Seven and Counting

Frank Rich comes close, but he forget someone:
By my count, "Jeff Gannon" is now at least the sixth "journalist" (four of whom have been unmasked so far this year) to have been a propagandist on the payroll of either the Bush administration or a barely arms-length ally like Talon News while simultaneously appearing in print or broadcast forums that purport to be real news. Of these six, two have been syndicated newspaper columnists paid by the Department of Health and Human Services to promote the administration's "marriage" initiatives. The other four have played real newsmen on TV. Before Mr. Guckert and Armstrong Williams, the talking head paid $240,000 by the Department of Education, there were Karen Ryan and Alberto Garcia. Let us not forget these pioneers - the Woodward and Bernstein of fake news. They starred in bogus reports ("In Washington, I'm Karen Ryan reporting," went the script) pretending to "sort through the details" of the administration's Medicare prescription-drug plan in 2004. Such "reports," some of which found their way into news packages distributed to local stations by CNN, appeared in more than 50 news broadcasts around the country and have now been deemed illegal "covert propaganda" by the Government Accountability Office.
He named six right, but there was a seventh fake reporter, Mike Morris, who was uncovered in early January but has become somewhat forgotten.
Shortly before last year's Super Bowl, local news stations across the country aired a story by Mike Morris describing plans for a new White House ad campaign on the dangers of drug abuse.

What viewers did not know was that Morris is not a journalist and his "report" was produced by the government, actions that constituted illegal "covert propaganda," according to an investigation by the Government Accountability Office.

In the second ruling of its kind, the investigative arm of Congress this week scolded the Bush administration for distributing phony prepackaged news reports that include a "suggested live intro" for anchors to read, interviews with Washington officials and a closing that mimics a typical broadcast news sign off.

Although television stations knew the materials were produced by the Office of National Drug Control Policy, there was nothing in the two-minute, prepackaged reports that would indicate to viewers that they came from the government or that Morris, a former journalist, was working under contract for the government.

Rich is right about something else, however. Even with the total number of paid shills at seven and rising rapidly, this is but a small part of the Bush administrations propaganda effort:
The pre-fab "Ask President Bush" town hall-style meetings held during last year's campaign (typical question: "Mr. President, as a child, how can I help you get votes?") were carefully designed for television so that, as Kenneth R. Bazinet wrote last summer in New York's Daily News, "unsuspecting viewers" tuning in their local news might get the false impression they were "watching a completely open forum." A Pentagon Office of Strategic Influence, intended to provide propagandistic news items, some of them possibly false, to foreign news media was shut down in 2002 when it became an embarrassing political liability. But much more quietly, another Pentagon propaganda arm, the Pentagon Channel, has recently been added as a free channel for American viewers of the Dish Network. Can a Social Security Channel be far behind?

It is a brilliant strategy. When the Bush administration isn't using taxpayers' money to buy its own fake news, it does everything it can to shut out and pillory real reporters who might tell Americans what is happening in what is, at least in theory, their own government. Paul Farhi of The Washington Post discovered that even at an inaugural ball he was assigned "minders" - attractive women who wouldn't give him their full names - to let the revelers know that Big Brother was watching should they be tempted to say anything remotely off message.

I don't mean to keep correcting Rich, especially since his article is so good, but he forget to mention how the Social Security administration is being forced to promote its own destruction. Considering all of this, I remain convinced that we have still only sen the tip of the iceberg.

Representative Louise Slaughter, NY-28, is leading the charge in Congress against Bush's propaganda. You can email her here to show your support.



Display:


Adolf Revisited (none / 0)

Didn't the Nazis do the same sort of thing?  Would it surprise anyone if Bush declares a FEMA emergency at the end of 2008 and takes control of the government as a dictatorship suspending our civil rights?  I'm waiting for the Hitler youth scouts, who save America by reporting on gays, liberals, and non-christians.  
http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 02:36:09 PM EST

Slowly find the evidence... (none / 0)

Let the crescendo peak in 2006...Just in time to sweep the elections.  Then lets impeach his ass and throw him in prison... How about a cell in OZ?  ;-)
http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 02:38:01 PM EST

My response (none / 0)

I have just sent the following email to Louise Slaughter, and I sent a copy to Jim McDermott.


Dear Representative Slaughter:

Although I am not one of your constituents, I want to thank you for your active role in investigating and getting answers regarding the disturbing activity by the Bush administration to stifle free press and to propagandize on behalf of White House policy using shills posing as journalists.

I believe this is one of the most troubling issues of our time.  The free press is the backbone of our democracy.  I've long been upset by the President's denial of access to those legitimate journalists who ask challenging questions or write/broadcast items that are critical of his policies.  The latest news regarding "Jeff Gannon" raises more questions and concerns.

Please don't back down on this.

I am also writing my own Representative, Jim McDermott of Seattle, to encourage him to support your efforts to uncover and expose this scandal, which threatens to undermine our national identity as a free, democratic society.

Thank you.


by nocloset on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 03:02:36 PM EST

There are still outstanding FOIA requests (none / 0)

I suspect we are just seeing the tip of the iceberg. Gannon/Gulich is the Titanic that will break this thing wide open. The incredibly softball treatment Kurty and Blitzer gave Gannon/Gulich this week will live long in media infammy.

Wolf actually accepted GG's explanation that he changed his name because Jeff Gannon was easier than Jim Gulich? I've only read about it, because I rarely watch Wolfie any more. He isn't worth the time. From what I've read they have both embarassed themselves.

A related benefit is the destruction this will do to the "liberal media" frame of wingnuts and GOPers. A "liberal media" would not have had to be dragged into this story the way they have. Their continuing reluctance can no longer be explained away. I can't wait to hear the rationalizations for why this is not an even bigger story than Monicagate.

