How To Be An Opposition Party

It seems like we are taking postive steps:
In response to continued revelations of government-funded "journalism" -- ranging from the purported video news releases put out by the drug czar's office and the Department of Health and Human Services to the recently uncovered payments to columnists Armstrong Williams and Maggie Gallagher,who flacked administration programs -- Sens. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Frank R. Lautenberg (D-N.J.) will introduce a bill, The Stop Government Propaganda Act, in the Senate next week.

"It's just not enough to say, 'Please don't do it anymore,'" Alex Formuzis, Lautenberg's spokesman, told E&P. "Legislation sometimes is required and we believe it is in this case."

The Stop Government Propaganda Act states, "Funds appropriated to an Executive branch agency may not be used for publicity or propaganda purposes within the United States unless authorized by law."

"It's time for Congress to shut down the Administration's propaganda mill," Lautenberg said in a statement. "It has no place in the United States Government." The bill is co-sponsored by Sens. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) and Jon Corzine (D-N.J.).

CNN has more:
Under the new bill, dubbed the Federal Propaganda Prohibition Act of 2005, the prohibition on propaganda would become a permanent part of federal law.

Federal agencies would also have to notify Congress about public relations, advertising and polling contracts, and the funding sources of all federally funded public relations materials would have to be disclosed.

Supporters of the effort include the two top Democrats in the House, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland.

The group also released a investigative report prepared by Democratic committee staff that found the Bush administration spent more than $88 million on contracts with public relations agencies in 2004, a 128 percent increase from 2000.

The right wing noise machine tried to bring down Jerome and Markos over blog coverage of payolagate. Well, they failed utterly (our traffic is up around 30%), and the story is still very much alive. Ha!



Display:


finally (none / 0)


by Nameless Soldier on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 04:44:00 PM EST

Nice bill, (none / 0)

but Chris, I hope you don't really think the Dean consulting thing was about attacking MyDD. The point was to invent a liberal equivalent to payolagate in the eyes of the casual observer, which I believe they accomplished, at least to some degree. It doesn't matter that the attack was nonsense.

The end result is that Reep apologists will have a talking point to keep coming back to on this issue, and people not inclined to pay attention to political news will shrug and think "whatever, both sides are doing it," and wonder why it's even news. Y'all just happened to be the target of opportunity; the point was to make a story, any story.

Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 05:03:29 PM EST

Re: Nice bill, (none / 0)

This is the best explaination that I have seen on this issue of how the noise machine works in a while. Concise and accurate. Thx. Too many of us get caught up in the controversy, and not enough of us step back to realize the real point is misdirection.
by bruh21 on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 05:18:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice bill, (none / 0)

Right, without a doubt, the casual observer got that stuck with them, and no follow-up-- that was left for my wife had to explain to the pre-school teacher, lol.
by Jerome Armstrong on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 06:11:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice bill, (none / 0)

Hey- there is no bad publicity (well, that's an exageration, but in this case it holds). In this case the buzz around the blogger "controversy" stands to help more than hurt.

There were probablly a lot of Dems out there who hadn't heard of MyDD before this story "broke", who now have found their way here thanks to the Right-Wing noise.

Future Majority / Young Philly Politics
by Alex Urevick on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 06:23:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

That so totally sucks . . . (none / 0)

I can just imagine that conversation . . . "No, we're not corrupt, it's just, well, there's this vast right-wing conspiracy, y'see . . ."
Yeah, I'm cynical.
by catastrophile on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 06:28:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Olney and the Democrats -- today (none / 0)

Warren Olney, on "To the Point" today, hosted a very interesting discussion about the future of the Democratic Party with a good group which included Eli Pariser.  You can listen online here.
by Bean on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 05:06:43 PM EST

Re: Olney and the Democrats -- today (none / 0)

the chair of the Oklahoma dem party is great.
by sam89 on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 06:58:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Olney and the Democrats -- today (none / 0)

Thanks for the link. I heard a portion of the interview over lunch. It was outstanding. Warren Olney rocks!
by Gary Boatwright on Thu Jan 27, 2005 at 08:20:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

one step at a time times four (none / 0)

Thats four days this week (so far) that Senate Dems have smoked the majority, on both message and delivery.
by desmoulins on Fri Jan 28, 2005 at 01:29:05 AM EST

The Senate Democrats are like the Iraqi Insurgents (none / 0)

They should be getting rolled but somehow, sticking together and not being fazed has stopped the "shock and awe" schtick.

Don't be fooled, Rove is reaching deep for the Nestorian Order on this one. He used the medium-strength tactic "a crisis" first, then he dialed it down to the weakest arguments "unfairness", saving the heaviest artillery for last. For the moment, the President is holding off because of the Iraqi elections, but the LA Times is reporting by Febuary 3rd Bush will be in Tampa on the attack.

Time to dig those trenches and get ready for the full frontal assault.

[looks for shovel]

by risenmessiah on Fri Jan 28, 2005 at 04:05:42 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.