Delegation of Dem Challengers meets with DCCC and DC PACs

From the Diaries. This is what it takes. Uphill Democratic challengers organizing for their own benefit. Jerome

Sometimes the tension between challenger Democratic congressional candidates and the Democratic Congressional Candidate Committee (DCCC) is strained at best.  This was not noticeable 5 minutes into the meeting at 9 a.m., Thursday September 15, 2005. Staff members of PACs know only too well that a meeting with Rep. Rahm Emanuel's entire staff in a room and having his undivided attention for more than 10 minutes just does not happen.  To have that kind of meeting for 45 minutes is an unprecedented event. Maybe we are seeing the first rays of hope from the party toward a greater commitment to challengers.

Cross-posted to SoapBox/Chicago.

The combined efforts of the  Democratic Commitment Conference Political Action Committee (DCCPAC), the NovemberVictory online discussion group, and the candidate leadership brought together the delegation.  The candidate leadership included Steve Porter, David Gill, and Tim Bagwell.

Tim Bagwell established the DCCPAC in March 2005 to support Democratic congressional challenger candidates. DCCPAC began working with the NovemberVictory online discussion group in April and organizing the meetings in June.  The PAC achieves its goals through an integrated network of state chapters.  Dr. Tim Bagwell chairs the DCCPAC.  Bagwell ran against Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL) in the 2004 Election. Richard Morrison, Rep. Tom DeLay's 2004 opponent, is the DCCPAC Vice-Chair.  The current chapters are Illinois, Texas, and New York with more to follow soon.

Democratic challengers coming together in one unified group meeting with the Washington Democratic leadership is historic. The Democratic congressional candidates completed three days of Washington meetings between September 13 and 15. The attendees completed their unprecedented agenda with a meeting with the DCCC leadership on Thursday morning.  The candidate delegation consisted of 11 candidates from 8 states.  As a delegation, the group represented 35 candidates in 20 states.  It is also reported that the candidates have met with the leadership of the following political action committees (PAC):


    International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
    Communication Workers of America
    United Electricians
    21st Century Democrats

The candidates reported in attendance are below.  Most of them also ran in 2004:

At the DCCC, the candidates met with Congressman Rahm Emanuel (IL-05). He said that the DCCC is targeting Republicans with ethics problems, all open seats, & ALL GOP incumbent districts where Kerry got 47% or better.  Until a candidate shows critical mass, certain non-monetary resources are available.  There is an opening in the dialog between the DCCC and uphill Democratic challengers.  Congressman Emmanuel also spoke of the challenges facing the party and the candidates. Each candidate has a role as an `agent of change' within the Party's `campaign for change'," said Rep. Emanuel.  He also promised support for all candidates.

Rep. Emanuel took questions and comments from the delegation of mostly second-attempt candidates from the 8 states. The DCCC's key management staff also participated in the meeting. The candidates took full advantage as they asked the hard questions of the DCCC.  They addressed their concerns about incumbent Democrat support within their states, support for second-time-around candidates, and low- or no-cost support of candidates.  They also explored initiatives toward veterans including requests for veteran demographics for their individual congressional districts.

The DCCC accepted a draft of a proposed party platform from the candidates. In a breakout meeting with DCCC staff, candidates established channels for that support with the DCCC staff.

If delegation of committed Democratic candidates had not made the trip to DC, no one would know their thoughts and heard their voices.  No one would be included in an ongoing dialogue for change.  The real change will come from the grassroots that requires nurturing before the DCCC will truly listen and change.  

For now, the delegation of candidates has proven themselves as a force to be reckoned with.  Hopefully, the candidates that could not attend realize this and know that someone proudly gave them their voices.


Display:


now if only (2.00 / 1)

we could get the DCCC and DSCC to stop picking sides in the party primaries ...
by Madman in the Marketplace on Tue Sep 20, 2005 at 10:57:01 AM EST

thanks (none / 0)

for FPing it, Jerome!

Philosophe, could you please post this on other community blogs such as daily Kos, My Left Wing, Booman tribune, also? This post needs to be seen by as many  people as possible, and it may also inspire other "challengers" to come forward, and generate support for the current ones (via links).

Please ask gently but explicitly for recommendations :) And hopefully other sites will front page it too.

Thanks for posting.

Neo

CLICK to Draft Al Gore!
by NeoLiberal on Tue Sep 20, 2005 at 12:37:23 PM EST

Re: thanks (3.00 / 1)

I've been trying to post & so far it's either buried or ignored.  This is the only place that has really considered it something of notice.

Yesterday, I tried posting it as a feedback comment to a post on the DCCC Stakeholder blog.  It hasn't been approved.  Even if it is, the 09/19 posting's already cycled off the main page.

