NJ Gov: Newsflash - Forrester Still a Schmuck

Late last fall, my first impression was confirmed. NJ GOP candidate Doug Forrester is a schmuck. During the GOP primary, Forrester ran a series of ridiculous ads showing himself holding a broom, under headlines about sweeping out corruption. It was like something right out of a campaign for seventh grade class treasurer, only backed by a huge corporate budget. I predicted back then that he'd lose, apparently giving Jersey Republicans waaay too much credit.

Well, Forrester's still at it, claiming that he's a good government candidate, focused on ending corruption in Trenton. It's great rhetoric, but it's a total farce.

Bergen Record columnist Herb Jackson called Forrester on his latest hypocrisy today in a scathing fact check piece on Forrester's stance on pay-to-play.

Republican gubernatorial nominee Doug Forrester has held himself out as an ardent advocate for banning pay-to-play. He ran TV ads holding a broom promising to sweep away corruption. He stood at press conferences on the State House steps and condemned Democrats because they have not passed a strict ban.

Over the past week, however, Forrester's stance on this issue has been thrown into question, and quite possibly shown to be a fraud. That's because Forrester is a prolific campaign contributor, and the company that made him a millionaire earns most of its money from "no-bid" government contracts.

Apparently, Forrester thinks it's wrong for some government contractors to make campaign contributions, but OK for other contractors, such as himself.

Meanwhile, Forrester -- for obvious reasons -- leaves out the fact that Jon Corzine is a strong supporter of banning pay-to-play. From the On the Issues section of CorzineForGovernor.com:

Ending Pay-to-Play

All New Jerseyans have a right to expect that when decisions are made about government contracts, the only determining factors should be quality and price.

Too often, that's not the case. In government, contracts have become `rewards' to be handed out to friends and contributors.

Enough is enough. Jon Corzine will pass a law ending pay-to-play at every level of government in this state - from school districts to towns, to local authorities, to county governments.

And, to eliminate pay-to-play, root and branch, Corzine will not only apply the new law to vendors and contractors, but also to developers who have permits and approvals before local or state government.

How Forrester can claim some sort of moral high ground on this issue completely escapes me. After all, it's the Forrester-backing Bush adminstration that sought to block the state's first attempt at banning pay-to-play. And it was the state's current Democratic (Acting) Governor who stepped up to the plate, challenging the Republican adminstration in court.

This GOP crowd is as hopeless as they are hypocritical.


Display:


The Broom Man (none / 0)

No bid contracts seem like a specialty for the GOPers.  They screwed up Motor Vehicles in a miraculously bizarre way by privatizing it under a no bid to a "politically connected" California firm (Parsons).  Sort of like Halliburton but staffed by the same old civil servants at a higher cost and less efficiency.

The broom is so silly it is usually relegated to sports.  But at least one comparison exist and it is so strange that I feel compelled to spill it out.

Forester is only slightly less ridiculous than the most screwy broom man politician of all, one Janio da Silva Quadros.  Quadros was a school teacher in Sao Paulo who spent hours each day shaking hands.  He used 20 years of hand-shaking to get elected Mayor of the largest city in Brazil.  He then moved on to Governor and finally President all within about five years.  The mustachioed, bow-tied Quadros campaigned like Forester using the broom and vowing to end corruption.

Brazil was just coming off the Presidency of Juscelino Kubitchek.  The man who built Brazilia to fulfill a pledge in the Brazillian constitution and make many contractors rich.  No roads.  No problem.  No town. No problem.  No bids.  No problem.  Kubitschek later said that nobody knew how much Brazillia cost and nobody wanted to know.  It was that wide open.  One of Quadros' opponents even ran using the slogan, "Sure I Steal, But I Also Build."

By that time, Brazil was so wide open corrupt that the voters did the unthinkable and elected The Broom Man, Quadros.  But nobody in their government took him seriously.  So he threatened to resign.  Then resigned.  And left the country on a slow freighter leaving his socialist VP in charge.  Quadros was sure he would be brought back and given additional powers.  he was mistaken.  Nobody stopped the boat and a few years later his VP was overthrown by a military coup.  The crazy broomster was banned from the country.

Like Jerry Brown or Doug Wilder, Quadros returned to his roots eventually becoming Mayor of Sao Paulo again in 1985.  But there was no national reprise for the broom.  Fortunately, Jerseyans won't give Forester as much of a chance.  He's DOA.

by David Kowalski on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 02:55:11 AM EST

Dapper Dan (none / 0)

Where's the O Brother Where Art Thou? reference? Remember the anti-corruption candidate in the movie, and his little-person sidekick, each with his own broom, vowing to make a clean sweep...?