This story could very well put the RWCM coverage of the entire Whitewater imbroglio back under the spotlight. The anticipation of Fitzgerald's investigation is agony. Any word on whether he has questioned GG? Why or why not? It looks to me like GG and Novak may be linked at the hip on this story.

Damn these are great days to be a Democrat!

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 03:10:35 PM EST

The "real" media are complicit. (none / 0)

I've long been coming to the conclusion that the MSM are "enablers" in the Vast RW Prop Machine.

How many "experts talking heads" do we see 24/7 that are "fellows" for propaganda organizations thinly disguised as "think tanks."

Yet the viewer or reader would never have a clue that these people are just highly paid shills for the organizations and people funding the "think tanks."

CNN, CSPAN, NPR, NYT, Boston Globe et al fail in their duty to warn their viewers/listeners about the  agenda that these talking heads bring to the table.

by Southern Patriot on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 03:20:40 PM EST

Re: The "real" media are complicit. (none / 0)

Yet The Daily Show with Jon Stewart is one of the best sources for real political news around.
by wayward on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 11:02:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This story should mainstream the story (none / 0)

I am not familiar with Editory & Publisher, but it sure sounds reputable. This story, Milbank, Dowd, and Others Weigh In on Gannon/Guckert should make this story very difficult to ignore.

Money quote:

And more today: Eric Boehlert in the online magazine Salon picks up another revelation from the blogosphere. It seems that Gannon/Guckert, as revealed in a television clip, had access to the White House briefing room as early as February 28, 2003. This may be significant, Boehlert argues, because the organization Gannon/Guckert worked for, Talon News, did not exist until March and did not begin publishing news stories until then.

How and why did Gannon/Guckert get an embossed press pass before Talon News was even a faux media outlet? The story also credits SusanG over at dkos for her Milbank interview and a photo of Guckert with an embossed press pass that the WH, Talon and Guckert have all denied being issued.

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 03:46:47 PM EST

Re: This story should mainstream the story (none / 0)

Joe Conason is making waves in the N.Y. Observer, Liberal' Media Silent About Guckert Saga.

Proof that "the liberal media" is but a figment of right-wing mythology has now arrived in the person of one James Guckert, formerly known as Jeff Gannon. Were the American media truly liberal--or merely unafraid to be called liberal--the saga of Mr. Guckert's short, strange, quasi-journalistic career would be resounding across the airwaves.

I may have seen a reference to this story earlier. There is no way the Gannon/Guckert story stays out of the MSM.

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 04:35:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

GannonGuckert the latest.... (none / 0)

Betcha there's dozens more we have not heard about.

If you haven't visited Pacific Northwest Portal, yet, you should. Now syndicating two dozen progressive blogs from the Pacific Northwest, the portal is your connection to the regional blogosphere. It also features newswires from each state, a comprehensive directory of all regional forward-thinking blogs and websites, and extensive listings of traditional media throughout Washington Oregon and Idaho.

Access over 200 of the Net's finest progressive blogs through Pacific NW Portal - regional politics at your fingertips.
by BoiseLiberal on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 03:48:48 PM EST

My Question is (none / 0)

How many journalism students will see shilling for either party as a way to make huge bucks? I mean, with the concerted effort to paint any journalist that is critical of Georgie as part of the "liberal media", coupled to the vast number of right wing stooges masquerading as journalists, our media is rapidly becomming something of a farce.

BTW, after seeing Curious Georgie's press conference today, will somebody please tell me what is so damn funny about recalling our ambassador to Syria that it merited not only a smirk, but even a brief chuckle?

BBTW--Any Missouri Blogs of interest?

by OxBuzzard on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 04:31:14 PM EST

did it happen? (none / 0)

Rich has a line at the end:

Is the banishment of a real newsman for behaving foolishly at a bloviation conference in Switzerland a more pressing story than that of a fake newsman gaining years of access to the White House (and network TV cameras) under mysterious circumstances? With real news this timid, the appointment of Jon Stewart to take over Dan Rather's chair at CBS News could be just the jolt television journalism needs.

Is Stewart in?

by Jerome Armstrong on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 04:41:05 PM EST

Re: did it happen? (none / 0)

He's in the running but Moonves et al have not selected their final choice by all published reports.
by risenmessiah on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 09:27:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Maureen Dowd (3.00 / 1)

I now have two heroes, both writing for the NY Times.

Here is what Maureen Dowd has to say on this subject.

by nocloset on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 07:20:14 PM EST

Re: Maureen Dowd (none / 0)

Thanks for the link.
by OxBuzzard on Thu Feb 17, 2005 at 07:54:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Anyone Care to Make it Eight? (none / 0)

This one fell through the cracks after about ten minutes:

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/news/epaper/2005/02/02/m1a_FSUCENTER_0202.html

FSU center spent public money to tout feds' policies
By Kimberly Miller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

(EXCERPTS) Wednesday, February 02, 2005

"A Florida State University center has used more than a half-million in education tax dollars to put a positive spin on President Bush's key school policies, including hiring a public relations firm to teach charter schools to be more media-savvy.

"Despite conflicting studies on the success of charter schools and other alternative education programs, the School Choice Center at FSU touts them as ways to 'increase student achievement, increase parental involvement, promote school improvement through constructive competition, and accomplish racial and ethnic diversity.'

"Since 2003, taxpayers have given the center $627,567 as part of a 5-year, $1.2 million federal grant made available through the No Child Left Behind Act, which promotes school choice as a fix for failing public schools.

"The center's mission is to make parents aware of all choice programs, including traditional magnet schools, expand the number of choice schools in the state, and help them "work the media" -- as was written in one of the PR firm's pamphlets."

by Village Jenius on Fri Feb 18, 2005 at 03:16:21 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.