College Republicans or Brownshirts?

Promoted from the diaries. The irony is that the campus GOP who complain about "communism" are the one's acting like Bolsheviks - right wing Bolsheviks - here. - Ben P

Something really disturbing happened to my father's wife recently at Santa Rosa College in California, and I've excerpted his email to me about it here. It seems to be part of a larger national effort to drown out diversity. Hopefully the blogsphere can get hold of stories like this and flush these weasels out into the open:

Friday an incident at Santa Rosa Junior College invaded our life, in this way; Late that day after the buildings were empty, someone posted flyers on the faculty offices of ten professors, mostly in the social sciences...& including [my father's wife, a professor there]. The flyer had a big red star at the top and consisted solely of the text of an obscure anti-communist section of the State educational code.(scroll down for complete text...you'll be surprised) It was signed: "Anonymous Students of the SRJC"

There has been a flurry of meetings, and statements issued, and the Channel 50 news came out to interview people. The 'Anonymous' ones surfaced and are... the 'College Republican Club'. Even after revealing themselves, they have not offered a single substantive example of how the ten professors were observed "inculcating communism." Although some professors on that list have discussed critical theories about the system, or have said something anti-Bush...some were unable to think of anything they'd said in teaching English that could be considered "Left". The Republican Club will only say that they are "getting reports from other students". Now it seems that professors have to assume that there are people monitoring their thinking and trying to taint them with negative publicity that would harm their standing... for example in a tenure review.  

A little research into the "College Republicans" reveals a wide-ranging effort to expose & intimidate "liberal" & "left"professors. David Horowitz and Lynne Cheney figure prominently in this national effort. Here's where they "report" on the incident:  http://www.collegegop.org/PressReleases/index.cfm/ID/27.htm The first posting of this was more gloating & lurid: instead of "Operation" as the title, they called it "Operation Red Scare" Then here's the more radical junior G-men: http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/ Sample the heading: "How to research faculty bias"  

The Faculty Senate is taking up the issue of intellectual freedom this week and demanding the College take a stand...they are also looking into the history of this education code section and seeing if it can be repealed in the legislature. The way this was done, with stealth at first and with the star so prominent, was very much in the brownshirt tradition of the last century. A lot of things come to mind when walking down a corridor of academic offices and seeing 'stigma' postings on individual doors identifying Heretics. [the text of flyer is in Extended Entry].

-Arne

The text of the Flyer, under the big red star: "EDUCATION CODE (Of California)  SECTION 51530 51530. No teacher giving instruction in any school, or on any property belonging to any agencies included in the public school system, shall advocate or teach communism with the intent to indoctrinate or to inculcate in the mind of any pupil a preference for communism. In prohibiting the advocacy or teaching of communism with the intent of indoctrinating or inculcating a preference in the mind of any pupil for such doctrine, the Legislature does not intend to prevent the teaching of the facts about communism. Rather, the Legislature intends to prevent the advocacy of, or inculcation and indoctrination into, communism as is hereinafter defined, for the purpose of undermining patriotism for, and the belief in, the government of the United States and of this state.   For the purposes of this section, communism is a political theory that the presently existing form of government of the United States or of this state should be changed, by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means, to a totalitarian dictatorship which is based on the principles of communism as expounded by Marx, Lenin, and Stalin."  

Display:


I strongly dislike communism, but... (none / 0)

I can't see where a free state that advocates political freedom can justify laws excluding (or endorsing) ANY political party unless it clearly is a violent one.

And even then we would have to be very careful because often a group's positions on things are misrepresented by those who oppose them.

In the case of communism, often, banning discussion of it seems to fan the flames of those who promote it..

Just like the way our 'wingers' tries to push the falsehood that they are some kind of oppressed minority.

I think that this is a good place to make the point that when you get down to their EFFECTS, the extreme right wing AND the extreme left wing governments BOTH typically create situations that impoverish the majority of their people...

Its because any idiot who puts ideology before people's needs.. as the current GOP does, is basically FAILING in their responsibility to lead...

God help us...

by ultraworld on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 07:53:53 PM EST

Re: I strongly dislike communism, but... (none / 0)

I like to think of the political spectrum much like a circle rather than a straight left right line, at some point facism and communism are really the same thing obtained via different means or tactics.

what I see as troubling in this country is the widening to the right of the acceptable political spectrum.

