To Turf or Not to Turf? Contest and Experiment

What is the best response to the Astroturf campaign kos noted today over on his front page? Would it be better to write letters to each of the papers showing them how they were duped, or would it be better to ramp up an Astroturf campaign of our own? Personally, I think both. Thus, I would like to announce a contest!

Use this thread to write a pro-Kerry or anti-Bush letter to the editor. Make sure that it is no more than 150 words in length. Over the next week, I will personally email the letter our readers judge to be the best to 400 different newspapers just to see how many of them bite and actually print the thing. I will subsequently write a follow-up letter to each newspaper that prints the letter telling them they have been punked. Hopefully this will undercut future right-wing astroturf campaigns.



Display:


Dear Editor (Projection?) (none / 0)

There is nothing original about what George W. Bush is doing to our country; his economic policy is copied from Herbert Hoover, and his foreign policy is identical to Lyndon Johnson.

Yet, I find it appalling that every newspaper prints the same lie: that President Bush, is a strong, decisive "one-of-a-kind" leader.

It is very important that this newspaper embrace a unique statesman like John Kerry. His words are always his own!

Thank you,

[Mr. Astroturf]

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue Aug 17, 2004 at 07:23:35 PM EST

Please don't (none / 0)

turfing is just wrong.  Why not simply have people submit letters that they have mailed to their local papers?  Set a goal of 400 unique letters.

That's a laudable goal.

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue Aug 17, 2004 at 09:03:14 PM EST

I agree (none / 0)

Duping 400 Op editors across the nation AND then pointing out their mistake WILL NOT help the "cause".  I am more interested in a mechanism to contact 400 papers based on location.  Imagine a resource for the lefty-blogging community that would allow us to easily contact OpEd's based on location.  We could easily contact local papers (state wide?) or contact papers local to relevant news (eg. Bush campaign denies teacher the right to attend local rally).

be good,
c

by c on Tue Aug 17, 2004 at 09:36:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nothing new about astroturf (none / 0)

Letter writing campaigning using boilerplate letters is a very old tactic, one that newspapers have long been well aware of. The only thing that's new is the fact that Google makes it easy to check.

These letters are pretty easy to spot -- you'll see them fairly frequently if you follow a letters section. Newspaper editors either don't care that they're canned or don't want to bother checking to see if they are part of an organized campaign. Either way, your project is unlikely to produce any new heat or light.

by smith on Tue Aug 17, 2004 at 09:39:25 PM EST

Astroturf Games (none / 0)

Hello. I saw this issue on Kos today.

I've got a sidebar of "Games for Wonks" at my site, including links to BC04's Newspaper Spaminator or whatever they call it. I can't swear my anti-Bush letters get through (can they possibly check each one?) but I go to it about twice a week and fire off a letter to the newspapers in my area.

http://simianbrain.atlblogs.com

I don't think there's any ethical issue with hijacking BC04 propaganda engines.

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue Aug 17, 2004 at 11:56:37 PM EST

Be kind to editorial boards (none / 0)

It would be better to let all the astroturfing come from the right -- these letters piss off the people who write the editorials!

They don't like being duped, and will ban future letters from anybody who makes them complicit.

I agree that 400 unique letters would be like the difference between Bush's crowds and kerry's crowds -- staged vs. real.

And those editors will be impressed in all the right ways.

by Anonymous Citizen on Tue Aug 17, 2004 at 11:57:48 PM EST

Out turf the turf (none / 0)

Let's have a contest to write the most idiotic right-wing astroturf letter, and then send it to the papers. Those who bite on a letter praising Bush for his silly slip-ups, his forward-thinking attacks on civil rights and tough-guy stances (and many will) will be humiliated to find they've been duped, and THEN will think twice about pro-Bush letters, not knowing where they originated.

But of course, we could always just attack each other because we don't all simultaneously have the same, PERFECT reaction to all of this.

JohnG

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 12:52:53 AM EST

Re: Out turf the turf (none / 0)

You may have something there.

Of course, I enjoy instigation.

by clawed on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 11:41:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

For John G. (none / 0)

There are three reasons why I am supporting President Bush this year for re-election.

