Kerry Kicking Ass in Gore States

(Cross posted from Swing State Project).

The number of Gore states that appear vulnerable to Bush pickups in 2004 is rapidly shrinking. Here is a state-by-state rundown of Kerry's strengths in key Gore states:

  • Michigan. The last two Survey USA polls out of Michigan showed double-digit leads for Kerry (52-41and 51-41 three-way). Three consecutive Zogby polls in the state have shown Kerry up by at least 7.5 in three way matchups in the state. However, the coup de grace is the latest EPIC/MRA poll where Bush is down seven in the trial heat at only 42, reaches an astonishing 52% unfavorable rating, (-6 favorable ratio to Kerry's +10), and registers only 34% right track. I was worried about Michigan for a while, but I am not anymore. The national shift among Muslim-Americans from majority Bush supporters to an almost perfectly solid anti-Bush voting block (3% approval rating among Muslims nationwide) is probably the main cause for this, since Michigan has the largest Muslim population of any state in the country.

  • New Jersey. A few wags, including Safire and Scheinder, have crowed lately about polls supposedly showing New Jersey to be a toss-up. However, I would simply direct them to the latest Q-poll from the state (Kerry up 52-38, 22 ahead of Bush in favorable ratio), Rasmussen (Kerry up 51-38) Star-Ledger / Eagleton-Rutgers (Kerry up 52-32 and 39 ahead of Bush in favorable ratio) and, best of all, up 52-40 with Bush at 49% unfavorables in the latest out of New Jersey from pro-Republican pollster Strategic Vision. Just like in 2000, New Jersey is deep blue. The FDU poll showing otherwise is either an outlier, poorly done, or both.

  • New Mexico. New Mexico was the second closest state in 2000, and has consistently been a toss-up for two decades now. However, a number of events have transpired to help Kerry this time around. First, in 2004 ex-felons will be allowed to vote for the first time in decades. Second, Nader is not on the ballot, but Libertarian candidate Badnarik is. Further, Badnarik is running hard in the state, including anti-Bush TV and radio ads. Third, the popular and powerful Bill Richardson is now Governor. Fourth, New Mexico has the highest percentage of Latinos of any state in the nation, and since 2000 Latinos have constituted the vast majority of population growth to the point where they are now the largest group in the state. As kos recently pointed out, Bush is losing ground among Latinos this year. There has not been much polling out of New Mexico this year, but what little has dribbled out has been good for Kerry. In early July, ARG showed Kerry up 51-43, and Zogby has shown Kerry ahead in three way matchups with Nader instead of Badnarik. While the two previous Zogby polls showed Kerry with large leads of 8 and 10 points respectively, the latest only shows Kerry up by 2. While this single poll raises cause for concern, at the very least this state is now lean-Dem instead of a toss-up. I will be keeping an eye on future polling to see if the Zogby numbers are confirmed.

  • Oregon. I have previously written about Kerry's consistent strong showing in Oregon. The latest Zogby poll showed Kerry's lead dropping to only 4 points (every other poll for months had shown Kerry up eight or more), but Zogby still includes Nader, who is not on the ballot in Oregon. When Kerry's lead dropped, Nader's total went up. Either way, Kerry has been at 50% or higher in every non-partisan poll out of Oregon since early May. When the challenger is at 50% or higher, the well-known incumbent wins less than 2% of the time.

  • Pennsylvania. Like Oregon, I have previously written about Kerry's consistent strength in Pennsylvania. Kerry's lead in the state has become so large and been confirmed from so many sources, that in three separate interviews at the convention I saw Ed Rendell asked about it. Since the time I wrote that article, Survey USA has shown Kerry with a 53-41 lead over Bush, the LA Times found Kerry up 48-38 in a three-way matchup, Zogby shows Kerry's three-way trial heat lead increasing to 8 points, and even pro-GOP Strategic Vision has shown Kerry up 51-43 with Bush at a -1 favorable ratio and Kerry at +12. Nader will have a close call to make the PA ballot. Kerry is clearly up big here, and the internals make it appear as though his lead will only continue to increase. These numbers certainly make me feel proud.