Forrester obviously never saw it. Or did see it, and completely misses the irony of what he's doing now.

by jeffj1111 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 09:21:36 AM EST

Re: Dapper Dan (none / 0)

yeah, that's the first thing i thought of. all he needs is a midget (a vertically challenged person) to say he's a "friend of the little man."

of course, we know how that worked out for Homer Stokes.

by scottmaui on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 11:35:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What's next? Foam hand? (none / 0)

We're Number One!  I bet the NJ GOP misses Schundler, the guy known for posing in front of raucous Dean rallies.
by freedc on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 10:25:16 AM EST

Follow the money (none / 0)

I hope someone is checking carefully to see where Forrester is getting campaign funds.  For just about any GOP candidate there is about 2 degrees of separation from Jack Abramoff, the Kevin Bacon of GOP corruption.
by freedc on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 10:27:51 AM EST

Re: Follow the money (none / 0)

I'd be careful about the guilt by association angle.  There's far more damaging "guilt by association" stuff on Corzine's side than on Forrester's side.  (Ever hear of Charles Kushner?)
by Mr Moderate on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 01:02:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Follow the money (none / 0)

Careful?  IF you take Abramoff's money or any dirty money, that's a bit more than association, that's bribery.  I don't give a rat's ass if Democrats do it also, they should be called on it too.  We're Democrats and we're also taxpayers, who don't like to see public servants taking bribes and abusing their positions of power.  Good riddance to Torricelli, Traficant, and Rostenkowski.  They are not the faces of the Democratic Party.

The difference is that Democratic crooks generally resign, get voted out or go to jail.  It seems that every time a Republican breaks the rules or abuses power, they get rewarded or promoted.  

by freedc on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 08:06:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Follow the money (none / 0)

Yeah, but Corzine isn't grandstanding on TV with a broom.  The point here is about hypocrisy.
by freedc on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 07:59:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Follow the money (none / 0)

What exactly do you think can possibly be investigated here? Corzine gave his girlfriend a loan, forgave it, and then paid all of the proper gift taxes. No laws broken, no conflict of interest, nothing. No one is even being evasive about what was actually done. Sure it's a little embarrassing, but not professionally so.

What's next, an investigation of Mary Matlin's loyalty to the GOP since she's "literally in bed with" a Democratic strategist?

by Scott Shields on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 08:56:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

As Bob Novak would say, (none / 0)

"That's bullshit.  I hate that."

DDDLV, You sure have a soft spot for Republicans.  But Republicans like Tom DeLay are bought and paid for and they use campaign money to buy other politicians and deliver them like Easter baskets to guys like Jack Abramoff and the industry lobbyists that line K Street.  And unlike Democrats -- and we have had our share -- the Republicans get away with it.

In Corzine's case the politician is the giver, not the receiver, so the idea that he did something wrong is ludicrous and just a desperate attempt to deflect attention from his opponent's hypocrisy.

I think I'll troll rate you now for wasting my time.

by freedc on Fri Aug 05, 2005 at 03:46:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

NJ GOP IN SHAMBLES (none / 0)

I honestly think the NJ GOP is one of the most inept political organizations in our country.  They can't even run on an anti-coruption platform cause their candidate will be exposed as a hypocritical crook.  In the last legislative elections, where Democrats took control of the legislature, Then Governer McGreevey had approval ratings in the low 40's.  As long as the current party leaders remain, NJ remains a sweet deep blue.      
by NJDEM1 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 at 08:06:28 PM EST

NJ is Safe (none / 0)

I think you can call this race safe for the Democrats Corzine is liked in Blue New Jersy and Forrester is well an idiot the one to watch is Virgina i think. Also New Jersy is one of like 3 states to vote for Kerry have a dem. Govenor have both Senate seats Dem. Majority of house seats Dem. and Maj. of state leg. Dem. the two other states are Washingtion state and Illinois.
Running the Davis, Nelson Klein team in Florida.
by Liberal on Fri Aug 05, 2005 at 02:31:28 AM EST

Frank LoBiondo, NJ-02 (none / 0)

Frank, are you reading this?  Your seat is on our list.
by freedc on Fri Aug 05, 2005 at 03:50:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Frank LoBiondo, NJ-02 (none / 0)

Wishing this Guy the Best of Luck, But Lobiondo is a fixture in South Jersey and he will be hard to beat. But anything is possible, look at Paul Hackett.
by NJDEM1 on Sat Aug 06, 2005 at 06:57:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Corzine voters are the schmucks (none / 0)

I am a lifetime democrat. The Democrat party I am used to and regard is no longer my party . The Republican party is not for me either . So , I can sit out this election . But I have a decent choice , more of the same from Corzine ,Lynch,Roberts,Lesniak,Norcross , etc. Or give Doug a chance. I am not stupid enough to believe he will really do something about Property taxes, since he really cant. Court mandates on Abbot, unfunded state mandates , skyrocketing construction, oil, utility costs. Health care, insurance , pensions taking a toll on the bottom line will weaken any plan. But, I am willing to have him there because if nothing else it will piss off the state dems who have done nothing either. Corzine , being a nice guy is not enough. If he ran as an independent and I believed he would clean house may present a challenge but nothing wrong with Doug for me.      
by njjoker on Mon Oct 10, 2005 at 03:41:04 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.