White House Withheld Iraq Intelligence From The Senate

The always impressive Murray Waas writes at the National Journal that during last year's investigation into the intelligence failures that led the nation to war in Iraq, the Vice President's office withheld crucial documents from the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Vice President Cheney and his chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, overruling advice from some White House political staffers and lawyers, decided to withhold crucial documents from the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2004 when the panel was investigating the use of pre-war intelligence that erroneously concluded Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, according to Bush administration and congressional sources.

Among the White House materials withheld from the committee were Libby-authored passages in drafts of a speech that then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell delivered to the United Nations in February 2003 to argue the Bush administration's case for war with Iraq, according to congressional and administration sources. The withheld documents also included intelligence data that Cheney's office -- and Libby in particular -- pushed to be included in Powell's speech, the sources said.

My first thought is that the fallout from the Fitzgerald investigation is looking like it will be far wider than expected. But then my second thought is about the 2004 election. A popular refrain on the right during the election was that John Kerry had the same intelligence as Bush when he voted to authorize the use of force. Therefore, Kerry couldn't really attack Bush on the war. Carla Marinucci of the San Francisco Chronicle wrote about this strategy on the part of the Bush campaign last summer.

By the time the American people vote in November, expect the Bush campaign to try to box the Democratic presidential candidate in like this: Kerry had the same intelligence information as President Bush on Iraq, made statements to indicate he believed in the same threats, and voted to support Bush's position. So either he made a big mistake himself or the president made the correct decision.

"If Sen. Kerry now wants to come out and say, ' I looked at the intelligence ... I said (Hussein) was a danger. I said he had weapons of mass destruction. But the president is a liar for saying the same thing?' That's going to be a hard sell to the American people,'' Rove said in an interview during a stopover in Sacramento on Friday.

"In order to be intellectually honest, then (the Democratic presidential team) has got to say if Bush is wrong for believing these things, Kerry is equally wrong for believing them as well.''

But did they really have the same intelligence? We know what kind of deceptions the White House was willing to engage in to justify a war in Iraq. And we now know that they lied to the Senate about the intelligence, at least after the war. While it's now a moot point to say that Kerry and Bush did not have the same intelligence on Iraq during the run up to war (not to mention not at all a surprise), everyone who repeated that charge owes Kerry a serious apology, from the so-called liberal media on down.

Kerry's not really the point here, though. The focus should be on Vice President Dick Cheney and the fact that he and his staff have continuously and repeatedly conspired to conceal the truth from the American people. And I'd be surprised if they did it without cooperation from the President's staff as well. The other day, I was half-joking about the prospect of Cheney leaving the administration. Now I'm starting to think it's practically a done deal.



Display:


The back story on WMD intelligence (none / 0)

The Left Coaster has an incredibly detailed analysis of the Niger-Uranium faux intellegence and a detailed breakdown of the false accusations against Joe Wilson.

The neo-cons and every member of the Bush administration has been lying about intellegence from the start. It would be surprising if Cheney did not lie under oath and commit perjury. Whether he is indicted for perjury will be a political decision, not a legal one. Let's hope Fitzgerald is as principled as has been claimed.

The entire Bush administration belongs behind bars.

by Gary Boatwright on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 11:06:02 PM EST

Not Surprised (none / 0)

As the entire foundation of this group is built upon lies and deception, no one should be surprised about this. It's how these people have conducted themselves starting with the run up to the 2000 election. And while blogs, such as this one bring this to light, until the MSM grows a set of balls and starts "calling out" this adsministation on this type of fraud, the American people will continue to swallow it. If the MSM had done its job, maybe a special prosecutor would not have been needed.  
Memo to neocons: I respect your right to have an opinion, but I just don't want to hear it anymore.
by blogus on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 06:39:15 AM EST

Apologies to John Kerry? (3.00 / 0)

WE OWE HIM NO APOLOGIES.  JOHN KERRY OWES US ALL A BIG APOLOGY.

George W. Bush is the single worst president in our history.  He is incompetence, corruption, nepotism, cronyism, and mendacity incarnate.  To call him a piece of filth, is to insult filth.

Going into the 2004 election, Bush put together a record that a Democratic nominee could only dream of having to face.  A bloody wasteful quagmire, premised on lies; a devastated economy; etc.

John Kerry had a moral obligation to win that election, particularly since he obviously had the money to do it.  His performance reminds us of Cliff Claven on that episode of "Cheers", where he is on "Jeopardy", all of the question categories are on the US Post Office (where he is a devoted employee), and all of the questions are puff softballs, AND HE STILL LOSES!

John Kerry obviously had the courage and balls to go up the Mekong River 35-40 years ago.  After his inexcusable performance in the 2004 election, he has had the balls to show his face, and to start early on posturing himself for the next presidential contest.

This all begs the question: with all of these balls, why didn't John Kerry have the balls to win the 2004 election?  We are all now going to reap what John Kerry and George Bush have sown.

If Kerry runs in 2008, I will work just as hard to oppose him, as I did to support him in 2004.  HEAVEN FORBID, if he gets nominated, I will swallow the taste of bile and puk in my mouth, and I will work to help him support the GOP nominee.

In the meantime, John Kerry owes every Democrat, and every progressive in this Nation, a huge apology.

by jfrankesq on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 07:17:16 AM EST

Re: Apologies to John Kerry? (none / 0)

AH Yes, where Cliff is ahead by an insane amount and bets it all on finally jeopardy.

What is they have all never been to my house?

Good post.  Spot on...

http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 10:53:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Run-up (3.00 / 1)

Cheney's "misleading" statements, documented in Waxman's Iraq On The Record report:

ABOUT
Prepared at the direction of Rep. Henry A. Waxman, Iraq on the Record is a searchable collection of 237 specific misleading statements made by Bush Administration officials about the threat posed by Iraq.

by rba on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 11:13:45 AM EST

i'd say (none / 0)

that for those of us who have tried to stay informed, this comes as no suprise.

but think of it from the perspective of the average, tv-watching american.  since the media didn't bother to report most of this stuff to begin with, this is new to most americans.  and although it's 2005 KIAs too late, i'm glad this info is finally getting out there.  hopefully it'll help keep the GOP poll numbers in the gutter, leading to a democratic takeover of congress in 06 and impeachment in 07.

hey a girl can dream, right?

Visit us at TexasKAOS, where we're taking Texas back!
by annatopia on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 11:16:12 AM EST

Re: i'd say (none / 0)

you are in my dream.
by turnerbroadcasting on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 11:32:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: i'd say (none / 0)

HEY NOW, NO CYBER FLIRTING ON MYDD...

You dog!!!  ;-)

http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 11:43:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

but it's friday! (none / 0)

certainly we can get away with a little bit of levity, right?
;^)
Visit us at TexasKAOS, where we're taking Texas back!
by annatopia on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 12:02:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.