NY Jew Reporting From the DNC Caucus

Actually I'm not going to discuss that thread at all. The Race, Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, or Gender of the next Chairman is of no concern to me. It's the ideas and the vision that matter.

After the candidates made their initial pitch to the caucus there was a question and answer period, questions were submitted by voting members and the moderator (NH State Chair, can't remember and didn't write the name down, sorry), posed a question to one of the candidates, who got two minutes to respond and then let a second candidate also answer the question. So here are the questions that were asked and the answers to the best of my steno abilities...

1) Would you as Chair speak out against cabinet and judicial nominees if a small minority of Senators were opposed to the nomination, but the majority of the DNC were for? (this was in reference to the Condoleeza Rice vote - would the Chair stand with the 13 Dems or the Majority?)

Wellington Webb - If he felt strongly opposed to the nominee (as he did in the case of Condi or a Clarence Thomas) then he would speak against such a nominee. Race or Ethnicity should not trump policies and positions when considering judges and the like.

Simon Rosenberg - The Chair should give private advice and council to the Congressional Leadership prior to important votes, but felt that it was not good for the Chair to speak differently than Reid or Pelosi. The Chair should follow the leadership. The Chair should be a consensus builder.

Howard Dean - also weighed in a bit. He felt that in the main Dems needed to speak with one voice, but that in certain cases the Chair should speak out even if Congressional Dems were leaning the other way. That we need to be careful when criticizing Dems who are representing conservative districts or who are from Red States and have different pressures on them.

2) How should the Chair work with Reid and Pelosi

David Leland - Must work with the leaders, but felt that the party message may be crafted in DC, but the party must be delivering that message in local districts by local reps. That when important votes are up, we are letting citizens know how and why Dems are voting in a particular way.

Howard Dean  - We must avoid embarassing politicians. Must respect Dems who are representing conservative states. The Democratic Message should be  come from the States up, not DC down.

3) What strategic, tactical changes would you implement immediately?

Martin Frost - Starting Feb. 13 doing some of what Karl Rove (spit twice, that would be me), did - contacting small donors and recruiting them as activists. The Dems have assembled lists of donors, now it's time to put them to work.

Tim Roemer - Elections are about Money, Message and Mechanics. We need to make sure we have the money available and that it is being wisely spent on message and mechanics. Need to look at how money was spent and in where it was most effectively spent and replicate elsewhere. Must start fighting for electoral reform and fighting gerrry mandering.

4) How can we fund and support new media and fight the Right Wing Noise Machine?

Donnie Fowler - Need to learn from the successes of Ken Salazar and MT. Why were these efforts successful and how can we replicate. We need to coordinate with groups like ACT, MoveOn and others. (Didn't really answer the question in my humble opinion).

Wellington Webb - We need to practice a politics of pragmatism, must not forget the base (Also didn't really answer the question).

5) If you are not the next Chair how will you help the person elected. (posed to all candidates)

Okay, no one would answer this question, said yes they would help and then went on to say what they would do as chair.

Martin Frost - Will continue to work with the Party in any way posssible and necessary.

Welling Webb - We need to not just talk about diversity, but act on it, put diverse faces before the electorate.

Howard Dean - Mentioned Democracy for America and how through that organization would continue to support candidates and campaigns.

Simon Rosenberg - Work toward increasing participation, need to imagine a new architecture and infrastructure for creating and communicating message, need to invest in think tanks, and encourage the blogosphere. Have weekly meetings with the leadership to develop a coordinated and disciplined message.

Donnie Fowler - Promised to work with whoever was elected chair.

Tim Roemer - The stomach that we have to go after each other should be directed at Republicans, must always remember we are on the same team.

David Leland - Loves the Party and what it stands for and will work no matter what the outcome.

6) Which Fowler Ammendment do you NOT support.

I'll do a separate post on this, because it was something I knew nothing about and found quite interesting.

7) We are losing Faith Based Voters, how to we regain them?

Tim Roemer - We need to speak to our core values on helping the poor and disaffected, the Dems value good jobs, economic security and focusing on these is how to reach faith based voters. Don't institute litmus tests for Dems, be the big tent party (in regards to his stance on abortion).

Martin Frost - We have let the Reps convince the electoral and we can't let them get away with it.

8) What are your plans to make the Democratic Party to Urban Voters when it's not election time.

Howard Dean - We need to become the party of reform the way Gingrich did for the Reps, because after 8 years of W the country will be desparate for reform.

Wellington Webb - We must go into rural areas much earlier and be a presence all the time, not just at election time

* NOTE - This theme was brought up by all candidates at some point. We can't just show up a few months before elections. The Dems need to be running a 24/7/365 operation.

