What the Thune bloggers really did

This piece is remarkable in how it sheds even further light upon the main difference between left wing and right wing internet activism. While the lefty netroots is frequently engaged in a wide range of activist work, the right wing netroots seems almost entirely focused upon the media--Chris

I recently wrote a long ass piece about what the group of bloggers did during the election for Personal Democracy Forum.  Basically, this group of nine bloggers tried to get in the heads of the journalists responsible for covering the election at the biggest newspaper in South Dakota, and managed to. While I write about Gannon's role with the bloggers and on the disclosure issue, my central point is that these Thune bloggers spent all their time attacking these poor guys at this local Newspaper and rattled them.

Having looked at lots of political and campaign related blogs, I don't think I've seen anything like it before. A pretty innovative use (not as innovative of course, as what Jerome has done with this blog).

Check it out.

David Kranz and Randell Beck, are you listening? Why doesn't your paper pull out all of the stops investigating this story?" -- Jason van Beek in a January, 2003 entry on his blog, South Dakota Politics.

At the end of January, newly-elected South Dakota Senator John Thune briefed his colleagues at a closed-door GOP retreat in West Virginia about the importance of blogging in contemporary politics. Thune earned his bragging rights by defeating former Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle this past November, in a race where conservative bloggers played a small but important role. But the story that Thune has to tell isn't anything like earlier political blog successes such as the Dean for America campaign blog or DailyKos.

The blogging efforts on behalf of Thune's Senate campaign didn't cause greater civic participation or bring in piles of small donations. Instead nine bloggers -- two of whom were paid $35,000 by Thune's campaign -- formed an alliance that constantly attacked the election coverage of South Dakota's principal newspaper, the Sioux Falls Argus Leader. More specifically, their postings were not primarily aimed at dissuading the general public from trusting the Argus' coverage. Rather, the work of these bloggers was focused on getting into the heads of the three journalists at the Argus who were primarily responsible for covering the Daschle/Thune race: chief political reporter David Kranz, state editor Patrick Lalley, and executive editor Randell Beck.

Led by law student Jason van Beek and University of South Dakota history professor Jon Lauck, the Thune bloggers tormented and rattled the Argus staff for the duration of the 2004 election, clearly influencing the Argus' coverage. They also appear to have been a highly efficient vehicle for injecting classic no-fingerprints-attached opposition research on Daschle -- most of it tidbits that perhaps might never have made it into the old print media -- directly into the political bloodstream of South Dakota. What they did may turn out to be a "dark side of politics" model for campaign-blogger relations in 2005-06 -- made all the more telling by the fact that the Thune bloggers relied heavily on now-discredited Jeff Gannon/James Guckert of Talon News for many of their stories.....

go to read the next 4,000 words.


Display:


That's a hell of a story janfrel (3.00 / 1)

I'm still trying to figure out why The Argus and other middle of the road media outlets pay so much attention to right wingnut blogs, but they ignore progressive blogs. I don't know if it's some twisted liberal guilt or misplaced liberal tolerance. They need to learn to tune them out and stick to their principles.
by Gary Boatwright on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 11:23:43 PM EST

Re: That's a hell of a story janfrel (none / 0)

My guess would be that it's an aversion to doing anything that might even seem vaguely like it could possibly lead to some form of liberal bias at a later date, so as to avoid being hassled by wingnuts.

Not that it seems to be helping...

by craverguy on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 11:27:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That's a hell of a story janfrel (none / 0)

In this case of the Argus guys, there wasn't any local liberal blogger(s) worth mentioning working on the scope of what the Thune bloggers were doing.

BTW, I see a birth of a Thune-style blogging phenomenon arising in the upcoming 2006 Minnesota Senate race. Someone started a Dayton Vs. Kennedy blog a bit back -- though it's just a pro-kennedy blog now, since Dayton isn't running --  and it has all the feel of the same kind of phenomenon (I'm not being conspiratorial here, kudos to these guys doing whatever the hell they want to, including not disclosing ties, working extremely closely with Kennedy's campaign, etc.) one gets from the Thune bloggers. I don't want to do a forensic on that blog, but rest assured that it's on the radar of South Dakota blogger Jon Lauck and Time Magazine blogger of the year and Minnesota resident John Hinderaker of the Powerline blog.

