WH Leaves "Mean Jean" Flailing in the Wind

During the debate on the immediate withdrawal amendment offered by Republican Duncan Hunter on Friday, Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-OH), the House's most junior member, proved quite the embarassment to both herself and her constituents, as Jason DeParle writes for The New York Times.

She grew up in the rough-and-tumble of a family auto racing business, went through concealed-weapons training, and bears a local nickname seldom applied to shrinking violets: "Mean Jean."

So when Representative Jean Schmidt, an Ohio Republican, created a furor on her 75th day in Congress by lobbing the word "coward" toward a Democratic war hero, those who know her best were anything but surprised.

Just this week, a profile in The Hill newspaper, which covers Congress, labeled her "gloriously uncensored." Back home in her suburban Cincinnati district, the Whistleblower, an online newsletter that tracks local politics, rushed out a special I-told-you-so issue calling the speech "vintage Jean Schmidt."

"We have said innumerable times that she would go to Washington and open her mouth and create an embarrassment," said Jim Schifrin, the newsletter's publisher. "She will say things that turn people off like nothing you've ever seen."

[...]

In scheduling the vote, Republicans were trying to embarrass Democratic critics of the war, forcing them to dissociate themselves from a call earlier in the week for a slower but still definite withdrawal. That call came from Representative John P. Murtha, Democrat of Pennsylvania, a Vietnam combat veteran who spent 37 years in the Marines and is one of the most respected military authorities in the House.

In attacking the Democrats' position, Ms. Schmidt, the newest member of Congress, said she had received a call from a Marine colonel, who "asked me to send Congressman Murtha a message: that cowards cut and run, Marines never do."

Not 48 hours after Schmidt was forced to withdraw these ignominious comments from the Congressional Record, President Bush took a few steps back from the attacks made by his own party.  Terence Hunt has the story for the AP.

After fiercely defending his Iraq policy across Asia, President Bush abruptly toned down his attack on war critics Sunday and said there was nothing unpatriotic about opposing his strategy.

"People should feel comfortable about expressing their opinions about Iraq," Bush said, three days after agreeing with Vice President Dick Cheney that the critics were "reprehensible."

The president also praised Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., as "a fine man" and a strong supporter of the military despite the congressman's call for troop withdrawal as soon as possible.

[...]

"I heard somebody say, `Well, maybe so-and-so is not patriotic because they disagree with my position.' I totally reject that thought," Bush said.

"This is not an issue of who's patriotic and who's not patriotic," he said. "It's an issue of an honest, open debate about the way forward in Iraq."

It took Jean Schmidt only three months in office to get publicly upbraided by the President, quite a feat even for a woman of her reputation. The Democrats ought not give her a pass next fall, especially in light of Friday's developments. It might take a candidate as strong as Paul Hackett to knock her off (or perhaps even Hackett himself [this is not intended to insinuate that Hackett should withdraw from the race for the Democratic Senatorial nomination to run again for the House]), but that should not stop the Ohio Democratic Party or the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee from investing the time and resources to pick off this low-lying fruit.



Display:


Agreed (none / 0)

This woman does not have the temperament to be a member of the House of Representatives.
The 10,000 Things
by Andrew C White on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 04:38:45 PM EST

Primaried (none / 0)

She won't even make it out of the primary.  If there were any celebrations louder than those in the lefty-blogosphere on August 2nd, they came from rabid wingers hoping Schmidt might fall flat in the special so they could primary her in 2006.  That's why they ran commercials urging Republicans to stay home the weekend before the election.

Her goose is cooked.

Tim

by Tim Tagaris on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 04:38:47 PM EST

Actually, (none / 0)

the kooks love her now. Take a peek at the Free Republic. They are regretting their tepid support for her. Birds of a feather and all that...
by Paul Goodman on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 04:52:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Actually, (none / 0)

well, I wish them luck in rallying behind her in a contested primary, which they have not shown the capacity or desire to do on that side of the net, cause she is going to get a serious serious challenger from someone inside the 2nd.

Tim

by Tim Tagaris on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 04:56:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Primaried (none / 0)

I've just bounced my rating on Bob McEwen up to a buy. He came in just behind her in the primary and had a very strong backing in the district.

He's been working the crowds for months now with rumors floating of him challenging DeWine and Schmidt.

Right now I'm betting that he'll go for it. I'm also betting that he will win and that he will be the next Congressman from the 2nd District.

I would love it if the DCCC could recruit a winner to run against the Republicans. Hackett opened up a very nice breach. If I was them I would be flying people in the talk with former Cincinnati mayor Roxanne Qualls. Listening to her talk I'd say she's very impressive. She's already said no in a radio interview, but the times they are a changin'.

