A Conversation with RI Sen Candidate Matt Brown

The following is another of what I hope will be many candidate interviews with the MyDD community.

For the past several months, Rhode Island Secretary of State Matt Brown has been waging a campaign for the Democratic senatorial nomination in the state. Others seeking the office include the incumbent, Republican Lincoln Chafee; Steve Laffey, the conservative Republican mayor of Cranston; and the former state Attorney General, Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse (with whom we are arranging an imminent interview).

On Monday morning, Brown and I spoke over the telephone about a range of topics related to his campaign. You can listen to the call here (warning: a 13.5 megabyte mp3), or read the rush transcript.

Jonathan Singer: As Secretary of State, you have instituted some tough regulations on lobbyists. Given the scandals surrounding Jack Abramoff, Randy "Duke" Cunningham and others in the Republican Party, to what extent will lobbying reform play in your campaign?

Matt Brown: It's an important part of our campaign and, more importantly, it's an important part of what I want to do after we win the election. I'll tell you a little bit about the experience we had here and how it will translate to Washington.

When I came into office, a scandal came to light. The chairman of the Health Senate Committee was getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars by the big healthcare companies to block healthcare reform from even coming to a vote. And meanwhile, Rhode Islanders, like people across the country, were paying skyrocketing rate increases every year for their healthcare. People were losing healthcare coverage.

I saw that the problem was that it was possible for these kind of payments to be made by lobbyists to elected officials because the lobbyists weren't disclosing the expenditures they were making, and that if they were forced to disclose those expenditures, of course they wouldn't get away with these kind of payoffs to elected officials for favors.

So we did two things. One is we closed the loopholes in the lobbying law and required that lobbyists disclose all of their expenditures, not just sum up the expenditures that had been previously itemized in the law. It required them to disclose all their expenditures.

We put those reports up online so the public could see them for the first time without having to come sift through files. But equally important to strengthening the law, we got much tougher than my predecessor had been on enforcing the law. We wrote them letters, we called them - the lobbyists, that is - to demand that they actually comply and fill out these forms that disclose this information. When they didn't, I personally called them and also went on to the floor of the House and the Senate and tracked these lobbyists down and told them they had to disclose this information.

We got most people to do it, just through perseverance and effort. But there were still some that did not disclose after that, so we, for the first time, posted the names of these delinquent lobbyists who failed to file their information on our website, so the public could see who was not complying with the regulations. And, of course, the press wrote about it, and now we have full disclosure in this state. Hopefully, that will prevent the kind of corruption that we had in the state in the past.

And we see, as I'm running now for Senate, the same kinds of problems that we had here in Rhode Island taking place in Washington, where lobbyists are not disclosing expenditures they're making, they're not disclosing which bills they're even working on, they're not disclosing their interactions with elected officials. Because of that, they're getting away with wielding undue influence over our elected officials, and I want to bring a stop to that.

Singer: Specific to the campaign, while there have been allegations against a number of members of the Republican Party in Congress - certainly Randy "Duke" Cunningham comes to mind. Lincoln Chafee hasn't been explicitly tied to lobbying problems. Do you think you'll still hammer away at his connection to the Republican Party, or will this be more of a general issue?

Brown: The problem with lobbying in Washington is that the system is broken, and it's broken for two reasons. One is that there's very little enforcement - nearly no enforcement - of the current requirements for lobbyists to disclose their activities. And secondly, the regulations as they stand aren't strong enough.

So it's a similar problem to what we had in Rhode Island when I came into office, and it requires a similar fix. We need to strengthen the laws and require more disclosure by lobbyists, full disclosure. One of the things that I called for in my proposal is that the lobbyists file disclosure reports monthly. Now they only file them twice a year. You file only twice a year, you could have already influenced legislation, gotten it passed, before the public even has a chance to hold you accountable for your activities and interactions with elected officials. So we require monthly disclosure to provide much more oversight of the lobbyists activities.

We call for real enforcement. Right now, it's the fox guarding the henhouse. You have entities that work for the Senate and the House overseeing the regulation lobbying activities with Senators and Congresspeople. So we call for granting the Justice Department the authority to enforce the lobbying regulations, as they do currently with foreign lobbyists. The Justice Department has the teeth and the muscle to actually hold these lobbyists accountable for their wrongdoing.

The third thing we do is extend the window, from one year to two years, in which elected officials and senior staff can waltz through that revolving door and become high-paying lobbyists. And the reason, of course, is that we want to prevent what we see now in Washington, which is members of Congress making decisions not for the good of the public but in the hope that when they get out of office they may be rewarded with a high-paid lobbying job.

[Cross-chatter over microphone level]

Singer: In your role as Secretary of State, you've worked hard to ensure that everyone votes and that every vote is counted. As Senator, what will you do to continue this?

