BlogPAC call w/Rosenberg tomorrow: what would you ask?

Hey folks, Matt Stoller just sent out the word that BlogPAC's series of conference calls with the DNC candidates starts tomorrow.  I wanted to post a heads up and let everybody know that the first call will be with Simon Rosenberg of the New Democrat Network.  

In a gesture to the netroots, Simon will be speaking to us right after he officially announces his DNC candidacy.  We are all going to have an opportunity to interact with him and ask questions, but I've been racking my brain trying to come up with a good one and I'm stuck.  so.... I leave it to you.  If you have a question for Simon, post it on this thread.

As you're probably aware, Markos has talked up Rosenberg's candidacy several times.  I can't find a bad thing to say about the guy.  The fact that he ditched the DLC before ditching the DLC was cool gives him points with me.  And the fact that Al From is going around publicly trashing him also gives simon some cool points IMO.  

But aside from the superficial stuff, I feel Simon did a damned good job during the last election cycle.  I enjoyed the NDN ads that targeted latinos (Markos discussed them extensively a few months back) and thought that they were some of the best made during the campaign.  I appreciate that simon seems to recognise that the party needs to continue to connect with and support african american, latino, and other "minority" voting blocs.  NDN has also had a blog for ages, and the organisation itself seems to value two way communication (such as we get on the bogs ya know).

But other than that, I don't know much about simon.  When Matt called me earlier today, he was able to give me a little bit more background on who Simon is.  And i trust Markos as well.  If both of those intelligent and interesting men say that Simon is a good guy, then I'll take their word for it.  

I've always been upfront about my support for Howard Dean.  But being a longtime dean supporter has taught me that nothing is ever guaranteed.  Everything can look like it's going your way and suddenly you're blown out of the water.  All these optimistic reports i've been reading about Howard's growing support really does my heart good.  But at the same time I refuse to fall prey to the echo chamber effect that convinced me that we were going to win the nomination (until the "imperfect storm" of course).  So what I'm trying to do - in looking at these other DNC candidates - is get a feel for who they really are.  You always knew who Howard was.  So if Howard either declines the job or runs and loses, I want to be comfortable with whomever wins.  as I told Donnie Fowler when he finally resurfaced to respond to those questions over here at mydd (remember the flaming bag of dog poop?), if Howard doesn't get the job, I want to be able to be comfortable and eventually support whomever does.  So I take this as an opportunity to help find out who Simon Rosenberg really is.  

Anyway, sorry to be so long-winded (as usual).  if you made it this far, i salute you!  if you've got a question for simon, leave it on the thread.

Poll
chairman rosenberg
thumbs up.
thumbs down!
not sure yet....
who?

Votes: 55
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


if you made it this far... (none / 0)

...i salute you!
Visit us at TexasKAOS, where we're taking Texas back!
by annatopia on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 05:47:37 PM EST

dammit man (none / 0)

front paged without a warning.  i've edited the post to reflect proper grammar.  caps and all!
Visit us at TexasKAOS, where we're taking Texas back!
by annatopia on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 06:39:46 PM EST

Moral Values (2.00 / 1)

Does the Democratic Party still view Poverty as its number one moral concern?

Is so, what will the Party do to show the electorate that eradicating poverty is its fundamental moral concern?

If not, what does the Democratic Party view as its primary moral concern?

Keep it short. DemocraticShortList.com
by Rob in Vermont on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 06:41:48 PM EST

Re: Moral Values (none / 0)

I would not ask policy questions.

I would ask about what's he's gonna do as chair of the DNC.

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 06:48:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Moral Values (none / 0)

I didn't intend it as a policy question.  I believe the party needs to figure out and start expressing what its moral philosophy is. Does it have a basic moral philosophy?

Is it the same moral philosophy of FDR and RFK?

All of the mechanics of raising funds and putting out a message won't mean much if we don't actually have a message, if don't actually know who we are.