Editor
Ohio 2nd Blog
by ignatzmouse on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 12:39:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

My Thesis is Vindicated (3.00 / 2)

Many Democrats and Leftists savaged John Kerry for losing. My thesis was that no good man can win with our current electorate. Paul Hackett, a veteran like Kerry, was defeated by Schmidt. How? How could anybody with a functioning corpus callosum choose that piece of filth over a hero like Hackett? We know how. It is the same reason that Ohio voters chose Bush over a man who was clearly better. The People are fools. And those who want to grow old and die in a prosperous and free America better start turning their efforts towards fixing the people, not just winning the occasional election.

In anticipation of the usual "Ohio didn't vote for Bush" rebuttal: They voted for Bush in 2000 as well. So let's not excuse them from blame by allegations of vote rigging. You are trying to let the People off the hook, possibly because of a marxist-utopian ideology that thinks of the people as essentially good, but in need a protective vanguard party (which of course you are a member of...).

The people aren't good. Especially in these small towns! The world has moved into a new technological age, yet these people want to take us back to the agrarian times, agrarian religion, and agrarian politics. They run away to their fronteir towns and get angry that the world and its changes keep coming.

You may allege that if Democrats can win an election that things will change. It won't be that easy. Why? The people will still be in charge. The are the center of gravity of our political system and no party can escape their pull for long. As 2006 gears up, and we endeavor to throw Jean and Co. out of our House, let us not forget to spend some time improving the people.

by Paul Goodman on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 04:51:28 PM EST

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

Your argument is a stretch- the difference between Kerry and Hacket is the difference between someone who lost his passion and someone who hasn't. it's not about either of them being good men. hacket may have lost, but he did so building for the future and didn't run away from what he stood for. kerry lost while trying to convince everyone that he was something he was not
by bruh21 on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 06:02:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

They still lost
"So this is how liberty dies...to thunderous applause." Padme, Star Wars Episode III
by jrflorida on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 10:18:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

one built for the future and other didn't. there ia difference from a team losing that has potential and a has been team losing. one has a future and the other doesn't. i think you understand and i think that last little blurb was an attempt to one up
by bruh21 on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 12:01:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

You can build for the future and still always lose.  They lost and thats all that matters.  There are no points for second, no points for maybe someday coming closer to winning.
"So this is how liberty dies...to thunderous applause." Padme, Star Wars Episode III
by jrflorida on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 08:05:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

>>>>>>The people aren't good. Especially in these small towns! The world has moved into a new technological age, yet these people want to take us back to the agrarian times, agrarian religion, and agrarian politics. They run away to their fronteir towns and get angry that the world and its changes keep coming.<<<<<

One of the best posts I have seen by someone commenting on this site.  Bookmark it.  Touche.

McCain is defining Obama, and Obama is neither defining himself, nor McCain. This is awful.
by jgarcia on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 09:54:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

i found it condescending
by bruh21 on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 12:02:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

It could be both condescending and correct.
by a517dogg on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 12:38:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

it's just consdending- if the voters were incapable of change- then my point about hacket obtaining more votes in a red district would not be true- but since it is, the idea that they are "evil" is bs
by bruh21 on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 01:58:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

still a MAJORITY of voters in Ohio 2 stuck with Mean Jean.  There's hope for some, but, sadly, not enough to make a majority in some places, i'm afraid.
McCain is defining Obama, and Obama is neither defining himself, nor McCain. This is awful.
by jgarcia on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 02:49:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

The problem with Kerry was that he would not defend himself in terms that people could view as having meaning.

"I voted for the resolution before I voted against it." Or perhaps it was the other way around?  What is that supposed to mean?

How about, I supported the concept, but the legislation was so badly written, it was worse than no legislation.  If X, Y and Z were changed, I would have voted for it.  If it was funded, I would have voted for it.

Kerry wouldn't defend his own military record against stupid scurrilous attacks by proven liars.  Sometimes even people not in 'Nam while Kerry was there.

He kept quiet during August, because  his previous strategy was not to spend any money in that month.  Meanwhile he was raking in more funds than ever expected, but couldn't change his strategy to meet the attack.  Come September he gave nambypamby answers to the accusations that he committed a war crime because he "shot a teenager (enemy soldier) in the back (quite proper in war)."

He allowed himself to be painted a coward by a draft dodging chickenhawk, and a deserter.

Never mind all the other stuff that Kerry could not or would not engage.  What do fence sitters see.  A joke, who doesn't believe protecting himself.  And someone who will not protect themself, certainly will not protect me.

Yeah, I gave money, support and finally a vote to Kerry. Though watching him squander all, to the worst president ever, made me ill.  It was only that the alternative was so much worse.

by AlphaHydroxy on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 12:45:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Thesis is Vindicated (none / 0)

The problem with Kerry was that he would not defend himself in terms that people could view as having meaning.

"I voted for the resolution before I voted against it." Or perhaps it was the other way around?  What is that supposed to mean?

How about, I supported the concept, but the legislation was so badly written, it was worse than no legislation.  If X, Y and Z were changed, I would have voted for it.  If it was funded, I would have voted for it.