I had a discussion the other day with a conservative colleague and he said he couldnt vote for Dems because htye were too extremist, when i challeneged him to name one of their extremist policies he failed ot do so, and laughingly cited social Security.

I am not sure how you internally defeat state sponsored and controlled ideology, especially when it is becoming increasingly intertwined with religion.

I am really stuggling to think of a good example.

by Pounder on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 11:04:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I strongly dislike communism, but... (none / 0)

Sadly, the only way Americans have ever done that in the past has been through military force, and our side no longer commands the military in this case.
by craverguy on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 11:16:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I strongly dislike communism, but... (none / 0)

Pounder, I think the fact you were in the Conservative Party in Britain says it all. I would be a swing voter in most European nations. In the US, I'm on the "left." I think it is vital to spread the meme that there is a centrist and a rightist party in this nation - i.e. . There is no viable leftist party in this nation, not even really a viable center-left, although I think the left third of the Democratic Party could be considered center-left. At most, there might be 10 to 20 members of Congress (in the Democratic Party) who could conceivably be considered left-wing in most other European and European-derived democracies.

Ben P

by Ben P on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 11:29:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I strongly dislike communism, but... (none / 0)

I'd probably qualify as "left-wing" in most European countries. Every single year, as my party slides farther and farther right, the siren call of the Green Party grows stronger...
by craverguy on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 11:35:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not Opinion: Democrats Are Centrist Party (none / 0)

There are folks who do cross-national research and comparisons, and the Democratic Party is clearly categorized as a centrist party by those who do this sort of research.

It's just this sort of exposure to reality beyond the confines of the nightly news that no doubt constitutes "communist indoctrination."

by Paul Rosenberg on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 11:41:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I strongly dislike communism, but... (none / 0)

I think your right Ben.

I wuold like to see us portray the devide as moderate vs extremist rather than a place on an ideological devide.

The best government is driven from pragmatism IMHO, with some decent core principles to guide you.

I think the Dems have the pragmatism, hence all their deal makings, but really lack a good set of core principles.

the GOP are purely driven by their principles, but their goals arent pragmatic, they are simply power grabbing

We need to highlight one and fix the other.

As chris's post earlier today suggested we have a problem. The Dems have a massive image problem, and issues arent going to fix that no matter how incompetant the GoOpers get or scandal ridden.

Armando has a right approach I believe, in his diary over at dkos
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/3/2/212950/4999

by Pounder on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 11:42:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

"For the purposes of this section, (none / 0)

. . . communism is a political theory that the presently existing form of government of the United States or of this state should be changed, by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means, to a totalitarian dictatorship which is based on the principles of communism as expounded by Marx, Lenin, and Stalin."

"Existing form of government," as in democratic republic?

"Unconstitutional means," as in electoral fraud?

"Totalitarian dictatorship," as in a society in the thrall of a single, unlimited ruler, which suppresses all points of view which are not in complete agreement with said ruler?

Why would Reeps be opposed to that?

Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 08:16:21 PM EST

Students who did it (none / 0)

should be expelled.  Perhaps the faculty should sue them for defamation.  That would certainly get the attention of the creeps, and the parents who taught them to be creeps.

As for the Repub campaign to stick it to leftist faculty: How utterly pathetic.  Possibly the nastiest front in this campaign are the attacks upon faculty in Mid-Eastern studies who somehow refuse to worship at the feet of the Likuddites.  I happen to be teaching a course on the Ancient Near East, and half expect to be denounced for being too sympathetic to the Sumerians.

by smintheus on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 10:06:34 PM EST

Sumeria (none / 0)

Reminds me of the Professor in the original Bishop's Wife who lost his job (presumably in the 40's when the film was made for being "too radical."  The character added that he had no thoughts on politics after the time of Nero.

This is an old story.  The American Association of University professors was founded to fight this crap a full 100 years ago.

First, i wonder how much of this is inspired by grades.  professors who fail to reward right wing propaganda with A's get hunted out.

Second, this had a history in the 50's in Texas.  At the time, the University's most distinguished history professor was expelled by a John Birch campaign. After a 50 year lullaby, the crap had returned.

Third, over the last 3 or 4 years I've heard of several campaigns against profs at junior colleges in California.  Politically out of touch, wouldn't you say?

