Payolagate: The tip of the iceberg

Dave Johnson of Seeing the Forest, who is remarkable, compiled and sent this to me on my request. I have forwarded it to Louise Slaughter's office, which I called earlier today. It offers a hint at just how far down the rabbit hole goes.

Chris -

This is a big subject and would take some time to research and get it right.  A lot of the info is in books.  (Someone has my copy of What Liberal Media...)  Here's a very short summary form online sources.

Note - the problem is what we don't know and can't find out.  Remember the Enron payola scandal, where Enron was paying journalists and opinion leaders huge fees for almost no work. (William Kristol - $100,000)   That is just one corporation paying an opinion leader.  The question is how many more of those are there?  This is called "buckraking" and "punditgate"

Four areas, all need more research:


  • Speaking Fees
  • The Enron Payola Scandal - an example of corporate cash
  • RW Think tank associations
  • Other sources of payoffs

Read the extended copy for the preliminary research.

Notes -

One part of this is understanding the importance of commentators (experts, scholars, interview subjects, opinion leaders) to the news mix, not just reporters.  

The opinion/fact mix:  Kurtz, on Project for Excellence in Journalism  http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A47180-2002Jan27&notFoun d=true:
[After 9/11] "In December, 56 percent of the comments on CBS's "Early Show" were opinion and speculation, compared with 35 percent on ABC's "Good Morning America." "Nightline" was singled out as the most factual program and for devoting more than half its segments to foreign voices."

Speaking fees

In the early-mid 90's there was quite a bit written about major mainstream journalists and commentators accepting huge speaking fees.  A few media outlets, like ABC, set up some rules regulating this activity.  Some great quotes came out of the press coverage of this, most notably George Will saying "My business is my business," adding, "Got it?"

Some of the press coverage:

http://www.commondreams.org/news2004/0111-01.htm
Are George Will's Conflicts None of Your Business?
Jan 1 2004
Will wrote a column on  Conrad Black's foreign policy views without revealing that he gets $25,000 each time he attends a meeting of Black's advisory board.  When asked about this, Will replied, "My business is my business," adding, "Got it?"

http://www.salon.com/media/media961022.html
Strange bedfellows: Journalists as corporate shills
John Stossel appearance Federalist Society, "According to the Reporter, at the meeting Stossel talked up his upcoming projects -- on "junk science," "freeloaders" and "the permanent government," all favorite conservative fodder -- and made a pitch for corporate sponsors: "I certainly would encourage any of you who knows somebody who buys advertising on television to say 'please buy a couple of ads on those Stossel specials.'"

"... And Stossel is not alone. Many of the most famous members of the D.C. press corps -- the true power elite of American journalism -- accept high-paying corporate speaking engagements and have direct personal ties to the political candidates. The top echelon of Washington political reporters -- Cokie Roberts, Sam Donaldson, George Will, Andrea Mitchell and many others whose heads appear daily on the screen -- receive from $10-$30,000 (in Cokie's case) per appearance from industry groups like the National Association of Realtors, the American Hospital Association, the Public Relations Society of America and the Mortgage Bankers Association."

..."Over the last 18 months, all three networks, in an effort to combat what ABC News Vice President Richard Wald termed "the appearance of conflict of interest," have imposed guidelines that prohibit their correspondents from taking speaking fees from profit-making enterprises or groups representing those they may report on.

But the real compromises lie deeper -- in corporate sponsorship that defines the very parameters of what is considered acceptable discourse. Take the pundit talk shows, where a parade of center-to-right-wing talking heads appear each week to engage in what passes as political debate. From "This Week with David Brinkley" to "The McLaughlin Group," two corporate sponsors predominate: General Electric and Archer Daniels Midland, two of the biggest corporate recipients of subsidies, tax breaks and government contracts in the country."

http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=1611
Take the Money and Talk
American Journalism Review  June 1995
"But [Cokie] Roberts doesn't want to talk about the company that paid her fee. She doesn't like to answer the kind of questions she asks politicians. She won't discuss what she's paid, whom she speaks to, why she does it or how it might affect journalism's credibility when she receives more money in an hour-and-a-half from a large corporation than many journalists earn in a year.
"She feels strongly that it's not something that in any way, shape or form should be discussed in public," ABC spokeswoman Eileen Murphy said in response to AJR's request for an interview with Roberts."
Steve Roberts, Cokie's husband : "Roberts says U.S. News has not been intimidated by the "cranks," who he believes are in part motivated by jealousy. "I think a few people have appointed themselves the critics and watchdogs of our profession. I, for one, resent it."

