Spitzer May Face a Primary Challenge

Why, why, why, why, oh why?

Newsweek is reporting that Ken Langone, billionaire and former New York Stock Exchange compensation committee chairman, is out to destroy New York Attorney General and 2006 gubernatorial candidate Eliot Spitzer. In that position, Langone approved an unheard-of $140 million pay package for NYSE chairman Dick Grasso. Langone and the rest of the compensation committee were a hand-picked crew of Grasso's cronies and apparently misled the full NYSE board about the details of his compensation. When it came out, Grasso was asked to leave and then sued by the NYSE for repayment.

Arguing that Grasso's compensation was illegal under New York state law, which dictates that executives of non-profits (like the NYSE) receive only "reasonable" pay, which is "commensurate with services performed," Spitzer sued to have Grasso's pay package overturned and replaced with something less extravagant. Also named in the suit was Ken Langone. Though Grasso and Langone claims these charges were baseless, Frank Ashen, the NYSE's head of HR, admitted that he misled the board in regards to Grasso's compensation and made a $1.3 million payment to the NYSE.

Since then, Langone and Grasso have repeatedly attacked Spitzer, mostly in the press, and mostly in the arch-conservative Wall Street Journal op-ed pages. Now it seems they're planning on taking their vendetta one step further. Langone is working to get Nassau County Executive Tom Suozzi to challenge Eliot Spitzer in the New York gubernatorial primary next year.

Langone and his wife have already given about $80,000 and in an interview with NEWSWEEK, Langone confirmed that he would use his Rolodex of well-heeled Wall Street bankers and assorted multi-millionaires to raise as much as $30 million or more for Suozzi should he be the one to challenge Spitzer. "I live in Nassau County and I'm very impressed with the job he's done," Langone said. "He's proven to me he can manage things and I believe he would be an outstanding governor and I am prepared to raise as much as it takes for him to be a viable candidate. No limit, no limit."
. . .
Suozzi carefully sidestepped questions about a potential Spitzer challenge. He said, at least twice, that he "is focusing on being county executive of Nassau County" and praised Spitzer for doing a "great job as attorney general." However, Suozzi also refused to rule out a potential run for governor.

As far as Langone is concerned, Suozzi welcomes his support for his county executive race (Langone lives in Nassau County). Suozzi said he first met Langone in October of 2002 at a house party in Long Island, long before Spitzer filed his case against Langone last year. However, he says the two have spoken since then and considers the billionaire financier "one of many contributors." But not all his contributors are worth upwards of $3 billion like Langone, who is the co-founder of Home Depot Inc.

This is an insane abuse of wealth to play games with serious, serious politics. But beyond that, how is it that Suozzi is even entertaining this kind of vindictive campaign? Suozzi has by all accounts done a good job as County Executive. He came to office on a reform platform, sweeping out the corrupt Republican machine that had run the county for years. At the same time, he's come under fire for being overly ambitious. That's not always a bad thing. But with the party's favored candidate for Governor up in all of the polls by at least 33%, maybe Suozzi should keep his ambition in check.

The other troubling factor here is that Langone is a hardcore Republican financier. Like all good executives (he's a co-founder of Home Depot), Langone gives to a few top Democrats as well. But he's given about ten times more money to Republicans than Democrats.

Looking at Langone's giving patterns, something jumps out at me. He donated $2,000 to William Weld's 1996 campaign for Senate. These days, Weld and Langone still run in the same Wall Street social circles. And it's quite possible that Bill Weld will be the GOP candidate for Governor facing Eliot Spitzer next year. A well-funded, bruising Democratic primary might even the 2006 playing field for Weld.

This wouldn't be the first time Ken Langone has used some bizarre tactics to attack a political opponent. In 1999, while Langone was on the board of Tricon Foods, Pizza Hut ran television spots in New York that mocked then-likely Senate candidate Hillary Clinton. Tricon is Pizza Hut's parent company. Langone was a former finance chairman for and major financial backer of Rudy Giuliani -- then expected to be Clinton's opponent. Democrats cried foul, calling the commercial an illegal contribution.

Here's hoping Tom Suozzi doesn't let himself get played by Ken Langone's dirty tricks.