It's here:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/9/19/1159/11147

I have front page permissions for the in-state community blog:
http://www.soapblox.net/chicago/showDiary.do;jsessionid=C91A83FA9B7F7EDEAC46A8E386C810B3?diaryId=306

It's also on my local blog:
 http://philosopheforum.blogspot.com/2005/09/real-leadership-vs-monumental.html

by Philosophe Forum on Tue Sep 20, 2005 at 10:18:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: thanks (none / 0)

You may want to repost the dKos diary, after making it a bit more "attention getting". I am no expert, my any means, but some of these tips may help:

Title: something like
"DCCPAC: Meet the Challengers" sounds intriguing and draws attention :)

content:

  • place pictures of the "challenger" candidates, along side links, and perhaps a one/two line bio
  • use the "div" tag to put stuff in nice boxes, so is grabs the eye
  • good use of bullet point, and numbered lists etc (you soapblox version does this quite well)
  • as I already said, request the readers to RECOMMEND.

Look at some of Maryscott's diaries for further clues (sans the "flowery" words, which she can inject artfully, but most of us can't :)). "soapblox" may also be able to help you out.

If you are interested revising, update your soapblox version, and drop a note here (as a reply to my comment), I'll stop by and check it out tomorrow (or later if you'll take more time).

thanks and keep up the good work.
Neo

CLICK to Draft Al Gore!
by NeoLiberal on Tue Sep 20, 2005 at 11:30:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: thanks (none / 0)

I'm trying again at DailyKos.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/9/22/73719/7418

Let's see what happens.

by Philosophe Forum on Thu Sep 22, 2005 at 07:38:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: thanks (none / 0)

Hi PhiFo:

It missed the boat again. You didn't "juice it up" as I suggested, did ya? :)

Anyways, I tried a bit to promote it, and pimped it in a couple of places like here, and even more aggregiously, requested Armando to FP it :) Not sure it'll work, but no harm trying.

thanks.

CLICK to Draft Al Gore!
by NeoLiberal on Thu Sep 22, 2005 at 11:29:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: thanks (none / 0)

But, I don't have too high a hope that my suggestions will be received enthusiastically :)
CLICK to Draft Al Gore!
by NeoLiberal on Thu Sep 22, 2005 at 11:36:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: thanks (none / 0)

I thought I embellished enough.  Can't fight a hurricane.

The front page publishing here has had a positive impact from what I hear.  The PAC should be working the print media.  The rest is word of mouth.

by Philosophe Forum on Thu Sep 22, 2005 at 12:08:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: thanks (none / 0)

"I thought I embellished enough.  Can't fight a hurricane."

Oh, BTW, I wasn't saying "missed the boat" with respect to embellishment, but instead to the diary not making the recommended list or the FP ad dKos. True, getting attention when a hurricane is descending is hard.

"The front page publishing here has had a positive impact from what I hear."

I am pleased to hear it, and thanks again to Jerome!

"The PAC should be working the print media.  The rest is word of mouth."

Sounds goos. but, in addition, please come back and post updates.

thanks
Neo

CLICK to Draft Al Gore!
by NeoLiberal on Thu Sep 22, 2005 at 12:55:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: thanks (none / 0)

Count on the updates!  There's a momentum going with like-minded candidates & PAC representatives.  It needs to continue.

Through these efforts, I hope to see a net increase in Democratic congressional seats in 2006.  By 2008, there should be a complete reversal & a Democrat-controlled White House.

If this doesn't happen, the Dem Party as will know it will cease to exist.  It's just a theory, & many things can happen in the next 37 mos.

by Philosophe Forum on Thu Sep 22, 2005 at 02:40:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: thanks (none / 0)

good luck, and see you around.

CLICK to Draft Al Gore!
by NeoLiberal on Thu Sep 22, 2005 at 11:36:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Suppporting these groups (3.00 / 1)

I get lots of info and mailings from the DCCC but I am interested in contributing to these challenger groups right now.  Perhaps I will revert to the DCCC if they get more serious about challenging with some backbone.  What are the contacts for the challenger groups?  Links?
by Mimikatz on Tue Sep 20, 2005 at 12:55:18 PM EST

Re: Suppporting challengers (3.00 / 1)

For the kick-off of a 50-state
campaign, this meeting left
a lot to be desired -- like
Texans, other Southerners.
Glad one from N.C. and one
from Ocala were present.

But Mimikatz speaks for many:
Where can we contribute most
effectively?

I'd like to see an outfit doing for
challengers -- with an emphasis
on red and purple states -- what
Emily's List does for women
candidates: Look over the hopefuls,
make a hard-nosed assessment
of their chances, cut to a short list
of the best bets, and raise early
money among us to jumpstart
their campaigns.

