NJ Report: Why Doug Forrester is Losing

Matt Stoller is the blogger for the Corzine for Governor campaign.  He writes at: http://www.corzineconnection.com/blog.

Before I get into the meat of this post, I'd like to ask everyone from New Jersey reading this blog to sign up to volunteer for Jon Corzine's campaign for Governor.  It's one of two gubernatorial races in 2005, and is a great chance to reject the Bush/Cheney agenda and put a talented progressive leader in charge of a large state.  You can even set up a house party and we'll send a surrogate to your house.  Ok, I'm done pitching, now I'll get into the numbers.

Right now, during an incredibly hot July in the Garden State, Doug Forrester is simply failing to gain traction with his candidacy.  Chris Bowers pointed out a few days ago that Forrester is falling further behind in the polls even as his name ID in the state goes up.  For New Jersey voters, apparently, to know Doug Forrester is to not like him.  This speaks to a couple of larger problems for the national Republican majority, which I'll get into towards the end of this post.

The reason Forrester is losing is simple: credibility.  By way of background, polls show that property taxes are the biggest concern for voters in New Jersey, and Doug Forrester is proposing a massive property tax scheme, promising a 30% cut over 3 years.  From the response, it seems as if he might as well have proposed giving everyone in New Jersey a pony and promising to pay for it with magic pixie dust.  It's not a serious plan, which is why voters aren't warming to it.  In fact, Forrester's been caught changing his web site and the numbers behind his plan, removing a web calculator that's supposed to tell voters how much they can expect to save on their property taxes with Doug's plan.  Fittingly, the calculator didn't work.  He's also been caught manipulating the media, cutting up newspaper articles and trying to pass off his edited copy as the real thing on his web site.  It would be sad if it weren't so patently dishonest.

Second, George Bush is not popular in New Jersey (only 38% of voters rate Bush's performance as excellent or good here), and Forrester through his recent fundraisers (with Karl Rove in June and Dick Cheney last Friday) has linked himself tightly to this administration.  (Forrester even takes credit for the axing of Dan Rather). Forrester's response is to try to link Corzine to recent New Jersey political scandals.  This is not working, because New Jersey voters, while angry at corruption and high property taxes, see the problem as a bipartisan one.  Jim McGreevey, the Democratic Governor who resigned last year in a corruption scandal, isn't well-liked, but his numbers are no worse than  those of Republican Christie Todd Whitman, the Governor from 1994-2001.  People are not willing to listen to partisan tirades about corruption.  They want to see honest candidates.  Forrester is trying to run Bush's campaign of tarring and feathering Corzine, and it's just not working because no one takes anyone seriously who won't acknowledge that corruption is in both parties.  Doug Forrester's shrill tone is in complete contrast to Corzine, who is a cool and competent leader.

The campaign is also finding that the Corzine Connection, which is the grassroots outreach element of the campaign designed to bring new voters and activists into the process, is working.  What happened in 2004 on the Democratic side - the public coming in to embrace leadership - isn't stopping just because of our disappointment in the Presidential race.  

There are two things to note about this race.  One, the politics of Bush aren't working anymore.  New Jerseyans want tax relief, but they are rejecting unrealistic plans in favor of genuine credibility.  They do not like how Bush is playing politics with national security; they just want the government to work on protecting the homeland.  More to the point, voters want a different type of politics with progressive and open leaders that they can trust.  Two, it's a hot summer, and neither campaign is currently on the air with paid media.  This means that the race is not over by a longshot.  So far, this race has been mostly battled in the newspapers and on the ground; but soon enough, the dynamics of the race will change.  When it does, I'll come back for an update.


Display:


NJ should consider a land-value tax shift (3.00 / 1)

tax the land value of a property heavier than the building/improvement value.
mydd straw poll vote: 1. other (gore) 2. unsure 3. dodd 4. edwards 5. obama
by colorless green ideas on Wed Jul 27, 2005 at 04:58:02 PM EST

Re: NJ should consider a land-value tax shift (none / 0)

Smart move.  Some cities in Pennsylvania and Virginia have adopted this.
by LoganFerree on Wed Jul 27, 2005 at 07:50:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Doug and W (none / 0)

This post made me think of something I saw in the Bergen Record last week. I saved it because it seemed interesting to me. In the Tuesday, July 19th edition on page A-3 the Record writes, "The Forrester campaign has said that the candidate differs with Bush on many issues."

That is a significant statement. Very blatant attempt to distance himself from the president.  Given that the Bush administration has been so bad to New Jersey on issues that matter to the state such as disbursing Homeland Security Funds on a threat based scale and cooperating in the implementation of prescription drug benefits, the desire to put space between himself and the White House is understandable and it benefits the dems.

Also, this may or may not happen, but I have a feeling if the Roberts nomination gets a lot of airplay and he tows the line that certain things, ie abortion rights, should be for the states to decide, it puts the burden on Forrester to assure voters he is not a true right winger. Of course, if the social conservatives abandone him, he is done.  

All in all it looks like the Forrester campaign finds itself in a tough position.

by dre2k5 on Wed Jul 27, 2005 at 06:27:27 PM EST

Go Corzine!!! (none / 0)

I'm looking forward to his win this year.

And, by the way, if you know any Republicans, ask them to get Brett Schundler's signs off of Rt 280. He lost. :-)

by cscs on Wed Jul 27, 2005 at 08:45:42 PM EST

I'm from New York (none / 0)

But I love Corzine.  I'll do whatever I can to point poeple in that direction.  He was one of three Democrats in the Senate saying what needed to be said.
DAGGER
by goplies on Wed Jul 27, 2005 at 10:37:51 PM EST

if you missed it (none / 0)

Some of it is archived at his site:
http://corzine.senate.gov/
DAGGER
by goplies on Wed Jul 27, 2005 at 10:38:48 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.