The Sensenbrenner legislation, tagged as a security measure, is a hodgepodge of provisions: one aimed at finishing a few miles of fence on the border near Tijuana, another raising barriers to asylum seekers who claim they are fleeing abuse in their home countries.
But the section likely to create the most controversy would make it more difficult for states to issue driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. Already under attack from both the right and the left, it has also provoked calls for still tougher measures, including a national ID card.
The bill's history in the House, where it passed on a 261-161 vote, holds crucial lessons for the debate ahead. It's no accident that only eight Republicans dared vote against it, or that even President Bush, who prefers a more measured approach to illegal immigration, ended up endorsing it. What Sensenbrenner grasps -- and his opponents ignore at their peril -- is that when it comes to immigration, what the public wants is control.
Why isn't their more news about this piece of legislation? Why isn't there at least an equivalent amount of news about this as there was about Bush's Latino-wooing, conservative annoying, "temporary guest worker program?" The REAL ID Act, a cravenly act of draconian scapegaoting (unfortunately supported by around forty Demcorats), is far more representative of the contemporary conservative approach and attitude toward immigration than Bush's earlier program. The identity politics of contemporary conservatism on on full display with the REAL ID Act, and the media isn't even showing up to report it.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 11 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.