Hackett Campaign Already a Success

As you probably already know, a Republican poll currently shows Paul Hackett with the margin of error in the special election in OH-02. Rest assured, this poll is real. I have sources high up inside both the Democratic and Republican parties who have seen it. Considering that Schmidt claims an old poll showed her winning by 17%, the momentum is undeniably in favor of Paul Hackett. It is now a real possibility that he could actually win.

However, while it is a possibility that he could win, keep in mind that Schmidt remains the favorite. The poll showed Hackett within the MoE--it didn't show him ahead. Republicans will also be dumping huge sums of cash into the district this weekend, in an ad buy, direct mailing and robo-call frenzy that will easily surpass Hackett's final efforts, despite the $350K+ we have raised for him (here and here). Also, in the special election last month, even though he was the top Democratic finisher, Hackett only finished fourth overall (though he did defeat Pat DeWine-haha). In other words, Schmidt is probably still a touch ahead in the polls, has a lot more money being spent on her behalf, and in a low turnout election will have the support of many die-hard Republican voters. While the mo' is clearly in Hackett's favor and he has made up a lot of ground, Schmidt remains the favorite. The real change is that she is no longer a lock.

However, even if Hackett loses, keep in mind that this campaign was already a success. It is going to be a lot closer than anyone thought it was going to be, and it has made real inroads into a deep red corner of Ohio. In the extended entry, I explain why. We should be proud of what we have accomplished here, and keep in mind that there are some people in our own party who believe that we have been wasting our time. Most importantly, we should hold Paul Hackett, a regular guy with a lot of guts who stands for what you and I stand for, in very high regard. Quite frankly, the whole things reminds me of the Dean campaign, and of working with Ginny Schrader last year, and not just because of Blogosphere Day. They have been my own inspiration to run for office. We need more people like them.

Money
Simply put, the netroots have forced a Republicans into a spending spree. As of July 22, the National Republican Congressional Committee had nearly $16.4M cash on hand. By way of comparison, the DCCC, had just over $8.5M cash on hand, barely half it's Republican counterpart. A difference like this makes the following ad buy all the more relevant:
In a sign that the 2nd Congressional District race might be tight, the National Republican Congressional Committee has dumped more than $500,000 into a TV ad campaign attacking Democrat Paul Hackett.

The ad buy was estimated at $265,000 in the Cincinnati media market, along with another $250,000 on Huntington, W.Va., stations that cover the eastern end of the seven-county district.

That's not all of it either.
According to Schmidt's report, her cash is coming from what looks like a "Who's Who" of Washington and Cincinnati.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert of Illinois; Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas; the National Republican Congressional Committee chairman, Tom Reynolds of New York; and Rep. John Boehner of West Chester Township each gave Schmidt $10,000 through their political action committees. Rep. Steve Chabot of Westwood gave $1,000.

More than a dozen other congressional lawmakers gave Schmidt more than $33,000, but it's the money from DeLay that has drawn attention.

Since there are also mailings and robo-calls coming in from the national committee, in total, that comes out to well over $600K from national Republican Campaign Committees and PAC's, all to save the most conservative district in Ohio, and the 5th most conservative district of the 177 districts in the "North" section of MyDD's Balance of Power Page (only three Indiana districts and one central Pennsylvanian district are more Republican than OH-02).

$300K of netroots money has drained twice that amount from Republican coffers, which will have an immediate impact on the cash on hand advantage currently enjoyed by Republicans in the House. That is $600K that Republicans won't be able to spend on candidates in close elections October of 2006, meaning that Paul Hackett has already given a boost to Democrats who will be in close races fifteen months from now.

Activists
As Tim has reported, the size and excitement surrounding the local Democratic canvass for Hackett is palpable. I t also puts the Republican canvass to shame. Such an activity has gone a long way toward identifying new Democratic activists in the district. Less attention to this race would have meant a smaller canvass, and a weaker Democratic Party in the area. If there is one thing Democrats need, it is warm bodies, and this campaign is helping to accomplish that goal.

Message
Whatever else happens, Paul Hackett has turned this super-red district of Ohio a little more purple. Just look at how his campaign has helped dent the caricatures of Democrats that the Republican Noise Machine has worked years to fix in the minds of voters. First, from the Cincinnati Post's endorsement of Hackett:

Hackett, in our view, is a gust of fresh air. If we had to put a label on him, it would be Libertarian Democrat. He says what he thinks and doesn't seem to have much use for the orthodoxy, or the partisanship, of either party. He doesn't want the government telling him what kinds of guns he can own, nor does he want it interfering in family or medical decisions or taking away civil liberties in the name of fighting terror. He regards Social Security more as an insurance program than a retirement savings plan, but wants to put it on a sound footing and would raise the earnings ceiling if necessary to do so.

