On social Security, The Time For Talk Is Over

Among bloggers, no one is taking more direct action on Social Security than the esteemed Josh Marshall. Many others are chipping in when we can, including Atrios with a Wall of Shame, and Steve Soto with a more comprehensive plan of action. However, as much blog action as we are taking, and as much of a line in the sand our Congressional leaders are threatening to take, the Republican attack is far more comprehensive. We are going to have to step things up. I discuss possible Democratic activism on Social Security in the extended entry.

As Eddie Vale of Ginny Schrader fame notes in the diaries:
While we talk the Republicans take action as outlined in the Washington Post:

"White House allies are launching a market-research project to figure out how to sell the plan in the most comprehensible and appealing way, and Republican marketing and public-relations gurus are building teams of consultants to promote it, the strategists said."

While the Republicans act, the Democrats wait:

"Democrats, scrambling to organize in the face of a multimillion-dollar juggernaut, have yet to settle on any particular counterargument but said they believe Bush's rollout of the idea has been rocky and new details will give them more ammunition."

I write this not to knock the Democratic Party, but rather to raise the idea that there might not be as big a crisis as people say. Yes, talking and determining our future is important, but a big part of the Democrats problem is we don't do the nuts and bolts work of organizing as well as the Republicans.

Eddie is right in that we like to talk. We like to be heard and we like to be Democratic. Last DFA Meetup, along with two other members of the steering committee I gave a presentation on how to help people talk like liberals when it came to Social Security. Afterward, we wrote letters to Rendell using these frames, but some people were annoyed that we were using talking point and frames at all, because "that would make us like Republicans." However, while many wanted to debate how to talk about Social Security, Republicans were rolling out TV ads in an attempt to destroy it. More form the Post article:
The campaign will use Bush's campaign-honed techniques of mass repetition, never deviating from the script and using the politics of fear to build support -- contending that a Social Security financial crisis is imminent when even Republican figures show it is decades away.

With resistance hardening among congressional Republicans, the White House is escalating efforts to get Social Security restructured this year. There will be campaign-style events to win support and precision targeting of districts where lawmakers could face reelection difficulties. As Republicans signaled earlier, they have begun hard-hitting television ads to discredit opponents and prop up the Bush plan.

The same architects of Bush's political victories will be masterminding the new campaign, led by political strategists Karl Rove at the White House and Ken Mehlman at the Republican National Committee.

I feel that we are beyond the point of talk now. My suggestion is that whenever a local newspaper talks about Social Security using a Republican frame, like crisis, a local group of Democrats should organize a protest outside the offices of that newspaper. That would be a lot more effective in getting press than just letters to the editor, in my opinion. Steve Soto has more ideas:
First, the DCCC and DSCC should work together to develop their lists of 2006 targeted GOP representatives and senators so that state-by-state campaigns can be planned now. In those districts or states, the two committees should start organizational activities with the local and state parties and with Democratic governors, to build a presence through press conferences and media events that will pressure GOP representatives and senators by calling attention to the false claims on Social Security and the GOP incumbent's past record of support for other Bush deceptions (Iraq and the tax cuts). These activities need to start now in advance of any Bush or Cheney road shows so that our message is local and seeded before Bush or Cheney or the surrogates get to these districts.

Second, both committees, working with the DNC should make defending and improving Social Security one of the major initiatives of the next two years by expediting the creation of a Truth Squad concept as we proposed almost two years ago here at the Left Coaster. Using a quick response team at each committee and at the DNC, all administration utterances on Social Security would be immediately responded to in the media by the committees and the DNC in the same news cycle.

Steve goes on to suggest some more ideas, but I'd like to throw in one of my own. As soon as we have all of our party members in line, we should release a one point Statement in Defense of Social Security in a huge ad buy. Signed by every Democratic member of Congress, it would simply state something like "Democrats will never allow Republicans to destroy the most successful program in governmental history, a program that is fully funded for many decades according to the trustees of Social Security. Every Democrat stands united in this defense."

Whatever we do, we need to act now. Let me know what ideas for action you have in the comments.


Display:


Social Security (2.00 / 2)

What is Social Security "fully funded" with?

Answer: an accounting gimmick between the Treasury Department and Social Security. The Treasury (all Americans) will have pay trillions of dollars starting in 2018 to keep the system functioning.

That's not "fully funded."

The first thing the Democratic Party must do is get it's head out of the sand on this.

Yes, there is a problem.

I'm for ending the wage cap on the payroll tax, but that alone won't do it. Means testing and a increase in the retirement age both sound reasonable.