I suspect that maybe the best campaign would make these cretins persona non grata on campus.  Flunk their sorry asses out.  They obviously don"t believe in education.  Only terrorism.  MAKE them THE SUBJECT OF CHEAP, WIDE-SPREAD RIDICULE.  Campus Republicans for Hitler?  Take their pictures and distribute leaflets against them as Nazis.  Maybe burn em in effigy.  Certainly ban their leaflets under hate crime legislation.  Sue em.  Ad nauseum!

by David Kowalski on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 01:54:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Cheney & Lieberman (none / 0)

Cheney & Lieberman
Sitting in a tree
K-I-S-S-I-N-G!:
Published on Thursday, December 13, 2001 in the San Jose Mercury News
Lynne Cheney-Joe Lieberman Group Puts Out a Blacklist
by Roberto J. Gonzalez

AN aggressive attack on freedom has been launched upon America's college campuses. Its perpetrators seek the elimination of ideas and activities that place Sept. 11 in historical context, or critique the so-called war on terrorism.

The offensive, spearheaded by the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, a Washington-based group, threatens free speech, democratic debate and the integrity of higher education. In an incendiary report, "Defending Civilization: How Our Universities Are Failing America," the American Council claims that "colleges and university faculty have been the weak link in America's response" to Sept. 11. It also asserts that "when a nation's intellectuals are unwilling to defend its civilization, they give comfort to its adversaries."

The report documents 117 campus incidents as "evidence" of anti-Americanism. More than 40 professors are named, including the president of Wesleyan University, who suggested in an open letter that "disparities and injustices" in American society and the world can lead to hatred and violence....

The American Council of Trustees and Alumni was founded in 1995 by Lynne Cheney, the vice president's wife, and Sen. Joseph Lieberman. Its Website claims that it contributed $3.4 billion to colleges and universities last year, making it "the largest private source of support for higher education." Cheney is cited several times in the report, and is reportedly a close associate of its authors, Jerry Martin and Anne Neal.

more sordid details...

by Paul Rosenberg on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 11:57:11 PM EST

The rest of the faculty need to act (none / 0)

The way rest of the faculty should deal with this is to also post red stars on their own doors.
by CathiefromCanada on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 12:17:42 AM EST

I hate college republicans. (none / 0)

Those kids are generally too naive and inexperienced about life in general to really understand many issues in politics. The most annoying thing on tv is when some reporter asks a college kid or high school brat their opinion about a some complex political issue of the day. I just have to change the channel as they regurgitate whatever it is their parents raised them to think.
http://operationyellowelephant.blogspot.com/
by Vote Hillary 2008 on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 04:41:42 AM EST

Re: I hate college republicans. (none / 0)

Republican ideals sound a lot better when you aren't in the real world yet.
by wayward on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 06:57:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I hate college republicans. (none / 0)

Hell Yeah...  I was a member of College Republicans at one point but that was because at the time they had hotter girls whose daddies had bought them nice 30-50K rides for HS graduation.  It was amazing how a little conservative rhetoric got some of these girls going.  Scary, but a heck of a lot of fun.  I didn't get kicked out, but I wasn't as welcome once they found out about the Clinton sign in my room and that I really didn't care about GOP values...I just wanted to hookup with their women.  ;-)
by yitbos96bb on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 11:00:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I hate college republicans. (none / 0)

Thus the Clinton sign...

by wayward on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 05:51:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I hate college republicans. (1.00 / 0)

Yeah, we all know how high taxes, unfettered social welfare programs, socialized medicine, govt. control over the economy works when tried.

Hey, anyone see the unemployment figures from the EU lately? Yeah, go, Socialism. Rah, rah, rah!

by Whatever on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 11:28:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Try "wholly without merit" (none / 0)

Ah, the old "balance" canard. In their case it's "wholly without merit".

News and Press
February 28, 2005
OPERATION

Over the weekend the Santa Rosa College Republicans posted flyers on the doors of 10 liberal professors. The Flyer had a red star at the top and cited a portion of the Education Code. Education code section 51530 "No teacher giving instruction at any school, or any property belong to the agency including the public school system shall advocate or teach communism with the intent to indoctrinate or implicate in the minds of any peoples a preference for communism." Signed sincerely anonymous students. The faculty is outraged and held a press conference at Santa Rosa Junior College. College Republicans were not allowed to attend because the faculty thought the CR's "should hold their own press conference. Later the "Chair of the Philosophy Department" arrogantly informed the CR's that they needed to consult the faculty before holding any press conferences. The professors are now working to remove the excerpt from the education code above. Local News and Press covered the story and made the correct choice with regards to consulting the Santa Rosa College Republican President and getting the balance story.