Keep it short. DemocraticShortList.com
by Rob in Vermont on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 07:21:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

if you're concerned about message (none / 0)

Then ask about the message process.
Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 07:28:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: if you're concerned about message (none / 0)

OK. When delivering the party's message about moral values, will the process involve actually mouthing the word "Poverty" or will it involve some subtler strategy, such as smoke signals or charades?
Keep it short. DemocraticShortList.com
by Rob in Vermont on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 07:34:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nyberg question list (none / 0)

I still think this list is good.

I'd add a question about compensation of media consultants. "Should the compensation system be changed? What role should the chair of the DNC play?"

Top Qs from the list:

  • What's the most concise way you can describe the duties and responsibilities of the chair of the Democratic National Committee?
  • How will you allocate resources differently?
  • What if the Democratic Party bureaucracy resists your changes? How will you deal with resistance to change from within the party?
  • What is the major factor that has kept the Democratic Party from winning in the last two presidential elections and the last six congressional elections?
  • How should the Dems organize to be more effective?
  • How much of the party's problems are caused by shortcomings of the party agenda? How much of the problem is communicating the message to the electorate? How should the Democratic Party create an agenda?
  • How can Democrats more effectively use the media?
  • What is your strategy for achieving verifiable voting? Should this be the top legislative priority for the Democrats?
  • Assume you are elected chair of the party. How should Democrats measure your effectiveness as party chair?

Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 06:59:01 PM EST

Training Democrats (none / 0)

Do you intend to increase "training sessions" for young Democrats across the country (not just THE young Democrats).

What kind of training sessions should our future party activists be going through in the near future, ie. what areas of focus?

Would they commit to a "mobile training effort," so folks don't have to travel to D.C. even if they live in Calif, Chicago, etc... 100 cities a year maybe, blue and red states?

A bit on the resources that would make a real effort in this vein possible.

Tim

by Tim Tagaris on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 07:39:09 PM EST

Re: Training Democrats (none / 0)

"A bit on the resources that would make a real effort in this vein possible."

Sometimes you just wish there was an edit comment function.

Tim

by Tim Tagaris on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 07:50:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

one question (none / 0)

Bush won about half of the votes from people without   any college education, almost all of these people voted against their own economic self-interest.

Do you have a distinct strategy to appeal to these voters? Can we still win this group decisively with economic appeals or do we have to compromise on guns, gays, or abortion to win or do we just write this group off as draw?

by srolle on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 07:43:06 PM EST

Re: one question (none / 0)


You pose a false dichotomy. Many of us liberals vote against our own economic self-interest, which we place below social values.

Better question:

Do you have a distinct strategy for framing Democratic polices in their context as social values, rather than economic ones?

by spandrel on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 08:02:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one question (none / 0)

i disagree.

we haven't done a good job at all of framing bush's actions as the class warfare they are intended to be.

Bush's policies help the rich and shift the burden onto the lower and middle classes.

When Bush said today that he would keep unlimited economic loss in his medical malpractice, while slashing emotional damage, who wins?

rich people benefit, because they are the only ones who need "unlimited economic damages", while poor people are the ones who get the seemingly "unfair" emotional damages.

We lost framing Bush's tax cut. Many blue collar folks who got $300 in the mail once loved the tax cuts, while they got screwed, and the upper class got all the money in the long-run.

Social security "reform" gives more to those who pay more in taxes and less to those that scrape by on minimum wage.

Maybe you feel like you are voting against your self-interest... I personally feel like paying more taxes, and not shifting the burden to the poor is the right thing to do.

I feel like we need a DNC chair that doesn't want to use bible verses to frame every bill we propose. I want to show people that they're being fooled by the right-wing noise machine into voting for scare issues, while the GOP robs them blind.

by srolle on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 11:38:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one question (none / 0)

I think we are agreeing more than disagreeing.
You wrote

Can we still win this group decisively with economic appeals or do we have to compromise on guns, gays, or abortion to win

And while I think we definitely should reframe the economic issues, I don't think these are the only two options (other than writing off these voters). Many voters - right and left - are primarily values voters, who give less weight to their economic self-interest, and I think framing progressive issues - such as Universal Health Care - as moral or social values instead of purely economic ones may have great sway with these voters. Without compromising on guns, gays, or abortion.