  • Washington. All seven non-partisan polls out of Washington since early June have shown Kerry up by at least 7.4 points. Every single non-partisan poll since Dean dropped out has never shown Bush closer than 4, or higher than 45 in trial heats. History shows that when a well-known incumbent is always losing and never above 45, that incumbent loses 100% of the time. Washington is solid blue.
Among Gore states, this leaves only Iowa, Maine's 2nd CD, Minnesota and Wisconsin vulnerable to Bush pickups. Of course, that is not to say that Kerry looks bad in these states:
  • In Iowa, only Zogby has had Bush over 46 since Kerry became the presumptive nominee, and right now Zogby only has Bush at 46.1.

  • Maine's 2nd CD No info. Pollsters never seem to bother to notice the way Maine dishes out its Electoral Votes.

  • Minnesota is a reversal of Iowa, as Zogby has shown consistent Kerry strength, but with the exception of the June Rasmussen poll, all others polls since March have shown a close race. Then again, no poll from Minnesota has shown Bush above the 45-point incumbent death line except Strategic Vision, which had Kerry at +16 favorable ratio and Bush at -2.

  • Wisconsin is unquestionably Bush's best chance for a pickup this time around. This was one of Kerry's poorest primary states, Nader will be on the ballot, and three separate polling organizations since June have shown Bush leading here. Still, Bush has reached 48 or higher only once in Wisconsin, in the consistently pro-GOP Badger poll from late April. While Bush is in the game here, Kerry is still in the stronger position.

So, even in these states where Kerry does not seem to be in an overwhelming position of power, he still looks good. In fact, of the literally hundreds of state polls taken since Super Tuesday, Bush has hit 50 in a Gore state only twice: the Badger poll I just linked where he had 50, and the May 24 Iowa Zogby poll, where Bush was at 50.1. Kerry is extremely well positioned to hold the entire Gore battleground. His position is so strong that he should be able to spend a significant majority of resources working on the 10 electoral votes from Bush states that he needs to win. As Charlie Cook has written, Bush needs to shift the fundamentals of this race to have a chance.



Display:


Another Big Reason (none / 0)

for all this strength is the work of the pro-Kerry independent groups, such as ACT, LCV, MoveOn, and Moving America Forward. I just came from NM, and you almost can't walk down an Albuquerque street without running into a pro-Kerry canvasser knocking on doors (and it's only August!). Same in Oregon, by the way. And Wisconsin, which is my hope for that state (and by the way, what's up with the Badgers? They vote for some of the most progressive legislators in Washington, but refuse to go quietly into the blue night.)
by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 01:57:20 PM EST

Re: Another Big Reason (none / 0)

We truly are well organized this year. I have never seen anything like it. It we lose this one, I don't know what else we could have done.
by Chris Bowers on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 02:17:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Another big reason (none / 0)

With Michigan and Pennsylvania looking increasingly safe,the campaign should be able to allocate a lot more resources to Ohio and Missouri.Florida is also looking good. The Quinippiac from today has Kerry up 47-41 there.

I remain cautiously optimistic, realizing that we have opponents who go totally below the belt. This swift boat thing is McCain in South Carolina all over again. Find some shadowy group to haul the lying crap, while insulating themselves without ever explicitly refuting their slimeball allies.

by Sy Gold on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 02:29:14 PM EST

What about New Hampshire? (none / 0)

It's not on the list. Or have you already put this one away for Kerry?
by niq on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 03:01:50 PM EST

Re: What about New Hampshire? (none / 0)

This post was only about states Gore won. I'll have the Bush battleground in a later post.
by Chris Bowers on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 03:03:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

From a Badger (none / 0)

Being a native of Wisconsin, I am highly disappointed that G-dub gets even one Badger vote, much less 40+%... however, Wisconsin is a fundamentally liberal and progressive state politically, and right-wing politicians have never been able to win state-wide here, at least since McCarthy.  Feingold will be easily re-elected to the senate and the only way Wisconsin will go Republican in '04 is if G-dub wins by a landslide.  It won't happen.
by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 03:11:56 PM EST

Re: From a Badger (none / 0)

What about Tommy Thompson? He struck this outlander as a prize pig, but seemed invulnerable in Wisconsin politics.
Can It Happen Here?
by janinsanfran on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 05:48:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kerry Kicking Ass in Gore States (none / 0)

Kerry Would Kick Ass more if he rebutted the $87 billion controversy. Such as.

