MyDD Conversation with CA Gov. Candidate Steve Westly

The following is another of what I hope will be many candidate interviews with the MyDD community.

Over the past several months, California state Controller Steve Westly has been engaged in a battle for the Democratic Party's gubernatorial nomination in the state against state Treasurer Phil Angelides (with whom we spoke many months ago and might once again speak in the future),

On Wednesday afternoon, Westly and I spoke over the telephone about a range of topics related to his campaign. You can listen to the interview here (warning: a very large wav file) or read the rush transcript below.

Jonathan Singer: For as unpopular as Arnold Schwarzenegger is, the state legislature appears to be even less popular. Many political analysts tie this to the seeming gridlock that always affects the state. As Governor, what would you do to improve the situation in Sacramento?

Steve Westly: I think since I've taken office as Controller, I've been focused on getting things done not on being an ideologue. I think I'm uniquely positioned as somebody who can bring Democrats and Republicans together to fix things, and I think that's what most people in the state are looking for. May I give you one example?

Singer: Yeah, definitely, please.

Westly: Again, over the last three years, the overarching problem in California, as you know, has been to solve the budget deficit. The Governor's solution has been to attack nurses, teachers, firefighters; my Democratic primary opponent's solution has been to attack the Governor; and I've focused like a laser on trying to bring more money into government.

We've had success with two very innovative programs: a tax voluntary compliance initiative. It was focused on clamping down on companies and high net worth individuals in high end tax scams scored to bring in 90 million, it brought in over $1.4 billion. People said, "Whoa, that was amazing. Can you do that again?" And we came back this year with a tax amnesty plan scored to bring in 250 million, it brought in $2.4 billion dollars. So I joke I'm still waiting for the thank you call from the Governor. But the fact of the matter is I think I've shown that you can focus on results, then you can bring money into government in ways that have both Democratic and Republican support.

Singer: Even though Governor Schwarzenegger's slate of propositions met with resounding defeat in November, they point to the real budgetary problem in the state, which is a combination of mandatory spending and caps on taxation. And as a result of those two facts of California government, it's very difficult to balance the budget. Can it only be done on the revenue side or the spending side, or will you need to address those two issues together in tandem?

Westly: Again, people get stuck in this town. When I came to Sacramento, people said, "Whoa, which side are you on? Are you on the side that wants huge tax increases that will run our few remaining businesses out of the state? Or are you on the side that wants to make massive cuts in education and healthcare?" And I said, "Wait a minute. There's a smarter way to deal with this." And again, it's not just something I've talked about, it's something I've done.

There's a lot of money already on the books that we're not collecting, even after the two programs I've done, which, again, has already brought in $3.5 billion. There's an additional $6.5 billion on the books today in taxes we're not collecting. So the smart thing to do is to start there, collect as much of that as possible, and then take a look at how much of a gap you have remaining.

Singer: The tough question is does Proposition 13 have to be changed? Do property taxes have to increase, as the former advisor to Governor Schwarzegger Warren Buffet suggested?

Westly: The short answer is I don't support changing Prop. 13. But more importantly, there's a simple political reality: Prop. 13 is not going to be changed any time soon, and the fact is our schools need help sooner.

Again, that's why I'm acting now, not hoping for something that might happen in the future to save us, but to come up with concrete solutions. We're looking at some follow ups to our successful voluntary compliance initiative and other programs to see if we can bring in additional money to help get more money into schools, healthcare and the areas where we need it. And I think we'll be successful bringing in additional money this year toward exactly that end.

Singer: Talking about education, a lot of people on the right side of the spectrum say, "Yes, let's increase funding for schools, definitely. But let's also increase accountability, especially for the teachers." And even some Democrats would argue that the teacher's unions play too large of a role in the party. Do you think that's the case? Or do you think that there are other ways of improving the state's education system without attacking teachers?

Westly: I think teachers are the heroes in public education, not the villains, as the Governor has tried to paint them.

I went to public schools K-12 in my life, almost all of which in California. I think teachers are the best things in the education system.

So I want to see Prop. 98 fully funded. I've pledged to do that. I'm the one candidate running for Governor who's talked about and actually shown you can bring a substantial piece of that money in by getting creative and being innovative.

Singer: Now speaking of healthcare, you have noted on your website, and I'm sure speeches as well, there are quite a few Californians living without healthcare. What steps can the state take - especially with the federal government making cuts to Medicaid - what steps can the state of California take to ensure that more Californians have healthcare?

Westly: First, you're absolutely right - it's a state tragedy that we have close to six million Californians without healthcare. And by the way, it's not cost-effective to have this many people exposed, clogging up the emergency room systems. It's wrong from a philosophical point of view and it's a poor investment for the state.