Brown: We need to strengthen the Help America Vote Act and we need to make sure the federal government does what it was supposed to do over a year ago as a part of the Help America Vote Act, which is to set national standards for the improvement and conduct of elections in this country.

The Help America Vote Act was a response to the disasters of the Florida election. What happened with the Florida elections that it exposed, not just a problem in Florida, but a problem in states and counties and towns across the country, which is that our elections were deeply flawed, our election systems were deeply flawed. Machines not working, registrations not being counted properly, votes not being counted properly, people not being told the right place to vote - all kinds of problems in the model democracy for the world.

So the Help America Vote Act was passed to provide some funds to help solve those problems, but also to set standards for the kind of voting machines we need to have, the way to count ballots, all sorts of areas that require clear standards. The people in Washington failed to set those standards.

Here in my state, I went ahead and set very high standards for us here in Rhode Island and implemented the Act, and actually have created one of the first state-of-the-art central voter registry systems in the country, which is really the cornerstone of the strong and accurate election system - to have an accurate, computerized, updated, fraud-proof voter list. And I ran a program called R.I. Vote to increase voter turnout, including making it easier for men and women serving abroad to register to vote.

So we went ahead here and did a lot of things to improve the conduct of elections, but there are places around the country, I know, where those improvements have not been made. And it's really a failure of the leadership in Washington to set the standards of elections.

[Cross-chatter over time remaining]

Singer: Let's move directly to the primary campaign, some specific questions there. Your opponent, Sheldon Whitehouse, has been endorsed by the state's two Democratic Congressmen and has more cash-on-hand than you, almost by a 2:1 margin. Can you win the Democratic nomination?

Brown: Absolutely. I've got a great family, I have a new baby. I wouldn't be doing this unless I believed that we were going to win this race. There are a lot of other things in life that I enjoy doing. I'm not going to run a campaign unless I am confident that we're going to win it.

And we're going to win it similar to how we won my race last time. I challenged the entire political establishment in my state against a corrupt local political machine. They threw everything they had at us. And I beat the incumbent in a primary with 58 percent of the vote and won the general election with 68 percent of the vote. Now that, as you know, was the same primary in which my current primary opponent ran for governor with the full backing of the establishment and lost the primary with 38 percent of the vote.

What wins these elections in the end is earning the confidence of the voters. We have over 1,000 people signed on to my campaign committee, people from all across this state of all different backgrounds. And the reason why people are getting involved in my race and the reason we're going to win this is that people know that the crowd that we've had in office for all these years hasn't gotten the job done. That's why people can't find a decent school for their kids, they can't afford their healthcare, they can't afford to heat their homes.

So they know that we need a very different kind of leadership. They know the fact that I spent most of my adult life working directly in communities, in neighborhoods with people is a good, an important kind of experience to bring to the United States Senate, because I understand what's going on in people's lives.

They know the fact that, as Secretary of State, I have fought some of the most powerful interest groups - not just in the state, but in the country, including the Bush administration, to make it possible for Rhode Islanders to buy their prescription drugs from Canada; including the lobbyists; including the healthcare companies, to get an Insurance Commissioner in our state and oversee the rising healthcare costs.

And they know that this is the kind of leadership that we need in Washington, leadership that does not wait for permission from the establishment or from the interest groups to do things, but leadership that does what is right no matter how tough the pressure. And they know from my record that's what I'll do, and that's why we're going to win this race.

Singer: Do we have time for one more quick question?

[Cross-chatter over time remaining]

Brown: What's your last question?

Singer: I just wanted to know if you had anything specific to the blogosphere about the campaign.

Brown: I'd say get involved, pay attention to it. It's not early anymore. This is a major race. This has been identified as one of best chances we have in the country to win a Senate seat back.

Don't wait. This really begins now. Really, the beginning of the year is when this campaign gets into high gear. This is a seat we should win, we need to win - this is a 4:1 Democrat state - and we need people all around the country to get involved, speak out, help us, come out here, feet on the street.

I know that there's a lot of talent and a lot of energy, a lot of commitment and conviction out there in the blogosphere, and we want all of it involved in our race.

Singer: Terrific. Well thank you so much and good luck.

Brown: OK. Take care.

[THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.]

For more on Brown, check out his MyDD diary.


Display:


Great Interview (none / 0)

Great work Singer.  

I've been following the RI race ever since Armando blasted Planned Parenthood for endorsing Chafee.  I'm impressed.  Brown has real guts.  He called for a timetable to bring the troops home back in August and has been organizing people to support a timetable ever since.   He has also been calling on his opponent, Sheldon Whitehouse, to debate the war in Iraq.  But it hasn't worked.  Whitehouse is a typical politician.  He has been all over the place on Iraq, afraid to take a stand in either direction, and generally looking weak because of it.  And then last week Whitehouse took a poll before flipping his position on Iraq.  Read about it here.