If elected, he notes, he would be the only member of Congress with direct military experience in Iraq - which, he says, is a fight we should end as soon as possible. He wants to finish the job and get out, and he wants the United States to stop holding hands with Pakistan and to get serious about tracking down those responsible for the 9-11 attacks.

We like Hackett's candor. We're impressed with the freshness of his ideas. We believe his experience shows him to be someone who is action-oriented.

We endorse Hackett for the 2nd District seat.

This is a paper that endorsed Portman and Bush in 2004. The Dayton Daily News strikes a similar tone, noting that even though Hackett does not break with his party's orthodoxy on most issues, he is not the "classic suburban liberal," has a "generally sound position on most issues," and is "the better choice for the 2nd district." Hopefully it won't take them long to realize that if someone does not break with his party much, but has a generally sound position on most issues, than maybe his party has a generally sound position on most issues. All that is required is to finish the syllogism. The message is seeping in.

Even if he loses, which remains the most likely outcome, the Hackett campaign has turned a corner of Ohio a little more purple, which in turn turns the state and the nation a little more blue. We have drained money from Republicans nationally, spread our message to one of the reddest parts of the country, and identified numerous activists to help keep up the fight in the future. That is a huge success. That is called building a party from the ground up. That is a fifty-state strategy. That is ending the scourge of the uncontested. Stuart Rothenberg may think I am clueless for supporting and encouraging stuff like this, and if he were the one talking to the grassroots about political strategy instead of bloggers, maybe the Paul Hackett phenomenon would never have happened. That, I think, would be a tragedy. If someone can't see the importance and the already achieved success of the Paul Hackett campaign, then they are the truly clueless.

Of course, if Hackett actually wins, then the flood-gates are open. Every Ohio Republican would be vulnerable. The long-awaited reversal of 1994 might finally be upon us.


Display:


YES (none / 0)

and a great observation.

The Democrats made a solidly Red election competative.  Instead of conceding ground, we fought hard.

Imagine if we did this in every district in 2006.  Red areas that the Republicans thought they could take for granted will now require more effort and work -- and money.  

by Bonddad on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 12:53:17 PM EST

Open seat, special election (none / 0)

It has been noted that southern Ohio is not like northern Ohio.  True.  The comparison would be Kentucky, a solidly red state at this point.  Well, the only House seat we have in kentucky was won in a special election (Ben Chandler) and Chandler was a solid 60-40 winner in 2004.  The one open seat, in suburban Cincy was the closest state House race (54-45 Pub).

Yes, red districts are a long shot but open seats and special elections are as good as it gets (ask Stephanie Herseth).

by David Kowalski on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 01:19:12 PM EST

Re: Open seat, special election (none / 0)

If only they were all special elections. We'd have 300 seats.
by Chris Bowers on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 01:28:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Now Chris... every election IS special... (3.00 / 1)

...in its own way.
by teknofyl on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 02:07:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What's up with Russo? (none / 0)

Why do you identify him as a Democrat? Is he really a Democrat? I thought he was a troll pretending to be a Democrat.
by Gary Boatwright on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 01:48:22 PM EST

snark (none / 0)

even if Hackett loses, keep in mind that this campaign was already a success.

Kinda like how KE '04 was a success. </snark>

You're sentiments are very appreciated, Chris, but the political cycle has been turning too long for me to by into that stuff.

Hopefully, Hackett wins and the price of electoral victory requires risk and investment. But if he loses it will be just that, a hard loss, not a victory in disguise.

by blueflorida on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 02:10:16 PM EST

not a waste at all (none / 0)

Look at last year's race for UT-2.

By the end of the race the NRCC had poured $864,116 on TV ads, brochures and telephoning in the district, outspending the DCCC by nearly 3 to 1.
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,595099743,00.html

The GOP candidate LOST! Part of the reason cited afterwards was that the NRCC was too out of touch with what Utahns think and really resented the outside interference. Their campaign was so grotesquely negative (yep, basically trying to portray the Dem as the abortion-loving pedophile satanic gay lover of Osama bin Laden even though he is a very conservative Mormon) In other words, the national GOP came in and totally blew it for their own candidate.

