House members rejected an effort to incorporate a plan passed by the Senate to require utilities to use more renewable energy like wind and solar power to generate electricity. They also defeated a bid to direct the president to find ways to cut the nation's appetite for oil by one million barrels a day.
...
The energy bill has come under criticism from some lawmakers and conservation groups for doing too little to cut into the nation's dependence on foreign oil while increasing oil and gas production. The two provisions dropped Monday were seen by the environmental community as among the few bright spots in the energy bill.
These were really simple, common sense, and bipartisan proposals the hard-line, oil-loving GOP House members stripped out of the energy bill. As the fantastic cover article in the latest issue of National Geographic points out, renewables like wind and solar are not the pipe dreams they once may have been. Solar power has become so efficient that all of the United States' electricity needs could be taken care of by installing solar panels on "less than a quarter of the roof and pavement space in cities and suburbs." And wind power now accounts for 35,000 megawatts of electricity production in Europe, as compared to a mere 7,000 megawatts in North America, which holds "huge potential for wind energy."
Unfortunately, there's obviously no compromising with the GOP oil lobby. To them, any suggestion of alternative sources of renewable energy is outrageous. Might it have something to do with the nearly $5.3 million in campaign contributions the energy industry has given these Republicans in the past four years? One wonders...
|
|
|
Permalink :: 32 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.