What I've articulated is that as Governor, the first thing that I would do would be to sign the Healthy Families legislation, known, too, as the Escutia-Chan bill. That's a first step, which provides basic healthcare for children. And again, not only is this a smart thing to do, it's clearly a cost-effective thing to make sure you provide health benefits for children.

Second, over the long haul, I'd like to see what was Prop. 72, also known as SB. 1, which was the employer mandated provision of healthcare for companies with a minimum of 50 or 100 people. I think that's the smart next step to making sure we do a better job of providing healthcare for most Californians.

Singer: Let's keep going through some more issues. The price of gasoline in California is among the highest in the continental United States, and the state has faced serious problems with its energy markets in the past. Notwithstanding a ban on Enron-like behaviors, which have caused a number of the problems in the past, what steps can be taken to alleviate the energy issues facing the state?

Westly: First, California does have some of the highest gas prices in the country, but part of that is because we have the highest environmental standards, and I think that's something many Californians are proud of.

As you know, California has long been an environmental leader. We passed the first catalytic converter legislation in the 70s. Within a decade, not only most of the rest of the country but the rest of the world had followed suit. So that's something I'm proud of.

Over the long term, though, we need to provide more power in this state so we can keeps costs at a reasonable level. And as you may know, I've spent a lot of my life working in the alternative energy field, starting in the Carter administration where I worked in the office of conservation and solar.

I think California's strong suit is to continue to lead the world in alternative energy, bring more alternative power online so that we can have more energy independence and more control over our power costs.

Singer: The issue of immigration is a very divisive issue, it's a tough issue. In the special congressional election down in Orange County a few weeks ago, the founder of the Minuteman Project pulled a surprising 25 percent of the vote, which is a large share even for Orange County. Given that so many Californians, both inside Orange County and around the state, are concerned with the flow of immigration into the state, how would you handle this issue as Governor?

[Cross talk about time remaining]

Westly: First, California needs to do a better job of securing its borders. We cannot have unabated hundreds of thousands of people crossing the borders every year. Most people understand that. But it's equally clear that the state's economy would not survive without the ample access to immigrant labor, primarily from Mexico.

What I want to do is turn down the partisan rancor at both ends of the spectrum, the sorts of unfortunate things that we heard in the Orange County congressional election, and particularly - and perhaps most inflammatory of all - was the Governor's call to support vigilantes at the border. That's not the right answer.

We need to be looking for common sense solutions like the McCain-Kennedy approach that allows immigrants to come across the border in a guest worker program, to get jobs in California, and to help drive this economy forward, and also to provide a reasonable path towards amnesty for many of the immigrants that are already living in California.

The other thing that's important to note is I've promised that within six months of becoming Governor, I would go to Mexico, meet with President Vicente Fox's successor, because the Governor of California and the President of Mexico need to have a close working relationship. I think that's been missing from the current equation, and that's something I would fix immediately.

Just as an aside, by the way, I just did some TV ads - you might not know about this - opposing the Governor's special initiatives. And I was the first candidate for Governor to do TV ads statewide in Spanish myself, and as I joked, I did them in Spanish, my wife did ads in Chinese, and between the two of us, we've got the state covered.

Singer: Final question - What would you like to say specifically to members of the liberal blogosphere to get them more involved in this race?

Westly: Two things. First, I think I represent something different. I'm not a career politician. I'm someone who's been politically passionate all of my life, but I'm someone who has a unique background in the high tech sector in Ebay, where I think we created one of the most democratic and empowering companies ever on the internet.

Second, I've been a classroom educator, and no one running for Governor in recent history has that background.

Third, I've been an effective Controller. Perhaps what I'm proudest about is when everyone else said it was impossible, I found ways to bring $3.5 billion into government to provide funding for things like education and healthcare that I'm passionate about. When people say I want to support the most progressive person in the California gubernatorial race, forget all the things the candidates will tell you. I would say I think being the one guy who's brought $3.5 billion into government for things we all believe in, like education and healthcare, by de facto makes me the progressive candidate.

So it's a different background, it's a commitment to Democratic core principles and it's the ability to put my words into action.

Singer: Terrific. Well thanks so much for your time and good luck with your campaign.

Westly: I hope we can talk an awful lot more, and as someone who's made my life in high tech on the internet, let me just say what you're doing is the future, I get it, and we're going to be giving you a lot of time, because a lot more people are reading what you're doing than an awful lot of papers in this state.

[THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.]


Display:


I'm looking forward to the debates (none / 0)

and a spirited primary. The California Democratic Party is fortunate to have two terrific candidates.
by Gary Boatwright on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 06:06:18 AM EST

sounds like a spitzer (none / 0)

I like him so far.
DAGGER
by goplies on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 06:50:14 AM EST

Re: sounds like a spitzer (none / 0)

I'm sure he's fine, but I have a couple of complaints about some fo what he said.