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:xOpyoQSZ3XEJ:www.sltrib.com/search/ci_2432237+matheson+utah+campa ign+ad+spending+negative&hl=en&client=firefox-a

by quoi on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 02:16:29 PM EST

Hackett is a success. (none / 0)

We need more veterans, tempered by their experiences in war, to run and represent the people. I hope that the people realize that even if Hackett doesn't win, he deserves our respect and support. If you don't show up, you will never compete. We can make the safe districts competitive because people don't like hte entrenched corruption. In red states this is what must be done as Dean has stated many time, and   the only way to do that is to support canidates that may be more conservative on social issues and overall moderates. It might be not be what you want, but are the corrupt Republicans establishment what you want running this country? If so, then please continue not supporting canidates who "can't win."

 

by Christopher Hitchens on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 02:20:06 PM EST

Re: Hackett is a success. (none / 0)

the only way to do that is to support canidates that may be more conservative on social issues and overall moderates.

Very few people have a problem with supporting ovall moderates. I think Hackett is a fantastic candidate. He has stated he would have voted against bankruptcy, and that makes him better than an awful lot of Republican lite hacks in Congress right now.

I am not aware of anyone who has supported candidates "who cannot win." As far as I know everyone in the Democratic wing of the Democratic party supports Howard Dean's goal of running someone for every seat.

I see no reason to support someone who pretends to be a Democrat, but votes for bankruptcy, ending the inheritance tax, Tom DeLay's Energy Welfare Bill and thinks Howard Dean is a "hard left" liberal.

by Gary Boatwright on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 02:47:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm helping Jim Brandt a little (none / 0)

Jim Brandt is a Marine and more conservative than I am. I understand that Orange County California is not friendly turf for liberals, but we don't have to try to find a Democratic version of B-1 Bob to prove we can be whackier than the GOPERS are.
by Gary Boatwright on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 03:23:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's like the Dean campaign (3.00 / 1)

I've said, ever since he dropped out of the presidential race, that Dean didn't lose. He did everything, and more, that he set out to do when he decided to enter the race. Indeed, he exceeded far beyond his wildest expectations (does anyone REALLY think he thought he could be a contender?)

Democrats have got to get beyond the simplistic win/loss assessment of individual votes and start thinking in terms of the expectations game. Even if you don't win the vote, if you exceed the expectations, especially by a wide margin, you influence the overall course of politics. And that is what we want. Because the more the course is shifted in the right direction the greater the chances that we will start to "win" in the electoral sense.

by Chris Andersen on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 02:34:57 PM EST

Dean was a contender (none / 0)

and would have beaten Bush like a damn drum
by teknofyl on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 03:24:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Miracles Do Happen... (none / 0)

but would I be correct in surmising that the votes in this election will be cast electronically? And that they will be tallied by that well-known champion of modern democracy known as the Diebold Corporation?  And that this will be undertaken without any meaningful public oversight, or mechanisms in place that would allow for independent verification of the results?

If these assumptions are correct, and Hackett does manage to win, then I truly would rate this as a political miracle every bit as unlikely and unexpected as myself emerging as the winner in a fistfight with Lennox Lewis.

With an anvil chained to my left ankle.

Immediately following the amputation of my right arm.

Still, as they say, miracles do happen...

by nattering nabob on Fri Jul 29, 2005 at 02:52:47 PM EST

Re: Miracles Do Happen... (none / 0)

Diebold is no involved in any of the 7 counties that make up Ohio's 2nd district. All 7 counties still use punch card ballets. The issue about how the punch card ballots will be counted. Will humans count them or machines.
by zacilor on Sat Jul 30, 2005 at 12:15:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

gdgfdsgfds (none / 0)

  各地机票预定电话
  北京机票福州机票
    010-89590599(国内)                              
  上海机票深圳机票
    021-52385605                                    
  广州机票西安机票
    020-38828892(国内)                              
  长沙机票青岛机票
    0731-4449549                                      
  成都机票昆明机票
    028-85563048(国内)                              
  杭州机票
    0571-56180877    
  武汉机票
    027-51518151(国内)      
  大连机票
    0411-88821866      
  南京机票
    025-86081380(国内)        
  厦门机票
    0592-5161000    
 
by llalx on Sun Aug 28, 2005 at 09:53:14 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.