OH-02: First Paul Hackett Commercial

From the diaries--Chris

The Hackett for Congress campaign has released its first commercial: A Call to Service. Democrat Paul Hackett is running in Ohio's 2nd Congressional District's August 2nd special election to replace Rob Portman.

Hackett Ad Screen Shot

The Hackett for Congress campaign has stated that these ads will start running tomorrow.

A Call to Service [mp4]

You will need QuickTime to view these videos.

Hackett is a Marine who just returned from serving in Iraq. He volunteered to serve despite his objections to the war. His platform can be summed up by this statement he made in the first debate against his opponent Jean Schmidt:

I'm for limited government, I'm for fiscal responsibility, I'm for a strong national defense, and I'm for fair trade. What do these concepts stand for? That means I don't need Washington to tell me how to live my personal live, or how to pray to my God. And I don't need Washington to dictate to my wife the decisions that she makes with her doctor, any more than I need Washington to tell me which guns I can keep in my gun safe.

On Tuesday James Carville will be the featured speaker at a fundraiser for Hackett in Cincinnati.

To volunteer and learn more about Paul, check out his web site.
To get up to the minute information on the race, check out my Ohio 2nd Blog.
To help get these ads on the air, go to the campaign's Act Blue page.

UPDATE: Dem Bloggers has the ad up in more formats.


Display:


pretty good (none / 0)

A good face, that's for sure.
by Jerome Armstrong on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 06:33:28 PM EST

If all dem canidates were like him... (3.00 / 1)

The democratic party would win back the house easily.
by Christopher Hitchens on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 08:40:22 PM EST

pulled (none / 0)

campaign just asked me to pull the 60 second spot. sorry bout that.
Editor
Ohio 2nd Blog
by ignatzmouse on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 09:18:17 PM EST

This candidacy... (3.00 / 2)

This candidacy looks very, very good on paper. Let's see if the voters in the district are receptive to a Democrat like Hackett. I know I'd vote for him.
by Tim Saler on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 09:40:42 PM EST

I had to rate something up (1.00 / 1)

Becuase that "Rethuglican" comment really looks like shit at the top.
by jcjcjc on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 12:44:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I had to rate something up (none / 0)

The ratings system is screwed up. Troll rates should be put at the bottom, or stay where they are.
by Christopher Hitchens on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 12:52:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Probably needs to be neg (none / 0)

Odds are, the system wasn't designed for a 0-3 scale.

I never messed with Scoop, but it seems logical that a 1 would rate higher than a none or a 0.

It probably needs recoded.  Easiest way would simply be to change the options from 0 thru 3 to -1 thru 2.

Certainly, it doesn't help the trolling issue to push them to the top.

by jcjcjc on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 10:02:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I had to rate something up (none / 0)

Hey, I'll take the bump. ;)
by Tim Saler on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 08:26:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

polls (none / 0)

how is he polling right now.  I heard that he's running a pretty strong race.  Hopefully we will have one more House seat in a few weeks.
Max Friedman
by Max Friedman on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 09:45:08 PM EST

Re: polls (none / 0)

As far as I know no polling has been done in the race yet. Anybody know of one?
by dantheman on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 10:19:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Sounds like a well p ut together campaign (none / 0)

good luck!
by bruh21 on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 10:30:52 PM EST

Rethuglican lite (1.00 / 1)

pro murder in Iraq. Pro gun violence. A Quisling who will stab a real Democrat in the back.
At least lieberman will have company on the Fox talk fests when they need a D to complain how radical those Democrat's who are against the militarization of our country and who are for saving life by enforceing the second amendment by limiting murder tools to a "well regulated militia.."
What is it withOhio and Penn? They won't support real D's like Ginny but have a rethuglican lite pro gun anti choice candinate like this guy and casey and they are rolling over.

by Rational on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 11:06:28 PM EST

Not at all. (none / 0)

For one, he's pro-choice.  For another, he opposed the war (although he believes we must remain in Iraq until the government can support itself).  

He's a real Democrat.  If you'd bothered to read his website, you'd know that.

by Drew on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 11:21:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rethuglican lite (none / 0)

I was wondering how long it would take to get a comment like this.

Try to life the blinders a little.

I'm against guns but I respect the fact that other people disagree. Outlawing guns won't solve the problem. Name calling won't solve the problem.

The reason there are so many gun deaths in cities is because of the lack of economic opportunity. Paul Hackett talks about that. He talks about jobs. He talks about health care.

You can lable him a DLC clone but that's because your ignorant.

As for Iraq, not every being a Marine I'll never understand his persective of getting the call from the people you've served with asking for your help. I've never lived that. But I can respect that and I can be very grateful for that.

If you're looking for people to hate, try looking at the idiots who sent them there, or looking at the idiots who don't want to talk about solutions. Paul Hackett is doing that.  

Editor
Ohio 2nd Blog
by ignatzmouse on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 11:21:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rethuglican lite (none / 0)

talking about solutions, that is :-P
Editor
Ohio 2nd Blog
by ignatzmouse on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 11:22:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rethuglican lite (none / 0)

I'm sorry, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Ginny lose?