  1.  He accepted the right wing rhetoric that California cannot raise taxes because higher taxes would run off whatever businesses remain. I live here in California and that's ridiculous. There are plenty of businesses here, people like living here and there will always be a market here for businesses to tap into. Its' great to fugue out ways to collect uncollected taxes, but that's not going to be enough. taking tax increases off the table ensures that we'll be a rich state that "can't" sfford to be so "generous" to our students and our working class.

  2. The guest worker solution to undocumented immigration isn't a eolution at all. The non-racist argument against it is that it (a) drives down wages with plenty of cheap labor and (b) increases the costs for education. Guest worker programs don't address either of those issues, so there's no need to do anything if that's all yuo're going to do. It's a cheap political fix, not a real solution. My person opinion is that the wage issue isn't about the immigration status of the workers, it's about the political status of labor these days. We need stronger unions to help protect wages in America, we need an economic policy that focuses on tightening the labor market so that wages can rise, and we need a political commitment to eduxate the people who live here. The immigration issue isa right wing misdirection, IMO.

Keith
by keith johnson on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 11:19:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sounds like a spitzer (none / 0)

The guest worker solution to undocumented immigration isn't a solution at all

Let's be honest. There is no solution to undocumented immigration. A minimum wage and worker's rights for Mexican citizens is the only real solution. We can only do so much. Mexico has to clean up their politics and put their economic house in order.

by Gary Boatwright on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 10:37:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sounds like a spitzer (none / 0)

"Let's be honest. There is no solution to undocumented immigration. A minimum wage and worker's rights for Mexican citizens is the only real solution. We can only do so much. Mexico has to clean up their politics and put their economic house in order."

That's correct. All a guest worker program will do is officialize the importation of cheap labor. What our working class needs is strong unions to prtect their incomes and rights. The other stuff is distarction.

Keith

by keith johnson on Sun Dec 25, 2005 at 01:36:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Hard for me to support Westly (none / 0)

First of all, Westly went out on the stump with Arnold in 2003 to promote Props 57 & 58. Westly even gave Schwarzenegger a $200
box of cigars in 2004, according to records filed with the Fair Political Practices Commission.

That's bipartisanship, I guess. We know how well bipartisanship has worked at winning elections.

Prop 57 was a $15B bond... and as a California taxpayer, I'd rather pay as we go for needed services - not pay for those services as well as a huge chunk to the bond holders. But I can understand why wealthy bond holders prefer them to taxes.

Westly, like Schwarzenegger, is all too willing to borrow his way out of deficits... which just piles on the debt.

by Malacandra on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 12:09:48 PM EST

Prop 57 & 58 (none / 0)

Props 57 & 58 were not the same as Schwarzenegger's recent right wing spin initiatives. The California Teacher's Association also supported 57 & 58.

I don't know why you say Westly is willing to pile on the debt. He was a former CEO for EBay and has done a great job as California Controller. Steve is an unabashed fiscal conservative, but that doesn't put him in Schwarzenegger's camp.

Like I said, I think we have two terrific candidates and am looking forward to their debates. Either one of them will kick The Porkinator's butt.

by Gary Boatwright on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 10:32:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Don't know about Westly yet (none / 0)

As someone who has bumped around CA politics and seen both Angelides and Westly on the stump, on pure appearance and pzazz, it is advantage Westly.

And we've proved with the incumbent how very important appearances are here.

That said, some Democrat is going to have to lay out a path to restore the State's ability to tax or there is no governing the place -- Sacramento will continue to see nothing but a series of acrimonious remixes.

Can It Happen Here?
by janinsanfran on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 12:45:24 PM EST

Re: Don't know about Westly yet (none / 0)

Have you seen Angelides recently?  He's certainly gotten a lot better on the stump.  
Visit my blog Say No to Pombo
by Matt Lockshin on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 02:16:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

re: Hard for me to support Westly (none / 0)

Malacandra, you wrote "First of all, Westly went out on the stump with Arnold in 2003 to promote Props 57 & 58. "

I'd like to point out that so did every other major Democrat in the State...except Phil Angelides...who stood with right wing nut Sen. Tom McClinctock as the only two high profile opponents of Prop. 57 and 58.

And the reason why the Democratic Party, CDP Chairman Art Torres, the Democratic Assembly Speaker, Senator Boxer, Rep. Pelosi, CTA, and AFL-CIO all backed Props. 57 and 58 was because the state was going to run out of money and there was no other way. Angelides' solution was a tax hike that would have been dead on arrival in a Legislature where a 2/3 vote is needed and right wingers never would have allowed it.

