While I think that is certainly the case with the pro-choice Guiliani -- unless he does an about face for purely political purposes -- I do think that John McCain has learned his lessons from the 2000 primaries.

He still calls himself pro-life, and I have seen him recently pushing the anti-abortion message. When asked questions about the health of the mother, stem-cell research, etc., he said those were tough questions, and behaved as if he were grappling with the issues themselves -- certainly not what the Religious Right would want to hear, but enough to make them think he could be persuaded to their side.

He also seems to have come into line with the Bush administration and mended fences over the slander that took place in 2000. John McCain is a smart politician. He realizes having Karl Rove on his side is a lot better than having him against McCain.

In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if come 2008, Rove is working in some capacity in the McCain campaign.

Running a poll that includes so many candidates, without more information, doesn't provide much insight.

They ought to put the various policy positions with the candidates.

Like, how many Republicans would support a candidate who supports equal rights for gays?  Or who is pro-choice?

Just showing the percentages is...misleading. The poll should disclose the various name recognition of each. After all, why do you think Condi is 30%?

In any case, Hagel's strong showing (relatively speaking) is an interesting sign. I think he's in better shape and might take fill the maverick void created by McCain not running.