Ferrer: "I Will Speak For Those Who Can't Speak For Themselves and I Will Be Heard"

This is when politics means something. Down in the polls by as much as 31%, Fernando Ferrer is admitting he could lose this year's New York City Mayoral race. But far from giving up, Ferrer is starting to play a much tighter game, and is going back to the 'two New Yorks' message of his 2001 primary campaign.

There are two New Yorks. I have lived in both. Born in one, I crossed the bridge of opportunity into the other, but I have never forgotten where I came from. And I will never stop fighting for what I believe until all our people live together in a City that gives all their dreams an equal chance to come alive.

Too often, the only Democrats who feel they can talk this way are the ones who find themselves down in the polls in the eleventh hour. But it's not a desperate tactic to deliver a hopeful, populist message. On the contrary, being an underdog gives a candidate a certain amount of leeway to drop the pretensions and speak from the heart. It's in this area that Ferrer excels.

When Ferrer pushed his 'two New Yorks' message during the 2001 Democratic primary, he was unfairly criticized as somehow dealing in coded racial language. But that's total nonsense. Anyone who's ever spent any serious time in New York City can tell you that the two New Yorks most certainly exist, despite the city's best attempts to sweep the divide under the rug. And they're not split perfectly along ethnic lines. There are literally thousands of diverse working families in Queens, the Bronx, and Brooklyn for every Trump in Manhattan. And sadly, there's still quite a few homeless for every Bloomberg, as well.

Ferrer recognizes that these old charges will return. The critics, he said, will "call what I have said today divisive." Some, though they know he's right, will attack Ferrer anyway for political gain. But he thinks that others, like Mayor Bloomberg, just don't get the other New York, saying that the Mayor "doesn't have any real understanding of what it's like to live on the harder side." As proof that the Bloomberg administration doesn't get it, Ferrer gives some of the statistics from the last four years:

• 105,000 more New Yorkers slipped into poverty last year alone. Currently, over 20 percent of New Yorkers live in poverty.
•The average price of a condominium in Manhattan exceeded $1 million for the first time.
•The number of families in the middle class has decreased while wages for the wealthiest New Yorkers dramatically increased.

In his own ads, Bloomberg brushes all of this off, saying something along the line of sure there are problems, but now isn't the time to change course. Is that really the vision (or lack thereof) New York City wants from its Mayor?

Win or lose, Ferrer deserves our respect for ignoring the critics and exhibiting the willingness to drive home the message that there are problems in this world that need to be solved. Facing up to these problems on the city or national level won't be easy. But they must be dealt with. I certainly appreciate the fact that Freddy's willing to step up to the plate.



Display:


Good luck to Ferrer. (none / 0)

I'd love to see a Democrat in charge of New York again. I hope to move back there some day.
by Covin on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 12:28:13 AM EST

Any Dem Not... (none / 0)

Any Democrat not voting for Ferrer is hurting New York State.

It's about time we take back this damn country...this is a good place to start.

DAGGER
by goplies on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 12:46:00 AM EST

Re: Any Dem Not... (none / 0)

Let's not forget that considering how much money Bloomberg raises for the RNC/NRSC/NRCC and other GOP organs, Dems voting for Bloomberg hurt every Dem in this country. If Bloomberg wins, all that last minute money in close races that the GOP party organs drop into close races should have a card attached attached to ad for Democrats. Something to the effect of, "This is From NYC liberals - Fuck Off."
by Kombiz Lavasany on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 01:29:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Any Dem Not... (none / 0)

I second your post and the post you were responding to.  What does it take to get the 20% living in poverty to show up and vote.  We win the nation if we get that vote out...maybe it isn't impossible.
BlueNC - Progressive NC Politics
by Robert P on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 08:40:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Any Dem Not... (none / 0)

ok let's do a blogger action...

Everyone on point.  Start blogging for him, about him, everywhere you can....Increase the name recognition as much as possible.

DAGGER
by goplies on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 12:22:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

In Defense of Bloomberg (none / 0)

I am a lifelong Democrat and I am supporting Mike Bloomberg.  While Ferrer is right to focus attention of his campaign to the poorest New Yorkers, mayor Bloomberg has done an admirable job helping New York's most unfortunate.  Finally, it is simply wrong to say that "Any Democratic not voting for Ferrer is hurting New York State."  Where was Ferrer in 2001 after Mark Green won the primary? He sat on his hands and refused to campaign for Green, after insinuating that Green was a racist.  That caused much of Ferrer's constituency to stay home during the election, which was one of the reasons why Bloomberg won in the first place.  See my extended response here:

The Agenda Gap

by michaelrherman on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 08:31:16 AM EST

Re: In Defense of Bloomberg (none / 0)