Kerry wouldn't defend his own military record against stupid scurrilous attacks by proven liars.  Sometimes even people not in 'Nam while Kerry was there.

He kept quiet during August, because  his previous strategy was not to spend any money in that month.  Meanwhile he was raking in more funds than ever expected, but couldn't change his strategy to meet the attack.  Come September he gave nambypamby answers to the accusations that he committed a war crime because he "shot a teenager (enemy soldier) in the back (quite proper in war)."

He allowed himself to be painted a coward by a draft dodging chickenhawk, and a deserter.

Never mind all the other stuff that Kerry could not or would not engage.  What do fence sitters see.  A joke, who doesn't believe protecting himself.  And someone who will not protect themself, certainly will not protect me.

Yeah, I gave money, support and finally a vote to Kerry. Though watching him squander all, to the worst president ever, made me ill.  It was only that the alternative was so much worse.

by AlphaHydroxy on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 12:48:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Schmidt and Vets (3.00 / 1)

The frame here has got to be that Jean Schmidt is a person who doesn't like veterans unless they are Republicans. Her campaign attacked Hackett and now she attacks Murtha. She doesn't really value veterans' service to our country, she only wants to use them as political props.
by mrgavel on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 05:57:19 PM EST

Re: Schmidt and Vets (none / 0)

She also doesn't know her branches of service.  Once a marine always a marine.  She takes a real chance of pissing off a fair number of them that see through such attacks.  Some of them do make it through bootcamp with a few brain cells left.  Its hard but not impossible.  They stick together.  
"So this is how liberty dies...to thunderous applause." Padme, Star Wars Episode III
by jrflorida on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 10:20:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Dems might not get rid of her. (none / 0)

The Republicans may do the job via a primary.  So, they say on DailyKos.
When this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit.
by CO Democrat on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 07:12:42 PM EST

Ambitious Schmidt (none / 0)

I think the frame here is that Schmidt will say and  do whatever seems to suit her perceived convenience of the moment.  That her ambitions are so unfettered by reason or humanity, that she will malign anyone or anything to reach center stage.
by AlphaHydroxy on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 07:13:19 PM EST

After watching Mean Jean's debut... (none / 0)

on the national scene, I'm convinced she has a real future in the GOP.

In fact, I strongly urge them to make her the spokesdragon for all of their scandals.

The more face time she gets the better (for us).

Long live Mean Jean (till November 2006).

Today on EWM: Bush: "Democrats Killed Jesus, Invented Disco and Drove Me to Drink"  

by The Muse on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 07:47:06 PM EST

Re: After watching Mean Jean's debut... (none / 0)

Mean Jean Schmidt should be the model for any Republican election posters/bumper stickers.  Her face should be printed in all its ugly, wrinkled glory with the hair tied back in a scrunchy. The amazing thing is she hates people who are bloggers and I think we should make her hate them even more.
by Marie Smith on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 08:57:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: After watching Mean Jean's debut... (none / 0)

I'm all for it.

We should start a mail campaign--not just email the 37 cent variety too.

Make them deliver it in dumptrucks.

by The Muse on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 12:11:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

"Cut and run" (none / 0)

Sounds cowardly, doesn't it? I wonder where these Republicans learned Military Science? The John Wayne School perhaps?

I would love to ask that Marine Colonel if he considered Chesty Puller's orderly strategic retreat down the Korean peninsula as "cutting and running".

Good Marine officers don't throw their men's lives away when there is no chance of victory. They withdraw, regroup, and counter-attack when there seems a decent chance to win. You only fight to the death when there is no other option. On those sad and hopeless occasions, Marines have fought gallantly. But dieing as a gesture when you could live to fight again belongs to B movies.

by antiHyde on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 09:17:18 PM EST

Mean Jean (none / 0)

I found some info on Mean Jean:
http://www.jeanschmidt.com/
http://blog.oh02.com/2005/11/03/schmidt-votes-against-online-freedom-of-speech-act/
http://www.swingstateproject.com/2005/07/oh-2_jean_schmi.php
http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2005/07/jean_schmidt_an.html
by Marie Smith on Sun Nov 20, 2005 at 09:57:33 PM EST

Hackett had the tougher challenge (none / 0)

Hackett's and Kerry's losses were not comparable. Wasn't Hackett contesting in a heavily republican district while Ohio as a whole is only slightly tilted to the republican party? Plus Hackett was a first timer in politics. I find hope in Hackett nearly upsetting Jean Schmidt. Now if Jean wins again in 2006, feel free to call those people idiots.
by Pravin on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 10:14:46 AM EST

Dems need to use Schmidt footage to beat her (none / 0)

My previous response was to Goodman's reply, not the main diary.

You know how the repubs like to use some unflattering footage of a democrat to make fun of them in campaign ads? Well, Jean Schmidt should provide the dems with ample fodder when they campaign against her. Just edit her footage to show all her worst face contortioning sides.

by Pravin on Mon Nov 21, 2005 at 10:18:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.