Also, of all the establishment conservative journalist types, none gets the potential of blogging better than Hugh Hewitt. Check out his book, Blog, which fits nicely on a shelf next to We the Media and The Revolution Will Not Be Televised.

There's some really good ideas in it, and some interesting exploration of the potential impact of dark arts blogging. he gets into hypothetical scenarios where a blogger ostensibly supports a candidate, gains a large audience through his talents, and then "turns" on the candidate. I think this is something more relevant in a primary process than a general election, but it's a rich field, and no doubt will come down the road.

by janfrel on Sat Feb 26, 2005 at 12:03:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Because the wingnut blogs (none / 0)

Pay so much attention to them.  If you hear your name spoken, don't you look up?

IMHO, The Argus Leader was not wrong to respond to the wingnuts.  They were wrong to respond to them in print.  They should have established their own blog and responded to them there.  It would have reached the desired audience (readers of the blogosphere), and it would have stopped the spread of their propaganda.  

This article should be required reading for every Democrat who plans to run for election in 2006.  Daschle v. Thune was the beginning; it won't be the end.  The Democrats must be prepared to respond.

Support Regina Thomas, GA-12
by Drew on Sat Feb 26, 2005 at 07:54:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Got Into Their Heads? (none / 0)

They're all big boys - a couple of bloggers shouldn't make much difference. IIRC, the bloggers were successful because they focused on Daschle's stances on issues that hadn't been getting much publicity in South Dakota. Bush carried the state by 60% to 39%, so focusing on issues that Daschle had oppossed Bush on was a fairly obvious strategy. It's the same strategy Democrats hope to use on Santorum and other Republicans that are thought to be to the right of their state's electorate.
by SLinVA on Sat Feb 26, 2005 at 02:14:04 PM EST

There are still alot of paid bloggers out there. (3.00 / 1)

One for example, is  ACE:

http://www.airborne-combat-engineer.com

It masquerades as a military blog but it
is hard wired into any campaign ongoing.

It's run by a guy named David Driskell.
He maintains a false address in Decatur, and
an actual address on the South Carolina border.

He likely played a pivotal role in
the McCain attacks in 2000, definitely
played a role in kerry attacks in 2004.

Not unlike the other paid off propagandists
this particular blog does two things.

1. he censors his readers heavily -
   often his comments go down to zero because
   he blocks alot of people.

2. He is paid off to write what he writes,
   and seems to know what Rove wants to do
   before he does it. On more than one occasion
   he had advance copy of a bush political ad.

There are alot of bloggers out there who
are paid off to be 'independent' sources
of 'military' news. The GOP that struck
down benefits for vets, cut pay of soldiers,
scared off big chunks of the special forces,
and skimped on up-armor for the HMVs is
constantly lauded here as a model of happiness
for the military...

by turnerbroadcasting on Sat Feb 26, 2005 at 08:14:20 PM EST

Somebody should tell this to Bob Somerby... (none / 0)

... he's convinced that the Gannon/Guckert thing is a non-story.

When a fake reporter who runs fake news has his fake stories used to oust a sitting Senator, I think it's a story, don't you?

by Phoenix Woman on Sun Feb 27, 2005 at 06:07:22 PM EST

All you need is the media (none / 0)

Yes its nice that we have a diverse blogsphere pursuing many ways to help Lefties. It doesn't mean shit though. They have the media and that trumps everything else. We ran a war hero who has killed multiple times for his country against someone who chickened out of a war he believed in. And we had the wimp. Why bother with great strategy if everytime we run a big play, it gets called back for holding? The refs decide the game and they own the refs. When blogs make a difference it is by directly influencing the media. Their netroots strategy is better.
by TJonBergman on Mon Feb 28, 2005 at 11:54:45 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.