Amendment to bill to pay for the war by increasing taxes on wealthy.
He voted for the bill with this amendment. Bush said he would veto the bill if this was the final version. No amendments allowed. Bill passed with no amendments and $87 billion was added to the debt.
Bush has troops in the war sacrificing lives and limbs, but Bush, the Republicans, and wealthy friends won't sacrifice a few dollars to pay for the war.
When the troops come home and start paying taxes, they will be paying for the war.
What a deal to support the troops! They have to fight the war and pay for it too.
Talk about a gigantic presidential hypocrisy. I applaud Kerry and Edwards, knowing the bill would pass, to vote against and not condone this hypocrisy.

by kitchingd on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 03:30:46 PM EST

New Mexico (none / 0)

Badnarik pushing in New Mexico is BAD NEWS for the Democrats, not good.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/New%20Mexico%20August%205.htm <-paid for by Badnarik

"Twenty-three percent (23%) of Republicans and 25% of Democrats say there are circumstances under which they would consider voting for Badnarik. After learning that Badnarik says he would stop the War in Iraq and the Drug War, just 13% of Republicans say there is still a possibility they would vote for the Libertarian. With that same information, 28% of Democrats would consider a vote for Badnarik and 43% of unaffiliated voters would do the same."

That's not good news for the Dems.  I have always thought that the Libertarians pull equally from both parties.  They are my second choice if I have a personal reason to dislike the Democrat or there is in no Democrat running in an individual race.

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 03:44:47 PM EST

Re: New Mexico (none / 0)

But his ads are very anti-Bush. That will help.
by Chris Bowers on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 03:56:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: New Mexico (none / 0)

Richardson and the Dems will not let NM go for Bush.  The voters have been evenly split recently, but the population leans Dem and the machine of Patron Richardson has been registering a bunch of new voters and is building a formidable machine.  The ground game is already hot and heavy here and the Dems will have a great turnout.  I suspect the Repubs recognize they cannot take NM but have to keep after it because the Congressional delegation could go from 2-1 in favor of the GOP to 1-2 or 0-3 if they don't get their folks out, particularly in the southernmost CD and the Albuquerque suburbs.
by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Aug 25, 2004 at 10:43:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kerry Kicking Ass in Gore States (none / 0)

Hmmm...I don't live in New Mexico, so I haven't seen the ads.  If all his ads are just strong anti-Bush ads, he's just acting like a Dem 527, isn't he? :p

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 04:27:21 PM EST

Nebraska? (none / 0)

I believe it's Nebraska that gives 2 electoral votes to the overall winner, then gives the other 3 to who wins in the respective districts.

Doesn't Kerry have a chance in the district which contains Omaha? (the other two are a lost cause, if I remember correct) I thought someone mentioned this at some point...

by ark on Thu Aug 12, 2004 at 06:46:01 PM EST

Re: Nebraska? (none / 0)

Maine also splits its electoral votes.
by kenfair on Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 01:22:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nebraska? (none / 0)

The district Omaha is in, Nebraska 2nd, consists of two counties which make up almost 1/3 of the state's population.   In 2000, Bush won 57% of the vote in the 2nd District.  It'll take some doing to get even a single EV for Kerry out of Nebraska.

J

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 02:38:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kerry Kicking Ass in Gore States (none / 0)

If Kerry wins New Hampshire and holds Blue, doesn't he win? NEW SLOGAN:
GORE PLUS FOUR!
by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 01:27:42 PM EST

Re: Kerry Kicking Ass in Gore States (none / 0)

No, Kerry won't win if he gets New Hampshire.  The states Bush won in 2000, because of reapportionment, are now worth 278 EV instead of 271.  So even if Kerry wins NH, Bush still gets 274 EV.  However, I'm still confident of a Kerry victory on Nov. 2.
by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 02:27:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.