Any other ideas?

by John Rogers on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 03:34:08 PM EST

Re: Social Security (3.00 / 2)

The Trust Fund owns US Government Bonds, which are backed by a promise to pay, which you call "an accounting gimmick."  If you look at the money in your wallet, these are "government notes" - also nothing more than promises to pay - to use your words, another "accounting gimmick."

So Social Security's bonds are worth the same as the money in your wallet is worth.  Either the government stands behind its promise to pay or it doesn't.  And if it doesn't, nothing any of us owns is worth anything.  Not our houses, or land, or anything else.  The proof of ownership for all of this is also pieces of paper backed by US Government promises.  Or, in your words, "accounting gimmicks."

Also, all the money that we exchange with other countries is worthless, too.  That is also "accounting gimmicks."

FYI Sec 4 of the 14th amendment to the Constitution of the United States says "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."

So, saying that the 2018 problem is a Social Security problem is like saying that your next mortgage payment is a bank problem, and they'd better reduce their expenses so you won't have to pay it.

-- Seeing the Forest
by davej on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 09:18:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Social Security (none / 0)

Yes, but you miss the point. The government is obligated to start repaying that debt in 2018. That means, all us are. That debt is off budget which means that we will have no alternative when it comes time to repay: either cut benefits or raise taxes.  
by John Rogers on Mon Jan 17, 2005 at 10:34:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Why Do You Hate America??? (none / 0)

As davej says,
Sec 4 of the 14th amendment to the Constitution of the United States  says "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."

You are questioning it, in violation of the 14th Amendment.

Why do you hate America?

by Paul Rosenberg on Sat Jan 15, 2005 at 02:20:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why Do You Hate America??? (none / 0)

I believe that we must honor our promise to pay, not ignore it and consider the issue dead and Social Security "fully funded," as you are doing.
by John Rogers on Mon Jan 17, 2005 at 10:36:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

A Simple Message (3.00 / 1)

The Short Sharp Soundbite:

The only threat to Social Security is from George Bush AND the Republicans.

Wrap the chain around the GOP's neck, and throw the anchor in the ocean.

Another counter attack is using the projected growth numbers to expose the BushCo BIG LIE on Social Security.

The very managable problem of the Social-Security-will-run-out-of-money-in-2042 is based on a projected GDP growth of 1.9%.

The BushCo projected growth for the Private Accounts is based on a number something like 3.8%. If that number is used to calculate the future of the Trust Fund, there WILL NEVER BE a shortfall.

BushCo can't have it both ways -- optimistic projections to justify their pet scams, and pessimistic projections to gin up a phony crisis. The LRWM will nail them to the wall on this.

Oh, wait . . .

by ck on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 03:36:48 PM EST

Social Security Requires Immediate Action (none / 0)

Between TPM,Atrios,MyDD,DailyKos,MoveOn, and others, a massive immediate push of action must be unrelenting! ANY OPPOSITION that is well grounded and organized (with great pressure brought to bear on our Congress), will not only run out some of the clock, but STEP UP OUR  OPPOSITION EFFORTS TO WIN ON THIS ISSUE. Give  the public the information and technical ability to protest, as make no mistake....Bush does NOT want to run out of time, and GOP efforts to ram Social Security Reform through will be UNRELENTING with a non-stop PROPOGANDA MACHINE GOING FULL-TILT. WE MUST ACT FAST!
by morris1030 on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 03:55:35 PM EST

ATTACK AD - SOCIAL SECURITY (none / 0)

SOCIAL SECURITY ATTACK AD:

Average Guy (not a redneck, just a decent looking middle-class guy)sitting on his couch watching a TV. Kids running in and out of the house.

Wife calls out from the kitchen: "Honey, the privatized Social Security account is due."

Husband: "Gee, Honey, I just don't know whether we should go for the hedge funds or the junk bonds this time. What do you think?"

Wife: "Oh, I don't know hon. Maybe we should call the family stockbroker."

Husband looks into camera dumbfounded: "Uh, family stockbroker?"

CAPTION ACROSS SCREEN: "Privatizing Social Security is for People Who Don't Need It..Count on the Party that created it to preserve it.  The Democrats.""

http://www.attackadoftheday.blogspot.com/

by jmckay on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 03:59:00 PM EST

An Idea I put forth (3.00 / 0)

over that Kos was simple

Democrats in one voice simply state that they will defend social Security, but if extemists in the republican party enact legislation to destroy it, the first act of Democrats would be to repeal those laws and restore social security once again. the transition costs would be picked up by wallstreet.

That alone should be enough to chill out the robber barrons on wallstreet. The market really doesnt like uncertainty. This would provide boatloads of it.

by Pounder on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 04:00:26 PM EST

Put up the fundraising buttons (none / 0)

Just like we did for the election. Let's get some money in the the jar so that we can go out and make the ad buy.