Display:


ooooh, mmm...no....mkay (none / 0)

won't work. lol.  
by Chavez100 on Thu Oct 06, 2005 at 10:59:50 PM EST

Yep (none / 0)


Bring it on. Some rich guy from Nassau county will get no votes vs Spitzer anywhere else in the state.

What this is really about is an excuse to throw $30 Million of negative ads at Spitzer. But what are the ads going to say? Stop this man before he pisses off more millionaires?

What a waste of money.

by Ottoe on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 10:00:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

G-d help us (none / 0)

and pray that this doesn't work.
The Kentucky Democrat
by kydem on Thu Oct 06, 2005 at 11:11:05 PM EST

Don't Think It Works (none / 0)

Spitzer is really popular, he's got deep pockets, and unlike most Beltway Dems...has his spinal cord fully attached. Hope Langone looks good in orange.
by risenmessiah on Thu Oct 06, 2005 at 11:22:00 PM EST

Re: Don't Think It Works (none / 0)

thats the spirit. I will print up a T-Shirt

REMEMBER PETE COORS

by turnerbroadcasting on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 02:29:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Suozzi has such an overweening sense of (none / 0)

self regard, that he would take Langone's money and to the devil with the Democratic party.

He has supported Republicans under the misleading rubric of "cleaning up Alabny".  He doesn't care if it undermines Democratic party interests or principles.

His opinions are very fluid as are his sense of principles.

I have never met a politician who is more personally enamored of himself.  ( I met someone who one of his high school girlfriends, who had the exact same opinion.)

Exposing Langone's motivation is very important because it is obvious that he is not interested in actually helping a Democrat to win.

by debcoop on Thu Oct 06, 2005 at 11:45:54 PM EST

Re: Suozzi has such an overweening sense of (none / 0)

You are giving Suozzi too much credit.  Langone is a convenient source of funds, but Suozzi has been up to this for awhile.
by debcoop on Thu Oct 06, 2005 at 11:47:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

a richer Al Sharpton (none / 0)

I doubt this will matter.  Spitzer has a huge reputation he has spent years building.  This is just a Republican stalking horse throwing in some early jabs.  Sorry for the mixed metaphor.  Well, not too sorry.
by CSears on Thu Oct 06, 2005 at 11:50:26 PM EST

A lot of hype (none / 0)

Souzzi is nuts but he's not suicidical. The poll numbers on this race (private Spitzer v Souzzi numbers) paint an insurmountable lead for Spitzer, probably among the largest leads ever polled.
by upstatenydem on Thu Oct 06, 2005 at 11:56:45 PM EST

Suozzi and Narcissism are synonymous (none / 0)

Tom Suozzi is a preening, slicked hair, grade B actor.
by debcoop on Thu Oct 06, 2005 at 11:58:28 PM EST

home depot? is that correct? (none / 0)

I thought  Bernie Marcus and Arthur Blank founded Home Depot.  Maybe its just cuz I'm from Atlanta, but that kind of annoys me.  I see that Langone has been cited as a co-founder, but I'm pretty sure he's not a co-founder in the way that Marcus and Blank are.

Marcus may be a big deal Christian type, and I may not like what Home Depot did for big box stores, but those two at least give back to Atlanta.  Marcus donated the new Georgia Aquarium (built to evoke Noah's Ark, actually), and Blank is a big time philantropist I think, as well as the popular owner of the Atlanta Falcons.

I guess I don't really have a point, just kind of sticking up for my home town guys, Home Depot.

by DreadPirateKing on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 12:11:57 AM EST

Re: home depot? is that correct? (none / 0)

A little research on the net shows the following.  Langone is a venture capitalist who has been on the board of Home Depot.  Forbes lists the source of his wealth as "investments" whereas Marcus and Blank are shown as "Home Depot."

Ken Langone has multiple entries where HE claims to be the founder of Home Depot.  It looks like he MAY have been the original bankroller of the idea but not the founder.  It also looks like he has an enormous ego.