Maybe you feel like you are voting against your self-interest... I personally feel like paying more taxes, and not shifting the burden to the poor is the right thing to do.

I wrote that I often vote against my economic self-interest - because, like you, I place a personal value on paying more taxes so that those who can afford less don't have to. This is an example of seeing the issue as ethical rather than economic, and I think for the voters your original post described is a strategy that might work as well as emphasizing economic self-interest and would avoid caving on, eg, gay rights.

by spandrel on Thu Jan 06, 2005 at 09:29:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

questions for Simon Rosenberg (none / 0)

Why did we go to war in Iraq?

DId you support the invasion of Iraq, and why?

How do you stop George Bush from privatizing Social Security?

Do you think corporations are exercizing undue influence in the governance of our country?

by janfrel on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 08:13:19 PM EST

It's About People (3.00 / 3)

Mr. Rosenberg:

1)  The Republicans have huge base of highly skilled and well organized volunteers.  They do not only come out at election time, they work all year, every year, to promote Republican candidates and Republican ideology.  

a)  How can we build a similar base of volunteers?

b)  How can we get the to work with each other?

c)  Does a Democrat of any consequence ever say anything without another Democrat of consequence immediately criticizing it in public?  Do you think that there is anything that can be done to reduce or eliminate this?

2)  This last election cycle produced a whole new population of politically active and politically interested persons.  What will you do to convince these people to become active Democrats?

a)  What will you do to make the state and local parties encourage these people to become active?

b)  What will you do to convince people that becoming active in their state and local Democratic Parties is worthwhile?

  1.  What will you do to bring the Democratic Party out of the Beltway?  And out of the Beltway mentality?

  2.  Can you give one example from this last election cycle of a mistake by the DNC that you would never want to make?

  3.  Name a Democrat of significance with whom you disagree on a major issue.  Tell us what you will do to make sure that this person stays in the party and works to get our candidates elected and our policies promoted.

a)  Have you ever tried something like this before and had it blow up in your face?

b)  Have you ever tried something like this and been successful?

  1.  Can you convince Hillary Clinton that she would best serve her country and her party by remaining in the senate?

  2.  Do you think the primary/caucus system should be changed?  If so:

a)  What changes?

b)  How are going to get Democrats in Iowa and New Hampshire to go along with these changes?

by James Earl on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 08:38:31 PM EST

Its about FIGHTING the GOP's GREED MACHINE (none / 0)

I think that the Democrats are in danger of forgetting how incredibly stressed the average American family is right now, and how terrifiing the future looks, 'if current trends continue'.

It's not a matter of 'quality of life'. Its sheer survival. The GOP knows that, and they are trying to use that situation into forcing Americans to give up our future, and our hopes of ever regaining our past quality of life just to survive right now; just so they can make more money by kicking us while we are down.

Ha ha.. we lose...

What can the Democrats do to stand up to fight the GOP greed machine?

ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID....

by ultraworld on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 11:47:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Seconded on eating our own (none / 0)

The Republicans - who actually have certifiable extremists - NEVER attack their own in public. Did any of them criticize Falwell or Robertson for blaming 9-11 on gays? None that I know of.

So I'd ask Simon what he is going to do to about DLC types going after the base, about congressional Dems like Evan Bayh and Chris Dodd sniping to the New York Times about the Kerry campaign last fall.

We don't need lock-step frog-marching like the GOP, but how can we develop at least a reasonable level of party loyalty, getting each others' backs in public, etc.

by daunte on Thu Jan 06, 2005 at 03:59:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

And more generally: Execution (none / 0)

Like any campaign, most of the candidates are adopting similar applause lines - "fifty state strategy" "framing" "democratic values" etc.

All good, but if we all agree what the problem is, it comes down to a matter of who can solve it. So basically, I would want Simon and any candidate to answer how he gets all the little Democratic fiefdoms to support a common agenda when the path of least resistance for them is to continue hording their small piece of the pie.

Some hypotheticals to show what this means operationally:

  • How do you get more conservative Southern Dems to fully support the Presidential nominee, even if he's a "northern liberal"
  • How can you get anyone to address voting rights issues, which are largely seen as a minority issue?