Simon Rosenberg - We must work on a common national strategy. Spoke out against putting IA and NH first in the primaries.

David Leland - The DNC should be helping local and state parties to prosper, not imposing on them.

** Personal note, as an urban voter, felt overlooked in the candidates responses to this question.

Whew... I hope these notes are helpful to some of you. It was a great experience. There is a great slate of candidates out there.


Display:


Excellent Diary! (none / 0)

Question 1: That's an entirely different take on Webb's response to the question of criticizing minority nominees than was indicated by an earlier diary. Thanks for the clarification.

I like Dean's response to Question 2. We can disagree with Frost and Roemer, but we need to remember that this is a big tent party and give conservative Dems flexibility on any issue except Social Security.

I'm not surprised Roemer had the strongest response to the question about winning back faith based voters. I posted a diary here and at dkos yesterday in an attempt to stimulate some discussion about Jim   Wallis' book God's Politics. I got one positive comment here and zero comments at dkos. Dems are still uncomfortable discussing issues and values from a religious frame.

by Gary Boatwright on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 12:23:11 AM EST

Webb and Roemer (none / 0)

I was one of several diarists who had a different take on Webb from this author.

He was saying yes, oppose a Clarence Thomas, but when it comes to Condi Rice, opposing her would be seen by most voters as the Dems being against a strong Black woman, so we have to pick our battles (i.e., back off her).

I am really confident that I understood him correctly.  While I don't think what he said was offensive, I think it wrong.  As Al Sharpton said, "Condoleeza Rice is my color, but Barbara Boxer is my kind."

In my opinion we need to stand up consistently for what is right.  Yes, you have to pick which battles you will go to the mat for (i.e., filibuster), and for non-lifetime cabinet appointments you shouldn't do so.  But you can sure VOTE against a bad nominee.  At first we'll take all kinds of flak, but after everyone gets used to the Dems having some backbone it will gain us respect.  The absolute WORST strategy is to wait to suddenly put up a fight until there's an election contest.  Then it seems like a cheap campaign tactic and lacks the appearance of conviction.

I really hope they stand together against Gonzales.

On Roemer and the big tent: He drew a very negative reaction from the audience by referring to "special interest groups" hijacking the Party on the choice issue.  This is very offensive, and a real distortion.  We (women, and pro-choice folks both) are the majority in this country.  But even if we weren't, that wouldn't make us a "special interest group."

There's a big difference between trying to talk about issues of faith in a constructive way and buying into the right-wing's version of faith-based moral values.  This is a big topic, but I don't think Roemer gets it at all.

by wishful thinking on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 01:40:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Webb and Roemer (none / 0)

I am also confident that I heard him correctly and my notes also reflect that.

His first answer to the question was "Yes, he would speak out against a candidate that only a minority of Congressional Dems opposed, if he felt strongly opposed to that candidate as well." And as a side note he did not care for Condileeza Rice.

We must remember the Chair won't have a vote on this issue, but he will often be the person explaining Dem positions to the press. And what I think is important in this particular instance is how the Chair would vote on Condi, but how he would handle dissent and difference within the party?

There is a lot of arguement and debate going on how the Dems work as an effective opposition party and not get painted an sore loser obstructionists by the RWNM (right wing noise machine).

The Chair I think needs to help Congressional Dems find their spine and can do that by supporting those who chose to take a stand and encouraging others behind the scenes to to the same. But in no way do I want the Chair castigating the leaders in public.

by brookeb on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 09:13:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I don't want them castigating Dems (none / 0)

in public either.  My concern is with whether the Chair will encourage strong, principled opposition ala Boxer.  In most respects I came away feeling that Webb would do that.  But we'll have to agree to disagree about his emphasis regarding opposition to Rice.
by wishful thinking on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 12:55:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excellent Diary! (none / 0)

Webb, probably could have communicated what he meant more clearly (which perhaps should be a red flag considering that the Chair is a major communicator).
by brookeb on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 08:59:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excellent Diary! (none / 0)

I totaly agree, it wasn't as clear as it would have been supposed to be.
Chop sticks
by ramen noodle on Sat Oct 20, 2007 at 02:07:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You realize of course... (none / 0)

... that you are talking about a...

"The Dems need to be running a 24/7/365 operation."

... 7 year campaign here?

The 10,000 Things
by Andrew C White on Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 11:52:06 AM EST

Excellent Diary! (none / 0)

You could use the open beta client to play as it's the same as retail. i have been playing the game for 1 year now on the EU server, there are some good tips on making world of warcraft gold here. i mean who don't want to get the best from wow?


by pimps on Tue Dec 13, 2005 at 09:34:12 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.