Spitzer is HATED by a lot of brokers.  The degree of venom seems to be seriously misplaced.  Looking at it from the standpoint of a distant observer, Spitzer's campaign to clean up Wall Street will actually help the credibility of these "little" guys in the mid and long run.  They just don't see it that way.

by David Kowalski on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 04:35:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm not sure people (none / 0)

Understand how much hatred there is from Wall Street towards Eliot Spitzer.  I have a number of friends and acquitances who work for huge firms in the city and they all hate him.  And I mean HATE him.  To them, take our hatred of Bush, then multiply it by 1,000.  

For example, I just spoke to a broker yesterday about the upcoming gubernatorial race.  I mentioned that Spitzer has a huge lead and you may have to prepare for this.  This broker, who I might add is in no way political, spent the next 10 minutes explaining how Spitzer will ruin New York City, how all the banks will move out of state and how New York will no longer be the financial center of the world.

He was dead serious.  

Just some food for thought.  Most of these guys (and gals) don't really care about Bush one way or the other.  Most may vote for him because of taxes, but they don't really go all the way for him so to speak (most of my Wall Street buddies are very liberal on social issues).  For Spitzer, it's a very different story.  They will get very active.

This race is going to get very ugly.  The problem about Langone is he lacks credibility and he is dealing with a person (Spitzer) who doesn't take sh*t from anyone.  

It will be very interesting to see how this unfolds.  

by Eric11 on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 12:57:02 AM EST

Re: I'm not sure people (none / 0)

Oddly enough, I think this dynamic -- Wall Street hating Spitzer -- could actually help him upstate. There's a sense among people all over the state that Spitzer has been fighting for them as AG and will continue the fight as Governor. So heavy Wall Street mobilization -- which I also think will happen -- could very well backfire.
by Scott Shields on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 01:04:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm not sure people (none / 0)

I know what you're saying.  I don't actually think that Spitzer won't win.  He should and I hope he does.  But Wall Street's hatred of him will turn the primary until a bloodbath.  This could lead to the possibility that Spitzer faulters from all of the negative advertising he will surely face.  

Without Wall Street's hatred, Spitzer probably wins by 40%.  Now it may be a close primary as  people get bamboozled by millions of dollars in commericals and negative campaigning.

   

by Eric11 on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 01:10:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

US v. Lay (none / 0)

Wall Street is about to get a giant black eye.

Federal prosecutors are gearing up for US v. Lay in January. Kenny Boy is going down the river forever if he doesn't fight so you better believe he's taking down everyone with him. People have forgotten about Enron rather quickly before recognizing that Lay is uniquely able to say some rather uncomfortable things about people like Dick Cheney to Dick Grasso.

I would not be surprised at all if subsequent testimony reveals all sorts of weird things including what role Enron was to play in Iraq (you know before 9-11 and all) to who in the Exchange looked the other way when Enron's stock was tanking.

Spitzer is going to feed off that like nobody's business. His ability to meld that with a general "law and order" candidacy is why people talk about him as Presidential Timber.

by risenmessiah on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 03:36:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm not sure people (none / 0)

No kidding.  I would probably lose half my clients if they knew I was voting for Spitzer.

This idea of a primary challenge is a joke.  But then again, over at dkos I see DEMOCRATS saying we need to finance a primary challenge to Hillary to "stop her for 2008."  So I guess the idea of screwing around with Democratic campaigns is bipartisan.

"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 05:46:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What a shithead (none / 0)

He is crazy if he thinks that has any chance of working. The only person who could possibly defeat Spitzer in the primary is Charles Schumer and he's not running. And Weld will also have to explain why he won't get bored with the NY Gov. job and move on to something else. Having a corrupt Wall Street tycoon supporting his opponent will probably help Spitzer.
by dole4pineapple on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 01:28:43 AM EST

Spitzer is Arch-Enemy of Republicans (3.00 / 0)

Republicans have a fear of Eliot Spitzer that goes beyond the New York Governor's race because they know he is Presidential material.

Spitzer is the enemy of cronyism. Billions of dollars are at stake every time he turns his cannons on a particular industry. Throughout his career he has been fiercely on the side of the common man in opposition to moneyed interests and in doing so he has made powerful, wealthy enemies.