One example of speaking opportunities:  (I don't know anything about this foundation and can't find anything...)  http://www.newingtoncropsey.com/Events/past.htm
Past speakers at Newington Cropsey Foundation, NY:
·    Howard Fineman
·    John Kasich
·    Kenneth Allard (military analyst with MSNBC and NBC News, as well as a regular columnist for MSNBC.com)
·    Oliver North
·    Alan Keyes
·    Sean Hannity
·    Cal Thomas
·    Richard Picciotto (9/11 Fireman)
·    Ruth Graham-McIntyre (Daughter of Billy Graham)

Current speaking fee listings:

The major journalists set the tone for "conventional wisdom."

Brit Hume $30K-50K
http://www.speaking.com/speakers/brithume.html

Andrea Mitchell $20k - 25K
http://www.speaking.com/speakers/andreamitchell.html

Lisa Meyers  $10K - 15K
http://www.speaking.com/speakers/lisamyers.html

Lawrence Kudlow $15,001 - $25,000
CNBC, contributing editor and columnist for National Review
Mercatus Center: http://www.mercatus.org/people.php/959.html?menuid=1
http://www.washingtonspeakers.com/speakers/speaker.cfm?SpeakerId=2234&CFID=2388892&CFTOKEN=4 1108284

Fred Barnes  Speaking fees: $7,501 - $10,000  
Weekly Standard,  Board of Scaife/Bradley/Coors-funded Institute Religion and Democracy  http://www.ird-renew.org/News/News.cfm?ID=597&c=3  Funding: http://mediatransparency.org/search_results/info_on_any_recipient.php?recipientID=174
Speaking bio at: http://www.washingtonspeakers.com/speakers/speaker.cfm?SpeakerId=570&CFID=2388892&CFTOKEN=41 108284

Kate O'Beirne  Speaking fees: $5,000 (if local) to $20,000
CNN Capital Gang, Washington editor of the National Review
Note - Former vice president of government relations at the Heritage Foundation
http://www.leadingauthorities.com/3727/O

Tucker Carlson  $10,001 - $15,000
http://www.washingtonspeakers.com/speakers/speaker.cfm?SpeakerId=3081&CFID=2388892&CFTOKEN=4 1108284

Robert Novak   Fee - on request
http://www.washingtonspeakers.com/speakers/speaker.cfm?SpeakerId=557&CFID=2388892&CFTOKEN=41 108284

Lou Dobbs     Fee - on request
http://www.washingtonspeakers.com/speakers/speaker.cfm?SpeakerId=83&CFID=2388892&CFTOKEN=411 08284

Sean Hannity
http://www.washingtonspeakers.com/speakers/speaker.cfm?SpeakerId=3168&CFID=2388892&CFTOKEN=4 1108284

John Stossel Fee range: $30K - $50K
http://www.speaking.com/speakers/johnstossel.html

Laura Ingraham $15,001 - $25,000
Radio show, Fox News Channel, CNN and MSNBC, Columns in newspapers including Washington Post, USA Today, and the New York Sun
http://www.washingtonspeakers.com/speakers/speaker.cfm?SpeakerId=2244&CFID=2388892&CFTOKEN=4 1108284

Tim Russert   Fee - on request
http://www.washingtonspeakers.com/speakers/speaker.cfm?SpeakerId=824&CFID=2388892&CFTOKEN=41 108284

Howard Fineman,   Fee - on request
http://www.kepplerassociates.com/speakers/finemanhoward.asp

Enron, Buckraking, Punditgate

In 2002 it was disclosed that Enron had been paying journalists and commentators.  This is only one corporation.  How much of this s going on?  How to find out?

Articles:
http://www.headlinemuse.com/Politics/moneyreporters.htm
Money, Power and Influence: Muckrakers Become Buckrakers by Richard Blow
Same article at http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/12360/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A58606-2002Jan29?language=printer
. . . And the Enron Pundits

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/12360/

Right-wing funding support

Lawrence Kudlow, Mercatus Center
http://www.mercatus.org/people.php/959.html?menuid=1
Mercatus funding: http://www.mediatransparency.org/search_results/georgemasonaggregate.php
$50,000 from Enron -- two $15,000 speaking fees and a $20,000 subscription to his New York economic research firm.

Arnaud de Borchgrave  Editor at large - UPI
Senior Adviser and Director, Center for Strategic and International Studies - RW funding: http://mediatransparency.org/search_results/info_on_any_recipient.php?recipientID=60

William Kristol serves on the board of trustees of the Manhattan Institute (paid?)
Bill Kristol, while editor of the Weekly Standard, was paid $100,000 for serving on an Enron advisory board over two years.
Kristol says he does "a fair amount" of speaking to corporate groups and doesn't normally disclose it.




Display:


Not by Commonweal (none / 0)

It's probably a good idea (IRS regulations) to point out that I didn't  do this as a Commonweal Fellow.  They don't financially support my blogging, either.  
-- Seeing the Forest
by davej on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 03:02:23 PM EST

Re: Not by Commonweal (none / 0)

Fixed. Sorry
by Chris Bowers on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 03:03:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Newington Cropsey (none / 0)

It's funded by Barbara Newington, and the Cropsey connection are the Hudson River School artists of the same last name.  

