Bankruptcy Bill And Joe Biden Are Evil

There is no way to criticize the bankruptcy bill that the Senate passed yesterday without being equally critical of Senator Joe Biden. The L.A. Times gives Biden and the bankruptcy bill a devastating one-two punch with Jonathan Chait's editorial, "When Democrats Join the Dark Side: Their kowtowing to home-state industries props up the Republicans", and a front page knock out blow about the bankruptcy bill itself, "Credit Card Firms Won as Users Lost:  They sought new laws but found ways to make money even on people who went bankrupt."

More in Extended Entry

The L.A. Times story, by Peter G. Gosselin, points out that this bill is a solution in search of a problem:

In the eight years since they began pressing for the tough bankruptcy bill being debated in the Senate, America's big credit card companies have effectively inoculated themselves from many of the problems that sparked their call for the measure.

 By charging customers different interest rates depending on how likely they are to repay their debts and by adding substantial fees for an array of items such as late payments and foreign currency transactions, the major card companies have managed to keep their profits rising steadily even as personal bankruptcies have soared, industry figures show

Gosselin also did an investigative series on Bush's Raw Deal for working people that are all linked to in the above diary. Wages for working people have been stagnant for the last thirty years and credit card industry profits are soaring, as is clearly illustrated by the graphic charts to the right of the story.

Analysts said that lost in the uproar over particular practices and cases is the fact that the credit card industry has almost completely remade itself in the years since it began pushing for passage of the bankruptcy bill -- a makeover that has left some analysts wondering why the industry needs the changes in bankruptcy law.

 "The idea that companies are losing their shirts on bankruptcies is a lot of bull," said Robert B. McKinley, chief executive of CardWeb.com, a Frederick, Md., consulting group that tracks the credit card industry. "With these rates and fees, the card industry is a gravy train right now."


And it's not just Congress powering the corporate gravy train. The Supreme Court has already stripped away consumer protection that used to be provided by state regulation:
McKinley, the industry analyst, said the firms were helped by a 1996 Supreme Court case that gave card companies new protections against state regulation of fees.

 "That really opened the flood gates. It set off a fee frenzy," he said.

An interesting observation is that Chait's editorial was written before the Senate vote on this abysmal piece of legislation. Why would Joe Biden vote for this garbage anyway?

All in all, he came across as just the sort of person you'd like to have as president.

 There's just one issue that's the exception. And that's what's wrong with most of the Democrats: There's always one issue that's the exception. But before we get into that, let me explain Biden's particular problem.

 Biden supports a bill in Congress that would make it harder for people to declare bankruptcy. This is one of those abysmal pieces of legislation that exists only because businesses with a vested interest in it have lobbied hard for its passage and that would have no chance of success if more than a tiny fraction of the public were aware of its existence.

Chait does us the service of explaining the real problem with bankruptcy filings that the bankruptcy bill in no way addresses:

The worst abuses are loopholes allowing corporations or wealthy individuals to declare bankruptcy and keep millions of dollars safe from creditors. One such device is something called an "asset protection trust" -- a kind of savings fund that can't be touched by creditors. States actually compete with one another to offer the most generous trusts so they can lure businesses and affluent individuals to park their money in that state.

 The most popular state for such trusts is corporate-friendly Delaware.

 Delaware, of course, is home to Joe Biden. It's also home to many credit card companies, the driving force behind the bankruptcy bill. You don't have to connect a lot of dots to see the picture here.

It's not just the DLC Joe twins and Ben twins. Chait points out how some of the most prominent and respected Democrats can be counted on the be Republican scum bags du jour:

When the Enron scandal broke, for instance, it came out that a few Democrats had joined Republicans to help the accounting and financial industry stave off sensible regulations during the 1990s. New York's Charles Schumer helped fight off efforts to bar accounting firms from receiving lucrative consulting deals from the same firms they audit -- a practice whose inherent conflicts were made notorious by the misdeeds of the firm Arthur Andersen. Connecticut Democrats Joe Lieberman and Chris Dodd shamelessly do the insurance industry's bidding.

 On the other hand, Northeasterners like Lieberman and Schumer staunchly impose tougher mileage requirements on the auto industry. Alas, the auto industry staunchly opposes such requirements, and therefore so does Carl Levin of Michigan, normally a supporter of such liberal causes as a clean environment.

 There's plenty more. Rural Democrats can always be relied on to support giveaways to agribusiness. Washington Democrat Henry "Scoop" Jackson, an old New Deal liberal, was known in his day as "the senator from Boeing."

This is how Bush and the Republicans will continue to crush working class Americans for the next three years; with a little help from their DLC friends on our side of the aisle.

The trouble here is that the relationship each Democrat has with his home-state business interests is the relationship every Republican has with every business interest. The bankruptcy bill enjoys unanimous GOP support in the Senate. It's a familiar pattern: Noxious laws enjoy support from a coalition of all the Republicans plus a rotating handful of Democrats who have ties to interested parties. Almost all the Democrats are on the side of the angels on almost every issue. But it doesn't take many Democratic defectors to give the Republicans a majority.

 The ultimate problem is that even liberal Democrats consider being in the pocket of a home-state industry an acceptable indulgence. A little bit of shame might go a long way.

I don't know if Joe Biden has any shame. I sent him an email inviting him or his staff to stop by and clarify the record if they so desire.