Like Tester in MT, Brown is up there with a new class of Senate candidates - candidates who aren't afraid to stand up for what's right.  Check him out: www.mattbrown.org.

Again, great interview and keep 'em coming.

by My Fedora on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 09:04:03 AM EST

Great work (none / 0)

Wow! I'm impressed too -- I hadn't been following the primary in RI very closely but this was a very easy-to-read interview, well done, and gives me a brand new respect for Brown. I look forward to the interview with Whitehouse; it certainly does seem that the primary itself may be quite a race to watch.
Tim Wolfe

John McCain is not pro-choice!

by bruorton on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 10:17:15 AM EST

Thanks (none / 0)

In case you didn't see it, Brown posted an op-ed in the Providence Journal a couple of weeks ago -
Get Set to Bring the Troops Home in 2006

Matt has called on his opponent, Whitehouse, to debate the war in Iraq.  But Whitehouse has dodged any discussion about the war.

M. Charles Bakst, a Providence Journal columnist,  joined Matt's call for
Sheldon Whitehouse to stop dodging a debate on the war in Iraq.

by Matt Brown for US Senate on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 11:08:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I might move to R.I. (none / 0)

The Democratic Party needs people like Matt Brown.  
Memo to neocons: I respect your right to have an opinion, but I just don't want to hear it anymore.
by blogus on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 10:25:56 AM EST

Re: I might move to R.I. (none / 0)

Thanks.  Matt is working to bring new leadership down to DC.  We need leaders who are going to stand up and say what they believe, say what they think is right.  Even more, we need leaders who will go out and organize people to make it happen.

That's what Matt did when he became the first Senate candidate to call on President Bush to bring the troops home from Iraq.  And that's what he did when he organized over 7,000 Rhode Islanders to support his call.  Matt has been calling on his opponent, Whitehouse, to join him for a debate on Iraq.  But Whitehouse has refused. (See Providence Journal article - Whitehouse dodges debate

by Matt Brown for US Senate on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 10:54:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Go Get Em (none / 0)

Matt Brown is the gutsy fresh face for the Party we've been aching for. He was WAY out ahead of establishment Dems in his call for a troop withdrawal from Iraq. But he needs the money to keep taking on President Bush and the business-as-usual establishment types...get online and help raise him some cash! www.mattbrown.org

 

by Shabasito on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 10:49:43 AM EST

it's about time... (none / 0)

I'm pleased to see that finally someone has the guts to stand up to the special interests. Matt doesn't just give lip service, he delivers. I didn't know how good his record was, I'll be voting for Matt Brown
by happydem on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 11:08:08 AM EST

Re: it's about time... (none / 0)

Thanks for your support.  Voting is great.  We also need people to get involved now - whether that's calling your neighbors, writing a letter to your local paper or contributing to the campaign.  Get involved today - www.mattbrown.org.
by Matt Brown for US Senate on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 11:09:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

who (none / 0)

who is the better candidate versus chafee? And which one is the more progressive one? he made it seem like whitehouse was a machine politician, bu is that actually true? I think they are both members of the DLC, not like that matters too much anyhoot
by yomoma2424 on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 02:31:16 PM EST

Re: who (none / 0)

We should hopefully have an interview with Mr. Whitehouse up early next week, so you should be able to decide for yourself.
My Direct Democracy
by Jonathan Singer on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 02:46:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: who (none / 0)

Jonathan -
Thanks for sticking around to help comment on this interview.  It's great work and I'm looking forward to the rest of the interviews.
by Matt Brown for US Senate on Wed Dec 14, 2005 at 01:53:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Matt Brown: DLC candidate? (none / 0)

The widely-read progressive RI Future blog asked a while back why Matt Brown is the only Rhode Island politician or political candidate on the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) website.

And why does Matt Brown have such a strong allegience to Sen. Joe Lieberman (maybe he's looking for a little Joe-mentum too?)

And why has Matt Brown stayed away from supporting important labor, gay and lesbian rights, civil rights and immigrants rights issues in the RI legislature while posturing in his run for Senate?

It would be nice if our national bloggers started asking the tough questions.
by matthewRI on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 05:56:41 PM EST

Matt Brown - Standing Up to President Bush (none / 0)

Matthewri -

I find it extremely strange (and rather unethical) for you to refer readers to your own blog/posts as if your word was the truth.  For the sake of an open and healthy discourse, I'd ask you to document yourself instead of merely smearing a candidate.  We need to focus on what's really important to people - setting a timetable to bring the troops home from Iraq, ending the incredible influence lobbyists and special interests have over our elected officials and helping Rhode Islanders afford their heating bills and prescription drugs.  This is what Matt Brown has been doing since August when he called on President Bush to set a timetable to bring the troops home.