No, I don't want to give a dime to
incumbents, least of all to those
stained by our Congressional
party's record of appeasement of
Rove & Bushco. Let them get their
money from K Street, as usual.

by Woody on Tue Sep 20, 2005 at 01:44:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Suppporting challengers (none / 0)

[Where can we contribute most effectively?]

Swing State Project has a PAC called "Leave No District Behind" which has an ActBlue contribution page.  It has raised $5401 so far, mostly from one $5000 gift, but this is with very little publicity.  The PAC's web site is undeveloped, but the description on the ActBlue page says that it will work for challengers, particularly in more difficult districts.  Swing State Project is a group that has established some significant credibility.

A while ago I proposed a "Quixote Fund" to raise money to
fund non-trivial ($10K) challenges in as many otherwise
 unchallenged districts as possible.  Until or unless someone
wants to revive that idea, Leave No District Behind looks like
the simplest way to give money toward the 435-district strategy.

Bob Brigham, if you're out there, is anything noteworthy
happening with this PAC right now?  I note you've had other
things on your mind...

by DaveMB on Tue Sep 20, 2005 at 02:52:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: $ for challengers (none / 0)

I like the Quixote Fund idea -- but it
needs a lot more funds !

Democracy for America is letting us
vote for our favorite challenger. We're
asked to donate, but can vote for free,
removing a big incentive to give.

A charity fund-raising scheme lets
people "buy" a vote.

Would election law allow a PAC to
let its members choose the first,
second, third, etc. condidates to
receive a minimum contribution,
say $10,000, with each member
getting to cast "votes" in proportion
to his or her donation ?

That way I'd figure, "My donation
could help [ name of challenger ]
get $10,000 from this organization.
I'm going to dig deep to try to win
the kitty for my guy."

The scheme allows "donation votes"
to have a real impact and sets up a
powerful reward for giving as much
as we can possibly afford -- or more !

O.K., O.K.  It's not one man, one vote.
It's more like, dollars for democracy.

by Woody on Wed Sep 21, 2005 at 10:37:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Suppporting these groups (3.00 / 1)

There's a lot of PACs on ActBlue.  The link to www.dccpac.com is in the posting.  There should be a contact link with Dr. Bagwell's e-mail address as well.
by Philosophe Forum on Tue Sep 20, 2005 at 10:41:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Suppporting these groups (none / 0)

Go to actblue.com to donate to each candidate.

Or for Dr. Gill (my candidate), you can go directly to davidgillforcongress.com and donate there (it is also through actblue)

by adamterando on Wed Sep 21, 2005 at 11:10:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

What did the DCCC say... (none / 0)

... about their relationship with DFA and DFA supported candidates?
The 10,000 Things
by Andrew C White on Tue Sep 20, 2005 at 02:16:00 PM EST

Re: What did the DCCC say... (none / 0)

The DCCPAC is an independent Political Action Committee.  It is not affiliated with either Democracy for America or the Democratic Party.  DCCPAC board member Richard Peterson is a member and supporter of DFA.  

Dr. Bagwell also says that DCCPAC fully supports the efforts of DFA to organize the grassroots and promote the progressive agenda.

by Philosophe Forum on Thu Sep 22, 2005 at 12:10:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What did the DCCC say... (none / 0)

Id wasn't sking about DCCPAC. I was asking specifically about the DCCC. I have heard third hand from one of the participants in this event that the DCCC has an adversarial view of DFA and DFA sponsored candidates. I am looking for confirmation or refutation of this third hand report.

Any help or insight you could give me would be greatly appreciated.

The 10,000 Things
by Andrew C White on Fri Sep 23, 2005 at 01:03:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Interested in a DCCPAC/November Victory Candidate? (none / 0)

Hello:

I would like to send each of you a thank you note for your comments on this article, but unfortunately, I am not able to do that here on MyDD.

My name is Dave Bruderly and I am one of the candidates mentioned in the article. I am running for Congress in 2006, against a Republican who has been in the House for 18 years. He has, essentially, done nothing to support this District or it's people, and I want to change that.

I am a Floridian who cares about our environment, our economy, our safety, our families and our rights. I want to go to Congress and defend all of them against any enemy, foreign OR domestic. I am a TRUE originalist. I believe we should respec that the Constitution was written with the idea that members of the community would put aside their jobs for a few years, serving the members of their community in Congress. I am not a career politician, you won't see me running for Senate or for Governor. I just want to help better the lives of my friends, my family and my neighbors.

I believe the best way to do this is to listen to their needs and to follow a progressive agenda that will help boost our economy, protect our nation and defend our freedoms as Americans.

Take a look at my website, it's WWW.BRUDERLY.COM. Obviously, if you like what you see, I would love to have your help. I am running for Congress in Florida, but I would love to be part of a November Victory for the entire country!

Thanks,

Dave

by Bruderly For Congress on Wed Oct 19, 2005 at 12:36:28 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.