Emerging Santorum Florida scandal?

Political Money Line reports the following information about Santorum's March trist down to Florida to appear with the Schiavo family and then raise approximately $250,000.

Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) reported raising $104,500 from individuals and PACs in Florida during the first three months of 2005.

Of the itemized Florida donors they received $84,300 on 3/31.

About $42,000 of the 3/31intemized donations came from the Miami area, possibly from a 3/29 dinner in Miami.

Tampa itemized donors on 3/31 over $6,000 including $3,000 from the PAC of Outback Steakhouse. These may have come from a 3/30 luncheon in Tampa hosted by Outback according to news reports. The PAC had already given $5,000 in January.

Orlando area itemized donors on 3/31 gave over $25,000 possibly at a luncheon in Orlando on 3/29.

Palm Beach area itemized donors on 3/31 gave over $10,000, possibly at a 3/30 dinner hosted by executives of Revlon according to news reports.

Itemized disbursements did not show any expenditures in Florida, nor reimbursements for the use of a Wal-Mart jet (news reports), although they did reimburse $364.90 to UST Public Affairs Inc on 2/4 for airfare.

The Santorum 2006 Committee reported raising $1,971,689, including $1,342,785 from individuals (of which $148,333 was unitemized) and $828,903 from PACs and other committees. They spent $484,456 and had 2,847,327 cash on hand as of 3/31. Additional receipts from the above events may have come in after the 3/31 close of books.

There are a few gems in the story. First, the fact that there's no reimbursement for the use of the Walmart jet may mean that Santorum used his Senate account to pay for the trip under the guise of meeting with the Schiavo family though in reality it appears most of his time was actually spent raising money for his Senate campaign.

If in fact the $364.00 to UST Public Affairs Inc was for use of the Walmart jet to bounce to, (and around) Florida and back it seems as an awfully cheap way to travel. No Senator would attend a series of fundraisers without at least two Finance staff, so who paid for everyone? Walmart can't be really that cheap.

It may be completely legal for Santorum to fly to Florida, meet the Schiavo family and (before it was cancelled) talk about how much he is committed to privatizing Social Security all while raising a boat load of cash on his Senate travel account. It just doesn't seem like a smart move for the most endangered Republican in the US Senate.

The second part of the question is who exactly paid for the fundraisers, since one imagines they require some money for food, rent, etc. It seems implausible to me that Santorum met a group of high dollar donors at the local Outback Steak House and walked table to table collecting checks and shaking hands while each donor picked up their own dinner tab. If someone else paid there would have had to been in-kind paper trail filled out for the events. When a candidate goes somewhere to raise money there is usually a long paper trail of expenses for the event, which Political Money Line explains don't exist on this trip.

Senate reports are extremely difficult to view online and since they're turned into the Secratary of the Senate's office and then scanned in at the FEC they can't be easily downloaded and parsed like reports from House Campaigns, Political Committee's and PACs. So hats off to Political Money Line for asking the first question.

Developing...



Display:


hmmm... (none / 0)

from the PAC of Outback Steakhouse

God I am so naive.

Why in the world would a steakhouse have a PAC?

The last time I ate in an Outback, it smelled like a dirty dishtowel.

We haven't eaten there since.

by wes wing on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 08:19:59 PM EST

Gen. Franks (Ret). on Outback board (none / 0)

Just happened a couple months ago. This is the same general that spoke at the RNC in August and who was in charge of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Maybe Outback is owned by very pro-GOP people.

by DaveB on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 08:48:39 PM EST

Emerging Scandal? Energing where? (none / 0)

If a tree falls in the forest and there is no mainstream electronic media to hear it... does it make a sound?
by dryfly on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 09:24:36 PM EST

Give it time (none / 0)

The MSM works on a longer, safer, less legally liable frame.

The Pittsburgh and Philly media are already pretty tough on Santorum.  If you saw him snapping at reporters over his family's unwillingness to live in PA, you'd see things were pretty mean given the primaries are over a year away.