Angelides always attacks Westly for supporting Prop. 57 and 58, trying to say it shows he's not a real Democrat. Funny thing is, every single one of Angelides' own campaign co-chairs (Boxer, Feinstein, Pelosi, Nunez) ALSO supported those inititatives. I guess Pelosi and Boxer aren't real Democrats then?

by Tom Lee on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 03:57:03 PM EST

bleah (none / 0)

For one thing, "focused like a laser" needs to be permanently retired. It's a phrase that tries to be impressive and futuristic but ends up lying on the carpet like a dead slug.

This all sounds like the usual corporate BS to me - not in policies, I mean in the language and style. Working "on the internet" is by no means any kind of instant cred. I worked at those boom companies. There was a whole lot of hooey being handed out.

"Revenue recovery" as an alternative to fixing the cancer that is Prop 13 is as disingenuous as Reagan's "waste, fraud and abuse."

by tatere on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 07:35:03 PM EST

re: bleah (none / 0)

Tatere,

You may take issue with the language Westly uses - and its true his language is not the most colorful or exciting - but his commitment to progressive values is clear.

He's committed to environmental protection, civil rights, a woman's right to choose,universal health care, and biomonitoring.

He went after tax cheats, who weren't paying their fair share, to bring in the money to fund the social programs.

That's the way Democrats win elections in CA. People will trust Dems with their money when they know we can spend it responsibly and when they know we've made sure everyone's paid their fair share before we ask everyone to pay more in taxes.

We can talk about ideal Dem candidates who are ideological purists until we're blue in the face.

But I'll tell ya, I'm a Dem who's more interested in winning back the Governor's Mansion from der gropinator than waxing about some perfect candidate who doesn't exist.

by Tom Lee on Fri Dec 23, 2005 at 08:09:27 PM EST

Response to Mr. Tom Lee (none / 0)

Let me start by saying that I am a resident Californian and have not bothered to read Westly's remarks,  because my mind is already made up to support Phil Angelides.  My reason for supporting Angelides is precisely because he opposed the Gropenfurher while Westly and most of the other Democratic leadership were giving Arnold one his beloved anal body massages.  Mr. Angelides was the only one out there giving a visible voice to the opposition of the Gropper and has done so consistently.   To tar Angelides opposition to Props 57 and 58 as making him slightly a 'right-wing nut' is a little disengenuous 'Tommy'.  I voted against both Props because I failed to see the impending debt crises you seem to imply.  The 'crises' was the result of at least two things:  Arnold's repeal of the car tax and his desire to creaate a crises to show that he was in charge.  If seeing Arnold for what he is, is nutty, then I plead insanity.  

Botton line Thomas: Arnold is a despicable Governor and probably worse than Grey Davis; Angelides is the only one of the California Constitutional Officers to have to guts to point this out; And he derserves to be Governor because he has that courage.

by CalMinorityWhiteGuy on Sat Dec 24, 2005 at 03:37:13 PM EST

A response to Mr. "CalMinorityWhiteGuy" (none / 0)


So you've made up your mind without ever hearing what Westly has to say, just because Angelides was out there attacking Arnold since day one.

Does that really matter? Is that really enough of a reason to back him for Governor?

Angelides has been running up and down the state for the past year telling Dems we should vote for him because he has been fighting Arnold since day one.

That's all well and good, but I am more interested in his record, where he stands on the issues, and what his vision is for our state.

I want to vote for my candidate based on what he or she stands for, not just for what he or she stands against.

And I think most Californians, and most progressive dems, would agree with me.

Angelides spends a good deal of his time bashing Arnold and Bush. And yes, they rightly should be bashed. But I need more than than from a guy who wants my vote.

And what will be Angelides' message in the general election? "Vote for me because I stood up against Arnold since day one!"

Is that message going to sell to people outside progressive enclaves?

Contrast that with Westly's message that look, like many Californians, he gave Arnold the benefit of a doubt, thinking he'd be a bipartisan leader who governed from the middle and would be, in some ways, to the left of Gray. But then Arnold revealed his true self and everything changed.

But don't you think the majority of Californians, many of whom also gave Arnold a chance, would appreciate that nuance?

I just don't think Angelides' wholly negative message will sell with the voters.

Maybe I'm right, maybe I'm wrong.

"CalMinorityWhiteGuy", you say you voted against 57 and 58 because you "failed to see" and impending crisis. And therefore, you allege, that there wasn't one. Well, my friend, you may not have seen an impending crisis, but the California Teachers Association, Democratic Party, California Labor Federation, and all of Angelides' own campain co-chairs did see a crisis.

And let's remember, some the democrats you say were giving Arnold an "anal body massage" by backing Prop 57 and 58 are the very same democrats now co-chairing Angelides' campaign...Boxer, Feinstein, Pelosi, and Nunez.

So that tired line of attack just rings hollow for me.

by Tom Lee on Sun Dec 25, 2005 at 01:06:03 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.