Spitzer is an absolute in your face take no prisoners enemy of the laizzez faire status quo that has existed on Wall Street in which hidden deals between corporations and brokerages siphoned away the nest eggs of ordinary Americans. He's fought them by enforcing transparency and prosecuting insider crony deals that were enriching executives of brokerage houses and large corporations to the detriment of ordinary 401k and pension holders.

Republicans, the party of entrenched corporate power and moneyed interests, absolutely hate this man. Anyone the Republican Party, the Wall Street Journal, and corrupt greed-soaked individuals such as Dick Grasso see as enemies, we should all fiercely support.

At some point, or even time after time, Eliot Spitzer will be the subject of swiftboat style attacks. Perhaps the news reported in this post signals the beginning of just such a campaign. Perhaps, but believe this, it won't stop here. This current salvo is just part of the firepower America's most feared Democrat will have thrown against him in the coming years as he attempts to advance from office to office.

by Curt Matlock on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 01:52:05 AM EST

Re: Spitzer is Arch-Enemy of Republicans (none / 0)

No thats just window dressing. Theres nothing intrinsically democrat or republican about Wall Street. Americans hate these huge CEO deals that sap the life out of the public markets. Spitzer is a darling amongst all republicans for getting tough and cracking down, this is a post dot-com, enron stock era + it is only a myth that the wealthy are republican. Most wealthy are libertarian democrats.

by turnerbroadcasting on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 02:28:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Scott, you worry too much (none / 0)

Spitzer will bury this joker. The kind of support he has earned with New Yorkers is not the kind that can be damaged by smear ads. Kerry others who were smeared were unknown quantities when they were hit. Spitzer is not unknown in NY. People know him and like him. Their opinions are hard.

Also, we all are underestimating how tough of an SOB Spitzer is. He's a former DA from Manhattan specializing in organized crime -- that's rough and tumble politics if there were ever such a thing. He's smart as hell too. And you can bet that if these Wall Street ass holes pull this sort of shit on Spitz, he'll ram a campaign finance bill through the NY legislature once he takes office in January of 2007, thereby making sure they can never do so again.

by pbhayani1987 on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 02:34:03 AM EST

Re: Scott, you worry too much (none / 0)

What, me worry?

I'm just trying to expose the Langone-Weld-Giuliani axis for the corrupt big money machine that it is. Better that we knock them out now, long before they rev up their smear campaign and start interfering with the Democratic primary.

by Scott Shields on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 02:45:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Scott, you worry too much (none / 0)

Agreed. Expose it to the light of day and watch them wither away.
by pbhayani1987 on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 11:32:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Suozzi (none / 0)

Suozzi is already in a job that is too big for him (CE of Nassau County).  His performance looks good from the outside only because of the incredible malfeasence of prior Republican administrations which had come close to bankrupting an extremely wealth county.

He has really serious problems with the people he surrounds himself with.  Upper level staff have been  out of control with corruption, sexual harrassment and cronyism.  

For example, his major solution to Nassau's many IT issues was to change to a different email system,and contract out most of the IT work.  Disaster ensued.

by AlphaHydroxy on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 09:55:41 AM EST

Alternate reality (none / 0)

I live in Nassau county and from my vantage point Suozzi has done a better job than any other county exec in the past 35 years.
He has managed to eliminate the deficit and get the county's bond ratings into the A class.

I'm not sure what is motivating all the anti-Suozzi comments posted here. There just seems to be a lot of dislike of the man personally. Or perhaps the posters are shills for the republican machine?

Judge by his record, not his barber. Also show me a politician who isn't ambitious.

I don't think Suozzi would challenge Spitzer, there are other steps he could take up the career ladder in the future. He might even be picked for some Washington job if the Dems ever get back into office.

---Policies not Politics
Daily Quiet Image
by rdf on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 11:37:53 AM EST

Re: Alternate reality (none / 0)

We're not so much anti-Suozzi as we are anti-Lagone. That man is indefensible. Spitzer had done a tremendoues deal of good for the state and the nation, and Suozzi -- if he goes against his better judgment -- would be allowing himself to be Lagone's tool. Lagone's backing of Suozzi has everything to do with a personal vendetta against Spitz and nothing to do with him really believing in Suozzi.
by pbhayani1987 on Fri Oct 07, 2005 at 02:15:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.