The first target: Your hometown newspaper. Print is far cheaper than TV. We have fine marketing and graphic designers on the web. With direction, and a mind for "the heartland" (with no pandering, etc.)

Second and easy target: Purchase a push-poll.
Put the push poll up on websites. Buy blog-ads.

What other guerilla-marketing tactics to we have?

by AnneinPhilly on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 04:00:55 PM EST

We're Already Way Behind (none / 0)

Read this and wake up:

Social Security Push to Tap the GOP Faithful

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7797-2005Jan13.html

We are already way behind. The Republicans have already thought this through and have a well-organized broad-based campaign up and running.

Dems and 527s need to get together with funders and put a mass organizing and media campaign together at once.

by mysteve on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 04:13:13 PM EST

Some random thoughts /actions (none / 0)

  1.  Where is our current DNC leadership on this?  Has there been any research/testing on the best way to defend SS and/or defeat privatization?  Bush/Rove and Mehlman (read "elected leaders" and "party structure") are working hand-in-glove with a clear, focused, researched plan.  Where are the coordinated talking points and action plans for our side? WTF are our elected and party leaders doing?

  2.  Why haven't BlogPac, DFA, Moveon etc. moved to create a substantial media/lobbying fund to counter what's coming from the other side?  Let's throw up some bats and become players in our own right.  Money talks and acts, and it's persuasive.  Frankly, until we see otherwise (see above) we can't assume our party leaders are going to get the job done.

  3.  I'd really like to see some research on this (hello DNC!) but I think "fearmongering" about overall US debt is a good counter to the Bush/GOP fearmongering about SS.  There really isn't any way to privatize without massive borrowing -- make that untenable and privatization fails.  

    We can't defeat privatization by just defending the status quo so we need to change the subject.  The GOP didn't defeat Hillarycare by defending the status quo, they fearmongered a side consequence of government bureaucrats run amuck -- they changed the subject.  Likewise, we need to change the subject.  $10-$15 trillion of debt is a pretty big side consequence to focus on.

    More generally, I think national debt may be the wedge that allows the Dems to claim the reform/outsider mantle from the GOP, which is the party of government and is running up the debt like drunken sailors.

4)  We need to put the SS Trust Fund front and center.  Privatization is a scheme to get out of paying back the surplus funds the working class has been paying and the GOP has been redistributing to the rich.  We need to force confrontation on this:  Make the government (read GOP) pledge to back the Trust Fund with "full faith and credit;"  Argue that the SS Trust Fund gets fully paid before elected officials get paid;  Argue that the SS Trust Fund gets fully paid before other Treasury Debt -- "Taxpayers get repaid when the retire before we repay the Chinese."  I'd really like the GOP to defend paying the Chinese first.

by Steve in Sacto on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 05:25:15 PM EST

The Greatest Generation (3.00 / 1)

I believe we need to ask for help from the Greatest Generation.

I believe that Bush's philosophies represent not only a stinginess of the pocket book, but a stinginess of spirit. I am also, frankly, tired of the conservatives treating our federal government like it is the Great Evil in the World (the Iraq debacle notwithstanding).

My grandmother, born at the turn of the century, withstood the Great Depression and two world wars. She knows and understands sacrifice, just like others in her generation, and people like her have the moral authority to suggest that our government and its programs are NOT the Great Evil in the World, but instead, our government is a Great Hope in the world, especially when we shut down foolish plans from corrupt politicians like George W. Bush.

I hope I don't sound too jingo-istic. I simply believe our country and our institutions are pretty damn cool, warts and all. I am sick of conservatives treating our own government like the Great Satan. I would suggest that treating our government like the enemy is more unpatriotic than eating French Fries or daring to question openly whether we should be torturing folks in Gitmo and Abu Graib.

It's time for some finger wagging. And I bet my grandmother is ready to work.

by Bald Peanut on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 05:39:28 PM EST

Exactly (none / 0)

Chris's story from the meetup exactly illustrates the point I was making in my diary.  

There is a time for talk (when you're planning) and a time for action (to implement the plan).

After the plan is made we need action, not more words.  And even if you don't agree with every part of it the democrats need to be united to implement it!

http://www.johnedwards.com/nh
by epv72 on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 06:59:32 PM EST

Frames we can use (none / 0)

Hey folks, over at the Rockridge Forums we're doing some work on developing frames around social security or at least collating the ones we already have. In fact, we'll be doing an online event soon to do more real collation these frames, refine them, and get people to start poinding the media with them. So, I'm glad to see the work that's already happening over here on that same front.

Cheers,
Matt

by blackmahn on Fri Jan 14, 2005 at 07:09:14 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.