And also, I would ask him (a career political professional) to show me that he has a better plan for the DNC than I (a random blog parasite) have, which I posted on dailykos a month or two back:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/15/8716/1809

by daunte on Thu Jan 06, 2005 at 04:15:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's About People (none / 0)

  1. What does it mean to be an American?

  2. How do we best deal with a media that is today so reluctant to do more than uncritically support what a President or other  politician says (especially when they are Republicans)? This  media also fails to report accurately what impacts and actions are actually going on, creating a rosier picture for (usually) the Republician agenda. How do we deal with this propaganda machine that shuts down any real political debate and conversation?

  3. How would you feel about engaging the country in a national conversation/debate about what it means to be an American? About what we stand for?  About what we stand for?  How would it be done in a way that gives attention to traditional American values such as commitment to a just society, representing democracy in the world, protection of free speech?  

Even if the country had this conversation, they would not be able to judge our actions because of the warped view of our impacts that people are getting?
by Nomad on Thu Jan 06, 2005 at 07:04:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Some hard questions for Simon... (2.00 / 1)

Everything I've seen so far has looked pretty good (especially the Nyberg list), but it seems like we're giving Simon the W treatment...asking him the easy questions he's expecting, which of course gives him the opportunity to recite canned answers.

Yes, it's important to see what he thinks he can do to stop Bush from privatizing social security. It's important to know how he plans to allocate resources (of course, he'd duck this one with a lame "we'll look at what we have and see where we need to expend, but mostly we need to build blah blah blah). I'd even like to see how he would like to be judged.

But there are much more important questions that Simon needs to answer if he's going to be DNC Chair...and they're questions that really go to his ability to LEAD our party in the Bush/Delay/Frist/Rove era.

1. For starters, Simon, what are your campaign credentials? Who have you worked for, and what did you do on those campaigns? What have you won? On a similar note, you claim to have "run" the Clinton campaign in 1992.  What, exactly, did you "run?"

Were you the campaign manager?
Were you the lead strategist?
Did you come up with the message?

The answers, by the way, are "no, no and no," and if Simon (a famous self-promoter) is happy to take credit for something that was so obviously somebody else's work, why on earth would people want to work with him.

Which, by the way, leads us to the next question.

2. In the past 2 1/2 years, somewhere in the neigborhood of 20 employees have quit NDN. That's a lot of turnover for an organization that's not so big to begin with. Simon, as head of the organization, what is it about your management style that people find so objectionable, and how would you do things differently as head of the large organization that is the Democratic National Committee?

And about that middle word..."National."

On 11/4, just 2 days after the election, you told NPR, "In the '80s and '90s, the Holy Grail was for Democrats to break through in the South. Well, certainly you can see a map now where we can win presidential elections without winning any Southern states. We almost did it this time. We came up one state short. Obviously, it would be better for us to be competitive in all regions of the country, but it's not necessary."

3. Simon, do you really think the Democratic National Committee should be headed by somebody willing to write off a significant chunk of the nation? Wouldn't we be better served as a party by a chairman who wants to encourage the party to grow in the South, rather than a chair who thinks several states are "not necessary?"

4. When's the last time you got your hands dirty on a campaign?

5. When's the last time you were "in the field," and what have you ever done at the grass-roots level?

6. As somebody who has a lot of respect for what Howard Dean did to engage the grass roots of the Democratic party (yet--full disclosure--isn't sure that Dean is the right choice for chair, either), I have to wonder, Simon, if you have a "core" And if so...where is it?  

You spent the last decade or so at the DLC and NDN promoting "centrist" New Democrats, but now you're cozying up to grass roots activists and others  by branding yourself a "reformer." What, exactly, have you reformed from the confines of your office at the NDN?

Sorry to disrupt the love fest, but we can't afford to put a chair in place that can't answer tough questions. And we can't afford a chair who wins us over with a bait-and-switch...claiming to be a reformer but unable to present the credentials.  

What we need is a chair with grass roots credentials. What we need is a chair who has been in the trenches, who has gotten his or her hands dirty, and who has the will to be a real reformer.