As a non-New Yorker I don't know all the ins and outs of past races, but I do know where we are today.  We are on Death Ground, where our only option is to fight, fight, fight.  
Voting for Bloomberg is falling on your own sword at best or swearing allegiance to the Republican cause at the worst.  In 2008 you can be sure that Bloomberg will be raising Millions for the RNC and will be up on that platform at the Rep. Convention talking about how he won the Democratic vote in NY because Republicans appeal to all voters...blah blah blah.
BlueNC - Progressive NC Politics
by Robert P on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 08:47:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: In Defense of Bloomberg (none / 0)

Unless the RNC comes to New York again there is no chance of Bloomberg coming anywhere near that stage.  It will not happen.  Even at the 2004 convention he gave a welcoming speech and then begged off the remainder of the convention under the pretense of "scheduling conflicts."

It's also worth remembering that Bloomberg invited both parties to hold their 2004 conventions in New York.  The only reason he wasn't up on the stage welcoming the Democrats is because they chose not to come.

"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 12:27:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: In Defense of Bloomberg (none / 0)

a) I agree with you about Bloomberg
b) Green did run a racist campaign in 2001, and unfortunately, Ferrer briefly tried to do so this year as well.
by bruh21 on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 09:12:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: In Defense of Bloomberg-Agree w/ you (none / 0)

As much as I would love to see a Democrat become Mayor of NYC, I definitely understand why Bloomberg is pulling in as much as 60%% of registered Democrats in NYC. LITERALLY, MORE THAN HALF of LIKELY Democratic voters in Liberal NYC are planning to vote for Bloomberg according to Marist Institute's Poll last week.

He has done an excellent job overall as Mayor. When you are a Republican getting MASSIVE support from Democrats in Liberal NYC- YOU MUST BE DOING something right.

When over 53% of African-Americans plan to vote for Bloomberg in NYC despite being a Republican- he must be doing something right.

When 40% of registered Latinos are supporting a Republican against a Latino Democrat- he must be doing something right.

When an advocate of the Homeless such as actress Whoopi Goldberg(who campaigned vigorously for Clinton, Gore, & Kerry)ENDORSES Mike Bloomberg for Mayor because of his work on the Homeless- That's a powerful statement.

Homelessness is a National problem. When the national economy takes a nose dive, homelessness soars across the country. From the streets of Los Angeles, Washington, D.C. to New York City.

It certainly doesn't help that these people live in the ONE OF THE MOST EXPENSIVE Places to Live in America. I have many friends who are making $60K to 100K annually who are just renting one bedroom apartments or even studios for $ 1,500 to $2,500+ monthly.

Regardless if its Bloomberg, Ferrer, Green or any Democrat for that matter- Homeless in such a HIGH COST of Living City WILL CONTINUE TO be a problem.
It's easy for all these politicians to promise this & that just to get elected.

As I've said before, the difference in support between Bloomberg & Guliani is this.

Rudy Guliani got most of his support from White voters in predominately Italian/Irish enclaves in Staten Island & Queens. But Blacks, Latinos, and large portions of Jews were not happy with Rudy.

But with Mike Bloomberg, he is getting HUGE support from everybody. He is beating Ferrer by 3 to 1 among white voters, 2 to 1 among Black voters, 3 to 1 among Asian voters, and he is getting 40% of the Latino vote & only trails Ferrer by 5% among Latinos ( according to Marist poll last week)

by labanman on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 12:28:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nothing succeeds like sucess (none / 0)

The biggest thing Bloomberg and Guiliani before him have going now is the simple smell of success.

No one really disutes that they cleaned up New York.  Some would argue with their methods, and many would offer that they may not have been the cause (an economic boom makes everyone look brilliant).

But, at the end of the day, success is success, and Bloomberg will roll.

Look at the bright side: to get elected as a GOPer in NYC means to never get elected for any office ever again.

by jcjcjc on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 08:55:14 AM EST

There's only so much to do (none / 0)

Sadly, our disastrous national politics make it very hard to get anything meaningful done at the State and local level any more.

The GOP has gutted social programs right and left in this country, and left state and local governments with one unfunded mandate after another.  And state and local governments don't have the ability to fill all the gaps, because they don't have unlimited credit like the federal government does, and they have to be much more measured in their taxation policies because they risk losing jobs and residents to neighboring localities.

Ferrer says the right words but he has no magic bullet, nor does anyone until we take back Washington.

"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Thu Oct 27, 2005 at 12:30:49 PM EST

NYC Democrats (none / 0)

I've said this before: we all want a Dem to run NYC, but the NYC Dem party machine keeps cranking out bad candidates.  When the Dems give us a good candidate, they will win easily.  But it's hard to convince myself, no less anyone else, that a machine politician like Ferrer would make a better mayor than Bloomberg.
by alhill on Fri Oct 28, 2005 at 12:34:14 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.