Go to www.guidestar.org and you can find their tax return.  

by SpinDentist on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 03:14:31 PM EST

Commonweal (none / 0)

Well, we can certainly MENTION Commonweal.  :-)

For people who are intersted in learning more about how the Right has managed to build themselves up to this point where they dominate our country's media discourse and politics I have put together this at Commonweal:  "A collection of links to articles, reports and resources for learning about the right-wing movement, its history, how it is funded and how it operates"

And, something just put up at Commonweal - not by me - some concrete suggestions for building a Progressive infrastructure to counter the Right's organizations.  See this page.

-- Seeing the Forest
by davej on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 03:16:01 PM EST

i'm on their mailing list (none / 0)

and have been keeping track of them since their inception.  they do good work, and we certainly try and support them.
Visit us at TexasKAOS, where we're taking Texas back!
by annatopia on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 03:34:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Mercatus Institute? (none / 0)

This looks like the same Mercatus Institue , that is funded by Richard Mellon Scaif, and Chris pointed us to in his diary More on Roemer.

I hope somebody is doing some more research on this peculiar organization, and Roemer definitely needs to answer a few questions about his association with this group.

by Gary Boatwright on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 03:47:58 PM EST

This is +MY+ Subject (none / 0)

I did freelance work for the WSJ on the Enron
accounting, was a source behind the scenes for
alot of SPE writedowns since I have both a
math background and I happened to be an
Enron (ENE) shareholder at the time.

I have two lifetime subscriptions to the WSJ
and the AJC for my work.

I am a bona fide independent. My bottom line
on the political process is summed up
in that song by Sting .. " they all seem
like game show hosts to me".

The america people were riffed 500 million dollars
last year, a half billion in cold cash
sailed over to none other than your friendly
neighborhood broadcast industry pocket.
With FCC media consolidation, the Federal
govt. can't even spend an annual budget
without giving this lobby succor.

My every atom of my being says this is
+the+ central issue. And there's value
in any station that realizes the
average consumer can get wize (we
read da footnotes, bra! got out
of my enron holdings with room to spare!)
and give the comcast/media/viacoms of the
world the heave-ho.

The NET rules!
Blogosphere is better than News!

I saw a great bumpersticker the other
day. it said.

" Lighten up your day with a psychopathic
  conservative talk show host."

>:)

by turnerbroadcasting on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 04:00:06 PM EST

PS. Y'all don't forget (none / 0)

The scumboat scandal spread to every region
that is a hot Talk Radio market, first. They
hammered the scumbarge vets message home to
every christian/ conservative in America.

Kerry's lead over Bush evaporated in direct
proportion to so called "truth" broadcasting
that invites listeners to speak out , esp.
nervous, nerdy "liberals" they can mock on air.

by turnerbroadcasting on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 04:03:01 PM EST

Re: PS. Y'all don't forget (none / 0)

So our tax dollars bought the Republican elite the best government we could buy them...

Sheesh.

Every college student in journalism ought to be encouraged to research and write on this mess.

Maybe we should hammer it home our own way, with our own money.  Mr. Soros, care to offer a couple of nice prizes towards the first annual Open Society Journalism competition?  Theme: Corruption in media and government...

by RayneToday on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 05:22:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Biased journalism (none / 0)

Nick Confessore also wrote in the Washington Monthly about lobbying masquerading as journalism, specifically about James Glassman purporting to analyze when he had a financial interest.  I think the link is http://washingtonmonthly.com/2003/0312/confessore.html.

Isn't Cokie Roberts lobbyist Tommy Boggs' sister and Hale Boggs (former Louisiana Congressman) and Lindy Boggs' daughter?

by Mimikatz on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 05:34:18 PM EST

Re: Biased journalism (none / 0)

columbia school of journalism review
wrote an amazing piece on coverage of
the democratic primary. it was outright
distortion.

amazing distortion.
is it that, they pay the "analysts" to come
on, and television company HQ has to pay them less
if someone else pays them off?

by turnerbroadcasting on Thu Jan 13, 2005 at 08:20:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Adding to the Crimes (none / 0)

Josh marshall has this to say at Talking Points Memo...mmm okay children...:
 (January 12, 2005 -- 07:31 PM EST / link / print)

We're all hip to push-polls and other strategies for below-the-radar advocacy. But perhaps the Social Security phase-out agenda provides a new and ready-made technique.

