MyDD :: Biden: "We represent the majority of the American people"

Biden: "We represent the majority of the American people"

by mindgeek, Wed Apr 27, 2005 at 06:05:00 PM EST

In the comments, some have asked whether or not this applies to the population of states represented by Democratic and Republican Senators as well. It does. The 45 Democratic Senators represent 296,673,557 people, while the 55 Republican Senators represent 289,532,423 people, according to the July 1st, 2004 population estimates by the census bureau. Another way of looking at it is that 174,919,609 people are represented by at least one Democratic Senator, and 171,349,042 people are represented by at least one Republican Senator. So, pretty much anyway you look at it, Biden is right. Democrats in the Senate represent the majority.—Chris

Today on C-SPAN, Senator Joe Biden is making/has just made a speech on the proposed rule change on filibusters of judicial nominations - the "nuclear option." He made an interesting statement, that "we [i.e. Democrats] represent the majority of the American people." This is interesting and true. 51% of voters since 2000 have voted for Democrats, 49% for Republicans.

One way to calculate this is to add up the total number of votes cast for Democratic and Republican Senate candidates for the last three elections, a period of time in which all 100 Senate seats have come up for election once. That total is:

Dem 100,494,879 (51%)
Rep 97,276,977 (49%)

Here are details of the calculation:
http://clerk.house.gov/members/electionInfo/2004/Table.htm
http://clerk.house.gov/members/electionInfo/2002/Table.htm
http://clerk.house.gov/members/electionInfo/2000/Table.htm

Year R D
2004 39920562 44754618
2002 20630984 18959386
2000 36725431 36780875

Tags: (all tags)

Permalink :: 16 Comments :: Post a Comment

He could also mean. (none / 0)

That the populations of the states represented by the Democratic Senators is more than that of the republican Senators. Which I think is also correct even if you split the populations of the states with one of each party.

by Delver Rootnose on Wed Apr 27, 2005 at 04:06:39 PM EST

perhaps (none / 0)

I thought of that. However, it's a more indirect calculation, and in my view a shakier argument because, as you point out, of the split-senator problem (for example, how to score Oregon).

by mindgeek on Wed Apr 27, 2005 at 04:17:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Some states, like California (none / 0)

have two Senators from the same party.

in California's case, they are both Democrats..

So splitting it 50/50 isn't accurate..

by ultraworld on Mon Jun 06, 2005 at 04:12:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Polls (none / 0)

I figured he was just talking about the polls saying something like 70% of folks opposed the rule change.

by Aurostion on Wed Apr 27, 2005 at 04:07:10 PM EST

As a minor wishlist item... (none / 0)

...I'd love to see the same/a similar analysis done for the HR :)

by nkedel on Wed Apr 27, 2005 at 07:46:28 PM EST

see the Clerk's site (none / 0)

Go to http://clerk.house.gov/members/electionInfo/2004/Table.htm

The result is there, though you may find it less to your liking. In 2004 the total was
Rep 55,713,412 (51.4%)
Dem 52,590,729 (48.6%)

Republicans won a majority of two-party votes in 2002 and 2000 as well (the last a near-tie). However, note that these counts are less precise because in some states, uncontested races are not tallied.

by mindgeek on Wed Apr 27, 2005 at 08:05:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Another strong argument for... (none / 0)

Full Representation also known as Proportional Representation.

The 10,000 Things

by Andrew C White on Wed Apr 27, 2005 at 09:47:16 PM EST

anyone know a reason (none / 0)

that I shouldn't support Biden in 08?

DAGGER

by goplies on Thu Apr 28, 2005 at 12:54:49 AM EST

I've got one. (none / 0)

He is surpassed only by Joe Lieberman in his commitment to selling out progressive values in exchange for a few grand in corporate donations.

by craverguy on Thu Apr 28, 2005 at 01:05:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I've got one. (none / 0)

I disagree. I think he's worse than Lieberman.

by Abby on Thu Apr 28, 2005 at 11:02:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: anyone know a reason (none / 0)

Two words: Bankruptcy Bill.

by DavidNYC on Thu Apr 28, 2005 at 03:19:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Yup-he's the senator from MBNA (none / 0)

One could argue that any senator from Deleware would have to be the credit card companies' cavana boy, however.

by Geotpf on Thu Apr 28, 2005 at 11:14:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

mkay (none / 0)

I really i wanted to like him.

sigh

DAGGER

by goplies on Thu Apr 28, 2005 at 01:28:02 AM EST

I'm glad a prominent Democrat is finally... (none / 0)

pointing out the obvious. E. J. Dionne made the same point in this column, published on March 22.

The Rethugs in the Senate say that they are the majority, and that in a democracy, the will of the majority should prevail (a doubtful premise, according to the founding fathers, but let that pass). But because of the profoundly undemocratic nature of the Senate -- which the southern states insisted upon, so that they could block moves against slavery -- the majority of senators actually represents a minority of the American people.

But this does not matter. Although Biden brought this up, the Dems will not make an issue of this, since it undermines the very legitimacy of the US system of government, as does the current corporate control of the election process, which Dems are determined not to challenge. So this will not be treated as relevant by the media, and those who do not get most of their information from the left wing of the blogosphere will not be aware of the issue.

by Alexander on Thu Apr 28, 2005 at 03:16:42 AM EST

Purpose of the Senate (3.00 / 1)

The purpose of the Senate was never to represent the American public as closely as the House does.

The purpose of the Senate was to make wild change- due to the fickle will of the American people- difficult to enact. This is one of the many reasons the fillibuster is such an important legislative tool.

So while the numbers are nice to see, they don't really mean all that much (I don't think).

However, I am not opposed to electoral college reform. I think these numbers help show what we all believe the be true. That the majority of Americans share the ideals of the democratic party. And being swept out of government despite our popular majority is a damn difficult pill to swallow.

by jacob wi on Thu Apr 28, 2005 at 10:36:41 AM EST

I am very sorry (none / 0)

Yes,I think something has project that铃声手机铃声下载手机铃声铃声下载手机铃声免费下载免费铃声下载三星手机铃声下载免费手机铃声免费铃声诺基亚手机铃声下载联通铃声下载疯狂青蛙铃声下载 mp3铃声下载三星手机铃声 mp3铃声 mp3手机铃声联通手机铃声诺基亚铃声下载

by markcqq on Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 06:10:08 AM EST

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.