Display:


Biden (none / 0)

No shame as he showed in stealing material from the British Labour party, verbatim, to fuel his no-go try at the Dem presidential nom in what 88.

This man, however, is a no chance candidate.  Just too open and shameless in his ongoing sellouts.  Forget 2008 or any political career outside of the credit card state.

Incidentally, JB, I posted a mostly ignored diary on daily Kos entitled Tom Carper, Corporate "democrat."  Actually got accused of making the thing up despite me (and anoth kossack) referencing multiple AP articles.  Why should I dare attack a Democrat?

Well, Carper continues to make my half hour of research at his own web site and AP articles make me into a frigging miraculous prophet.  Corporate "Democrat" multiple times over.  Sad thing is that the only real coverage of Tom's tactics was on the Philly paper (north delaware is fast becoming a Philly suburb) rather than the Wilmington one (Delawareonline on the net).  They prefer to cover high school basketball and show unlimited pictures of Dem governor Ruth Minner, a good soul but not exactly Hollywood material in the looks department.

The differnce between Biden and Carper is that Biden takes some high profile liberal positions on the Judiciary Committe and only mostly serves his corporate masters.  Carper makes no effort to establish Democratic credentials.  His site, in fact, documents his work with Delaware Republicans and the Bushies and did not seem to make any mention of working with Dems.  Gulp.

What this shows is that the fainthearted faction spends so little effort covering its tracks that even minimal research brings out the sell outs.  Where's the MSM?  Too busy covering Michael Jackson, Martha Stewart, and Kobe Bryant to bother.  The political/government coverage is mostly warmed over press releases, after all.  What do they teach in journalism school?  I think it's hair care and dress for success.  At least those are the ones who get hired.

by David Kowalski on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 02:25:03 PM EST

Re: Biden (none / 0)

I understand exactly kowalski. I'm trying to break them in over at dkos, but there are a lot of fainthearted faction kossacks when it comes to some of the DLC "heroes" like Biden and Schumer. I just posted another diary up top that I am going to carry over to dkos a little later.

I don't really expect it to last over there, but I'm giving it a shot anyway.

by Gary Boatwright on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 02:30:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Biden (none / 0)

Pitiful. Here we have a law which is going to devistate middle and lower class Americans, and Kos readers won't support it becuase they like Biden?

I hope he does run in 2008 so that we can expose him for the fraud that he is.

Incidently- Biden is on the armed services committee and one of the groups that's likely to get hit hard by this, as they are a constant target for pay-day loans and other predetory credit practices, is soldiers (and their families). I think we should definitely make a push to strip him of that appointment for this outrage. Not like it would really happen, but if we could scare a little sense into him then maybe in the future he wouldn't be so quick to sodomize middle-class America.

Way to stand with the soldiers and workers Joe! You'll have a nice spot right near the furnace when you go straight to hell...

Future Majority / Young Philly Politics
by Alex Urevick on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 03:30:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Biden (none / 0)

It isn't that they aren't hard enough on Biden. The top recommended diary was a MaryScott rant from hell about the bill.

I just don't think they see the full picture on economic issues. Maybe the front page diary about putting heat on Greenspan will do some good. I doubt it. We need to put heat on Biden, Dodd, and Hillary and Boxer too.

This bill was completely greased and it took the cooperation of the whole Democratic caucus not to allow a filibuster. I think they all have dirty hands on this one. This bill should have been forced to survive a filibuster vote just to make a point.

The DLC still rules the Democratic party.

by Gary Boatwright on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 05:31:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Biden (none / 0)

Maybe you're being too hard on Biden.  He may have voted for this "only reluctantly" just the way he voted to confirm Condi.

Or maybe all the "love" he feels for A. Gonzales is clouding his otherwise crystal clear judgement.

All snark aside, I fear for the future when I see legislation like this pass by with barely a word or a protest.  I doubt your average citizen understands  this at all.  

by bellarose on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 04:40:50 PM EST

Re: Biden (none / 0)

The L.A. Times article was pretty clear that hardly anybody even knew it was coming up for a vote. The entire Democratic Caucus greased the skids for this bill. There is no other way it got passed so quickly. This bill was a shining example of the DLC power brokers in action.

The corporate bosses said jump and the DLC said how high. The DLC bosses said jump and the Democratic Senate Caucus said how high. Every single Senator was complicit in this bill getting passed.

by Gary Boatwright on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 05:34:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

They won't stand up. . . (none / 0)

. . . unless a public groundswell of opposition frightens them into it.  

With so many people focused on Social Security, I can only imagine how many rancid pieces of legislation are awaiting quick, quiet passage.

Does anyone know how far in advance a vote is scheduled?  I know Republicans, as the majority, set the schedule.  Can they fast track legislation thus avoiding media attention and public debate?  Is this what happened?

by bellarose on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 06:29:38 PM EST

Re: They won't stand up. . . (none / 0)

I don't know the details, but I suspect they can. Check out Basie's front page blog on the Podesta interview. If you go to Podesta's website it still has an article about bankruptcy bill strategy.

Even someone as well connected as Podesta had no idea this thing would go through so quickly. Your question about how the vote on this was scheduled is an excellent one bellarose.

by Gary Boatwright on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 07:49:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.