I'm also not sure why you're saying Singer didn't ask tough or important questions during the interview.  Certainly how we're going to stop lobbyists and special interests from influencing public officials is a critical - and timely - issue.  As is how we can improve the Help America Vote Act, so we can make sure every vote counts and encourage more Americans to get involved in the political process.  He's a professional through and through.  This seems a little bit out of no where.

Instead of trying to smear a candidate by citing your own words or challenging the talents of a journalist, I hope we can agree to focus on important issues.

In that spirit, do you think Whitehouse should join Brown for a debate on Iraq?  The Providence Phoenix recently reported that Whitehouse was dodging a debate on the issue.  If we've learned anything from President Bush's irresponsible conduct of this war, it's that the people deserve to know where candidates stand on the war and what their plan is to bring the troops home.  Thoughts?

by Matt Brown for US Senate on Wed Dec 14, 2005 at 01:52:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Matt Brown - Standing Up to President Bush (none / 0)

If you are saying that labor, civil rights, gay and lesbian rights, and immigrants rights issues are not "what's really important to people" I would repond that you are in the wrong primary. These are core issues for tens of thousands of Democratic primary voters in Rhode Island and your views on these issues are important and necessary for our democratic electoral process to work. And your comments are just another example of why the progressive community and progressive leaders across Rhode Island have not joined the Matt Brown campaign.
by matthewRI on Wed Dec 14, 2005 at 03:06:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Matt Brown - Standing Up to President Bush (none / 0)

Matt has been a leader on labor rights (listen to a podcast about Brown standing up to Wal-Mart because of their unfair labor and business practices, civil rights (Brown is opposed to Judge Alito because of his failure to uphold basic constitutional rights), and certainly Matt's work cleaning up the voter file made it easier for all Rhode Islanders to vote - regardless of their background.

Other than your own comments, I'm not sure where Matt hasn't been strong on these important issues.

So I'd ask you to be more specific.  Where do you think Matt Brown has been strong?  Where do you believe he could be more clear?  No offense, but please use independent sources this time, not links to your own words.  It is unethical for you link to yourself as fact.  We want this to be a platform for ideas and discussion - not negative, attack politics.

by Matt Brown for US Senate on Wed Dec 14, 2005 at 03:53:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

matthewri (none / 0)

MatthewRI is a Sheldon Whitehouse operative who has planted himself in the blogosphere with the sole purpose of tearing down the only progressive grassroots candidate in the field, Matt Brown. His boss Sheldon Whitehouse has dodged and weaved his way out of a discussion on Iraq and refused to join Matt's call for a timetable of withdrawal. Now they spend their time mounting back-room whispering campaigns against Matt Brown instead of going out and demonstrating real leadership. What a joke.
by Shabasito on Wed Dec 14, 2005 at 10:53:01 AM EST

Re: matthewri (none / 0)

Smearing me doesn't answer the questions, my friend. From the progressive weekly the Providence Phoenix:
The board of the Young Democrats is stocked with political talent, ranging from treasurer Meghan McBurney, the daughter of state Senator John F. McBurney (D-Pawtucket), and diversity director Julian Dash, who was recognized by the Phoenix as a Local Hero this year for his efforts in promoting affordable housing and civic engagement, to multi-tasking political director Matthew Jerzyk, a law student at Roger Williams University, an organizer for Service Employees International Union, District 1199, and the guiding force behind www.rifuture.org, one of the best and best-read political blogs in the state.
For the record, I have not taken a position on the US Senate race nor have I endoresed any candidate and my blog has posted many press releases from the Matt Brown campaign. So, again, answer important questions about progressive issues facing Rhode Island and save your personal attacks for the other side.
by matthewRI on Wed Dec 14, 2005 at 01:23:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Matt Brown - Standing Up to President Bush (none / 0)

As I wrote above, in the spirit of an open and honest discusssion, I'd ask both of you to take this bickering somewhere else.  This isn't a platform for smearing people or candidates.

If you haven't gotten a chance, please go and read Brown's plan to strengthen federal lobbying and ethics laws.  I'd like to hear some thoughts and feedback.

by Matt Brown for US Senate on Wed Dec 14, 2005 at 02:07:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wow (none / 0)

Nice interview - it's hard to get candidates to actually give us substance like this!

It's also good to see a Dem with some spine.  Having spent my life in the non-profit and public interest sector, Matt looks like the kind of candidate I can totally get behind.

by Yoohoo on Wed Dec 14, 2005 at 03:39:43 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.