Finally, we need a chair who wants to win. A chair who refuses to write off an enitre section of the country just because we haven't won there in a while (Montana, anyone?).

I guess the question for the rest of us is: "Is Simon Rosenberg the chair we need?" And when you really think about it, the answer can't be anything but a resounding "No."

 

by Blue Goose on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 10:06:36 PM EST

Re: Some hard questions for Simon... (none / 0)

Thank you for showing up for the first time today and asking a bunch of really interesting and pointed questions about a candidate.  I'm glad you created an account on MyDD to participate in the discussion about our party, and I'm sure you have no ax to grind.  After all, lots of people just kind of drop by, get interested in a thread, create an account, and drop lots of oppo research.

Simon has never claimed to have 'run' the Clinton campaign in 1992.  That's absurd.  He was in the War Room, and he was quite young at the time.

The rest of your questioning is mostly dishonest and done in bad faith.  But thanks for coming by. Simon ain't perfect - I work for the guy.  But he's tough, he's fair, he's smart, he's competitive as hell, and he's willing to face some brutal realities about our party that few others will.

by Matt Stoller on Thu Jan 06, 2005 at 12:50:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Some hard questions for Simon... (none / 0)

I know there are lots of reports about Fowler being a sub-par organizer, but given how many trolls he's brought to MyDD he can't be that bad. However, if he is such a netroots genius then why can't he get any love from people who posted here in 2004?
by Bob Brigham on Thu Jan 06, 2005 at 01:00:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm not sure I like Chairman Rosenberg (none / 0)

I would ask him what's going to happen with the NDN. I do quite like him, but I want there to be a centrist organisation within the DNC that can be a viable alternative to the DLC. That's what worries me the most.
by latteromden on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 10:46:16 PM EST

We know what the GOP stands for... (none / 0)

The GOP has successfully framed themselves as being the party of low taxes, moral character  and smaller government...

We all know this is BS... they are for small gov't except if it applies to military, security and law-n-order... but not white collar crime law-n-order. And we all know they have serious moral issues as well...

Regardless they have made these memes stick in th epublic mind.

So without saying 'we aren't them'... What do democrats stand for?

And how do you plan to get this message out so we aren't spending all of 2006 and 2008 trying to redine ourselves (after the GOP has defined us already)?

by dryfly on Wed Jan 05, 2005 at 10:49:57 PM EST

Re: We know what the GOP stands for... (none / 0)

Exactly. What does the Democratic Party stand for? Not its policy details, but its fundamental principles?  The principles upon which our policies derive?  The principles that Democratic politicians can speak clearly and credibly about? The principles upon which we can draw clear, connect-the-dots contrasts between our party's values/vision/record versus the GOP's?

Here's my suggestion: Democratic Short List

 

Keep it short. DemocraticShortList.com
by Rob in Vermont on Thu Jan 06, 2005 at 12:06:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Why you, and not Howard Dean? (none / 0)

If Rosenberg and Dean are competing for the same votes, as has been suggested, then he'll need to answer that question.
by Drew on Thu Jan 06, 2005 at 02:34:50 AM EST

Questions for all candidates (none / 0)

What specific steps will you take to ensure that states parties are building to win?  That voter files are up to date?  That voter files are used to there full potential?  That they are building a database of local supporters and embracing the grassroots to win races from state legislative seats to governors races to house and senate contests?

Will you target based on precinct performance or do you believe that with modern technology we can cherry pick Democrats even in the reddest of counties or states?

How will you involve the grassroots in the day to day activities of the party?

Will you have a conversation with red America?  Will you talk at them or listen to them? What specifically have you done to date to validate that you will do this?

Who will you promote as talking heads for the party?  Will they be diverse?

Will promoting Democrats on security be a top priority?

Will you look for the best innovators or will you keep the same circle of people on as advisors?  Who are those people?

Do you think either party has really adjusted to a post 9-11 America?  Should Democrats?  How would the DNC facilitate such a thing?

Will you build the permanent research and communications staff to match the republicans that has been promised so many times before?

What have you done that prepares you for this job?

by fightforamerica on Thu Jan 06, 2005 at 12:22:40 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.