Bounce? We Don't Need No Stinking Bounce!

As the Cook Political Report noted before the convention, Bush was already in a perilous situation even before any upcoming bounce, largely due to his horrific standing among undecided voters (emphasis mine):
For the better part of four months, this race has been effectively tied, with the two candidates running at about 45 percent or 46 percent, give or take 3 percentage points, depending upon the poll, the week, and the events leading into the survey. Since Kerry's choice of Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina to be his running mate, the Democratic ticket has ticked up about 2 to 4 points, and is ever-so-slightly ahead in most polls. The mistake that many make is to assume that a tie in the polls means that the two candidates have equal chances of winning. Not so.

An axiom in politics is that undecided voters rarely end up casting their ballots for well-known, well-defined incumbents. If a well-known and established incumbent picks up one-quarter to one-third of the undecided vote, he is lucky indeed. Just a cursory look at the current pool of undecided voters suggests that Bush is unlikely to get even one-quarter of the undecided vote.(...)

Among all registered voters, 41 percent agreed with the statement that the country was headed in the right direction, while 56 percent thought it was off on the wrong track. But among undecided voters, only 18 percent said that the country was headed in the right direction, and 75 percent said it was on the wrong track.(...)

On Bush's job-approval rating, 49 percent of those surveyed approved of the president's overall performance, and another 49 percent disapproved. But among undecided voters, only 22 percent approved, and 69 percent disapproved.

I have often been (justifiably) accused of being overly optimistic about Kerry's chances in this election cycle. However, considering just how bad these numbers are for Bush and that this is convention week, I feel perfectly justified in at least a little triumphalism.



Display:


Arizona (none / 0)

Just what are Kerry's chances in Arizona? It might not be worth that many electoral votes, but it would sure be nice to be in a blue state on election day.
by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Jul 28, 2004 at 01:07:49 PM EST

Re: Arizona (none / 0)

I give Kerry about a 10% chance of winning there.
by Anonymous Citizen on Wed Jul 28, 2004 at 04:15:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Arizona (none / 0)

I'd say he has a better chance of winning here than 10%.  Not sure it's a toss up, but the independent streak here helps Kerry, in my opinion.  I think the other races--especially a couple of ballot measures--might help.  If Bush's numbers continue to erode nationwide, AZ could be in play.  The GOP here is split between radical leadership and more moderate officeholders, not to mention IND-lean Rs.  If it's solely a referendum on Bush, I can't see a whole lot of the moderates and leaners voting for Bush again.  At worse, they'll probably just stay home.  If that happens, it'll be interesting if Dem orgs can get out the vote--the big push right now is towards the latino community.

BTW, neither Cobb nor Nader will be on the ballot.  The Libertarians will, however.

Scott from Phoenix

by zaea on Thu Jul 29, 2004 at 01:56:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Good News (none / 0)

This information and polling is truly good news. These are the truths that are hard to come by in the general media.
by Ronin on Wed Jul 28, 2004 at 01:39:54 PM EST

bounce... (none / 0)

considering that the networks have not covered any of the convention, i don't expect any bounce at all.

you heard it here first.

but this is good news and i hope it holds true.  we have got to uproot the shrub.

Visit us at TexasKAOS, where we're taking Texas back!
by annatopia on Wed Jul 28, 2004 at 02:30:33 PM EST

Re: bounce... (4.00 / 1)

Due to lack of coverage by the networks for the Democratic convetion I would be interested to see what the coverage is going to be for the Republican Convention. I hope the same or even less.
by Ronin on Thu Jul 29, 2004 at 10:32:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

my point exactly (none / 0)

the networks have chosen to not cover the events leading up the most important election in my lifetime.  therefore, since the voters have very little opportunity to actually, i dunno, change their minds or decide who to vote for based on coverage, i don't expect much poll movement after either convention.

i tell you what, though.  if the networks give the GOP convention more coverage than we're getting, i will be really.  really.  pissed.

Visit us at TexasKAOS, where we're taking Texas back!
by annatopia on Thu Jul 29, 2004 at 12:52:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Where's Osama? (none / 0)

Chris, we're for you even when we're against you. After the last election nobody can take anything for granted. We want to make sure you're not wearing colored glasses.

And where is Osama when the Republicans need him? Any rumors on that in Convention Hall? Will they nab him today or tomorrow?

by Anonymous Citizen on Thu Jul 29, 2004 at 01:46:22 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.