Free Range Democrats

Democrats with eyes on the future have been looking west for some time now. It's easy to see that the Western Democrats, winning races and maintaining strong approval numbers in states that vote predictably Republican in national elections, must be doing something right. It's something we have talked about here a number of times. Montana native Bob Brigham and Schweitzer campaign consultant David Sirota have been proponents of the Montana Governor for some time. Now even The New York Times has gotten into the act, with an article by Timothy Egan, "Out West, Democrats Roam Free."

Look at these numbers," said Gov. Brian Schweitzer, pointing to the annual Montana State University survey showing him with a job approval rating of 69 percent - 27 points higher than President Bush in Montana and 21 points above the Republican senator, Conrad Burns, who is up for re-election next year. "People seem to like what we're doing."

Across the vast inland sea of Republican red, in states like Kansas, Wyoming, Oklahoma and Arizona, other Democratic governors are soaring at the same high level of approval in the polls. They may not look much like coastal Democrats, and they may not talk much like their party leaders. At times, they act as if they would rather catch the bird flu than have their pictures taken with Howard Dean, the Democratic Party chairman who often runs into "scheduling conflicts" with the governors whenever he visits.

But as Democrats look to nationalize the Congressional elections next year, they have been traipsing off to political backwaters likes Helena, Cheyenne, Wyo., and Topeka, Kan., for tips from Heartland Democrats. The breed that has long been ignored, but was forced early on to learn some survival strategies, is now in vogue.

With the national GOP in shambles, it's fairly clear that if the Democrats come even close to pulling together attractive candidates with interesting ideas, there will be huge gains for the party in 2006 and 2008. As we've been looking beyond the beltway for quite a while, the media is apparently finally catching up.

Governor Dave Freudenthal of Wyoming sums up the secret of the Western Democrats' successes pretty simply. "Stick to the kitchen issues - health care, jobs and fairness - and stick to the facts." While that sounds great, it exposes an underlying problem which may explain how it's possible that Brian Schweitzer and George W. Bush can be elected on the same day. Governors don't deal directly with national security issues. They have the luxury of sticking to "kitchen issues." However, the war in Iraq has all but destroyed the Republican dominance on the issue of foreign policy. This should level the playing field, opening huge doors for the Democrats in general, but Western Democrats in particular.



Display:


The (Mid)Western Democrats (none / 0)

Also have the luxury of not being hindered by the constant "He'll be like Ted Kennedy" attacks. Now, if a difference is presented in a way that shows people that electing a Democrat helps them out more, then that's a good step. As well, telling them about the ways that Republicans aren't representing them would also be very helpful. People may disapprove of the Congress, but until they disapprove of their Congressman, they're not going to go out and vote for a Democrat to replace him.

I think that on a Federal level, the War is becoming more of a kitchen table issue. I'm sure more families share their concerns over the war and over someone they know who is over there. But, the challenge is to present a clear messege on Iraq.

The biggest thing is that the tone must be defined by us, not by them. They've continually set the tone and forced us to play as a visiting team.

by RBH on Sun Nov 27, 2005 at 02:56:45 AM EST

Change the Tone (none / 0)

How else can Tony Knowles win in Alaska, Freudenthal in Wyoming, Sebelius in Kansas, Schweitzer in Montana...easy take the locally popular position on divise issues instead of the Democrat line in DC. That's not to say that it's wrong to do so...but that in order to win over liberal Democrats these candidates have to appear to be anything but equivocators and triangulators.

The Democrats handed the Republicans 2004 after the Iraq war vote. Bush's incompetence on Hurricane Katrina now allows us to take it back...but only if we tee off and show no mercy in '06 and beyond.

by risenmessiah on Sun Nov 27, 2005 at 03:09:00 AM EST

Re: Change the Tone (1.00 / 1)

You don't need to win Liberal Democrats in Kansas, Alaska, Wyoming  or Montana.  There are no Liberal democrats in these states or if there are they may up less than 1%
by orin76 on Tue Nov 29, 2005 at 12:33:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Change the Tone (1.00 / 1)

Second Liberal Democrats in the Democratic party are a vocal minority. Liberal Democrats only make up 27% of the party.
by orin76 on Tue Nov 29, 2005 at 12:36:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Change the Tone (none / 0)

That wasn't my point at all.

In the "red states" the Democratic candidates can take the populist position that is at odds with the national party. It's when they try to go national that they run into trouble appeasing the liberal base because of the potential for triangulation.

by risenmessiah on Wed Nov 30, 2005 at 02:48:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Being SMART is not TRIANGULATION (3.00 / 2)


I live in Kansas- Gov. Sebelius is SMART.

She is always one step ahead of the Republicans on every issue and she continually outflanks them.  In fact- I can't think of one major defeat she has been publicly handed- but I can think of many (budget after budget, Education funding) she has handed the GOP their asses on a stick.  

This in a legislature 2/3 Republican.  

Is out championing gay marriage.  Uhhh...no.  Has she made the famous Kodos pledge "Abortions for all!"  - nope.  