Many companies have benefits providers who have regular contact with quite

Advertisement
Show Blue State Pride!
Guaranteed to last
4 more years...
USA-made Quality
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
T-shirts, knit hats,
Baseball hats, Sweatshirts.
Also Mugs and bumper
stickers, all with the
understated Blue States
Flag Logo.
  a few individual employees. Today, for instance, I received a copy of a flyer posted around one firm letting everyone know about an upcoming special presentation on the Social Security 'crisis' for the benefit of the company's employees.

The presentation is being put on by a representative from a certain financial services company.

The flyer reads "Social Security ... Find out: How it works, Why it is in crisis What to expect."

Of course, there's also details with date and time and even the munchies that they'll serve. You can even get an individual consultation if you want, it says -- no doubt to tell you that the Social Security Administration is set to auto-destruct and that anyone who thinks they'll ever collect a Social Security benefit is certifiably insane.

Have you seen flyers like this showing up at your work place?
-- Josh Marshal

by meagert on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 08:16:50 PM EST

oops...sorry for the cut and paste...n/t (none / 0)


by meagert on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 08:18:45 PM EST

I was a paid spokesman (none / 0)

at one time for a drug company. Well, actually, I never really got paid, or did the speaking, but I did go to the training sessions in order to learn how to speak to other docs about a particular treatment for diabetic foot ulcers (don't worry, I'll spare you the pictures). It was hammered again and again that we MUST disclose that we were paid spokespeople - even if doing a simple conference in house and unpaid. If we recommended the treatment, we needed to let the audience know the connection. Mind you, this is a good and necessary product. It has helped many a patient immmensely. So, while I have to disclose my connections whenever I recommend a non-controversial medical treatment (and I do think I should), the pundits and press get to keep mum while they pollute the airwaves with invective bought and paid for by the GOP. Beautiful.
by Tito on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 11:22:28 PM EST

The Public Relations Model (none / 0)

This simply documents that the media do not operate on the news model, but rather on the public relations model. In PR, the client pays to get their message out. Colleges and universities are full of "communication departments" that jumble both together, which is, of course, a way of legitimating public relations, and confusing people about the nature of news.

This is not to say that individual examples are not heinous. But it is to say that something much more fundamental is needed than exposing individual transgressors.

In Good News, Bad News: Journalism Ethics And The Public Interest, Jeremy Iggers (a working journalist with a PhD in philosophy), criticizes journalism through the lens of journalism ethics. The problem, he says, is not so much violations of ethics as it is the ethics themselves, which pretend to be disinterested, but in fact are very much self-interested.

Journalism has always been essentially a commercial enterprise, and only provisionally a professional one. Thus, the public relations model is not so much an intrusion from outside--as many honorable journalists see it--but rather a natural creature of the whole system that must be vigorously and systematically held in check by fundamental strictures grounded in a non-commercial, even anti-commercial ethos of public service, This ethos, in turn, must be rooted in a broader democratic culture well beyond the bounds of the journalistic community itself.

A democratic culture such as, oh, I don't know, the blogosphere, maybe???

by Paul Rosenberg on Thu Jan 13, 2005 at 01:04:58 PM EST

Call to Roll It All Around! (none / 0)

This is a call to contact as many right-wing pundits as you can, asking them how much money they're taking to lie to you.
The David Corn piece shows that right-wing pundits are actually angry about this scandal too, though not necessarily for the same reasons.  Linda Chavez was willing to go on Fox News and slam Armstrong Williams because she is afraid of a backlash against right-wing punditry.
From the David Corn piece:
"Prior to going on air, [Chavez] had complained that ArmstrongGate had caused some people to assume that she and other conservative commentators were also riding this gravy train. Since the story broke on Friday, she said, several people had asked her how much she had received from the Bush administration. She was pissed at Williams for conduct that was raising questions about the whole cadre of rightwing pundits."

If we can get more right-wing pundits to feel the heat of this scandal, they might be willing to keep on talking about it in the mainstream media channels that they practically own now.

If we can get them to keep on talking about it, we can get the public to keep on thinking about it.

Finally, if we can get the public to keep on thinking about it, then when the amazing scholarship currently being worked on by Dave Johnson and others drops, things will be ready to explode.

To reiterate: call and email as many right-wing pundits as you can right now and demand to know who they're taking money from.

by sisterray on Thu Jan 13, 2005 at 04:10:09 PM EST

Cokie Roberts (none / 0)

According to the linked June 1995 American Journalism Review article, Cokie Roberts got paid $35,000 for an hour-and-a-half speech and Q&A by JM Family Enterprises.  According to a Harper's article (available here: http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Republican-Propaganda1sep04.htm) JM Family Enterprises is one of the ten biggest conservative foundations, with 2001 assets listed at $25 million.
The founder of the organization, Jim Moran, is a big free trade advocate and long-time Republican donor (he personally gave $20,000 to the RNC in '92, $1000 to Bush in '99, etc.).
by sisterray on Thu Jan 13, 2005 at 05:09:58 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.