Plus, you don't want this story to peak before DeLay's does.  You want it to peak just after DeLay (sometime in 2006), so Dems can run on a broad platform attacking the GOP for its dry-rot while in power.

by jcjcjc on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 10:30:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Second most endangered... (none / 0)

I think Chafee is more endangered.
by rafadex on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 09:38:09 PM EST

Re: Second most endangered... (none / 0)

I think we're splitting hairs.
by Kombiz Lavasany on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 10:37:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Reporting date (none / 0)

It appears this report ended 3/31.  Is it possible the charges for expenses (including the Walmart jet) weren't charged until April?
by Geotpf on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 09:43:18 PM EST

Re: Reporting date (none / 0)

If they spent any money before the 31st they had to report it, even if they received the receipt or in kind paperwork after the 31st. Just as if they were sent money before the 31st that they received after the 31st they'd have to show it as received by the 31st. They could still amend their return but, it would seem like it's a big lapse of judgement on their part.
by Kombiz Lavasany on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 10:36:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

hmm... right to sneak them in on tax day (none / 0)

put the charges down on apr. 16
by turnerbroadcasting on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 09:49:46 PM EST

anyone else remember how (none / 0)

they broke the story about saddam
hussein captured on the day they
signed the patriot act into
law

since the kurds actually found him,
hey - you know - maybe santorum was
timing his pr.

by turnerbroadcasting on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 09:50:37 PM EST

HUH? (none / 0)

The Patriot Act was signed in October, 2001.

Saddam was captured in Dececember, 2003.

What the fuck are you talking about?

by Geotpf on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 09:53:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

He's talking about (none / 0)

a bill which was signed the same weekend as Saddam's staged-for-the-cameras capture. The bill included some language from a draft bill, known informally as "PATRIOT Act II," which had been leaked previously (spurring a fair amount of outrage in some circles). The regime apparently decided that "PATRIOT II" would do better as bits and pieces quietly attached to other bills.
Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Wed Apr 20, 2005 at 02:07:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

A little waiting may be required on these charges. (none / 0)

Correct me if I'm wrong (as I am totally work-fried), but if they received a bill within the period - but did not pay it - it would show up on one of the "debt" schedules.  But...depending on the size of the debts (there's something like a $500 threshold), they do not need to be reported until as much as 60 days from when they occur.  As such, a bill from March could not be showing up until into the May or possibly June report.

There is also a $1,000 per year, per person exemption for hosting fundraisers in your own home.  If the event was held in a private residence the owners (husband & wife) could each spend $1,000 without having to report anything.  This could also be a reason nothing is showing up.

The aircraft issue is one where the timetable falls in favor of the point being made in this post.  Payment on use of private planes must be made within 7 days of the travel beginning.  That would fall within March and would have to appear on the reports dur tomorrow.

by jdthompson on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 11:45:38 PM EST

Re: A little waiting may be required on these char (none / 0)

Correcting me if I'm wrong is...me!

I was not thinking about the dates right.  Never mind on the "7 Day" jet rule, I just went back to the top and saw the funds were raised in the last days of the month.

Like I said, "work-fried"

by jdthompson on Tue Apr 19, 2005 at 11:48:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A little waiting may be required on these char (none / 0)

You raise a few points I thought about but I didn't want to complicate the overall point. First, the $1,000 exemption is correct if it's held at someone's house (which I doubt these fundraisers were). The problem is even if it was it would still need to be In Kinded to the previous cycle. I'm sure a PAC or person could hold the fundraiser somewhere else and pay for it, therefore it would come out of their maximum contribution limit. But that would still need to be an In Kind. The other questions are hotels, car rentals and other expenses. The only possibility is that they are tied to someone's expense report. I don't know how they would need to be reported, but I think (I could be wrong) as expenditures in Florida. There aren't too mnay ways to pay for some of these expenses months later, though that would be a possibility. When you rent a room, you pay for a room then, same as renting space for a fundraiser. Again, I'm not a campaign finance expert, but the fact that the reports show no expenses in Florida, no expenses for the fundarisers or the trip is odd. The PAC report scheduling is slightly differnt. He may have used his leadership PAC to pay for everything. So there's definitely questions, though I'm not at all familiar with how leadership PAC money can be used for directly for raising money for the campaign. We'll know more tomorrow when the monthly deadline pops up.
by Kombiz Lavasany on Wed Apr 20, 2005 at 12:12:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

If he has a leadership PAC... (none / 0)

...that's probably what he used to pay for his expenses with.
by Geotpf on Wed Apr 20, 2005 at 02:41:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I am very interested in this (none / 0)

I am very interested in this
尖锐湿疣 性病 尖锐湿疣 咪喹莫特 明欣利迪 疣迪 尖锐湿疣 咪喹莫特 咪喹莫特 疣迪 明欣利迪 疣迪 艾达乐 咪喹莫特 尖锐湿疣 尖锐湿疣 尖锐湿疣 尖锐湿疣
by hpvv on Tue Dec 20, 2005 at 02:51:58 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.