democratic opponent.

Running for the Democratic nomination this time around is a seemingly bona fide candidate, Eric Massa: Naval Academy graduate, former senior aide to Gen. Wesley Clark, Republican-turned-Democrat, opposes Bush's war in Iraq.

Democrat Stan Lundine represented the 29th for many years before becoming Mario Cuomo's lt. governor, and then kind of dropping off the radar screen. So this district has proven that it will elect a Democrat.

Ignitor

by Ignitor on Thu Sep 29, 2005 at 01:44:05 PM EST

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.