But she has steered clear of those red herring issues and kept the focus.

Frankly, there are only 2 or 3 issues that LOSE for Dems nationally- gay marriage is one.  It is SUICIDE to get behind these kinds of proposals (gun control is another) in these western states.  

That is not equivocating-- it is being SMART and living to fight another day on issues that MATTER.  

Would you hire George W Bush to be YOUR latex salesman?
by jgkojak on Sun Nov 27, 2005 at 03:15:34 AM EST

Re: Being SMART is not TRIANGULATION (3.00 / 2)

I think you're right. But Dems don't have to support the hate-filled anti-gay measures, wejust have to make sure that working class religious or socially conservatives don't think that abortion and gay marriage are our top priorities. African-Americans are our most reliable constituencies even though they are quite socially conservative, because they see us as at least close to their side. All working people need to see that.

Keith

by keith johnson on Sun Nov 27, 2005 at 10:03:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Not really... (none / 0)

Western Democratic Governors have great numbers, but so do their Republican peers.  I think it's more a matter of attitude toward government in the west than anything else.
Bleeding Heartland - Iowa's Progressive Community-oriented blog
by ItsDrewMiller on Sun Nov 27, 2005 at 05:33:04 AM EST

title (none / 0)

I love the title on this one.  It made me smile.

:)

DAGGER
by goplies on Sun Nov 27, 2005 at 05:58:18 AM EST

Stick to kitchen table issues. (3.00 / 1)

Very interesting. Very true. Very successful. And because it's been so successful, we now have a crop of western Democrats being touted for national office, as capable of winning in "red" states.

Also interesting is that in another context, the exhortation to "stick to kitchen table" issues is derided as "spinelessness" or even "cluelessness" by  some of the same folks who champion these western Democrats as our next great hope.

When Schweitzer sticks to kitchen table issues, it's genius. When Emanuel sticks to kitchen table issues, it's irrelevance.

by Kagro X on Sun Nov 27, 2005 at 01:19:13 PM EST

moving to the Bible Belt (3.00 / 1)

I'm very proud of my state, Oklahoma, for having elected Brad Henry.  Who would have thought Kansas and Oklahoma would have Democratic Governors, whereas New York, Massachussetts, and California would not?  

I believe it is important to stick to "kitchen table" issues in local elections, and in the House seats, but I also think Democrats in the Bible Belt need, if they are pro-life need to take full advantage of the union of their progressivesism.  If you have the time, check out my diary on turning around the abortion wedge.

Being a pro-life Democrat should be a local asset in the Bible Belt, not just a way to keep Republicans at bay.

by give em hell Huddleston on Sun Nov 27, 2005 at 01:49:43 PM EST

You all aren't recognizing something! (3.00 / 1)

There's a difference between libertarian conservative states such as AZ, MT, and WY, where according to SUSA are overwhelmingly pro-choice and at least tolerant of most gay rights.  The other religious conservative states like those in the South have yet to be inclined towards ANY Democrat not named Zell Miller.  However, I cannot explain the Kansas phenomenon.  There have always been sexuality rumors surrounding Napolitano.  And voters in libertarian Arizona don't give a shit.  But, IMO, she couldn't get elected in Georgia.

We have to be careful we don't sell out gays and abortion rights NATIONALLY in our haste to appeal to voters out in red America.  We CAN do both.  As a gay American who is married in Massachusetts, I can understand the Wyoming Governor's local message as long as we don't take it nationally.  If that happens, I bolt, and so does my money.

The only balls the Clintons ever show are against their fellow Democrats, especially progressives.
by jgarcia on Sun Nov 27, 2005 at 04:07:05 PM EST

There is a lot of truth (3.00 / 2)

to this point of view.

But they couldn't help getting in a b.s. dig at Gov. Dean while they were at it could they?

What a crock. It is so tiresome.

In the meantime, the exact thing that Gov. Dean is doing at the DNC is getting these folks in the west... and other states that have been ignored... the help they need to build on their gains and continue their winning ways. This b.s. about scheduling conflicts is exactly that. B.S. It has occured a couple times and they make it sound like no one wants anything to do with the guy. Crap on a stick. The fact of that matter is that it is the state parties that are falling in love with him and what he is doing most. It is the DC dems and their loser consultant buddies that wish he would go away.

Get involved local. Win local. Win nationwide. It is a simple formula.

The 10,000 Things
by Andrew C White on Sun Nov 27, 2005 at 07:07:26 PM EST

Balance! (3.00 / 1)

The same article also mentioned Romney as a republican counterpart to Shweitzer et al.  Of course, while they gave chapter and verse on the approval ratings of the dems, they neglected to note the terrible approval ratings of Romney.  

When will the simple minded balancing go by the wayside?  The Grey Lady has been all too happy in recent times to write ledes with dominant republican rhetoric cited within and absolutely no mention by name of dems.  Here they cannot resist tossing in a lousy repub example for comparison.  Sheesh.  

by calscientist on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 01:19:17 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.