The first is his strong leadership on the crucial steel tariff issue.

The second is his steady commitment to the McCain-Feingold campaign finance legislation.

And the third is his unwaivering commitment to a patient's bill of rights.

Also, the other guy, who looks French, is a big-time major-league flip-flopper.

Thank you,

[Mr. Astroturf]

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 01:16:20 AM EST

this was in my local paper from me (none / 0)

Some praise bush's moral clarity. Morality seems  relative; I happen to think bush's repeated lying, and his sanctioning of barbarism is extremely immoral. It's a race to the bottom with bush; as if "not as bad as Saddam" is a measurement. The Geneva Conventions define a minimum decency and bush bounces hard on that barrier. That's us; scraping the bottom of world leadership!

Bush bragged about killing in his State Speech - he leaned forward and he gloated. He's the killingest governor ever; mocking one woman's appeal.

Some praise bush's resolve. A pit bull has resolve, but questionable policy. Resolve ain't no good if you ain't right.

What about supporting our troops? Inviting "bring it on"? Darn, seems they did. Guess they missed "mission accomplished!"

I'd prefer a thinking president. Bush's lack of thinking is documented. The soft expectations of low bigotry - the emptiness he spews is so meaningless that the corrections don't even register. Dumbness as a tool -  works on some. It's as if his Magic 8-Ball has only ; "stay the course", "tax cut", and "they hate our freedom." Defenders say he's doing the best he can; probably true. We need someone who can do much better

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 03:33:47 AM EST

Dont Email (none / 0)

Don't Email - It's more likely to get published if it comes on paper.  Real astroturf letterwriting works because local yokels send in the letters from local addresses, so the paper thinks it is actually getting the opinions of local residents and readers.  

It'd be better to just have MyDD readers send the letter by snail-mail to their local paper.

But, if you must email-blast, at a minimum, send each email separately, not cc:'d.

by Silent E on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 08:55:36 AM EST

Re: To Turf or Not to Turf? Contest and Experiment (none / 0)

"Don't Email - It's more likely to get published if it comes on paper."

That's not true these days, now that email is acceptable for nearly everyting. They'll usually contact you to be sure it came from you, whether it's on paper or not.

That's another reason not to astroturf. If they find out you did they'll look you up and call you out.

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 09:31:21 AM EST

I have a better idea... (none / 0)

We should send each newspaper a dozen or more copies of each Bush astroturf letter from different people.

That way, each editor will see it's phony.

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 11:16:25 AM EST

My "Letter" - Look familiar... (none / 0)

New job figures and other recent economic data show that America's economy is stalled - and that the President's jobs and growth plan is not working. The Labor Department announced that employers added only 32,000 new jobs in July, far below expectations. In total, over 1 million jobs have been lost since Bush took office, the first time this has happened since the Hoover administration.
by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 11:35:42 AM EST

Killingest (none / 0)

Hmm I may be :misunderestimating" you here, but is killingest a word?  Don't lower yourself to Bush's intelligence level.
by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 11:36:56 AM EST

and i would know (none / 0)

the proper spelling according to the brilliant mr. kutcher is Punk'd!
like oh my gawd i cannot belieeeeve you didn't know that!
;P
by lauren s on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 12:17:45 PM EST

Astroturf (none / 0)

While to idea to grow our own Astroturf is a good one, your specific proposal is fundamentally different than Bush's Astroturf campaign.  By putting that text on his website, Bush got hundreds of supporters to send in that text verbatim to all their local papers around the country.  It has hundreds of names attached to it, most of whom are probably residents of the communities in which the newspapers which published the letters are based.  If what you do is send one letter out 400 times, under your name to newspapers located hundreds or thousands of miles away, all you'll do is expose which papers will gladly print letters from activists who are not members of their own community.

What you could do is come up with the best letter possible, then use the internet publicize it as widely as possible and get as many people all over America to copy it, attach their name and send it to their local papers.  Then, let's see how many newspapers get duped.

by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Aug 18, 2004 at 10:14:32 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.