Cunningham Admits Taking Bribes, Resigns

Republican Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham had already handed us Democrats a huge boost in our quest to take back the House in 2006 by announcing his retirement earlier this year. And of course, the very reason he announced his retirement -- a votes-for-yachts scandal involving a defense industry lobbyist -- added to the laundry list of scandals tarring House Republicans. So is it really all that important that Cunningham has come clean and admitted taking bribes? Well, for starters, it means that there's now one less Republican in Congress.

Cunningham, 63, admitted to taking $2.4 million in bribes in a case that grew from an investigation into the sale of his home to a wide-ranging conspiracy involving payments in cash, vacations and antiques. He entered pleas in U.S. District Court to charges of conspiracy to commit bribery, mail fraud and wire fraud, and tax evasion for underreporting his income in 2004.

Cunningham answered "yes, Your Honor" when asked by U.S. District Judge Larry Burns if he had accepted bribes from someone in exchange for his performance of official duties.

Cunningham, an eight-term Republican congressman, resigned after his guilty plea even though he had announced in July that he wouldn't seek re-election next year.

Beyond the fact that there's now one less member of the House Republican Caucus, this is the beginning of the end for the corrupt Republicans who've developed an all-too-cozy relationship with lobbyists. Sure, Tom DeLay's been indicted and Bob Ney's been implicated in the Abramoff scandals, but none of that is as clear as an actual admission of guilt.

Tonight's evening news will likely be filled with stories about a Republican Congressman taking pleading guilty to crimes that could (but probably won't) earn him some serious prison time (up to ten years). If there's any justice in this world, the story will be reported in context of DeLay, Abramoff, Ney, Safavian, etc, etc, etc.

One of the major points of the Democratic efforts to win back control of the House will be Republican corruption. In 1994, when an indictment of Democratic Rep. Dan Rostenkowski on mail fraud charges, the corruption argument helped usher in a Republican Majority in the House. That scandal is peanuts compared to the rampant corruption the Republicans are currently wrapped up in. This is something one of their own admits. As former GOP Congressman J.C. Watts has written, "Republicans in just 10 years have developed the arrogance it took the Democrats 30 years to develop." This from a Republican who was part of that power shift in 1994.

And as Jonathan wrote earlier, the GOP retirements of 2006 are likely to have the same impact as the Democratic retirements of 1994. More open seats to defend plus a black cloud of corruption equals disaster for the party in power.

UPDATE: I left out two important facts.

1. There will be a special election. Special elections are our friend.
2. Democrat Francine Busby will be running. Her prospects are good, but she'll need our help.



Display:


attainable seat (none / 0)

Good news, bad news.  The seat (50th Cal) is in So Cal, and the district is quite Republican, having voted for Cunningham for 8 terms.

Balancing that is the good news that there is already a good candidate in place Francine Busby who is running as a main issue restoring integrity to congress, and has backed up that issue with her proposed Clean House Act , something I believe the entire party would do well to rally behind.

Her fundraising efforts have almost collected as much money as they did last election cycle, when she ran against Cunningham. There is one Republican, Mark Wyland, who has "raised" more money than her, but that is a misnomer, seeing as he paid all that money out of his pocket.

In 04 she was outspent about 3.5 to 1 by Cunningham.  Traditionally, if Democrats can stay within 2 to 1 of Republican spending, they do fine. Right now, having raised $248,000, outraising every Republican except a guy who has $252,000 to blow on his own campaign, is fantastic.  

Anyone who, like me, is starting to assemble a spread sheet "war room" might just want to put the 50th California District down as winnable.

by give em hell Huddleston on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 04:15:15 PM EST

Re: attainable seat (none / 0)

Wow.  I like the 'Clean House Act'.  Great fucking name.  Thanks for pointing it out.
by Matt Stoller on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 05:41:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.