Apparently, their "young pioneers" indoctrination didn't include a session on proofreading press releases.

A DD-4 could do wonders for them.

I know a place where they can participate in all the real "Operations" they could ever want - and where there's a real need.
http://www.dior.whs.mil/forms/DD0004.pdf

543,895 votes
by Michael Bersin on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 06:29:45 AM EST

College Democrats (none / 0)

Should attach signs that say "TERRORIST" to the doors of the dorm rooms of the college Republican.

Turnabout is fair play, right?

by Drew on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 10:29:57 AM EST

Leader of the Nazis (none / 0)

According to the Young Republican directory, the head of the wingnuts at Santa Rosa is a young lady named Molly McPherson.  Her e-mail is srjcgop@freedom.usa.com (i think that's it).  The directory has a connection to e-mail her at.

Can't believe that the GOPers are actually nationally PROUD of this monstrousity.

Guess she's in training to become the newxt Ann Coulter.

by David Kowalski on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 02:07:02 PM EST

Sonoma County DFA is on top of this... (none / 0)

Santa Rosa is my town, and last night our local DFA organization voted unanimously to support the SRJC teachers and administration, and we're issuing a press release to that effect.

We will use this opportunity to demonstrate community support for SRJC's academic freedom and highlight the Republican tactic of attempting to stifle dissenting opinions.

FWIW, Sonoma County is overwhelmingly Democratic. Our congresswoman is Lynn Woolsey, one of the most progressive voices in the House.  The college Republicans aren't likely to make many friends around here with this stunt.

by Malacandra on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 03:00:29 PM EST

Re: Sonoma County DFA is on top of this... (1.00 / 0)

Yes, yes, "Progressive." I hope this makes you all warm and fuzzy about Ms. Woolsey:

"Last July, a 20-year-old thug named Stewart Pearson soaked a rag in toilet bowl cleanser and Ajax and used it to smother 17-year-old Tina Phan while she was sleeping in her Terra Linda, Calif., home. Tina gasped, trying to fend off Pearson, but he wielded a knife and overpowered her. Pearson raped and brutalized her. According to Phan, Pearson told her he had committed the same crime before and planned to do it again. Phan bravely persisted in pressing charges against Pearson. He initially denied raping Phan, but admitted guilt last fall.

Enter Rep. Woolsey. As first reported by the Marin Independent Journal, the outspoken feminist and anti-violence-preaching Democrat attempted to intervene in the case. She used her official stationery to send a letter to the local presiding judge in support of . . . the convicted rapist.

In a bleeding-heart plea for leniency, Woolsey wrote: "Stewart Pearson is a young man from a supportive family. I believe he has a promising life ahead of him, and I urge you to consider these factors when deciding on a suitable sentence." Woolsey noted further that Pearson had volunteered for her campaign, as if stuffing envelopes for Woolsey somehow mitigated the violence he committed against Tina Phan -- whose promising life Woolsey didn't bother to show an ounce of concern for at all."

Gosh, thank Gaia that the Progressives are protecting us from the guys that wanna privatize SS.

by Whatever on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 11:33:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Gosh! (1.00 / 0)

"Although some professors on that list have discussed critical theories about the system, or have said something anti-Bush...some were unable to think of anything they'd said in teaching English that could be considered "Left".

Who in their right mind would contrue anti-Capitalist and anti-Bush remarks as Leftwing? Let's check in with Ward Churchill on this one, shall we?

by Whatever on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 11:30:38 PM EST

Whatever...nevermind (none / 0)

Hmm, looks like we have raider from the right-wing-osphere in our midst...I guess "Whatever" as a moniker says it all...

"Anti-Bush" hardly qualifies as "Leftist"...How about Richard Clarke and Paul O'Neill--big time commies. And did anyone say "anti-capitalist"? Being critical of "the system" could mean anything. I mean, Greenspan called for changing to a consumption-based tax yesterday...isn't that being "critical of the system"?

I don't even know why I'm bothering...jeesh.

by argghh on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 01:30:27 PM EST

Portland Too (none / 0)

Looks like the commie smear is happening other places too...

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/03/312542.shtml

Does all this strike anyone as slightly comical? I mean, does communism still hold the same taint as it once did? It almost seems like old folks so out of touch they're still coming down on the Elvis pelvis.

by argghh on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 02:05:26 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.