Is the split up of the unions a harbinger for the Democratic Party?

Four major unions decided Sunday to boycott the AFL-CIO convention, setting the stage for one or more to bolt from the 50-year-old federation in a battle over how to reverse organized labor's decades-long decline, The Associated Press has learned.

The unions, representing about one-third of the AFL-CIO's 13 million members, planned to announce the decision Sunday afternoon, a day before the convention opens, according to three labor officials familiar with the failed negotiations to avoid the walkout.

None of the four dissident unions planned to formally severe ties from the AFL-CIO on Sunday, officials said, but they are now poised to do so at a later date.

The protest is led by Andy Stern, president of the federation's largest union, the 1.8 million-member Service Employees International Union. He is virtually certain to pull his union out of the AFL-CIO in coming days, with hopes of bringing his allies along, officials said.

Joining him in the boycott will be the Teamsters, United Food and Commercial Workers and UNITE HERE, a group of textile and hotel workers, according to the labor officials.

The four unions already had formed the Change to Win Coalition to pressure AFL-CIO President John Sweeney to undertake major changes to the federation.

Seems like the only way to rid ourselves of the DLC may be to cut off an arm or a leg... it can't do any more damage than what the DLC is doing now to the parrty. We are now being run by Lieberman and his six cronies.

Anyone, anyone Bueller?


Display:


As much as i love clinton (none / 0)

DLC has it's head in the sand.  Clinton won because of Perot in 92 and the DLC acts like had a winning game plan all along....ack.
by Chavez100 on Sun Jul 24, 2005 at 03:32:40 PM EST

Lieberman has hijacked the party (none / 0)

that is not how I see Democracy.
Besides telling us how to live, think, marry, pray, vote, invest, educate our children and, die, the GOP has done a fine job of getting gov't out of our lives.
by Parker on Sun Jul 24, 2005 at 05:18:53 PM EST

I sure hope so! (3.00 / 1)

It's improtant for people to vote their conscience and not vote in such a way that they regret it later. For instance, I was for Kerry 100%; I'd vote for him again in an instant. Many others wanted Dean or Nader, but voted for Kerry in order to defeat Bush. Afterwards they felt bitter and started blaming Kerry for things he really ought not be blamed for (like the stupidity of the American people).

If the abortion-on-demand, gay marriage Democrats split-off from the party, then there will be at least three parties in America that are true to themselves: a right-wing (bordering on fascist) party in the republicans, a centrist party in the democrats, and a left wing party in the Greens or what have you.

Even if the Repubs wipe the floor with the other two parties in the short term, imagine the benefits of a 50-25-25 split. For one thing, the presidential debate will include a Nader-style leftist who will present their case forcefully and proudly. Over time the party ratios will even out and there will be a good chance for a centrist or a leftist to win, especially if the repubs fuck up, which they are bound to do (and if they don't then they probably should retain power anyway).

by Paul Goodman on Sun Jul 24, 2005 at 08:09:50 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.