It's people like you who want to make sure the Democrats are in the minority forever.

by upstatenydem on Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 11:46:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rethuglican lite (none / 0)

that was uncalled for. The only person you will ever agree with 100 percent is yourself. That was one of the first things that my polical science professors used to say to me. The point is that you are being unrealistic. He's running in a Republican district. He's talking, I believe from what I am reading, from his heart rather than centrism such as that expoused by the DLC. What he is saying is a point of disagreement about where hte line is for gun control, but it certainly is a right in this country to bare arms. I disagree with him on this issue- but I respect his opinion just the same.
by bruh21 on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 12:13:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rethuglican lite (1.00 / 2)

The political debate would be furthered if the old "Rockefeller" republicans would return to the Republicans and try to retake control of a party that did have some respectable and notable hero's ( Bob LaFollette, Norris of Nebraska and others).

Rather they have acqueised to the siezure of thier party by the radical right and showing a absolute lack of political courage have started to run as D's.

The political debate would be furthered by two ( or more) mature parties engaged in reasonable debate over issues of legitamate political disagreement.

As it is now there is the atavistic right and rethuglican lites who agree on about half of the republican agenda and less then 20 % of a progressive agenda representing the D's.

This is why the D's lose they don't really offer an alternative.
And when they get in office they roll over in the name of pragmatism, electability and fundraising. Hence the constituency that should support them feels that why should they when the elected D's won't fight for them.

An individual who is willing to murder in an illegal war and justify it with the Nuremberg defense is not some one that the future of our country should be entrusted to.

by Rational on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 01:44:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rethuglican lite (none / 0)

yeah okay- i am really tired of talking to beligerent people. i can be as beligerent as the best of them, but basically you aren't adding anything useuful, at least i dont think, to the conversation
by bruh21 on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 02:35:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rethuglican lite (none / 0)

You are fucking dispicable. The gall you to dishonor a man who served his country, to call him a murderer, to imply he is a war criminal. It is dirty little rat fucks like you who give our Party a bad name. Leave the Democratic Party, pissants like you aren't welcome.
by upstatenydem on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 09:16:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Lack of support (1.00 / 4)

If Ginny got the support in publicity and $'s this rethuglican lite is getting she would havew won but she had to fight the D's who were upset because she wasn't spending enough lining the pockets of thier loser consultants and the Rethuglican party.

I believe that winning with Quisling's is not winning.  These are the sort of D's that sabotauged clinyons health care and stood by making sactomonious noises while the rethuglicans attempted a coup.

The history of the 2nd amendment is "for a well regulated militia.." i.e. National Guard. any other reading is purposeful and ignorant obstructionism that supports the death industry in this country.

To participate in am illegal war is to commit a crime. Just as Capone's trigger men did not have a legal defense by saying "they were just obeying orders" nor does any one who participates in murder in Iraq.

To say that true liberal and progressive values condemn the D's to permanent minority status is to have a truly negative opion of the american people.
That is like telling Tom Paine ( and NO I do not consider mayself anywhere near but to take an extreme) taht it is because of people like him that the Colonist's will never be taken seriously.

by Rational on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 12:22:31 AM EST

Re: Lack of support (3.00 / 3)

Come arrest me. I'm right here. I'm waiting for you. I am proud of my service in Iraq. I'm proud of what I did. I killed people, but I am no murderer. I've helped more Iraqis with my bare hands than you ever will in your life. My friends died and not for nothing. All vets deserve respect, but our country is screwed up. I'm tired hearing from the liberal chickens and the chicken hawks. Let's get some real leadership from those who sacrificed the most for their country.  

by Christopher Hitchens on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 12:44:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Whatever. (3.00 / 2)

First, you didn't bother to read his statement on abortion before you attacked him, falsely, as anti-choice.  Now, you didn't bother to read his statement on health care before you again attacked him on health care:

I pay taxes to see that my neighbors and I get the things we need. Is it too much to expect that some of our tax dollars be allocated towards a fair system that provides affordable healthcare coverage to all Americans?

I'm not suggesting we pay more taxes, just that they get spent on what's really important. Our government should be more concerned about preserving the health of our people than protecting the profits of the health insurance industry and other powerful interests.

Yeah, I'm sure he'd've sabotaged Clinton's health care plan.

Furthermore, you didn't bother to read his statement on guns.  Does he ever reference the 2nd Amendment?  Nope.  He does, however, stress the importance of responsible gun ownership:

I understand that guns in the wrong hands are deadly. They must be kept out of the hands of criminals. And we must demand that law-abiding citizens who do own guns, like me, use them safely, responsibly and in compliance with the law.

I have safety locks on my firearms. At home, they're locked in a safe. When I go hunting outside of Ohio, I make sure I comply with the local gun laws.

All my friends who share my interest in hunting share my sense of responsibility toward the safe use and storage of their firearms.

Yeah, he's a gun nut, alright.

Otherwise, if American soldiers are responsible for this "murder," because they fought it, then so are American taxpayers, because they paid for it.    I daresay that number includes you, Rational - unless, of course, you're a tax resistor.  Which I very much doubt.

by Drew on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 01:21:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

This guy sounds like a Liberaltarian (3.00 / 1)

I like that, as I am one also.
by Geotpf on Mon Jul 18, 2005 at 12:22:44 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.