The Iceberg in Payolagate

Bush says:
"All our Cabinet secretaries must realize that we will not be paying commentators to advance our agenda. Our agenda ought to be able to stand on its own two feet," Bush said at a news conference.

Bush's remarks came a day after syndicated columnist Maggie Gallagher apologized to readers for not disclosing a $21,500 contract with the Health and Human Services Department to help create materials promoting the agency's $300 million initiative to encourage marriage.

Bush does:
Senate Democrats held their session to highlight their opposition to the Bush plan and what they say is the administration's improper use of a government agency.

Specifically:

  • The agency's communications plan directs workers to spread this message: "In order for Social Security to be there for future generations, necessary reforms must take place."

  • Talking points distributed internally reflect Bush's political messages about Social Security and the need for personal accounts. It includes Bush's principles for reform, including that "modernization must include individually controlled, voluntary personal retirement accounts to augment Social Security."

  • Mailings to Americans detailing the benefits they can expect to receive also warn that "the Social Security system is facing serious financial problems, and action is needed soon to make sure that the system is sound."

  • The agency's Web site and customer service telephone lines push the need to "modernize and reform" the system, saying the future shortfall is "massive and growing."
"We feel that this is a gross misuse and waste of government funds and government personnel," said Steve Kofahl, a claims representative from Seattle and also a union representative.
How, exactly, is this not exactly the sort of thing that Bush is decrying? The only difference I can see is that this is far, far worse. Not only are they using Social Security money to promote the destruction of Social Security, they are forcing government employees to go along with it. This is the most outrageous of all payolagate episodes. This is the stuff of ideological one-party states.



Display:


Reminds me of pushing the Medicare bill through... (none / 0)

And a lady named Gina Kolata.  I worked very hard to oppose this bill, and I did a lot of research.  I often wondered about her effect on this bill with her articles.  The first one is just a total outrage about how the seniors abuse the system.  Just outrageous.  

The others show up now in the pattern of annual physicals not being paid for as much, and even blood work which used to be paid for annually being thought unnecessary now.  Here are 3 articles by her.

Gina Kolata articles

Patients in Florida Lining Up for All That Medicare Covers
http://web.mylinuxisp.com/pipermail/mednews/2003-September/000399.html

http://eyetrack.morris.com/story_pages/4_a/23.shtml
Annual physicals not needed

http://www.forensic-psych.com/artNYTimesLtrHJB7.26.02.html
Research Suggests More Health Care May Not Be Better

by concerned democrat on Fri Jan 28, 2005 at 04:20:11 PM EST

Bush's hypocrisy (none / 0)

My favorite part about Bush is how he likes to talk the talk about following Jesus, but he just can't walk the walk.

"And when you pray, do not be likethe hypocrites, for they love to pray standing on the street corners to be seen by men, I tell you the truth, they have recieved their reward in full."
Matthew 6:5

Bush loves to talk about how great his policies are in public, but he just can't seem to do them in private.  It would seem that he just isn't producing a quality product.  Not so ironically, Jesus spoke about that too.  

"Watch out for false prophets.  They come to you in sheep's clothing, but insardly they are ferocious wolves.  By their fruit you will recognize them.  Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?"
Matthew 7:15-16

Bush's fruit and his words just don't jive.

by Nameless Soldier on Fri Jan 28, 2005 at 08:13:54 PM EST

Chris, are you watching this? (none / 0)

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/1/28/203014/655#128

It may not be "Payolagate" -- it may be "Propaganda-gate".

by RayneToday on Fri Jan 28, 2005 at 11:21:00 PM EST

Why use taxpayer dollars for payola? (none / 0)

According to David Brock, author of 'The Republican Noise Machine', the top 20 conservative think tanks receive $1 billion in funding anually. The Heritage Foundation could pay all of the Armstrong Williamses with the spare change they find in the couch cusions. But now, due to Republican sloppyness and arrogance, all of this payola stuff is available to anyone smart enough to find it through the Freedom of Information Act (and I do mean SMART).
by bobinson on Sat Jan 29, 2005 at 04:21:03 AM EST

Re: The Iceberg in Payolagate (none / 0)

免费色情电 影
免费黄色电 影
免费成人电 影
免费激情电 影
免费性交电 影
免费三级片
色情网站
黄色网站
成人网站
成人视频
by llss77 on Tue Feb 21, 2006 at 10:41:41 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.